Worst Kept Secret or Rumor that Wont Die?
It seems this rumor just wont die. First there are magazines listing the game for both the PS3 and Xbox 360, the developer diary which was hosted on the Mercs 2 website, showing developers working on Xbox 360 dev units and now this.
It seems the next issue of Game Informer have secured a preview of the following titles: .....
hit the jump for more
Bad ports don't necessarily mean bad games, but they're inexcusable nonetheless. From the lazy to the straight-up weird, poor ports can cost companies a Bad ports don't necessarily mean bad games, but they're inexcusable nonetheless. From the lazy to the straight-up weird, poor ports are inexcusable.
There are oh, so many sequels in video games these days. We've got eight games that we wish would get a follow up.
I cant agree with a lot of games on this list. Far, far more deserving entries - which I wont go into now. All I will say is Blast Corps U...I can dream, cant I?
The Darkness games are among my favorite games of last gen. Both were very unique in their own ways. I'd love to see a third iteration though I doubt it'll happen.
Folklore 2 would be nice as well.
Well apart from Jak and Daxter the rest are total crap and I for 1 are glad there was no more of that crap, now if you want to talk about Heavenly sword and Medievil now thats 2 that should have another go at this gen
All publicity is good, right? Well, not always. Here's a look at a few of the best (and worst) publicity stunts for games.
simply because EA is the one publishing it... the word exclusive and EA never fit in the same sentence... lol!!!! sad but true, yet this couldn't be more wrong, most namingly that panademic is the developer, as far as this is concerned EA is only giving it the resources to bring it the the shelve, think about it, EA is the biggest software development studio out there and hey publish on every platform so they rake in the money from everything, yearly revenues tap into billions. so they're the perfect company to go for... heck if i was designing a game and couldn't come up with th millions to put it out and market and distribute i'd go straigt to EA as well,... as far as i see, tis game is more like a timed exclusive if anything because we do know that both Panademic/bioware are a combined studio and both are knee deep in PS3 and Xbox 360 game developement, so for them to say that they have 360 dev kits and are working on it is a given but i think it's another title, just like bioware gave the hint that it too is working on a ps3 title... and this isn't the first time thatGI has been wrong, they them self claimed that bioshock was headed for the ps3 and it's been since debunked so i see this as another one of those. if bioware wanted bioshock as a ps3 title then they would have announced it, just like the cas with this... i'll wait for the official word from the mouth of panademics president. because my eyes read that it will remain exclusive for ps3 as of the moment. and on that note i'll leAve this alone
I know the the PR agent at Pandemic, Angella Wong, and Mercenaries 2 is a for sure PS3 exclusive.
that it's a PS3 exclusive.
if ps3 looses Mercs 2 if we gain crysis and xb*x doesnt
Anyone remember when Mercenaries 1 was a Playsation exclusive? Yes, same thing.
They announce it as a PS exclusive, talk about how superior the PS hardware is and how this could only happen on PS. Then six months later, a better-looking and smoother-running Xbox port will hit the shelves.
This is known as "having your cake, and eating it too".