490°

European Commission responds to perceived bias in Microsoft-Activision merger

European Commission Deputy Head draws ire for public comments regarding the Microsoft-Activision merger, but he is not involved in the merger unit.

Read Full Story >>
tweaktown.com
Orchard531d ago

I don't think it matters if he is involved with the unit or not - he will likely have contact with said people.

He has single handedly just handed Microsoft their biggest legal defense against any decision by the EU commission that they are not happy with. They will just point towards this guy and say "Look, the case was already decided before they'd even reviewed any evidence".

Nacho_Z531d ago

Microsoft can point to him all they want but it'd be pointed out to them, as it is multiple times in the article, that he has absolutely nothing to do with it.

sparky77531d ago

It doesn't matter he could still have influenced people who are part of the decision process.

Orchard531d ago

That's now how courts work. He is an employee of the same organization, and has direct contact with members who are undertaking this review.

"My Playstation" shows bias, and he's already stated the outcome of a case before the investigation occurs by stating "working to ensure that you will still be able to play Call of Duty on other consoles".

He's just handed Microsoft a huge win. Wonder how much they paid him for that :P

Lifexline530d ago

Lol clearly you are uneducated about the law. Orchard is right if the EU rejects it they can use this as one of their bullet points to appeal the decision. Why do you think usually organizations don’t make public comments when an investigation is happening. Which is why I said the EU commission clearly is wanting attention.

Christopher530d ago

***That's now how courts work. He is an employee of the same organization, and has direct contact with members who are undertaking this review.****

Perhaps you don't understand. They made statements to ensure that doesn't happen by noting his detachment from the process entirely. With their public comments saying he isn't involved, Microsoft would now have to prove his involvement since it was addressed prior to arguments and decisions.

Lifexline530d ago

@above that is not how it works in real life. If you work for an organization every single employee represents the company. That’s why companies have policies for all their employees. Because they know every single person they hire represents them. Which is why there is a vetting process to getting hired. Look at other cases in law.

Orchard is correct this could potentially help them if the outcome is unfavorable he is stating facts. People need to learn about the law and how it applies to companies and it’s employees. Anyone with a job knows this when you work for a company if you do something wrong you can put the company at risk for a lawsuit and getting yourself fired in the process. That’s why I’m surprised the EU employees are being so vocal. When other agencies around the world aren’t.

Christopher530d ago

*** that is not how it works in real life. If you work for an organization every single employee represents the company. ***

I love the logic of this.

Random employee goes on Twitter to say something. Now, for all eternity, that employee comment is now going to allow others to question all things for that company.

That's not how that works. Companies respond to the validity of the comments of employees all the time and evidence must be presented to invalidate those responses. What you might be confusing here is public opinion, but legally that's not how it works.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 530d ago
sparky77531d ago

Yep I can't see it getting blocked after this, since the appeal process could make the entire commission look like a joke and could cause companies like Facebook to call their bias into question too.

Orchard531d ago

Yeah, this could open a huge can of worms for all the other things they've ruled upon in the past.

Nacho_Z531d ago

You're dreaming Orchard. Just because you desperately want it to be the case doesn't mean it is.

Orchard531d ago (Edited 531d ago )

Nothing to desperately want at all. I've been clear time and time again that I think this deal should (and will) go through - and COD should (and will) stay on PS.

darkrider531d ago

Give it a rest. Is opinion is well know here. He will always defend Microsoft at any cost. Even in taking games that for decades were played by millions of sony gamers and still are. From a company that just can't compete in videogaming. Can't create amazing games, well let's buy they all. It's OK.

This deal shouldn't never go through if he was gamer. Never. No gamers wants to take games from other gamers. No matter if it was Sony or Nintendo. Buying huge publisher to force gamers in to trash services... What's next when this deal doesn't work? Well for a trillion dollar company the answer is easy. Another publisher and another.

sinspirit530d ago

They really think that a potentially biased or influential person means the ruling would benefit MS.. not how it works. You don't get to point out someone's bias and the judge just goes, "yeah I guess, that must mean we should ignore facts and proper review and the damages to the market when this entity would be purchased".

Redemption-64531d ago

You and your ilk are so ill informed it's laughable.

Crows90531d ago

Cod won't stay on PlayStation. The only thing in writings states a certain amount of time

Orchard531d ago

Minecraft is still on PS.
Destiny 2 is still on Xbox.

It’s not impossible that COD stays on PS - they’d also be giving up a lot of revenue if they remove it.

I expect it to stay on PS - but Xbox and/or GamePass players will get perks.

1Victor531d ago

Let’s grab our pitch forks and torches a dude on a different department of the European Commission said "The Commission is working to ensure that you will still be able to play Call of Duty on other consoles (including my PlayStation)" let us all rage because HE POINTED OUT HE HAVE A PLAYSTATION 🤦🏿.
RAAAGEEEEEEEE AND INDIGNATION 😱

neutralgamer1992531d ago

Forget about all of that we just don't want any console maker to acquire these publishers. I don't think that's hard to understand. Ms got Bethesda and made their games exclusives now so they can say "games will be available on other platforms all they want but reality is once any deal goes through Ms has all the power"

What's amazing to me is how many Xbox gamers want this deal to go through and don't see the negatives or the long term ramifications of this deal. If you are a gamer and you support any console maker to acquire publishers than you aren't being a neutral gamer

Gamingsince1981531d ago

They don't see the negatives because they think this will help Xbox finally get second place instead of third I guess. Also they wouldn't care what games playstation gets because they only use xbox.

The3faces530d ago

I agree with you to a certain extent but no matter how you do it the end result is the same., whether you buy a publisher or you make third party deals for exclusivity it keeps games off every platform and it's wrong. MS and Sony are guilty.

531d ago
531d ago
tay8701531d ago

nah he didnt hand him any ammo. If MS wants
this to cross the finish line, they will have to put it in writing that it will stay on PS permanently and release day and date. not some half ass vague statements. they havent put it in writing because they dont want that. they want to try and force new players into the xbox eco system.

Crows90530d ago

"Minecraft is still on PS.
Destiny 2 is still on Xbox.

It’s not impossible that COD stays on PS - they’d also be giving up a lot of revenue if they remove it."

Theyd be giving up a lot of attachment rate to gamepass if they dont remove it. Eventually it will be more lucrative for them. Especially once they get back the money they spent.

Minecraft is not a core experience for consoles. Ive never played it for one. Bungie only just got purchased by sony and there was clear communication that the game would stay multiplatform.

There hasnt been this clear communication at all regarding Call of Duty. We also know much more details about the ActiBlizzard deal than those others. We know they sent a letter agreeing to a certain period. We know they purposefully left out any language that it would continue to stay afterward. We also know that despite phil saying it will stay...nothing in writing has guaranteed that...why dont they want to do that? One possible answer.

Extermin8or3_530d ago

There's no legal case there. You'd have to prove he had any involvement or influence which would be basically impossible. Plus remember the eu couets do as the commission wants- almost always.

zarbor530d ago

Yup. You are correct. No matter how much he or they try to explain, he's tainted and open the possibilty of bias.

dumahim530d ago

I work for a company. People here make decisions regarding the type of toilet paper they buy. Do you think, just because I work for the same company and can contact them, that I have any influence over the type of toilet paper they buy?
Spoiler...

I don't.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 530d ago
XiNatsuDragnel531d ago (Edited 531d ago )

Hopefully European commission does block this, or on the condition that Activision sells Blizzard, Crash and Spyro, and most of IPs to other companies or form a side company to house these IP in as a consequence for this huge purchase but nah that ain't reality.

531d ago Replies(2)
SPEAKxTHExTRUTH531d ago (Edited 531d ago )

It’s a bad look for the EU commission no matter how people try to spin it. This can definitely play into MS’s favor if this guy is legit.

1Victor531d ago

Next we will see a comment from the janitor and be all rage and indignation because he can influence the decision by cleaning their office 🤣

SPEAKxTHExTRUTH531d ago

What a dumb comment. You’re comparing a janitor to someone who works in the EU commission in some degree? His comment comes off bias simple because of his position and he could potentially sway people who DO work on the commission. It’s just a bad look and a comment he should have kept to himself.

Gamingsince1981531d ago

I hope he does sway people, no one but fanboys want this deal going through, no one can think it's a good idea for MS to own pretty much everything.

SPEAKxTHExTRUTH531d ago

And only a fanboy would care if this deal goes through or not. I personally couldn’t careless

Gamingsince1981530d ago

@speak

Nope, only a fan of gaming wouldn't want it going through, nothing good can come from MS owning everything, it just seems you're an xbox fanboy pretending not to be. I know im neutral in the console wars because I don't even own a playstation 5 or xbox, I only have a pc, but I still see the big picture like a lot of others do.

Even stevie wonder can see MS is bad for gaming and MS having a monopoly in gaming is about as bad as a scenario as you can get.

531d ago Replies(1)
1Victor531d ago (Edited 531d ago )

How is my comment any dumbe compared to both your above and bellow my 🤷🏿 at least the janitor got a better chance than someone who is not even close to the people ……… you know what the point is that this is the epitome of grasping at straws for people like you trying to find a excuse and cry out IT WAS BIASED if the merger don’t get approved 😩

531d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 530d ago
ActualEngineer531d ago

The gaming community's response on this case is a prime example of how childlike, immature and immoral most gamers are; how out of touch, unknowledgable and two-sided they can be and how entitled they can feel.

Activision Blizzard is a company facing an internal collapse, bleeding talent and facing legal trouble from it's employees. With a board of directors that can not assess the situation properly and fix the company's internal problems and their game quality (especially blizzard) has been on a sharp decline compared to what they could have been.

Most franchises, on the other hand, are being bled to death and communities like WOW are starting to die.

Yet, despite microsoft being able to fix the internal problems and aliviate the stress between management and employes, gamers choose to attack the acquisition that could actually save the company. The acquisition that could possibly save and bring back the life to World of Watctaft, diablo, overwatch 2, Tony Hawk etc etc.

It is beyond me, as such, to think that someone can be so small as to ignore the actual death that is lurking around Activision's ip's corner, so that he can still play call of duty in that single console of his.

rippermcrip531d ago

First of all you're being dramatic about the state of their games.

Secondly, name a single franchise that Microsoft has ever taken over and saved? The truth is the opposite. Games they've taken over generally go down hill.

Gamingsince1981531d ago

What a wall of text for nothing, take a look at all the things MS has done with the companies they acquire, none turn out fine, I would rather EA bought Activeblizzard than MS.

SPEAKxTHExTRUTH531d ago

How is MS in the position that they are in today if everything they do is wrong? Lol clearly people at MS know more about how to run’s business than you do.

SurgicalMenace530d ago

They're good at making Operating Systems, but their gaming division has never turned a profit since its inception. That should explain things clearly enough. To be fair, they don't have the best track record when asked to create anything outside of systems and controllers. All these big acquisitions only help to illustrate their deseration in the industry that you're so convince they know so much about. Owning an XB every generation has given me 1st hand experience of their lack of effort and I wouldn't trust them with any company at this point.

sinspirit530d ago

@SurgicalMenace

Well I wouldn't say good. They simply came into a booming market at the exact right moment. Windows has notoriously had terrible OS's with anfew good ones in there. But, they just keep having strange issues and updates mess up features and drivers all the time. Their console OS has been more heavy weight than others in the past, not sure how bloated it is this gen. They're really not as talented as their revenue will tell.

@SPEAKxTHExTRUTH

It's not because their console itself got them there. Any other business would have bailed from how long it took XBox to finally profit. You don't need to have business skills to point out their mismanagement of developers, games, and consoles. We see developers go downhill, shutdown, restricted, forced to work on projects they don't want, and we have the most notorious hardware failure rate ever under their management. Don't bring up tired arguments like that. It's just a petty way to try and end an argument when you have nothing to argue your side.

staticall530d ago

Sorry, but a lot of what you've said can be applied to Microsoft as well, especially this part: «With a board of directors that can not assess the situation properly and fix the company's internal problems and their game quality».
343 Industries wasting $500 million dollars on Halo Infinite (and releasing awful 4 and 5 beforehand) and all we got is infinite problems and delays. What's the excuse? It's a studio created by Microsoft, isn't it?
The Coalition and Perfect Dark hiatus, so they had to hire another studio to develop the game together. Doesn't that scream "internal problems"?
And for that Microsoft turned Rare into, they should have a special cauldron in hell.

The only studio i can think of that's doing it's job great is Forza developers. And i wouldn't say this has anything to do with Microsoft or their "help".

Microsoft has 23 game development studios (according to their own official Xbox website) and what they got to show for it? And before you say, Sony has 19 game development studios and they release hit after hit. So Sony has less quantity and more quality. Microsoft has no excuses. So please, stop acting like they're some sort of savior.

darkrider530d ago

Microsoft can't even fix their own studios, much less tons more of studios...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 530d ago
Show all comments (69)
270°

Steam’s Refund Policy Change Won’t Affect You Unless You’re A Lowlife

Steam is changing its refund policy, but you probably won’t be affected

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
thorstein17h ago

Should have happened a long time ago. People wanting refunds after 50 hours in game.

fsfsxii13h ago

Pc gamers will take this as an excuse to pirate things

KyRo13h ago

I'm not sure why you're getting disgrees. Whilst not all PC gamers are petty, an awful lot of them are lol

Crows9013h ago

Entirely untrue. Not any more petty than console gamers. The only large difference is console gamers don't have much of a choice.

Michiel19894h ago

Not sure why you're getting agrees. an awful lot of console gamers are overemotional twinks ready to go to war over a plastic box, I'll take being a pc gamer then.

Speaking about overgeneralizing much.

qalpha13h ago

Daily reminder that 'TheGamer' is a corporate-generated, anti-gamer, anti-consumer, clickbait web site. They are mostly A.I. generated articles that villainize gamers. They provide nothing positive and actively try to provoke and divide the community through extreme view points and politics. Do not give them any clicks.

Inverno13h ago

Only scumbags? As if people don't play their games on console put in the most amount of hours and return it to GameStop and trade it in for another game. But also how many people are actually do this? And what games have been allowed to be refunded?

DustMan13h ago

You can refund any game you've purchased as long as it hasn't been longer than two weeks, and you've played less than 2 hours. I wish they would change it to 3 hours because some RPG's have so much exposition that you may only get an hour total of complete gameplay. That's my only knock on it. I've refunded plenty of stuff I was just curious to try. I typically stay away from Early Access titles which are the only ones affected by this policy change.

Inverno12h ago

Apparently early access doesn't count, only complete games with a play early preorder bonus.

Gaming4Life198113h ago

I definitely know if I want a refund in 2 hours.

SegaSaturn6694h ago

I never liked refunding anything. Even if a film is bad, i dont want my money back. Sometimes things just aren't for me, and it's not the creator's fault necessarily.

Show all comments (13)
110°

Outriders Dev's Next Game Has Been Canceled After Publishing Agreement With Take-Two Fell Through

Outriders developer People Can Fly's next game has been canceled after its publishing agreement with Take-Two Interactive fell through.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Tacoboto2d ago

"the capital group of PCF Group S.A."

If you're getting funding from a group that needs two different ways of Acronyming itself, things will not go the way you want them to.

banger882d ago

If it was more online-only crap then good riddance.

jjb19811d 16h ago

Outriders was crap. They slapped that game together and threw in a loot system to get players' attention. This game was absolutely jank and the always online nonsense made it stutter like crazy. People Can't Optimize.

thorstein1d 15h ago

I liked Outriders but I could see where the artistic vision was compromised. The way the industry is now, it wouldn't surprise me that upper management would scrap something that didn't pull in money via gaas, mts, or other means.

290°

Microsoft’s Surface and Xbox hardware revenues take a big hit in Q3

Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
darthv722d ago

Xbox content + services up 62% while hardware down 31%... seems about right with the way they tout you don't need the hardware to play. People can play on their phones or smart tv or other means. I don't hardly play on my consoles directly since getting devices like the logitech g-cloud and ps portal. Which is to also say I have been playing more digital than physical because of these devices.

solideagle1d 20h ago

you should apply in MS PR team buddy, I think you will do a great job in my humble opinion :)

Sonic18811d 18h ago

I thought darthv72 and Obscure_Observer already work for Microsoft 🤔

dveio1d 17h ago

MS: "Xbox services and content without AB up 1%, with AB up 62%. Hardware down 31%. In total a loss of 350 mill."

darthv72: "Seems about right."

MS: "Excuse m ..."

darthv72: "I don't hardly play on my consoles directly."

MS:

Lightning771d 13h ago

What he said was facts. How he plays games is no concern of you. Don't get too mad about it.

Cacabunga1d 20h ago

I can tell people like you are an absolute minority..

If service is up means their fans and fanboys accepted this model and subscribed to it. The near future you will see a big decline because the service is saturated.

darthv721d 6h ago

to you it may seem like the minority... but your bubble is shrinking because more and more are following suit. convenience is a hell of a drug and its also why physical sales only amount to 30% of overall game sales. times are changing, you either get with them or you get left behind.

neutralgamer19921d 1h ago

Darth

30% physical sales: yet Phil and xbox division are in a rush go give up on that 30%. they don't have any right to give up any piece of the pie since the control such a little of the pie to begin with

also, the market is clearly speaking that the model Xbox is pushing isn't working right now the keyword being right now. you are right about freedom to play anywhere so i hope they put their games on steam

shinoff21831d 19h ago

But that's been ms for years. When things aren't going their way they try to change the way things are said. For instance console sales are down, they stop telling how many sold instead telling us how many hours spent in halo or headshots. So it makes sense console sales down just say people are playing on more devices then previous. What they won't say is how many xbox players jumped ship to ps5.

Cacabunga1d 18h ago

Hardware sales are so bad that Sony and Nintendo are blowing the sales off the water with their hardware.

If Xbox are losers, others aren’t..
Xbox already tried everything with Xbox live then subscriptions went down so much that they had to find something else. Their fans subscribed then reached saturation rather quickly.

Hardware and exclusive games is where it’s at! Keep gamers excited, announce decent software and people will support you

itsmebryan1d 14h ago

@shin
Well keep it simple Sony 's operating income is down 26% and Microsoft's is up 32%. No MS spin there, just facts. 😉
Cheers

S2Killinit1d 7h ago

MS is after diminishing consoles as a medium. They want to destroy this market because they couldnt win. MS’s vision is to dissolve console gaming.

romulus231d 13h ago

Odd that a company that touts you dont need the hardware to play is already touting another console in the works.

darthv721d 12h ago

They are not reliant on the HW but still want to maintain a presence (no matter how small) is a good thing. It shows commitment to the craft. It reminds me of SNK and how they made games for their own hardware (Neo Geo) while also making them for others because they knew there was a market to do so. They knew they would sell more to others but also sell to their own niche fan base.

TheEroica1d 6h ago (Edited 1d 6h ago )

Perfectly reasonable post down voted by insecure corporation friendly folk.... But not gamers. Real gamer want accessibility and ease of acquisition for all.... Company shills are the only ones still telling us that hardware locking people from games is good for us.

Chevalier1d 1h ago

@Darth

You should stop parroting metrics like an idiot without context.

"Xbox content and services revenue grew 62% in Q3 from a year earlier, “driven by 61 points of net impact” from the purchase of the third-party video game giant, Microsoft said."

61 of the 62% was from their merger so net increase is ONLY 1%

https://www.mesaonline.org/...

itsmebryan16h ago

@chevalier

It looks like made a great purchase. Much better then Sony buying Bungie. 😉
Cheers

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 16h ago
purple1011d 23h ago

Xbox hardware revenue tanks to lowest point of Xbox Series generation

Profchaos1d 22h ago

I'm not surprised surface is struggling they aren't relevant anymore

DOMination-1d 12h ago

In the last two years they've started exiting the consumer market altogether. All of the newest Surface products are business models only. They can't seem to work out what they want to do with it.

XBManiac1d 21h ago

Too expensive hardware when others offer the same or more for less? Good work, Green Team.

SimpleDad1d 21h ago (Edited 1d 21h ago )

"Despite some early successes for Xbox games on rival platforms, Xbox hardware is down by a massive 31 percent this quarter."
"Without Activision Blizzard, Microsoft’s overall gaming revenue would have actually declined this quarter."
"Xbox content and services would have only been up a single percent without Activision Blizzard..."
"It looks like next quarter is going to be a similar story for gaming at Microsoft, too."

That is crazy... so A/B/K is carrying the whole Xbox gaming.
Oh and Microsoft will be fine. Windows, Office and Cloud are growing with each pc purchase.

purple1011d 21h ago

Activision: "we gonna need a bigger rucksack/backpack please"

Microsoft: "why's that"

Activision: "to carry yo' weak ass'

Profchaos1d 20h ago (Edited 1d 20h ago )

Top brass have also wanted to start seeing returns on the 100 billion they have put into various Xbox related moves so seeing more multiplatform games is highly likely especially from abk

It's basically saying that PlayStation is the reason Xbox is afloat right now thinks to Ps5 versions of COD

Kornholic1d 19h ago

So basically PS and PC gamers' money is keeping Xbox on life support.

MrDead1d 12h ago

The only growth MS will get out of the console industry is if it supports it's rivals platforms. Xbox is a pointless machine now. I can see them on a big push for live next, and they won't give up on trying to buy Steam.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 12h ago
Show all comments (46)