1010°

Game Informer July Cover Revealed: The Next Gears Of War

Game Informer writes:

Usually, we like to reveal the name and final cover art for our upcoming issue's cover story the Thursday before it hits subscribers. This time we're saving the full unveiling of the game's title until Monday during Microsoft's E3 press conference, but we can confirm that our next cover is the new installment in the Gears of War series and is coming to Xbox 360.

Read Full Story >>
gameinformer.com
Paradicia4348d ago (Edited 4348d ago )

Woah, was not expecting that.

Perhaps a sequel to the original gears trilogy? With a hint of the man in chains being Marcus Fenix.

Gears of War: Exile

Come to think of it; I could see this being the Halo:Reach of the gears series.

:O

Abash4348d ago

I was hoping there'd be a Gears of War break till next gen, Gears of War 3 had a conclusive ending. I guess publishers like flirting with the possibility they will exhaust out the IP before next gen

exsturminator014348d ago (Edited 4348d ago )

@WrAiTh I don't think it would've made the cover of Game Informer if it was DLC; maybe a "should have been DLC" like Halo: ODST, but it'll be a full $60 game guaranteed.

As for the reveal: really? Another year of "Halo, Gears, Kinect, and Xbox-is-awesome-goodnight-folk s!" hype? They've been doing the same show for three years it feels like.

sikbeta4348d ago

Another GeOW? Didn't see that coming at all tbh

BlindGuardian4348d ago

it could be a GOTY edition with the single player DLC already released plus another short campaign

a brand new Gears for the 360 would really change predictions about a next gen in 2013

WrAiTh Sp3cTr34347d ago

@exsturminator...yeah, I guess you're right.

SilentNegotiator4347d ago

"Woah, was not expecting that"
"Another GeOW? Didn't see that coming at all tbh"

....really, though? Did you think they would let one of their more popular franchises take a rest? And I do mean both MS and Epic Games.

joab7774347d ago

Its a microsoft necessity like halo. Every other year, they have a blockbuster to accomlany their CoD dominance. It keeps xbox ahead without having to risk new IPs. It may b a reach type game, but i wouldnt be surprised, like halo 4 that it would b the beginning of a new trilogy. This almsot guarantees that the unreal engine 4 will be able to work on the 720. Microsoft has to giv epic the specs they need. I would, though prefer to see a new ip from epic but, oh well, we all know it will sell alot.

da_2pacalypse4347d ago

It's a prequel guys. It won't be a follow-up.

CoolBeansRus4347d ago

Abash i agree with you but at the same time the devs need to make money. :D

EVILDEAD3604347d ago

Gears prequel FTW...

Life is good

Evil

Peppino74347d ago

This will be good news regardless. Maybe even a possible ps3 version. Wasn't the Ms deal only a trilogy?

pixelsword4347d ago (Edited 4347d ago )

Whether it's DLC or a full game,

Please,

Please,

PLEASE show a lot of footage and multiplayer at E3!

:D

DeFFeR4347d ago (Edited 4347d ago )

Wrong comment...

Patriots_Pride4347d ago (Edited 4347d ago )

yESSSSSSSSSS!!!!!

gatormatt804347d ago

So do you guys think this is the huge secret game that nobody saw coming... You know, the game Geoff Keighley was talking about??? Me personally, I kinda saw this coming.

Kurt Russell4347d ago (Edited 4347d ago )

GEARS OF WAR... YEEEEAH! *active reloads*

If you don't like the idea of it... just don't buy it ;)

+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 4347d ago
lastdual4348d ago

I was hoping for a Pendulum Wars prequel, but those look like reavers flying in the background, which would seemingly place this game after (or during) Emergence Day.

Paradicia4348d ago

This could take place right after the locust invade sera. It'll be interesting to find out Epic how Epic mold the storyline to fit the canon of the 3 game arc.

Jazz41084347d ago (Edited 4347d ago )

For those saying Gears is milked then what about Uncharted? Its had 4 full retail games an sony released a year later. So its ok when sony does it but not ms? The 4th uncharted game would be your golden abyss btw. I'm not judging but wasn't resistance a new ip for sony as well just like gears. I believe with burning that's 4 for that one. The hypocrisy on this sit is terrible. I also ask what if it was ms who was screwing gamers out of money on burning? Sony has done more of this and more often then MS. I would love to see some new ips from ms but I know we will when the new box is released.

orange-skittle4347d ago

I said the same thing. It'll be during the Pendulum Wars. Just look at his captures...they aren't Locusts, so it was before Insurgence Day. You're incarcerated by COGS.

andibandit4347d ago

Jazz i simply could not agree more with you, altho i am a bit tired of the gears series, the delusioned people on this site, astound me with new stupidity every day.

DeFFeR4347d ago

@Jazz - there was a PSP Resistance (Retribution) too, so Burning Skies is #5

BISHOP-BRASIL4347d ago

Neither Sony nor MS let their most popular franchises just hanging... We could argue that about Halo, Gears or Forza as much as we could for God of War, Uncharted or Resistance. It's just how this gen works.

Although you can get people to play new stuff, the fact is being part of a reknown franchise is the selling point of this gen. Don't matter it it's crap (not that I'm saying either those sequels are), don't matter if it's more of the same, as far as they keep pumping out those sequels within 2 years the brand is recognised and so it sells.

And you can fit here MS or Sony just as much as you could fit Activision, EA, Ubisoft, etc... Japanese devs do it less, like have some 3 to 4 years in between main games of the same franchise, but they also do it none the less, or maybe even more if we look for the spin-offs.

This doesn't mean Sony and MS operate on the same ground though, Sony simple invest more in 1st party, so the difference is that they can do that to more titles while still release major new IPs yearly, while MS relies more on the 3rd party for that so it's not so often we get something new.

Basically it means while both MS and Sony do the "milking" (if you want to call it that), the general complain is that MS survive out of it alone, while Sony don't.

Not saying it's a fair complain, MS do have new IPs, specially within Kinect, but Sony have more devs behind them, hence this (distorted?) impression.

milohighclub4347d ago

@jazz yeah but your missing the finer details m8, golden abyss was done by a new studio for a new platform. Tbh you could tell it wasn't a naughtydog game and the vita desperately needed it for launch.
Resistance has had 5 titles over 3 platforms.
This will be gears fourth title on one platform all by the same dev with the last major release being the end of last year.
Unless its a next gen launch title....
if uncharted 4 was announced for this gen then Sony fans would be saying the same thing, but it ain't so they aren't.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4347d ago
fermcr4347d ago

Love the Gears series. Bring it on.

Oh_Yeah4347d ago

id rather see a new alan wake or see an attempt at a new fable (not journey) or even better a new ip!. gears always seems the same...no new gameplay mechanics, they give you some big steroid guys and tell you to shoot stuff...thats cool, enemies are great but atleat add some air combat or some vehicle combat then i might be interested.

Thatguy-3104347d ago ShowReplies(13)
aviator1894347d ago

I actually think it may be a prequel to the events of the first game. He's probably in chains because we find him in a prison in the first gears of war. We'll likely see Marcus's story of emergence day and how he went to prison. Just a guess.

showtimefolks4347d ago

here is my question since MS and Epic had a 3 game deal that is now over do we think this will come out on all HD consoles and pc?

Slient Knight 94347d ago

Is there any point of it coming to pc and ps3 if it just one game prequel?

But if it's start of a new gears of war trilogy then yeah hopefully does come to other consoles.

Patriots_Pride4347d ago

I think if that was the case Sony wolud have show cased at there conference for a more shock and awe.

Biohazard88604347d ago

Lol how did u not see this coming ?? anyways im def looking forward to this game.

ziggurcat4347d ago Show
ginsunuva4347d ago

How were you not expecting that?

Don't you know Microsoft's exclusives pattern is "Halo, Gears, Halo, Gears, Halo, Gears, Halo, Gears..."?

xAlmostPro4347d ago

Gears Kinect incoming, it's the only reasonable for an announcement so soon after the last installment.

I mean there was 2 years between Gears 1+2 and 3 years between 2+3..

This is less than a year after Gears 3's release date.

Well either that or they're going to release a sort of 'teaser for a teaser' and it will say "full announcement 2013"

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 4347d ago
Emilio_Estevez4348d ago (Edited 4348d ago )

That's kind of lame of them to steal MS' thunder. If I was MS I would have made sure there was absolutely no mention of a new Gears until Cliffy B walked on stage.

Krug - O I know, so maybe I should've worded differently. Like why would MS let this out before E3, one of their biggest games would have been a huge surprise...Now it will only be a surprise if it's not what the people want(like kinect)

Krugsy4348d ago (Edited 4348d ago )

Dude, all this stuff is strategically planned. MS knew exactly when Game Informer would release their cover. Massive corporations don't leave something like this to chance. All those "leaks", yeah, not really leaks.

But yeah, I think they should of held onto the announcement till their conference rather than announcing it this way.

Dee_914347d ago

might have something bigger up their sleeves to announce in their conference.
I cant help but feel MS will announce some new IPs after this.

Imalwaysright4347d ago (Edited 4347d ago )

MS? Epic owns the rights of the GeOW franchise and they can unveil their game whenever they want too.

Krugsy4347d ago

To think MS hasn't got a massive say in how this IP is marketed is simply naive.

Imalwaysright4347d ago (Edited 4347d ago )

Again Epic OWNS the rights of this franchise and they can do wathever they damn please with it. If they wanted they could do a SNES version of it and wouldnt be mine, yours or MS business! Epic is not a MS 1st or 2nd party dev and owns MS nothing specially now that their 3 games contract deal has ended. In fact i wouldnt be at all surprised if this game was multiplatform or a 360 timed exclusive.

Krugsy4347d ago (Edited 4347d ago )

Sheesh, you clearly don't know how business works.

You actually think that Microsoft is going to let them go and push a major game, a game that MS would be incredibly invested in, without any of their own input? Yes, they don't own the rights to the new game (yet), but they do have a rather strong business relationship with Epic. Both companies would be in constant communication with each other as it would be mutually beneficial. In a business relationship like this, MS holds most of the cards as they have the fatter wallet. Epic isn't gonna piss them off by 'surprising them'.

Also, it's already been confirmed that the official unveiling is going to happen at Microsoft's Press Conference, meaning the two parties were in communication prior to Game Informers announcement. In fact, the whole cover wasn't unveiled, meaning, they're holding off until the conference to allow MS and Epic to mutually announce it.

Even if it does go multi platform(which it wont), Epic would have been in communication with MS so as not to loose their buisness relationship.

Imalwaysright4347d ago

"You actually think that Microsoft is going to let them go and push a major game, a game that MS would be incredibly invested in, without any of their own input" Oh my... It does NOT matter how much MS is invested on this IP because they dont own the rights of it. Dont you understand? EPIC CAN DO WATHEVER THE FUCK THEY WANT WITH IT. MS doesnt get to tell Epic what they can do with their Ip and all their millions wont change that.

"Both companies would be in constant communication with each other as it would be mutually beneficial. In a business relationship like this, MS holds most of the cards as they have the fatter wallet. Epic isn't gonna piss them off by 'surprising them'." Their business relationship changed as soon as their contract ended so Epic will surely take a course of line that is most advantegeous to them, not MS, because Epic are the ones holding ALL the cards as they own the IP. LMAO pissing MS off.

As for the game being unveiled on MS conference it doesnt change the fact that Epic can do whathever the fuck they want with their Ip. Even make it multiplatform, unless of course they've made a new deal with MS.

Genghis4347d ago

You have no idea how this stuff works. Why would Epic make a poor decision to betray the company that put them on the map by not considering the stragetic plan of that company. Maybe they can do whataver they want, but when it comes to business ethics, which you know nothing about, you follow the plan that suits your main interest's ideals.

badz1494346d ago

"Why would Epic make a poor decision to betray the company that put them on the map..."

Dude, u don't know what u're talking about! MS put Epic Games on the map? LOL it's Gears that has put the Xbox brand on the map, not the other way around! Unreal Engine & Unreal Tournaments are what putting Epic on the map way before MS even in the console business! Even without MS, Epic was already racking in those money from their Unreal Engine licensing from left and right! It's the single most used game engine ever!

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4346d ago
Shaka2K64347d ago ShowReplies(2)
Patriots_Pride4347d ago

It can still be a surprise maybe an open world RPG or MMO game, I would shit my pants.

user54670074348d ago (Edited 4348d ago )

As much as I like Gears of War I just can't get excited with the thought of a prequel trilogy

I know what happened, I've heard about it in the games and I'm sure if I wanted to know more I could buy the novels that they've brought out

This may seem silly but I like Marcus as a character, for me he was the face of Gears of War like how Nathan Drake is the face of Uncharted and how the Master Chief is the face of Halo, if they do lock him away like the picture suggests then I don't think I could play as another character. Shame they didn't have a Halo 3 Legendary type of ending for Gears 3 showing a new threat, giving Marcus and the gang a chance to rest but giving off the impression that "peace dosen't last for ever".

I mean I wanted to know about Myrrah and how she is human.

VanillaBear4348d ago (Edited 4348d ago )

Totaly Agree

I just feel with prequel trilogies it's not as exciting because you know what happens in the end. I thought in a secret ending they would of shown some other type of Locust carrying Myrrah away in a ship and then revaling a "King" Locust on board, then zooming out to reveal that a planet next to Sera is the real home planet of the Locust and because the Queen has failed they have to finish a job she couldn't finish herself......I know how bad that idea was but it's just an example

"I mean I wanted to know about Myrrah and how she is human."

This needs to be explained aswell

RedDead4348d ago

AH that woulda been a nice surprise for E3

Show all comments (213)
180°

Microsoft’s Surface and Xbox hardware revenues take a big hit in Q3

Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
darthv7215h ago

Xbox content + services up 62% while hardware down 31%... seems about right with the way they tout you don't need the hardware to play. People can play on their phones or smart tv or other means. I don't hardly play on my consoles directly since getting devices like the logitech g-cloud and ps portal. Which is to also say I have been playing more digital than physical because of these devices.

solideagle1h ago

you should apply in MS PR team buddy, I think you will do a great job in my humble opinion :)

Cacabunga1h ago

I can tell people like you are an absolute minority..

If service is up means their fans and fanboys accepted this model and subscribed to it. The near future you will see a big decline because the service is saturated.

shinoff218339m ago

But that's been ms for years. When things aren't going their way they try to change the way things are said. For instance console sales are down, they stop telling how many sold instead telling us how many hours spent in halo or headshots. So it makes sense console sales down just say people are playing on more devices then previous. What they won't say is how many xbox players jumped ship to ps5.

purple1014h ago

Xbox hardware revenue tanks to lowest point of Xbox Series generation

Profchaos3h ago

I'm not surprised surface is struggling they aren't relevant anymore

XBManiac3h ago

Too expensive hardware when others offer the same or more for less? Good work, Green Team.

SimpleDad2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

"Despite some early successes for Xbox games on rival platforms, Xbox hardware is down by a massive 31 percent this quarter."
"Without Activision Blizzard, Microsoft’s overall gaming revenue would have actually declined this quarter."
"Xbox content and services would have only been up a single percent without Activision Blizzard..."
"It looks like next quarter is going to be a similar story for gaming at Microsoft, too."

That is crazy... so A/B/K is carrying the whole Xbox gaming.
Oh and Microsoft will be fine. Windows, Office and Cloud are growing with each pc purchase.

purple1012h ago

Activision: "we gonna need a bigger rucksack/backpack please"

Microsoft: "why's that"

Activision: "to carry yo' weak ass'

Profchaos1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

Top brass have also wanted to start seeing returns on the 100 billion they have put into various Xbox related moves so seeing more multiplatform games is highly likely especially from abk

It's basically saying that PlayStation is the reason Xbox is afloat right now thinks to Ps5 versions of COD

Kornholic40m ago

So basically PS and PC gamers' money is keeping Xbox on life support.

Show all comments (13)
300°

Microsoft Seemingly Closes Bethesda France

As part of its plans to cut 1,900 jobs, Microsoft has reportedly shut down operations at Bethesda France, letting go roughly 15 people

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
Hereandthere1d 11h ago

Microsoft should have left them stay 3rd party

GamerRN1d 9h ago

If they are let go, they can be whatever they want. They ARE 3rd party now... 🤦

Barlos1d 6h ago

Yeah, they're also jobless.

GamerRN23h ago

They can form a company if they want, they are just as jobless as if "Microsoft had left them as 3rd party".

peppeaccardo1d 1h ago

"MIcrosoft leaves Bethesda do what they know how to do best" ... close! Oh the irony ....
(Citation from a week old article)

ChasterMies21h ago

I think Microsoft and other game publishers are letting people go because they think ai will replace them. Doesn’t matter how much profit they make. They were always going to be let go.

PassNextquestion1d 11h ago (Edited 1d 11h ago )

Bethesda France was made up of roughly 15 people... they couldn't of being doing much

Bethesda France mainly did publishing and marketing within the region

blacktiger1d 9h ago

that's a shame for you to say that, i'm sure Elite loves hearing what you just said.

Mr Logic19h ago

What a stupid thing to say. The elites give 0 fucks what we say on an obscure website in the comments section.

Crows9018h ago

You can always reach out and give them jobs at your company man. Don't wait

Profchaos1d 11h ago (Edited 1d 11h ago )

Bethesda France focused on publishing and marketing in the region. And 15 people lost their jobs as part of the closure.

I wonder if this is part of Microsoft's strategy to abandoned physical media or possibly gamepass advertising makes their roles redundant you don't need to market a game as hard when the majority of players get the game as part of a sub which already promoted upcoming games

Tacoboto1d 10h ago

It's France too, there's a high likelihood only 1-2 people on the team even had an Xbox.

Profchaos1d 10h ago

Possibly guven all the leaks we know the Xbox brand is really struggling in the region.

Yi-Long1d 7h ago

Well, if your consoles and games are barely found in any stores any more, of course you're gonna struggle finding consumers ...

XiNatsuDragnel1d 9h ago

Tbh Microsoft I think Bethesda being 3rd party same with Activision would probably more competitive than thus scenario imo

Profchaos1d 8h ago (Edited 1d 8h ago )

I think it would have been better for all parties really especially gamers

TheColbertinator1d 9h ago

The recently purchased Activision French offices might take over all the licensing and marketing for Microsoft in France from now on.

Show all comments (21)
280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple10112d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref12d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde11d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander197211d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville11d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff218311d ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos11d ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
isarai12d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref12d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan11d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis00711d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander197212d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

12d ago Replies(3)
Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

12d ago
12d ago
Zeref12d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde11d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander197211d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander197211d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier11d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto11d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff218311d ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto11d ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
Hofstaderman12d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts11d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts10d ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic11d ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)