Side by side graphics comparison of Rainbow Six: Vegas on the PS3 and Rainbow Six: Vegas on the Xbox 360. Both versions are near identical. The PS3 version is darker than the Xbox 360 version therefore the Xbox 360 has better character models.
all this says is HORRIBLE PORT!!! this game was only so so on xbox so screw this garbage. any port from the xbox looks this way. hope graw2 looks better. they are spending more time on it
EDIT: i forgot to add FIRST POST... woop woop
I don't know where you got that, but Vegas was not so-so on the 360.
are you kidding me? Vegas on the 360 was awesome. And are you a little lost you hope graw2 looks better? You know it's been out for like 3 months now right?
a $1,000,000,000 short. Hate to be buying ports for the PofS 3. You get the game a year later with bad graphics and no achievements, what a shame!!! hehe
Vegas is an awesome game on 360 and as a PS3 owner I am happy they didn't F it up like SC:4!I will pick this up and I encourage all other gamers to do the same!;)
i am glad your not a contributor otherwise you would be getting loads of reports saying "bad editing" lol, seriously i think you need to re-edit your comment and fix the mistakes lol.
My lord the PS3 suck. It is so funny. By the way, only ignorant gamers don't know that a game that is ported almost a year later should definately look better than the original. The PS3 just sucks. You jap lovers are a joke.
I'M HAPPY WITH THE 360 VERSION, EVEN THOUGH I HAVE A PS3, I REALLY DONT GIVE A ****.
i heard that the ps3 version in 1080i looks blurry for some reason. if ran in 720p it looks identical to the 360 version....thanx again ubisoft, with ps3"s hdmi and new super white options, i have no doubt this game will look good on my ps3.
edit: ign said it, i have not seen it for my self http://ps3.ign.com/articles... i still plan on buying june 26th
seriously?.... i think games look better in 1080i on my TV compared to 720p.
1080i always is supposed to look better than 720p but not by much as 720p is supposed to run a little smoother. I personally dont see much difference, most people will see none. Go with 1080i and people that say 1080p are full of [email protected]
What are you guys talking about? for static images its a known fact 1080i is better, But for moving images 720p is better. 1080p is really only noticeable on moving pictures or games, and when you have a image bigger then 40".
Most videophiles know these facts.
woooow. this video cannot get any more bias than that lol. GT always tries to make 360 games look better lol, Better character models? No red light on face?? yeah maybe thats because his face is looking DOWN on the ps3 version, and maybe they hadnt realized they set it on `1080i instead of 720p. jesus, did you people (who made the vid) even see the interviews where they stated that the (and i quote) "PS3 version has gone through a lot of polishing since the 360 version and has more detailing now". ... Im NOT a fanboy i just think this video is ridiculous, frankly i like the 360, but theres no doubt the ps3 will ust keep getting better and better
The 360 version, as a whole just looks better. No matter if Michael is looking at or away from the red light. Also, what's up with no proper 1080i? Really a shame cause I think 1080i looks much better than 720p, at least it does on my tv/xbox.
oh shut uupppp
one of the worse sony fanboy excuses iv EVER heard
and i thought the faces in both looked doo doo
i agree with #3.1/#3.2 and you should stop making excuses, oh and unlucky for you mate you have 11 disagrees so maybe that link isnt reliable or something? (i didnt open the link as i cant be @rsed lol)
actually i dnt think it looks that bad. Not as bad as fear. GIve ubisoft some credit i think they did an okay job. As long as the frame rate dosent suck it will should be cool. I'll probably pick this up never got around to playing it on xbox
FEAR looks like poop compared to the 360 version...its probably the worst looking game compared to the 360 counterpart the ps3 has recieved yet...if that makes any sense...(it looks great for a 2005 engine on the 360...on the ps3, it looks crappy)
I will definitely give this a try...I was never a fan of the this series, and have played each on for some reason...all the way back to the 98 release of the original on the PC...but a lot of you guys claim this to be very good and worthwhile...I will at least rent it...
I am not upset at all about these "ports" not looking as good as the original version...This is not a game that I bought a PS3 for...and I am only interested mostly because of the fact that there is nothing else out right now...if it looks better than FEAR, and its fun to play with better online than FEAR...I will definitely end up owning it probably...
I HIGHLY recommend this game. If you have both systems then I would wait and see what the final verdict is on the PS3 version but I've got the 360 version and its as close to a perfect game that you get IMO. Right up there with Resident Evil 4. Controls are PERFECT, game play is frantic, intense, and a whole lot of fun. In fact, if you're dying for a good game right now I say pick up the 360 version cause its definitely worth it. Or like you said, give it a rent, you wont be dissapointed.
Cool man...yeah I don't own a 360...My roommate does, but even he overlooked it I guess...I would here it was good...but figured it was super tactical and simply not a lot of fun (Like I said I never cared for the first couple in the series)...
I probably will end up buying it for the PS3...Sigma was pushed back a few weeks...and the 360 isn't hooked up to the 60"...I don't care if the graphics end up being a little worse than the 360, as long as the game isn't broken...besides we have more controllers for the ps3 right now anyway...
ps3 version will do just fine
"From what we saw of the opening levels, the PS3 version of Vegas is pretty much identical to the Xbox 360 version, not just in gameplay but in visuals as well. Then again, Ubisoft wisely has decided not to fix what was clearly not broken. The modified Unreal Engine 3 graphics engine that powers the game looks unchanged, though the frame rate does seem to struggle a bit more during some of the more intensive scenes. On the plus side, the PS3 version seems to have a bit more physics interactions built into it, as we saw more objects react to explosions and gunfire."
and even better they said that
"While the single-player campaign looks as solid as it did in the Xbox 360 version, the PS3 version will have exclusive multiplayer maps and game modes not seen in the 360 or PC versions of the game--but we'll cover those in our upcoming multiplayer preview. Rainbow Six Vegas will ship for the PS3 later this month."
This video is only trying to keep us from recognizing the positives of the ps3 version.
360 sharper up close, better colours, better drawing distance, better lightning.
And don't start, Sony droids, that its a port. All games are programmed on PC's first and then made optimal for a specific console. Straight ports are something from the past... What can be from influence, is the time they take to make a game optimal for the console.
But in this case... They had more time to work on the PS3 version.
@ Kornbeaner (below)
"What PC do you know to this point that has a cell chip in to optimize PS3 code for porting. This game is a port no matter how you slice it."
Nope. Like I said. Basic coding is done on PC. They optimize on the devkits of the PS3 and 360.
Plus, the 360 also got simulated by multiple CPU's. They can do about the same with Cell. No excuses anymore dude. It's not a port. The PS3 same story as PS2. Lots of hype, but graphical less quality then the XBOX
What PC do you know to this point that has a cell chip in to optimize PS3 code for porting. This game is a port no matter how you slice it.
How can you optimize code for a system without the proper tools?
"Plus, the 360 also got simulated by multiple CPU's. They can do about the same with Cell."
"about" being the key word. the new Intel chips can run quad-core processors, so you can in a sense run code for the 360 and get a better understanding of what can be done on that system, that still leaves you about 3 processors short of what can "in theory" be done by the PS3.
It's a Port the same way that Bethesda ported obilvion to the PS3. Only difference is that they took the time to make sure they did it right. And why is it that all games that are made by sony first or even second party don't have the same washout issues or any of the other issues that seem to plauge most ports. Kush games was able to get there games to look just as good or slighty better then those same titles on the 360, not more then 2 months after the intial release.
And whose fault is it that there are no proper tools? What does it matter that the cell might be that alien artifact that you claim it is if no one knows how to use it?
Point is. Any port that is not given the proper attention is alway gonna look worst on the PS3. weather its a straight port or a game that is programmed into a PC first before ported, A game on a PS3 has to be treated as it's own product. Games like Lair, motorstorm, MLB 07: the show, even Oblivion don't have the issue that seem to plauge a bunch of the ports that are shown for comparsion on this or any other site. there are ways to get around for programming ports to the PS3 without the drop in qulity that has been shown by 90% of all developers so far. While part of it is Sony's fault companies like Kush games and Bethesda have been able to rival or surpass even by the smallest margin the visual qulity they put out for the same title on the 360.
the ps3 should get ports from the wii not the 360, then maybe the games would be equal in quality
Code that was engineered for the 360 platform was juggled on the PS3 until a compromise was found between framerate and graphic quality.
Simple as that. Does Mart think the whole thing was rewritten from the ground up for the PS3?
A Port is simply copying and translating already existing code and as with any translation, its never as optimal as the original source.
I think they did well considering the vastly different architectures
of both consoles...
Plenty of information is available on the net about topics such as this for those interested in anything other than uninformed childish boasting.
You sound like a acomplete fanny mouthing of about how you think the Xbox version is better and that no one should challange that, oh that 1mm made a big difference, errr i think not, you need to stfu in future because nobody wants to hear your ignorant, fanboyish, queer, virgin opinion on things, you need to get laid loser and fast, your losing your mind let's do a comparison huh...........
GT5 will kill Fozra 2 now without a shadow of a doubt, don't give me that PGR4 nonsense, the game stinks, if Killzone 2 isin't a Halo killer it will still be better than 90% of all games on Xbox 360, MGS 4 and FF 13 are not going multiplatform regardless of slow sales of PS3, which in time will pick up and destroy 360 for a third time, oh yea it will Sony still has major brand strength, i'm also sick of all these little homo fanboys who work in the game stores, there all fukin xbots, they always had some sick idea the xbox was better due to the power, but it didin't hold a candle to PS2 in games, yet the Xbox dummies sed buy this it's more powerfull, and because Ps3 hasen't shown E3 2005 graphics yet they say crap like oh it isin't as powerfull as they said buy 360 the graphics are better, i mean wtf is that, i said to the man erm no i don't think so i don't want a console that breaks down every two months, i'd rather buy a quality product that lasts, where i can have the best gamming experience PS3, welcome chang3, death to all Xbots, it's comming.
hmmmm a nice little flamewar going on here, kornbeaner just go play your PS3.
I hear you Mart but why does Virtua Fighter look worse on the 360 than on the PS3? Why does Oblivion look better on the PS3?
It boils down to who is writing the code and what type of effort they plan on putting into it. They didn't want to ground up the PS3 version of Rainbow 6 on the PS3 the same way they didn't want to ground up Virua Fighter for the 360. Naturally they won't look identical because the systems are different if you try and port them.
Look who's talking...just go play your Xbox 360, mate.
Please, stop with these supposed comparisons, they are not useful since there are too many variables to be conclusive and even if it was possible to conclude anything from them, it would be, they are pointless for comparisons! Jeez, don't you realise that the consoles have different graphics cards, therefore even if the resolution and textures are the same, there will always be 'perceived' differences,because of the way the GPU's display colours etc.Look at most of the past comparisons for multiplatform games posted on this site and you will see, with few exceptions, that the differences are perceived, not real.I know its a fun pastime for some,but it really doesn't help determine if the game is any good.
Because the 360 is a DEDICATED games console AND it has a FAR more SUPERIOR GPU the PS3 GPU is trailing behind very badly and the devs still dont have the time or money to render all the visuals via software to make up for the lacking features in the PS3 GPU.
ALL 360 games will ALWAYS look better thats a fact of life deal with it.
Uh huh...So why does Oblivion look/run better on ps3?
Cartman it looks just slightly better, because they released the PS3 version a full year after the 360 version.
The 360 version came out together with the PC version. 360 hardware was known much shorter. If Oblivion was released for the 360 at the same time as the PS3 version, be sure the 360 version would look better again.
Some things have been patched, some shader models etc. for the 360, but overall some things can't be done by patching. That has to be done in basic coding.
Thus, that's why the PS3 version looks a tad better. Watch all other games that release at the same time or where the PS3 version had more time. ALL better on the 360.
Must ring a bell, somewhere...
Talking about making excuses. Why should we listen to anything you say Mart? You say that the excuse can't be used that "dev's have had 1 more year to work on the 360 than PS3" and then you turn around and say that the reason Oblivion looks and runs better on the PS3 is b/c they had an additional year to work on it. Typical fanboy response.
Isnt the whole thing with the 360 supposed to be that its easy to code for.
I thought that the 360 and the PC use the same tools.
Therefor I dont think your excuse holds any water.
If only all developers were are committed to the games as bethesda... the 360 version is sweet, its the one I own, but the framerate slows to like 2 fps sometimes, i swear to god
Whats the point of that site doing the comparisons? most people know the 360 is more powerful only Sony fanboys care to fight the fact.
PS3 versions of games need months of extra dev time to match or in some peoples eyes pass the 360 versions. Oblivion needed months of extra time to work out unfinished devopment that PS3 gained from and the 360 suffered from before the 360's graphical patch that is. WoW 1080p HD this and HD that was the pitch Sony sold.
If people keep doing this it will sink Sony I'm thinking this is actually reaching the casual masses and is hurting PS3. $600 and hearing this.
again 360 looks better!!!, i have ps3 but thinking of selling it for xbox elite.
i am tired of this always delayed ps3!!!!!!!!!!!
yesterday two updates for two most important games were delayed!!!!!!!!
it is too much sony!!!!!!!
i am leaving your family!!!
no more fcuking delays!!!, no more!!!
I traded in my ps3 for a 360 best thing i ever done! :)
I've actually thought about trading in mine lately. Since it just sits and doesn't do anything. But i'm really really looking forward to Heavenly Sword, Lair, and Final Fantasy. I know I would regret it.
to sell my 360, but nobody want it~ wanna trade ur ps3 to my 360???
I traded in my 360 for a Wii. Best move I ever did. I slowed Global warming by that much.
Not only that, you also (if somewhat negligible) helped in delaying Bill Gates' ruthless attempt to monopolize the video game industry the same way he did to the PC industry. So, cheers.
dude~ why somebody take out my bubbles? I'm offering to trade here... you are such a m0rr0n!
if you don't like ur ps3 then we can do trade here... I don't want my 360. but if you don't have one.. don't say you have it!
you are such a Dum8 @ss!
fanboyism is such a gays... buy it first before you said it, at least I bought 360 first... and I don't like it... so I wanna sell it... but nobody want it. if you need another one to play forza... this is good option. if you have stuck ps3... then I want one. I can pay extra, coz ps3 is more expensive than 360.
don't just take people's bubble out... you fanboys should learn some manner.
you niggas, never had ps3s.. stop bullshitting, i have both systems holla at me on xbox live i u need proof.. i'd trade my 360 for a ps3 in a heartbeat if i was dirt poor like you, but i wuld never in my right mind trade a ps3 for a 360.. i'd trade 2 wiis for a 360 and 3 for a ps3 but thats a different story
I laughed So hard when you just said 720p made graphical effects appear vs when it was on 1080i I dont think 1080i mode will darken the game yet still be washed out and faded. All PS3 games look faded washed out with limited color depth. Maybe i should put my set on 720p so unforseen lighting effect will appear and make my gaming that much more enjoyable on my HDTV.
AntiBots I didn't bother reading that link. Speaking of Fanboy you have the nerve to call me out with a user name like AntiBots. This is what you said and i Quote: i heard that the ps3 version in 1080i looks blurry for some reason. if ran in 720p it looks identical to the 360 version...
^^ did you even watch and or read the vids on the site i don't care what some fanboy typed i'm looking at the god dam vids!; one is washed out (not talking about detail) and one of them has inferior lighting effects. The game is suppose to be vibrant and saturated with Vegas light, in the PS3 version it looses some of the look and feel.
U Retarded son 720 won't magiclly add red reflective light on the charectors faces. You're the dumb ass fanboy putting your foot in your mouth.
Won't look the same no matter what you come up with the only thing that makes sense is the blurr and detail which wasn't what i was talking about thus the comment in respose of you bring up they how they look the same if PS3 was in 720p and me saying there is graphical effect missing in the PS3 version and the fidelity and vibrance does not match the 360 version do you understand?.
i quote "One strange and disappointing issue that we came across however is that though the game supports 1080i, it's quite blurry when played at that resolution. Forcing the system to run at 720p clears this issue right up though and everything looks quite crisp" here is the link read it your self... http://ps3.ign.com/articles... .
Maybe you should think twice before shoving your foot in your mouth and looking like a A$$ hole fanboy on N4G. i never said that 720p makes effects appear. thanx for trying to make ME look like a idiot ... fanboys are so low
EDIT: POG ok you said "I laughed So hard when you just said 720p made graphical effects appear" which i never said
ign says"Obviously, Rainbow Six: Vegas on the PlayStation 3 is mostly identical to what we saw on the Xbox 360
ign also says" From a technical standpoint, Ubisoft looks to have the title running identical to what we saw on the Xbox 360. It looks to us like some of the bloom effects and other filters aren't quite as abundant as they were on Microsoft's console....Once in the heat of the battle though, it looks about as good as we ever remember seeing it."
will 720p magiclly add red reflective light on the charectors faces, not if its already their just turned down
your might not be a fanboy but you had no reason to come at me like that, besides, these comparison videos are usualy [email protected]
antibots, autobots, gobots, oohhhh, your thinking xbots....thats just you being insecure
ps3 version looks good to me
since you act like you know so much about the technology why don't you explain to us how the 360 who can only do 8bit per pixel RGB has deeper colors than the PS3 who can do 10bit per pixel RGB?
Sony even calls this mode "deep color".
no wonder you have 1 bubble when everything that comes out of your mouth sounds ignorant and contrived.
...but it DEFINITELY looks about 8 months OLDER. ;)
I've been playing this game regularly since day-1....played it online for about 3 hours tonight, in fact. Sony fans who diss this game, because they somehow think the PS3 version deserved "more attention" or something, deserve every bad thing that comes their way. This game kicks ass.
Lot of people would go for Gears but to me no, Rainbow by far is the best FPS do date on next gen consoles. I know we have more on the horizon but when it comes to online play this game is simply unmatched.
EDIT it may look like sh!t on the PS3 but you PS3 fans should get it just on the gameplay alone and I hope it's online is as robust as Live because it simply is kick ass on live.
one console had better _____ and the other console had better _____ !
So which one's matters to you should guide you to the version you buy.
Ive had mine on 360 since its Launch and am not going to buy another! LoL
What would suprise me is if Sony were to pull somthing out of there hat other than Oblivion. Whats the score now? It's not even a close race, infact the PS3s car got turned around and is now going the wrong way.
nice, im not going to buy one tho lol
And this was delayed for how long. this is why im a 360 fan. there aint another console to be a fan of. wii and that other one no thanks. ill wait till later when u finally get those sicker higher deffer games, could be soon i hope
This is not good if PS3 keeps getting ports, but sadly that is prolly how it is going to be unless devs forget multiplatforms.
Why PS3 gets ports is because PC/360 are easier to dev to and currently gives the biggest sales to any multiplatform game. Therefore PS3 comes always last, devs needs extra time and the game does not sell as much due the lower user base.
Only some bigger devs can afford to make multiplatform titles from scratch to PS3 and there are not that many.
Ha, X360 fanboys do everything to make PS3 look bad. PS3 output has always been less saturated than the X360. Note: real life is not saturated! I hate it when people turn the saturation/vibrant colors up on their tv/monitors and make everything colorful. I don't trust fan made video comparison, furthermore this is poor quality.
Also, the differences are so minimal to make any real difference. It's not PS2 vs Xbox anymore. The differences are so minimal.
Wait for reviews to point out the real differences.
edit: Though I only have a PS3, I am usually pretty unbiased. I just can't stand fanboys BS anymore.
All I can say is my Ps3 I have right here looks crisp to me on all the games I have. I don't notice any 'blurry' or crappy textures or washed out colours. It looks sweet.
Having said that the 360 shots in this post look way better. Now I don't know if all these port comparisons are legit or not, but all I can say is, things look fine right here. I need to get my brother to bring his 360 over one day and do my own side by side.
I have always said that ATi is a better image than Nvidia and I still say that, but like I said, my $h!t looks crystal here.
Some shady $h!t going on here?
so i cant see a difference.
blame it on the programmers...
poor fellas, i bequeath to thee... a BOOT to the HEAD!
Rainbow 6 vegas Rocks!
this game really old now?
If it plays as well as the 360 version then you would be crazy not to buy it. It's great online, my friends and I have been playing it since it was released late last year. My main concern would be headset support as to get the most out of team games you need to be able to communicate with team members. If it's implemented well (i.e. not like Motorstorm's 2-player or F1CE's non-existent support) and the game plays as well as the 360 version then it's a no brainer.
how can it come out late and not look as good ?
how will DIRT compare ?