460°

Diablo 4 is in development, and it started as a Souls-like

An in-depth report suggests that Diablo IV has had a fraught development, but it's on the way.

Read Full Story >>
pcgamesn.com
Jimboms2402d ago

I would have been so into that!

Seraphim2400d ago

as a spin off or something in the Diablo world I don't have a problem with that. Matter of fact it might be interesting if they pulled it off. As a mainline game, absolutely not.

In all honesty though I think Blizzard really nailed it with Diablo 3. Simply following that formula, making some improvements, perhaps a few tweaks/additions is really all that's required. Long as the level design is solid, game play is similar, etc. To date Diablo 3 is still a game I can pick up at any time and thoroughly enjoy. It's combat, world, classes, drops, goblins, Rifts, Paragon system, Seasons, everything about D3 makes it just a great game. Though I definitely wish there was more map to play and more classes to level up. So far, since release on PS4 I've replayed D3 and went on to play with every class except Demon Hunter and Necro so far. Next time I pick the game up or have time to kill I'll likely knock one or both those classes out. Forget exactly where I'm at and I know it;s low compared to many who've played D3 but I have something like 400 Paragon if I recall. For me a game is completed and that's pretty much it. Maybe stick around for a few trophies or the platinum if I'm enjoying it but overall once it's done, it's done Replaying or going back to a game is incredibly rare for several reasons. So for Diablo to continuously engage me when I have the time or desire to go back and continue to do so year after year really says something; at least to me.

2400d ago
TekoIie2400d ago

@ButtAnihilator

"At this point you'd want some exciting changes to the series, instead of just more of the same."

A mobile version good enough?

Sirk7x2399d ago

I would like a return to a more Gothic artstyle with Diablo 4, akin to 2. D3 was a very fun game, but it just felt too happy/colorful for the setting. Don't get me wrong, I have nothing wrong with colorful games, as I play tons of Nintendo games. It just didn't feel right.

2400d ago Replies(7)
Muzikguy2399d ago (Edited 2399d ago )

No way. I think this would have turned more people away. I definitely wouldn't want it. Not as a main game. I'd like to see more like Diablo 2 again. I really think 3 messed up big time coming off the success of 2

lelo2play2402d ago (Edited 2402d ago )

Thank God they didn't follow Dark Souls. To be stressed out simply by playing a game is not for me.
I'm no masochist... I play games to have fun.

Felix_Argyle_Catbro2402d ago (Edited 2402d ago )

Sometimes you must put in the effort to learn to play.

lelo2play2402d ago

Simply don't like the game. I find the gameplay clunky as hell and stressful.
I remember playing Dark Souls where I killed all the enemies at a section to reach the boss, after being killed by the boss, i had to repeat the whole section, killing the same enemies to reach the boss again... after that, I knew the game wasn't for me.
Like I said, I play games to have fun. Daily life stress is more then enough for me, don't need a game to increase it.

Lexreborn22400d ago

@lelo2play that’s how we used to play games in the old days. Mega mans a prime example... or Mario.... or donkey Kong.... or any game when you didn’t have save states

patrickman2402d ago

Is it really that hard for you? I had fun with both Dark Souls and Diablo though.

Yui_Suzumiya2400d ago

In Demon's Souls I got to the first few skeleton enemies after the tutorial area and that was as far as I could get. I began gaming in 1990 on the NES as well.

I_am_Batman2401d ago (Edited 2401d ago )

"I remember playing Dark Souls where I killed all the enemies at a section to reach the boss, after being killed by the boss, i had to repeat the whole section, killing the same enemies to reach the boss again... after that, I knew the game wasn't for me."

That's why you open up shortcuts, learn enemy patterns and memorize the level design. That's a huge part of what makes these games so rewarding. Going through a new area you are supposed to learn about those things. When you come back the things that seemed hard the first time are going to be much easier when you are paying attention. Also most of the time you aren't required to clear an area out at all.

lelo2play2401d ago (Edited 2401d ago )

No thanks. I tried it and simply don't like the game. End of story.

Ricegum2400d ago

Lelo

No need to be rude bud.

pyroxxx2400d ago

you can also run to the boss most of the time, but game can be kinda pain in the ass,.. especially DKS1,.. where you need all the armors for one stupid trophy,.. and on NG+ or ++ it gets some things get really stupidly hard (Orstein &Smough fight with killing fatty first to get the other armor)

I_am_Batman2400d ago

That's fine. I'm not trying to convince you. I was just debunking your argument that you have to be a masochist to enjoy these games. I don't want people that never tried these games to read your comment and think that the game is stressful by design or you have to grind your way through hordes of enemies every time you die to achieve progress.

lelo2play2400d ago

Quite frankly, that's how this game feels to me. If they just added a save-point before the boss, that would improve the game so much more.
The way it's made, it just feels like a waste of time repeating the same section (killing dozens of enemies) over and over until you beat the boss.

Dragonscale2400d ago

Adding a save point just before a boss would be pointless. If you don't like the souls games fine, just play something else. Obviously the games aren't for you.

KTF262400d ago

You don't have to kill all enemies
run away until you reach the boss is a good strategy in dark souls

ninsigma2400d ago

" gameplay clunky as hell"
"I killed all the enemies at a section to reach the boss, after being killed by the boss, i had to repeat the whole section, killing the same enemies to reach the boss again"

That's exactly why I didn't like demon souls. Did not enjoy the gameplay. Died. Had to do it all again. Turned it off. It's not the difficulty that I had a problem with or even having to fight the enemies again, it was the having to go through that clunky combat again. I played bloodborne and I loved it because the gameplay was far better. Never had a problem of having to fight the enemies again and again because I found the combat far more fun. Dark souls 3 is the same. Much improved gameplay in 3 over the previous souls games.

MoshA2400d ago

I love that about dark souls. Puts casuals off thinking the game is psychopathic or something. Easily worth enduring all that just for the soundtrack.

TheGoodestBoi2400d ago

Not sure why you're getting so many disagrees. Diablo should just stick to being Diablo

2400d ago
jznrpg2400d ago

Masochist ? I’d say impatient and not willing to pay attention enough to figure out the obvious patterns. Souls games aren’t hard like most people make them out to be, you just have to pay attention and not try to button mash your way through. And you can always summon help which makes it way easier

william_cade2400d ago

In my opinion Souls-Borne games are some of the best and most fun games out there. Bloodborne and DS3 are mechanically beautiful.

Psychotica2400d ago

The feeling of accomplishment is the fun..

2400d ago
JesusBuiltmyHotrod2400d ago

Such a dumb comment i'm no Masochist and love souls, geta clue.

Imalwaysright2400d ago

Whole section? When I was a kid if we saw the game over screen we had to start from the beggining and in those days games weren't just difficult, they were also unfair.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 2400d ago
Relientk772402d ago

It should be like Diablo, not Souls. Blizzard better not screw this game up dammit, already been waiting years for Diablo 4.

sinspirit2400d ago

They really could fit a lot of Diablo elements into a mix of Souls and Dragons Dogma type games, but it would be silly to do this with the main series name.

2400d ago
Show all comments (58)
80°

Diablo 4 Year 2 Anniversary event with free goodies confirmed for Blizzard’s ARPG

Blizzard’s Diablo 4 is almost two years old with the game’s upcoming anniversary taking place on June 5, 2025. While no official announcement has been made from Blizzard about its contents, the ARPG developer is releasing a new event for the game’s second anniversary.

Retroman15d ago (Edited 15d ago )

Was interested in purchasing Diablo 4 but after watching 10 hour video on YouTube changed my mind . Too many cut scenes than gameplay actions, I want to play the game Not watch mini movie in a game LoL 🤣🤣🤣

wesnytsfs15d ago

Would be nice if they put the expansion on Game pass.

15d ago
210°

Diablo 4's Berserk Crossover DLC Costs an Insane $150

And there's no bundle

Read Full Story >>
pushsquare.com
Lionsguard41d ago

Remember Oblivion horse armor everyone? Good times good times.

gigoran841d ago

I remember when they were testing the waters with paid DLC and people were screaming to not buy them so that companies would get the idea that we didn't want to pay for unfinished games. Gamers didn't listen, now the game companies are lapping it up.

Xristo41d ago

The Oblivion horse armor may have been the beginning of cosmetics however, the WoW Celestial Mount takes the cake for setting us up for the present day. That mount made more money for Blizzard than the whole Starcraft 2 franchise. Just sad and crazy.

Michiel198941d ago

horse armor wasn't the first mtx, far from it.

PRIMORDUS41d ago

Nope cause I torrented that game and the horse DLC lol

tombfan41d ago

When did we lost the ability to see COSMETICS on game stores at just $3 DLLs...

anast41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

It's Diablo Immortal: Re-skinned, the Orca edition.

Michiel198941d ago

at least be right for once...diablo immortal is D3 reskinned.....
You are always the most opiniated on games you haven't played and don't know a single thing about.

anast41d ago

Hi Mich. Good to see you are kind of doing okay. You still have this fascination with imaginary omnipotence, but at least we are getting somewhere.

Michiel198941d ago

you recovered from the iceberg?

Show all comments (18)
90°

Diablo 4 devs state game’s hated roadmap is incomplete, promise “good surprises” are coming

Speaking to fans on Twitter, Blizzard director of social and content marketing Adan Fketcher explained that the roadmap fans have been given is incomplete. While the roadmap does include some of the additions coming to the ARPG, there’s also more that the studio has yet to reveal.

AndrewM68d ago

Sorry I picked up Poe 2 last week, and it is way better than your game will ever be.

anast68d ago (Edited 68d ago )

They should have taken their time and made a good game instead of panicking after the Immortal "Don't you have phones?" fallout.

Michiel198968d ago

it already took them a decade, not sure how much more time they need

anast68d ago

They hadn't worked on it for a decade: "instead of panicking after the Immortal "Don't you have phones?" fallout."

CrimsonWing6967d ago

I haven’t beaten Diablo 4, but from the time I’ve spent I really loved it. What is it that people hate about it?

anast67d ago

The builds are too basic and the end game is not good, which is fine if they went the Diablo 2 route, but unlike D2 the build complexity really isn't there — the lack of tend game quality and the lack of build complexity is a recipe for suck in the ARPG space.

41d ago