220°

Naughty Dog's Corrinne Yu Inspired by Carmack to Aim for 60 FPS; Wishes Had More Time on TLOU PS4

Naughty Dog's graphics coder Corrinne Yu is considered one of the most prominent experts in the industry in tweaking graphics engines for performance and glitz, even due to her previous work as Principal Engine Programmer in Microsoft's Halo team.

Read Full Story >>
dualshockers.com
Pandamobile3554d ago

It's getting a little tiresome hearing about 60 FPS like it's some brand new revelation in the games industry...

Artista 3554d ago

Things are never a big deal until consoles catch up. . just gonna have to live with it ^_^

Am_Ryder3554d ago

Brand new for consoles. Still tiresome as heck though. Fps is function over fashion for me. Over 30 and i'm happy. One sensitizes to fps and resolution really quickly so it barely matters anyway when it's lower/ higher.

SoapShoes3554d ago

Brand new? Sonic Adventure in 1998 was 60fps and, at the time, looked better than PC games.

I_am_Batman3554d ago

I think there were over 100 games that run at 60fps on the PSOne (like Tekken1, 2 and 3). Nothing brand new about it.

NarooN3554d ago

Agreed, Batman (wow, don't get to say that every day...)

I remember playing TONS of PS1 and even PS2 games that were a solid 60fps. I remember playing a few racing games on PS1 and Dreamcast that had actual cheat codes to boost the framerate to 60fps, at the cost of a small dip in visual quality. The inverse was also true on some games: a code that lowered the framerate down to 30fps but increased the visual fidelity. I remember Gran Turismo 1 had a "High Res" option.

TL;DR: 60fps is nothing new for consoles. Only the CoD Kiddie Generation would think otherwise.

Am_Ryder3553d ago

When I wrote that comment up there, I was on the cusp of adding "brand new for HD 3D games, that is." Because obviously plenty of games have been 30FPS or above.

I decided to leave that clause out, and within a day, a ton of disagrees jump on the tiny crack in my argument... It was clear what I meant. This fucking website, man.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3553d ago
KING853554d ago

It certainly isn't new. I think the media is making a fuss is because the new consoles are now able to output native 1080p and 60fps.

Am_Ryder3553d ago

If you see my comment above, I knew that. Because it's blindingly obvious. I thought I wouldn't have to clarify that, obviously, plenty of console games have been 60FPS. I was referring to current-gen stuff, namely since high-FPS became some massively important talking point.

user56695103554d ago (Edited 3554d ago )

Most console gamers on this site don't look to or appreciate anything outside of their preferred console. Look at how much they bash each other and downplay games that's not on their console. Look at all the great indie games and big dev games that get port and now they love. I bet you now they will respect Carmack just because this. where as we pc gamers take info and research then give an opinion.

@gamercologyst
He wasn't right to say it like that but he was mainly saying game play is the most important thing. Why are you playing games if it's not to have fun. He focuses on the tech of God engine because that's what he's great at. It not a one man team that makes a great game if you really felt that way why are you waiting for no man's sky it has no story at all. I'm not saying I agree with everything he say and do but it should be common sense what he is talking about. Gamers love fun games. A lot of people best selling and love game is not the best graphical games. And that's one of the reasons they wouldn't last on console yell go to the next new or graphical games.

@pan
Devs use this as new marketing because they know there are a lot of fun boys spreading the word. They are easily manipulated. All you have to do is say res and frame rate the fanboys will do the rest in spreading the hype. Look at watch dogs the Devs didn't spread the hype the fanboys did. They just was excited about their game and the fanboys used it to compare how powerful the consoles was different. Half of last year that game was off the radar but as soon as they said it was a difference in res people started talking about it. Pub and Devs know how to get these gamers. And most of the level headed gamers when it comes to these tactics are pic gamers because saying that we will no be impressed because we were doing it a long time ago.

LightDiego3554d ago

And you want to say something about fanboys with this name and your stealth troll in every single console article? I don't want to be rude or something, but you are one of the biggest idiots of here.

user56695103554d ago

Ha I did make this name to piss people off but most of what I say is to wake people up because why we fight these companies are getting over on us. I definitely don't hide my hate for ps fanboys since I use to be a ps fan. People get mad that I point out contradictions and you on of them. Ps fanboys are running rampant on this site

BitbyDeath3554d ago (Edited 3554d ago )

I agree, 60fps is so overrated. Differences between 30 and 60 are minimal at best.

Pandamobile3554d ago

Maybe if you're visually impaired.

KING853554d ago

I don't know how many 60fps games you've played, but in my experience the difference is very big. I guess to each their own.

lsujester3554d ago

To me it largely depends on the game how much of a difference it makes. Side by side, you can usually tell, but functionally it depends on other factors, such as visual references. TLOU is very noticeable, but something Journey probably wouldn't be as much because there's not as much movement any given time.

Plagasx3554d ago (Edited 3554d ago )

Why do people say this??? It would take a blind person to not be able to tell the difference.. -_-

Jihaad_cpt3554d ago

Sounds like when people say 1280x720 looks the same as 1920x1080. There is a difference but not every game needs it

BitbyDeath3554d ago

30FPS is smooth as butter for me, if seeing better is an impairment then this is one I wouldn't want to give up.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3554d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3553d ago
3554d ago Replies(3)
blackbirdi3554d ago (Edited 3554d ago )

stop hyping this bi*** she is getting all the credits for last of us and everybody knows that the work was from the ice-team and other developers at naugthy dog ...its really a shame that she got the credit for things she didn't contribute at all and all the hype about uncharted 4 engine it was written by somebody else she is only overseeing the project nothing more and thats why many guys leaves naughty dogs because this women is geting all the credits even for games she wasn't a part of it

blackbirdi3554d ago (Edited 3554d ago )

dude i worked with that women for 4 years before and believe it or not she is nothing ....what she is claiming never was true
she is married one of the directors at gearbox she gains power only because of her husband and in interview she credit everything to her self even the first borderlands was delayed because of her bad coding and the engine was a total disaster thats why we switched to unreal engine and we took a cell shading

DeadMansHand3554d ago

@black. I hope your coding is better than your grammar.

MasterCornholio3554d ago

Sounds like you worked for the women instead of with that women.

Was she your superior or something?

I dont see why you are so jealous of her that you have to spread BS about your ex boss. Just be happy that she's working at Naughtydogs instead of your studio.

blackbirdi3554d ago

she never was my superior , she was a co-worker you can ask anybody at naughty dogs or even at 343 studios if she really deserve the credits for that work or not and you will be really surprised what they will say about her ...

MasterCornholio3554d ago (Edited 3554d ago )

@blackbirdie

You were probably just the janitor then. I refuse to believe that a programmer with a college education can't even make comments that are grammatically correct on N4G.

I dont see any proof that you even worked with her in the first place.

Cryptcuzz3554d ago

What is your full name and position in the company, when you used to work with her. No name person spreading FUD is not respectable at all.

sourav933554d ago

Suuuure...you worked with her...

kingPoS3554d ago

The way I see it, a reputation can draw people in. Only those who've worked with her would know what really goes on. In my case, I'm on the outside looking in, I see a tweet here or there and all of sudden the web explodes. I can help but feel that people use those kind of sites for power trips in addition to hype.

It's also one of the reasons why folks keep coming back to n4g, people love rumors, regardless of it being true or not.

Gateway MT6706 2008

WeAreLegion3554d ago

No decent game developer is going to hire someone who can't piece together simple sentences. You have never worked with Corrinne Yu.

voodoochild3463554d ago

Believe it or not the majority of the earth's population speaks languages other than English. America is not the world.

WeAreLegion3554d ago

That comment was completely unnecessary here. This person clearly speaks English, fluently.

What makes you think I'm an American, anyway? I could be British. I could be from any country, really. English is a popular language.

Get off your "America sucks" pedestal.

dcj05243554d ago

Yeah English isn't the only language.

TekoIie3553d ago (Edited 3553d ago )

@voodoochild346

Making the baseless assumption that because person X on the internet speaks english they must be American?

Therefore because they're American they think America is the world?

http://s2.quickmeme.com/img...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3553d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3553d ago
gamercologyst3554d ago

so why don't inspire to Carmack About the Story Driven games?

"Story in a game is like a story in a porn movie. It's expected to be there, but it's not that important." - John Carmack

if you downvote me it wouldn't change the fact that you don't like Videogames and everything you care is Graphic and Story Deal With it

you're not a gamer i'm sorry you're just another dumbed down casual gamer

MegaRay3554d ago

There's nothing wrong in having a good Story and Graphics if that doesnt affect the gameplay. sadly, it does affect the gameplay most of the time.
But for me, I always ask how good the "gameplay" is, and never really care how "realistic" it look, or how "amazing" the story is.

SuperBlunt3554d ago

Kojima productions and naughty dog with tlou seem to be the only ones who can push graphics, story, and gameplay very very hard imo

1nsomniac3554d ago (Edited 3554d ago )

I agree with you, Carmack has seriously lost the plot over the last decade!

His comments regarding pretty much everything have been mindblowingly stupid for someone that is so talented!

kevnb3554d ago

I'm very confused, are you alright?

SuperBlur3554d ago (Edited 3554d ago )

even if corrinne yu was inspired by the pope , she doesn't work on stories , she's a graphic coder

Same goes for John Carmack , he's a programmer not a story writter , who cares..

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3554d ago
Kivespussi3554d ago

I wish every game would aim for 60fps even if it would come at a cost of graphics... Good that ND has taken this approach, TLOU multiplayer is fantastic at 60fps.

Show all comments (47)
160°

The Last of Us Part 1 – Why The Ending is Still so Impactful

The Last of Us never dreams of insulting its audience’s intelligence. And the best example of this is, of course, is its ending.

Read Full Story >>
goombastomp.com
shinoff2183496d ago

Shit the beginning was to. I'm not sure how I would feel if I didn't have kids but having them it broke my heart to see.

ClayRules2012496d ago

Yes. The beginning and ending…how they break you, make you think , question things etc. so impactful.

And yeah, I have a son (he’ll be going to college here next year) and just feeling Joel’s pain, heartbreak, loss…it hits you differently when you have a kid (s) of your own.

PhillyDillyDee496d ago

I didnt have kids when i played it and the beginning had me sobbing. That story left an impact on me

Orchard496d ago

The story was a rollercoaster from start to finish. Probably my 1st or 2nd most favorite game on PS3 (the other being MGS4).

Aloymetal496d ago

I agree with you. MGS4 was truly special, I wasn't the biggest fan of the long cutscenes but I understand is part of Kojima. Great game nonetheless.

Snookies12496d ago

Best Metal Gear game, coming from a HUGE fan of the series. I bought a PS3 JUST for MGS4. And got the collector's edition too. Worth every bit of money.

Yes, the cutscenes can be very lengthy. But a lot of it was quite necessary to really tie things together. Previous games had some longer cutscenes as well. It's just that they were trying to wrap everything up with MGS4. So, it's understandable that they'd have to throw some info dumps into the game here and there.

Orchard496d ago

The cutscenes are long indeed, every Kojima game sets a new record there :P

But the game was awesome, the second they showed that first E3 demo, it was clear it was going to be something special.

I still remember being mind blown by the Octocamo. It was also the first third person shooter game where I felt like the controls and aiming etc all went smooth / fluid and weren't janky. Hard to explain in words, but it felt 'natural' to aim, move etc in it.

gangsta_red496d ago

I thought the game went on a little too long and it started to wear thin. It should have stopped at Winter. That would have been a great way to end that game with the sequel continuing from there (if necessary).

-Foxtrot496d ago

I loved it however the ambiguous ending was kind of ruined in the sequel

The first game had this conflicting grey area of Joel's actions, a decision to let you think it over and discuss it with people, however the sequel created a narrative that "OMG JOEL 100% DOOMED HUMANITY...HOW SELFISH" and making out Ellie wanted to die in the hospital even though 1) She didn't know she was going to die and 2) She was ready to see Joel once she got out of surgery so he could teach her how to play Guitar.

For me he did the right thing, I mean they pretty much attacked him when he was trying to save Ellie, they lied to him and said they were going to kill her without thinking any other decision out or asking Ellie herself and they pretty much were going to throw him out onto the street without any of his weapons/gear where he could have probably died. There was no guarantee a cure could be made with these guys, it was all "chance".

Crows90496d ago

Exactly. He made the first good decision and this time around the girl he took care of didn't die while escaping...which alluded to the beginning of the game. He was prepared this time.

-Foxtrot496d ago

Like I just don't know why the Fireflies (and now Jerry in Part II) didn't think about any other tests, it was literally "Yeah this bitch has gotta die". You're telling me they couldn't wait for more blood tests, think of new ways to approach it? The worlds been gone for decades, it's not going to collapse even more by waiting, the damage is done.

If they woke Ellie up and asked her but Joel also told her what they did and were going to do to him I don't think she'd really want to sacrifice her life for these guys compared how she suddenly reacts in the sequel.

Even the hospital setting in the original game was run down, dirty and literally the best they could do, that alone didn't inspire confidence they had the tools to distribute a cure let along make one. I know the sequel and remake kind of retcon it where it looked cleaner, brighter and newer but again I'm going off the original, the first time I played it. The Fireflies at the end of the day were not good people, they were still terrorists with their own ambitious goals in mind, I don't think they would have been fair handing out the cure if they did get it made

TricksterArrow496d ago (Edited 496d ago )

It's a work of fiction, and more than once Bruce and Neil stated that the cure was a given, it was a sure thing and they regret not making it more clearly. If the cure wasn't a thing, the ending wouldn't ne nearly as impactful as is.

Crows90496d ago

@trickster
Except tlou2 states that it isnt a given. The ending is still impactful.

Inverno496d ago

Think the reason why she was going to die was because the guy was a vet, not a doctor

-Foxtrot496d ago

Yet suddenly was the only person who could create a cure

"We deffo need to kill her"

"Wait...WHY"

"Trust me....I'm a vet"

TricksterArrow495d ago (Edited 495d ago )

Jerry was a doctor. A lead doctor. His bio makes it clear that he attended Northern Utah Medical University. He just happened to like animals. I wonder if people really pay attention to the games they play anymore (if they played, it’s a toss with TLOU2’s critics)…

Imalwaysright495d ago

TricksterArrow

You should play the PS3 version. Once you do, you'll realize that the ending was retconned because Jerry wasn't the surgeon that was going to kill Ellie.

TricksterArrow495d ago

I played all versions. He was not a vet in any of them.

Imalwaysright495d ago

He was not in the original version of the game but the "Jerry" that Joel killed in the original clearly wasn't someone that acted professionaly or inspired confidence because he was willing to work in a dirty operating room and was wearing boots.

TricksterArrow495d ago (Edited 495d ago )

Jerry was a minor unnamed role that got expanded on the sequel and also got recast, not unlike any TV series and games before this one (such as Resident Evil, in which Claire, Leon, Carlos and Chris all look considerably different from one iteration to the other). Also, still not a vet. And also unsure what argument you are trying to make by “dirty room” and “wearing boots”. He is still a doctor that has the ability to develop a cure, it doesn’t matter what he is wearing or what tools are at his disposal, the story is what it is.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 495d ago
ChubbyBlade496d ago

That’s why I didn’t like part 2. It removed all the nuance

Inverno496d ago

I think when you realize he's a vet, Joel's decision feels a bit more justified for those who played both games. Just playing, since you're in Joel's shoes, you don't really question it. Then playing the second there's a justification that doesn't take away from Joel's decision but for the player should reinforce your understanding of it.

You said it in the second comment. "The Fireflies at the end of the day were not good people, they were still terrorists with their own ambitious goals in mind." That's why they just went along with killing her cause they didn't want to figure out some other way.

shinoff2183495d ago

Foxtrot

I think they just tried to show you how Joel's decision affected more then just Joel and ellie . Just showing different angles and a bigger picture. I think Joel did the right thing.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 495d ago
dmonee496d ago

The story had me emotionally engaged. Gaming for 40 years it was the first time a game story messed with my emotions in the way movies do. As far as the game and gameplay? Not so much lol. It wasn’t bad in my opinion but the game itself was ok. It was the storyline that kept me going in TLOU 1 and TLOU 2.

ClayRules2012496d ago

“As far as the game and gameplay? Not so much lol. It wasn’t bad in my opinion but the game itself was ok.“

What exactly did the game do that qualifies it for just being ok? And same question for the gameplay?

dmonee495d ago

That’s a tough question because I could ramble on and on as to why. I’m speaking for myself because I usually pass on survival horror type games. So instead of getting into a debate as to why I found the gameplay to be ok. I originally commented on how the narrative had me emotionally sucked in. Especially the opening segment. So much that I purchased a game I would never have purchased if not for the story. It’s more kudos to the developer for getting people like me out of my comfort zone to play a game I wouldn’t usually play.

ClayRules2012496d ago

I know some people were upset with Joel lying to Ellie (friends of mine) that they felt it should’ve given the player an option to have Joel either

A. Lie to Ellie or B. Tell Ellie the truth. Type of situation, which just makes no sense. The game nor its story doesn’t given the player any control to have/make any choices that change the direction or outcome of ANY of these characters in this unforgiving and dark world.

I don’t blame Joel for doing what he did.

1. Ellie became the “Something” that he needed to keep fighting for, beyond just living day to day, simply being survivors.

2. Marlene gave orders to that no -name guard to kill Joel if he tried anything…you just done pissed him off all the more with those words. I wonder, if Joel had been killed and Marlene ever came across Tommy again (Joel’s brother) would she have the guts to tell him “Listen Tommy, we need to talk! About Joel…I couldn’t waste this gift. Tommy “What the hell you talking about, Marlene??” Marlene “I had Joel killed, if he” Tommy “YOU SON OF A BITCH!” Got carried away there lol. You get the idea tho. To my point, it wasn’t guaranteed that Ellie was the cure, and after all Joel did, went through, not even allowing Joel to see Ellie, just talk with her, that’s messed up.

3. Of course looking at the actions Joel took in the hospital and how that has major consequences in Part 2 for him, Ellie etc. it’s not like there wouldn’t have been a big threat later on at some point. This world is wicked, dark, unforgiving and everyone’s growing up, has their own WANTS. NEEDS. DESIRES. Solely for themselves, loved ones, or group. All while trying to survive.

Joel I think knew when he said “I Swear” that he’d done something much worse than when he actually saved Ellie from that operating room and possibly causing death to humanity (as if it would be appreciated anyways.

Yes, he lied to the one person who gave him purpose to live, purpose to have hope, purpose to be that father again (which he of course wasn’t looking for, but it just naturally happened upon him) like he was to his daughter Sarah all those years ago. And to him, maybe in that moment, lying would be worth the little bit of time, the years they’d have together creating memories, seeing Ellie grow up before his eyes etc. rather than lie to her and see a reaction in words and deeds in which she might’ve ran off losing all hope and trust in him etc. I mean, she did lose trust in him all those years later etc. but as we saw, she was willing to work with him, try to repair what Joel broke, and he knew it wouldn’t be easy, as did she. But with time she understood I think why he did what he did.

It’s just sad in the end, his lie, the time they lost with his betrayal, and than horrific death, caused Ellie to go seek revenge in a way in which Ellie changed, she kept chipping off more of herself along the journey, scary and sad thing to see, and exhausting. But powerful storytelling throughout it all.

Show all comments (36)
40°

Top 10 PlayStation Plus Premium Horror Games

We love to scare ourselves silly within the horror genre of video games. Thankfully, there are many to find on PlayStation Plus Premium, such as the intense Resident Evil VII: Biohazard and cult favorite Little Nightmares.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
40°

PlayStation Store July Sale Is Live With More Than 500 Games Discounted

PlayStation Store is offering a new sale this week with more than 500 games discounted including some DLCs. See the complete list here.

Read Full Story >>
novicegamerguides.com