Approvals 13/10 ▼
lipper (1) - 4694d ago Cancel
Nineball2112 (10) - 4693d ago Cancel
units (2) - 4695d ago Cancel
170°

Sony PSN Future in Hands of Hackers Not Security Upgrades

Exerpt:: "As a former programmer, former political/business consultant and customer of PSN, I am drawn to this story. This reopening will be one of the most important points in the history of Sony.

While Sony will claim that it is in control of its own future, the future is actually in the hands of hackers."

Read Full Story >>
news.yahoo.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

Other
v interesting topic & not lame at all
lipper4694d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Lame
Roscoe3zz4695d ago WhoDisagree(1)Agree(0)
Lame
disturbing_flame4695d ago WhoDisagree(1)Agree(0)
Lame
LAME
firemassacre4695d ago WhoDisagree(1)Agree(0)
+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4693d ago
Bonobo123454693d ago

LOL

Seems this guy knows nothing of the hacking community if he regards Lulzsec and Anon as the best out there..

does he think it was these guys that Hacked PSN in the first place?

qwertyz4693d ago

bullsh*t. teh cell will prevail

montyburns0004693d ago

im going to laugh when sony used a completely different CPU for PS4 locking out BC once again.

qwertyz4693d ago

@montyburns000
I was joking. sony'll probably use a power7 for ps4. its capable of emulating the ps3 cell and is much easier to code for. the ps4 will have a multicore cpu with a beastly gpu so game will have an easy time tapping the machines power. that's the approach sony took with ps vita by the way

TBM4693d ago

Can someone please tell me how you can be a former customer of a FREE SERVICE there's nothing to cancel.

StanSmith4693d ago (Edited 4693d ago )

Firstly, PSN isn't a free service. You have to purchase a PS3, PSP or Vita to access the service. It is significantly cheaper than Xbox Live but it is not free at all.

Secondly, you are a customer because you purchased the hardware which has access to said service and you also will have no access to the store which means no more DLC etc.

@tbm
That's exactly my point. You don't have access to the service unless you buy something. Therefore how can it be a free service?

TBM4693d ago

I would expect someone to purchase said systems if they wanted to use PSN so the service is free since there's no monthly/yearly subscription to use it, other than PS+

travelguy2k4693d ago

you can join the PSN from a PC, and never buy a PS3 or a PSP. Wont be much use to you but you could.

nolifeking4693d ago

Psn is free genius. I could probably go make an account on their(sony) website for my cousin, who doesn't have a ps3.

StanSmith4693d ago (Edited 4693d ago )

I can go make an xbox live account on a PC. Doesn't make it free though. I'd have to buy an Xbox to get the basic service plus pay a monthly subscription to get the full one.

Also just because you can create the account means nothing. You still can't access the service until you buy the Hardware that Sony stipulate therefore it is not free.

@below
My logic isn't stupid. I never once said that PSN is like Xbox live in terms of cost. So instead of of trying to re-word my statement, try re-reading it again.

PSN costs money to access as you have to buy Hardware that Sony stipulate to access it. Yes, once said hardware is purchased, there are no additional costs but that does not make it free. Xbox live is exactly the same for the Silver Membership. However, you have to pay a subscription to access the same features that are available on PSN.

Therefore PSN is cheaper and better value for money, but it is not free.

nolifeking4693d ago

Access and pricing are different. Buying a tv doesnt somehow make fox, abc, cbs ect paid channels like hbo and showtime. Your logic is stupid.

MysticStrummer4693d ago (Edited 4693d ago )

That's really shaky logic, Mario. Not everyone has an internet connection, but they can still use their PS3 to watch movies and play games. Some early adopters just bought one to play Bluray movies. PSN is just another feature that can be used for free. If PSN was required for all games, or all PS3 use in general, you MIGHT have a point, but it's not and you don't.

nolifeking4693d ago (Edited 4693d ago )

Yes your logic is Mario. What good is a free pair of shoes without feet? The service, in and of itself is free, of course your gonna need the hardware it runs on. What your basically trying to tell me is, this very site is not free because I bought a laptop to access it. That open bar I barley remember, not really so open, seeing as how I got a taxi to go.

Cheaper and more value for the money? How? I never spent a cent getting psn, my ps3, coompletly different story.

StanSmith4693d ago (Edited 4693d ago )

@mystic

My point still stands and you proved that too. Why isn't PSN seen as a feature of the PS3 just as Blu-ray movies and playing games are?

Blu ray movies, high quality games, PSN access etc are all features of the console. They come in the price tag that you pay when you purchase a PS3, Vita or PSP. There is no shakey logic involved. It's a fact.

The only reason it's touted as free is for the pissing matches that happen daily on here between Xbox and PS3 fans.

@nolifeking

No this site isn't free as you have to pay for the hardware and access through your ISP.

BubbleSniper4693d ago

so does that mean you pay triple for playing games on xbox live? you know.... ISP, THE CONSOLE (/eyeroll) and the sub?

nycredude4693d ago Show
+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 4693d ago
150°

Sony Patents To Prevent You From In-Game Harassment By Reading Your Emotions

A new patent recently published by Sony wants to gather biometric data of gamers to track whether one is being harassed using AI tools.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community18d ago
Profchaos18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

I hope this is one of those patents that never comes to fruition.

I already dislike the fact you can pay a significant amount for a online service buy associated games and content on said service and get banned from that service over potentially a misunderstanding the bans are already handed out for flimsy reasons

I'd rather see money invested in a ban that simply removes the offensive players ability to communicate with unknown players allow them to continue party chats with friends but not with Joe blow on cod.

exputers18d ago

Agreed. Blizzard recently banned a college Overwatch 2 player who's dependent for saying "shit." Pretty harsh.

Profchaos18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

How rediculas really. You can't say a word that's allowed in most PG films and prime time TV but the game is based around killing the enemy team using guns, explosives etc.

It's just backwards.

just_looken18d ago

What your talking about is called block list

In 2006 a spaceship dropped of the playstation 3/xbox 360 i say that that generation was the last great gen with game functions/tech that has yet to comeback

Anyhow the playstation 3 if you block listed a id they could not talk to you in chatroom with either text or voice. But that was pre mind fucked 2018 when people were more human than sheep.

But hey gta 6 is coming out billion dollar budget without a single player custom character creator and without singeplayer coop off/online something saints row 1-3 had on the xbox 360.

z2g18d ago

Take my social security and bank account numbers too! Here’s a picture of my wife and our address.

phoenixwing18d ago

Cmon where's the pictures of your children. Don't hold out on them.

H918d ago

At this rate I feel Sony will eventually sell a room to play games in it where they can monitor your every breath

jambola18d ago

I genuinely get a bit worried sometimes when a friend says something that could be offensive In a party
Because I have no trouble believing some bans would happen when in a private party for saying something wrong

SegaSaturn66918d ago

I want them to censor erotic content by measuring my groin temperature so i dont get too distracted while playing black ops 2.

Popsicle18d ago

Terrible idea. Not only do I not consent to providing my biometric data, the potential for mishandling biometric data is almost a certainty. Positive stress and negative stress can produce similar changes in biometrics. Interpreting the precise emotion a person is feeling is not only invasive but could be easily misconstrued. I hope this never comes to fruition.

Show all comments (14)
130°

Sony Could Increase Your Game's Difficulty If It Sees You Complain About It

Sony has recently published a new patent that wants to dynamically handle the games' difficulty and gameplay based on the player's emotions.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community19d ago
jznrpg19d ago

This is something I might use. Sometimes I play some good games but they don’t have difficulty option and are a little too easy.

Profchaos19d ago

Souls games will be like that players struggling make it harder

PassNextquestion19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

I think if used correctly it could work well

jambola19d ago

cool idea
cool idea for horror games especially
the way it's explained here sounds like it could never be forced hopefully, so that's ok with me

Show all comments (8)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community39d ago
ChasterMies39d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken39d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga39d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken39d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6439d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long39d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197239d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic39d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 39d ago
DivineHand12539d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91339d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer39d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit39d ago (Edited 39d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91338d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit38d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 38d ago
Christopher39d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6938d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit38d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal39d ago (Edited 39d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher39d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken39d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197239d ago (Edited 39d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic39d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2339d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218339d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder39d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts39d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)