140°

Sony Vita versus Mobile Gaming

Sony Vita versus Mobile Gaming - and examination.

Read Full Story >>
jcwigriff.com
slavish4447d ago

mobile phones this year will surpass vita &ps360 in performance and graphics with quad-core and s4 graphic cards. I would have got vita if it was a phone. That closed the market to a large group of people. I, and many others, don't like caring multiple devices.

Diver4446d ago

an those games will generate phone sales. how? because when you try to play them you will throw you phone against the wall. somebody here the other day was uninformed enough to bring up shadowgun. as i said then, ahahahahahahahahaha!

it isnt any good. it looks good for a phone game but there is a reason it didnt score great. it plays like crap. youll get so frustrated right after you break your phone youll realize how you were played by articles that think a phone can stand up next to a vita a 360 a ps3 or a pc.

what else is good about shadowgun beside the looks. nothing. you get stuck in scenery and have to crash the game. thanks for showing us you never played the game. "oh it looks good." so what? there are plenty of good looking games that are crap.

did you try to run from enemies in that game? now you see why touch pad controls alone just blow. an you cant defend phone games outside of angry birds. we had something similar on low end pcs called solitaire.

the people that think a phone game can hold against a real game machine do more to discredit their own comments by by simply making the claim than anyone.

lumley6664446d ago

slavish......

urrrm a smart phones gaming capabilitys arnt even in the same leage as a vita, i have a powerful smart phone an a dual core tablet, and while the graphics are good the games are pretty crap compared to vita

slavish4446d ago Show
Ezio20484446d ago ShowReplies(1)
plmkoh4446d ago

Surpassing specs based on benchmarks is one thing, but the practical experience that is ACTUALLY playing the game is another.

Take any benchmark mobile phone game and have a look at how much phone resources it actually uses, and you will find that it probably uses less than 30% CPU power and around 130mb or so RAM, even in this age of 1.5ghz Dual core and 1gb of RAM on a phone.

This is exactly why there is still nothing today on the mobile phone that looks and plays better than MGS: Peace Walker on the PSP despite that being on an ancient platform that runs at most 333mhz with 64mb of RAM.

The very fact that mobile phone games are no longer attractive once priced over $4.99 should be a rhetorical in itself for developers having no motivation to push graphics on hardware.

Ron_Danger4446d ago

Have fun playing all those advanced touch screen only games on your advanced phone.

Take whatever the best racing game is on android or iOS and put it up against Wipeout2048... Guess who will win...Wipeout 2048 is one of the best looking games I've ever played and the controls are perfect... And you can play against other people on the vita or ps3 at the same time...

But since it can't make phone calls, I guess your right... /s

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4446d ago
Wigriff4447d ago

I don't want a powerful handheld market. The handheld market - much like the PSN and Xbox Live - gives indie developers a much needed platform to experiment on. Mobile gamers also have lower graphical expectations. Even if mobile devices DID exceed the graphical abilities of the Vita or current consoles, it doesn't mean that I want to play games on them. My current phone is more powerful than my PS2, but I would rather play games on a PS2. A console or a PC is more accommodating for games than a phone.

I think your assessment is off base though. Sony wouldn't have released the Vita with its graphical capabilities only to be easily out-shined; and the Vita offers more intuitive gaming than a touch screen phone.

The next generation of consoles will exceed the ability by mobile devices exponentially, and AAA developers will devote exceptional amounts of time and money to push the capabilities of those platforms.

I stand by my arguments presented in the original source: If the Vita would have been made into a phone, they would have sacrificed far too many things that make the Vita a superior tool for gaming.

CYBERHATER4446d ago

A lot of people are not interested in the Vita. There is just to much other stuff out there right now. And at that price in this economy, with hardly no storage? Not good.

DarthSidious4446d ago

What economy? The Dow broke through 13,000 two days ago for the first time since the financial crisis in 2008. The official unemployment rate has been in steady decline for months. What price? The PSP launched for $250 in 2005! The PSP Go launched for $250 two years ago. And let us not forget the crapbox that is the Nintendo 3DS that, yes, also launched initially for $250 just last year! None of those previous three handheld systems had a quarter of the power and potential that Sony's awesome new Playstation Vita. If you can't afford a PSV because you think the economy is too harsh or the price is too high, perhaps you should explore leaving a capitalist society where hard work yields great rewards, or just don't buy one! Or, find a better paying job (assuming you do work, in this economy LoL).

CYBERHATER4446d ago

Maybe after it has been out on the market for a while maybe just maybe, even the hardcore faithful will open there eyes.

DarthSidious4446d ago

The Vita is for gamers who actually want a device like it to first and foremost, play good games and provide great experiences. If you don't want a PSV, don't get one. You're simply not the target market.

monkeyfox4446d ago

Iphone (for example) can cost around £500-£1000 over a 2 year contract. Vita costs £199 or £249 (for a 3G one).

I have had an iphone 4 for the past year or so and i must say most of the games suck. There are like 4-5 that really are any good. I mean can someone please tell me what games come close to console gaming or indeed vita on iphone?

Mobile gaming on android/iphone is great for indie developers though... We are at a point like we were 30 years ago where one person can make a game and get it plauyed by millions.. thats pretty cool

Show all comments (31)
50°

How to Visit Landmarks in Fortnite and Complete the Week 7 Quest

Finding Landmarks can be crucial for your Fortnite games, either for loot or for quests.

220°

Microsoft’s Surface and Xbox hardware revenues take a big hit in Q3

Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
darthv7218h ago

Xbox content + services up 62% while hardware down 31%... seems about right with the way they tout you don't need the hardware to play. People can play on their phones or smart tv or other means. I don't hardly play on my consoles directly since getting devices like the logitech g-cloud and ps portal. Which is to also say I have been playing more digital than physical because of these devices.

solideagle5h ago

you should apply in MS PR team buddy, I think you will do a great job in my humble opinion :)

Sonic18813h ago

I thought darthv72 and Obscure_Observer already work for Microsoft 🤔

dveio2h ago

MS: "Xbox services and content without AB up 1%, with AB up 62%. Hardware down 31%. In total a loss of 350 mill."

darthv72: "Seems about right."

MS: "Excuse m ..."

darthv72: "I don't hardly play on my consoles directly."

MS:

Cacabunga5h ago

I can tell people like you are an absolute minority..

If service is up means their fans and fanboys accepted this model and subscribed to it. The near future you will see a big decline because the service is saturated.

shinoff21834h ago

But that's been ms for years. When things aren't going their way they try to change the way things are said. For instance console sales are down, they stop telling how many sold instead telling us how many hours spent in halo or headshots. So it makes sense console sales down just say people are playing on more devices then previous. What they won't say is how many xbox players jumped ship to ps5.

Cacabunga3h ago

Hardware sales are so bad that Sony and Nintendo are blowing the sales off the water with their hardware.

If Xbox are losers, others aren’t..
Xbox already tried everything with Xbox live then subscriptions went down so much that they had to find something else. Their fans subscribed then reached saturation rather quickly.

Hardware and exclusive games is where it’s at! Keep gamers excited, announce decent software and people will support you

purple1018h ago

Xbox hardware revenue tanks to lowest point of Xbox Series generation

Profchaos7h ago

I'm not surprised surface is struggling they aren't relevant anymore

XBManiac6h ago

Too expensive hardware when others offer the same or more for less? Good work, Green Team.

SimpleDad6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

"Despite some early successes for Xbox games on rival platforms, Xbox hardware is down by a massive 31 percent this quarter."
"Without Activision Blizzard, Microsoft’s overall gaming revenue would have actually declined this quarter."
"Xbox content and services would have only been up a single percent without Activision Blizzard..."
"It looks like next quarter is going to be a similar story for gaming at Microsoft, too."

That is crazy... so A/B/K is carrying the whole Xbox gaming.
Oh and Microsoft will be fine. Windows, Office and Cloud are growing with each pc purchase.

purple1016h ago

Activision: "we gonna need a bigger rucksack/backpack please"

Microsoft: "why's that"

Activision: "to carry yo' weak ass'

Profchaos5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

Top brass have also wanted to start seeing returns on the 100 billion they have put into various Xbox related moves so seeing more multiplatform games is highly likely especially from abk

It's basically saying that PlayStation is the reason Xbox is afloat right now thinks to Ps5 versions of COD

Kornholic4h ago

So basically PS and PC gamers' money is keeping Xbox on life support.

Show all comments (22)
140°

Why Monopolies In Gaming Must Not Be Allowed

As of right now, there are no monopolies in the games industry, and for the sake of the medium as a whole, they never should either.

thorstein17h ago

Shouldn't be allowed in any field.

Inverno13h ago

And yet the biggest tech companies in America are essentially that. They buy up all the small comps only to kill them off and steal what they have, and if they can't buy em they bleed them to death.

jwillj2k412h ago

Eventually they’ll realize the value is with the employee not the company. Buying an IP means nothing if the people who contributed are let go. They’ll get it one day.

MrCrimson11h ago

tech is different because they buy threats and then kill them. Twitter bought Vine and did nothing with it. Despite people seemingly liking it. Could've had tiktok a decade before bytedance. go figure.

Zenzuu12h ago

Monopolies shouldn't be allowed regardless. Not just for gaming.

MrCrimson11h ago

They buy IPs not talent. That's why these buyouts never work and the IPs die. Right now it's too expensive to develop games - but I expect that to shift maybe as AI tools can make it easier. The best games have been indie games for awhile as big developers fuck their ips to death with "games as a service" -