Does it have to?
The first one was a good game, but I think people over egg it a little in regards to how good it actually was. Like all ND games, the story is derivative of something else, with the impressive thing being the environments and set pieces.
It'll be a good game. Leave it at that.
Unicorn shite rolled up in 100 dollar bills for skins.
It's not going to count for nothing when one console will release with all sorts of exclusives, VR and whatever else, and the other is just a glorified multi-plat system for the first two years that's offering fuck all.
*YAWN*
Ohh, what a lovely gesture, Bobby.
You fat, greedy, capitalist cunt. You should be giving your employee's a care package of support financially, instead of your fucking number.
Absolutely, yes. The only thing negative about the Rift S (relatively speaking) is that it's still tethered, but you'll quickly forget about that. Good luck finding one, though. The naysaying gremlins on here will make you believe VR isn't selling, when its actually selling out faster than the demand can keep up with.
Yes, thankfully there are people out there that understand and realise the potential of it. I'd be losing interest, and hope, in the industry if VR died off. It's a technology that is simply too good to fail in the long run. It's been attempted and been a pipe dream for decades, but it's now an actual real life thing now.
A VR "helmet"?
LOL enough said, really.
starchild6h ago
Was your console and your TV free too?
Nothing more to add to that, really. Those crying about it being VR only need to accept that eventually more and more big games like this are going to get made for VR. They were expecting - sorry, hoping - that it was a fad and it'd be dead by now. Well, here we are in 2020 and guess what...
I wonder if these asshole so called hack journalists writing bollocks like this would have said and complained about the same thing back in 1993 when Doom came out? And before anyone who thinks they are clever tries to tell me "Oh, but you didn't need a expensive VR headset back then to play that", well, you'd be missing the point. You still had to actually buy a functioning PC capable of running that back then, and back then that meant everything, including the monitor, so ...
Probably not. But it would be massively different, and, well, very underwhelming. Basically, it would be just like HL2 in 2020 but somewhat inferior due to it missing design concepts specifically made for traditional gaming. Thing is HL2, when modded for VR, elevates that game. Gamers that want to cry and moan, and throw the toys out of the pram because this is in VR, just don't understand or realise that VR as a medium has a magnitude of potential that far outstrips that of traditional g...
A middle finger to against everyone who said its not possible? What are you on about? No one said its not possible to play it flat. The difference is, if you'd even tried VR you'd know this, is the control mechanics would be impossible and the game not only would be massively different and downgraded in experience, but completely devoid and missing the point of why it needed to be VR in the first place.
The cult of Kojima. Absolute deluded weirdos. He's just a fucking game dev that makes weird shit, and often isn't even that very good. That's it.
Spot on.
And those crying about the price of a HMD, it's first gen VR. They aren'#t that expensive compared to that iphone you willingly dropped half a grand on for a fucking emoji upgrade.
Young Gerry Adams.
"We still have stupid gamers that support this door-knob and tout him as a hero"
Oh, I've noticed that on here and elsewhere. They seem to lose the ability to talk when you present them with stuff like this.
This is coming from an absolute moron who said there was nothing to worry about and that it was blown out of proportion. Fuck him.
LOL
At least once? How about it being mandatory? Ah, that's right - I forgot Americans don't like to read.
Shite.