I've been playing CoD since the original was launched on the PC, it bothers me because with recent versions it's moved further away from being a first person shooter and more about instant gratification and easy kills for the kids with a short attention span.
It makes me weep to see gamers lap up the same garbage from the Call of Duty franchise year after year. I hope I'm wrong but this years instalment looks like it's moving even further away from the original series that was all about gun battles and not some n00b one hit kill smart weapons or silly kill streak perks. They may as well just ditch controller and mouse and keys support and just make it a tablet game when you press the screen as quick as you can to get kills like a glorified...
I think graphically its the best looking racing game to date and in terms of physics and realism its much better than anything in the Forza and Gran Turismo franchises. I think PC, XBOX and Playstation fans are in for a real treat and I hope that fanboy's can see past their exclusive titles and give this a chance.
I've been running the closed beta for a while, it ran very nicely on my old system that was an AMD Quad Core 3.4GHz CPU with 8GB 1333Mhz RAM and an AMD 6870 1GB graphics card. Obviously you have to turn off some effects but it still looked as good if not better than anything else out there and I thought was more realistic than Forza and Gran Turismo.
I've been playing the closed beta for some time and its going to be a great game on PC, Xbox and Playstation. I hope that the fanboy's out there will give this game a chance over their exclusive titles like Forza and Gran Turismo as I think its better than both of them.
Pick whatever platform suits you but at least get the facts straight if you're going to try and put forth an argument to convince people they have to choose one over the other.
The crux of his argument is sales, its clear he does not understand the JPR research and the writer also includes VGChartz sales figures as proof when those sales figures do not include digital sales which is where the bulk of the sales would have taken place for Watch Dogs on Steam and Uplay not ...
Doom is going to be very different to the modern day shooters we have now, it's got a different set of game mechanics that I'm worried some reviewers just won't understand and give it bad reviews because they will inevitably compare it to Call of Duty or Battlefield.
I've already read some comments like "you can carry all the weapons all the time" and "there is no health re-gen" and also "the level design seems very linear". Those...
I'm really looking forward to the new Doom, I still remember picking up a shareware diskette for Doom in a games store years ago. Some of the comments that Eurogamer collected from various gaming sites has me worried though that Doom will be given poor scores from reviewers who don't understand what Doom is. Comments like "you can carry all the weapons all the time" and "there is no health re-gen" and also "the level design seems very linear" that's w...
Despite Microsoft's desperate hype to make people believe they needed this game I doubt it sold as much as EA expected and they must be kicking themselves for making this a Microsoft exclusive. Even an XBOX One owning friend no longer plays it and I gave up on the PC version a while ago. The AI is awful, it's truly bad for a game that relies on it to mask the low player count. No single player, no level destruction, no bullet penetration, low number of levels and multiplayer modes for...
I'm not saying the whole level should be destructible but you should see corners being smashed off the sides of buildings as Titans pass by them and at the very least bullet penetration. Far from being a design choice I think that's down to a poor choice of an old game engine that perhaps does not support such an ability no matter how much its customised. As ramiuk1 says shooting someone through a mess fence or a catwalk floor should be possible but it is not. Even simple boxes provid...
I can't justify spending any more on this game. Its an average online only game that has been hyped into making people believe its great.
No level destruction or bullet penetration despite it being a futuristic FPS with high powered weapons and mech's. 6 vs 6 propped up with AI that is anything but intelligent, in fact its possibly one of the poorest examples of AI I've seen in a modern game.
The review sites that gave Titanfall perfect 10/10 sc...
Your blind fanboism doesn't hide a truly average game. I owned an XBOX and 360 long before I owned a Playstation, the format doesn't matter to me its all about the game. I was excited by its release, had it on pre-order from August 2013 and waited and waited. Funny thing is there is an XBOX fanboy at work and he agree's that Titanfall was a massive disappointment and he no longer plays it on his XBOX One.
Titanfall was a massive disappointment. I pre-ordered it on Origin after it was first show at E3 last year but as the release drew closer the more concerned I was about it being a flop. Microsoft just did their usual routine of bulldozing a game to the top with hype.
People raising concerns about the AI in multiplayer, the low player count, no single player, the lacklustre graphics, lack of bullet penetration which is now a standard feature in other FPS all got shouted down ...
Yeah I've only bought a gift copy of Farcry 3 for a friend so far as I've filled my boots in previous Steam sales.
So some guy who runs a small gaming website has better a better financial plan and knows better than a global electronics giant who has been making games consoles for nearly 20 years?
Cool, I was on the fence about this game but for £15 it's worth a punt
I can't help but feel this is just a PR stunt designed to boost the image of the XBOX, like "Halo is so great other formats are practically begging us to bring it to them" Of all my PC gaming mates not one of them has ever expressed an interest in having Halo on PC. I've played the whole series on XBOX and 360 and it's good but if you strip away the hype it's just an average game.
You're a bit 'special' aren't you? As I said its in the name, it's part of the battlefield franchise so of course it would look like Batttlefield else they would have made it look different like Medal of Honor looked different to Battlefield 3. Go and grab yourself a facepalm and sit in the corner and eat your crayons.
This is just more of the same "EA is evil" bandwagon nonsense. Of course it looks like Battlefield it uses the same engine and EA has never made any secret of that, here's the clue - it's in the name BATTLEFIELD Hardline. It's more than just a mod or a re-skin it's a standalone product with a single player campaign and multiplayer modes. When did gamers become so cheap?
Nope, we have Call of Fall: Titan Duty 2