Approvals 11/3 ▼
djtek184 (1) - 5579d ago Cancel
Lord Anubis (4) - 5579d ago Cancel
BlackIceJoe (2) - 5579d ago Cancel
resistance100 (2) - 5579d ago Cancel
Spike47 (2) - 5579d ago Cancel
370°

Resistance 3: Modern Warfare in the works?

Mike Ferro writes,

"Resistance 2 is one of my favorite games of 2008 with its stellar online multiplayer mode. The game was highly anticipated and went on to sell over a million copies. There is a new rumor doing the rounds that Resistance 3 may follow in the footsteps of Call of Duty and do a re-imaging of the game to a more modern warfare setting.

There is word that some of the ideas that have been thrown around regarding the next installment of Resistance involve shifting the timeline to the present or near future."

Read Full Story >>
gamer.blorge.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

Spike475579d ago

although I doubt they are but either way the next resistance game will be awesome.

5579d ago
Danja5579d ago

atleast the dam game still has Co-op....so whats the fuss??

this game offers so much that you shouldn't really be b!tching because they choose to take a different approach by actually making seperate Co-Op mission/story outside of the main game..which other game does that..

ne ways R3 will be awesome but I doubt they will follow in COD4 foot-steps the setting goes well with the game and story , but it's possible

Cajun Chicken5579d ago

Nah, R2 should of really had Co-Op during the campaign. Me and a friend completed Resistance 1 together and I got him all excited to play Resistance 2 in co-op. But of course, we couldn't.
R1 had a VERY good co-op game, its a shame Insomniac removed it in R2. 'Bit of a backwards step, imo.

Cryos5579d ago

I agree with Lightning and Cajun,

I completed R1 with my brother in Co-op, and have had many many parties were we break out the game just to play a death match. Good times.

The removal of those features was definetely a step backward.
In fact, the move towards more online multiplayer instead of co-op split screen play is a step back for the industry in general, imo.

cereal_killa5579d ago

LightningPS3PS3 do you just copy and paste every comment that has to do with the PS3 needs a pay cut, needs a pay cut, now it's co op, co op ok we get it already.

LastDance5579d ago

im wit you guys...didnt end up playing resistence 2 because no coop in the main story.

Doppy5579d ago

Read my last Resistance post to see what they need to do with R3.

LJWooly5579d ago

If you really let the lack of Co-Op in the SP campaign put you off playing R2, then you are stupid.

The game gives you plenty of better reasons to not play it.

socomnick5579d ago

they need to end this horrible franchise its terrible.

WaitStation 35579d ago

@1.9 aka Socom

Just wait till R3

supahbad5579d ago

i bet you anything hale lives, and he is actually like half cloven and the 3rd game you are super hale killing everything in your way. ok maybe not but i still think he lives cause he is a cloven and that is why he and sheppard are the same because they both know the cloven are coming back to take the earth back

PirateThom5579d ago

Where's Alan Wake and Huxley?

Mozilla895579d ago

A few million people would probably disagree with you. Like maybe the people that bought the games.

Doppy5578d ago

@ socomnick

No n4g needs to end your account

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 5578d ago
KillzoneKid5579d ago

R2 is an awesome game

R3 will be even better

i love the 60 player comp matches and 8 player co-op of R2

just too addictive

N4360G5579d ago

I agree.Resistance 2 is the sh*t!!

I am loving the online co-op,and the single player campaign is epic!!

djtek1845579d ago

Nice. knowing Insomniac, they will get this done in no time.

SAiOSiN5579d ago

r3 will be announced q1 2010. you can quote me on that.

TheHater5579d ago

Everyone knows it is coming in 1010 :) Ratchet and Clank is coming this year from them :)

SinnedNogara5579d ago

I think they should make a longer storyline set in 1954--1962 storyline (a 12 hour campaign). I also think that weapons like the Hailstorm, Sapper, Arc Charger, and Splitter could return to replace the Bellock (it kinda sucks).

TheColbertinator5579d ago

I miss the Arc Charger :(

And I agree the bollock sucks

callahan095579d ago

Gotta know how to use it. You can launch a few flame rounds off surrounding an enemy and give them literally nowhere to go without having to run through the flames, catching on fire, and basically guaranteeing a kill. And if you actually hit them with one of the rounds, it's pretty much an instant death. There's a lot of useful applications for the weapon if you know what you're doing with it. It's hilarious watching people who aren't used to fighting against someone with the bellock, as they catch on fire and run away and think they've gotten away scott free, not realizing they're on fire until it's too late. They die and I get my XP and all is well haha.

Show all comments (55)
100°

7 Deserving Games That Never Got Backward Compatibility

Backward compatibility works for many games on newer consoles, but titles such as The Simpsons: Hit and Run have been left out.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community11h ago
80°

20 Best Survival Games of All Time

From base building to swinging willies, here are the best survival games around, which include a couple of less than obvious picks.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community12h ago
210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1d 7h ago
XiNatsuDragnel2d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga1d 5h ago (Edited 1d 5h ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow1d 23h ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo1821d 4h ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie18h ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

13h ago
Hereandthere9h ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 9h ago
Notellin14h ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

13h ago
Hereandthere9h ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Hereandthere9h ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

OtterX1d 7h ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

RNTody1d 6h ago (Edited 1d 6h ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno1d 5h ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Sheppard7t31d 4h ago

How did Sony kill the series?

Inverno1d 3h ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

13h ago
fsfsxii14h ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno13h ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (26)