410°
6.8

Mirror's Edge Catalyst Review - IGN

The staples of Mirror's Edge remain refreshing, but Catalyst's attempts to keep up with the open-world Joneses don't always jive with its design strengths.

LucasRuinedChildhood2899d ago

Oh wow. I think this kind of shows that it's not always a good idea to shoehorn open-world into everything. That being said, the traversal (especially with the grappling hook) looks really good. Not enthused by the combat though.

Erik73572899d ago (Edited 2899d ago )

I mean from the review its apparently fun to parkour around the city....only bad part is the story really....

But hey we are in a society that only looks at numbers and somehow think that a magical number should make them view art in a different way

LucasRuinedChildhood2899d ago

No. He mentioned additional problems besides the story: he said that the city is bland, that the tasks can become very repetitive, that the graphics are muddled, that there's some weird design decisions (collectibles) and that combat needs work. You have selective memory. If you're implying that I only looked at the number, well, that's just not true.

ginsunuva2898d ago

We get what you're trying to say, but we're not even talking about the score.

I mean clearly the combat sucks.

Plagasx2899d ago (Edited 2899d ago )

Wow... seriously disappointing.

nX2898d ago

At this point I've actually expected nothing else from DICE. Apart from the fact that they had to rush out Battlefront last year, most of their staff is probably working full-time on BF1. This is just EA more or less "giving people what they want".

Shubhendu_Singh2899d ago (Edited 2899d ago )

What the...poor Mirrors Edge.

I was even surprised EA greenlighted MEdge sequel seeing how the original was so loved but didn't sold that well. Now I can pretty much guess EA would never take a risk like that again, which is such a huge loss for us gamers. I loved original ME, lets see if I like ME:C or not.

@vickers500; I'm picking it too in a sale. But my point was, that this will further discourage EA to let their developers make games they really want to. I'm guessing DICE must have faced a hard time convincing EA top guys for letting them make this.

vickers5002899d ago

I dont care what IGN says, I'm getting it. Most reviews I'm seeing are 7s and 8s, and given that a large portion of "game journalists" are the types to give 8s, 9s and 10s to every cod, I don't really trust their opinions either, most low scores will probably be the result of these people being disappointed there isn't any guns or shooting in the game. Just like the first one.

I played the alpha, it was good. Not cancelling my pre order, and I suggest anyone who liked the first one not let these good scores (7s and 8s are good) affect their decision to purchase it.

annoyedgamer2899d ago

Or maybe EA ruined the game? You really think EA cares about artistic integrity? One look at this sequel and I can see their footprint all over it.

Zorkaz2899d ago

I with you on this one. In fact, although IGN have a point, I think it was important for the game to have an open world. Besides, it's a quasi unique genre, and the closest to first person open world freerunning we have so far is Dying Light (in which the freerunning was honestly quite disappointing). Whatever the case, there's very little they'll be able to do to stop me from loving it ...

georeo2898d ago

"I don't care what ign say's" lol. But, if they had gave it a higher score, you would of been happy! So, just play game's, and stay off a review site, just because your game didn't get outstanding review's.

Salooh2898d ago (Edited 2898d ago )

I am expecting 8/10 if it's not challenging. If challenging like the first game than i am sure that it will be 8.5+ for me.

IGN gave the first 7.4 and it was faaar from that score in my experience.

vickers5002898d ago

@georeo

Actually no, it wouldn't have made a bit of difference whether they gave it an amazing review or not. Truthfully, I didnt read IGNs review, I've actually been staying away from that site all together.

I just figured I'd encourage those who DO care about their reviews to not let this sway their opinion, and to not forget that the first Mirrors Edge had similar review scores. And it's due to the fact that most reviewers simply don't like a game all about parkour with no shooting. There's a lot more reason to not respect IGNs reviews specifically, but I wont go into that here.

@annoyedgamer

They cared enough to keep shooting out of it, I'd say that's a safe enough bet that the artistic integrity has been kept mostly intact.

This game would never have received 9s and 10s, the gameplay is a tad to niche for that to happen, especially in an industry where if you have a first person game, people are going to expect pew pew, bang bang.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2898d ago
Erik73572899d ago (Edited 2899d ago )

Stop looking at numbers dude, like this is what is ruining gaming are these stupid scores.

Play the game and enjoy it!
Don't listen to what some guy has to say for it, especially ign!

Naughty_Cloud2898d ago

People listen to sites like IGN, because they are on a tight budget, and want to know if its money well spent. A little research goes a long way. But if u are fan of a particular franchise, then that's a different matter.

Relientk772899d ago

Well guess I'm waiting for it to get cheaper, just like the first game

WellyUK2899d ago

Just as mediocre as the first game then.

Sunny_D2899d ago

That's kind of harsh. The first game was fun and had a lot of potential. I'm assuming DICE went in another direction for the sequel.

Show all comments (40)
60°

Looking back to the failed parkour of 2016's Mirror's Edge Catalyst

Kaan writes: "Mirror's Edge will likely never get a third try. The second game does not look like a cheap effort. By all accounts it is beautiful, especially with its FPS Boost enhancements. The city glows at nights and shines in the day. Lights will reflect off of Catalyst’s many structures made of glass. It’s spectacular to run through. But such a lavish production often comes with risk aversion and sadly Catalyst crumbles under this pressure. It’s held back by the pressure to conform, rather than trying to be genuinely different."

Read Full Story >>
thexboxhub.com
lellkay1071d ago

The parkour was great. It was just the story and characters didn't get interesting until the final moments and then it was to late.

160°

FPS Boost at 120fps: Battlefield 1/4/5 - Titanfall 1/2 - Mirror's Edge Catalyst Tested

Digital Foundry: Microsoft's FPS Boost support expands again, this time with 120Hz upgrades for 12 games and a 60fps boost for one! We decided to check out the improvement to some of our favourite games in the line-up, including the three Battlefield games that are supported, Titanfall and Mirror's Edge Catalyst. Which consoles support which games, what's the performance really like and are there resolution compromises?

Read Full Story >>
digitalfoundry.net
darthv721115d ago

FPS boost is a nice feature. Cant wait for more games to get that.

Eonjay1114d ago

While FPS boost is nice, I feel like it is the bare minimum in upgrades and only helps those with 120 capable TVs. Most of these games are PC titles as well. These games should be patched to run high/ultra PC video setting.

ActualWhiteMan1114d ago

Microsoft is killing it. Meanwhile Sony only lets developers upgrade older games if they make a PS5 version. Which means, less games getting upgrades on Sony’s offering.

jukins1114d ago

Alternatively seems to be a focus on releasing newer games? People barely played the games before 120 fpsnisnt gong to change that. Not to mention the people with the capable tv.

dcbronco1114d ago Show
nickanasty2061114d ago (Edited 1114d ago )

Soon this will not be the case though, and all of these other added perks like 120fps on older games will just be other great additions and features that PS users do not have available to them. I think any additional updates to features for games is something that shouldn't be discredited. Once Microsoft starts rolling out the new games on a regular basis, this argument is not going to age well. For now, you are correct on the new game front, but that is all going to change here soon enough. Sure most argue the "Wait until E3" remark over and over, but that will certainly be a thing of the past with everything Microsoft is working on now. Good things come to those who wait is the way I look at it for now.

Christopher1114d ago

***Once Microsoft starts rolling out the new games on a regular basis, this argument is not going to age well.***

This argument hasn't aged well for a long time now.

foker1114d ago

They are really killing it,.. They haven't released a new first party game in 600 days if not more

SpineSaw1114d ago

Now wait that's not true. 600 days is looong time and they did release a few First Party games that no one played or no one can remember by name but you do make a good point and it don't really matter if its been 6 days or 6yrs for Xbox First Party what they've released has been poor at best.

Army_of_Darkness1114d ago (Edited 1114d ago )

@actualwhiteman

Killing it? Ms? Lmfao! Boosting fps on old last gen games on a new gen console while not releasing a single first party next gen game is killing it to you?! 🤣😂
Meanwhile.... Sony what? Oh has been focusing on releasing actual new first party games. Funny, you forgot to mention that part bud.

Christopher1114d ago

***Meanwhile Sony only lets developers upgrade older games if they make a PS5 version.***

Well, this is just factually incorrect. The Division 2 got an upgrade for PS5 but is running the PS4 version. Other games have had similar.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1113d ago
1114d ago
MetroidFREAK211114d ago

Man, that makes me want to reinstall the OG Titanfall... seeing people still playing it. Memories

Destiny10801114d ago

battlefield 4, 720p 120fps, campaign locked, multiplayer drops down to 98fps
battlefield 1, 792p 120fps, campaign locked, multiplayer locked
battlefield 5, 1080p 120fps, campaign locked, multiplayer locked
mirror's edge catalyst, 936p 120fps, campaign locked
titanfall 2, 810p 120fps, campaign locked, multiplayer locked, series s not so good
titanfall 1, 792p 120fps, campaign locked, multiplayer locked, no s support for this game

its better then nothing, if they were upped to 4k i would have been impressed, titanfall 1 looks so much better on Pc

darthv721114d ago

It is called "fps boost"... not "res boost"

Destiny10801114d ago (Edited 1114d ago )

titanfall 2, is 4k on the xbox one x, why not "fps boost"
Battlefield 1, is 4k on the xbox one x, why not "fps boost"

DJStotty1114d ago

"titanfall 2, is 4k on the xbox one x, why not "fps boost""

Erm, no

"In general, the One X plays out between 1440p and 1800p with rises to 4k (2160p) in quiet scenes with little activity."

On topic, this is a FPS boost, not a resolution patch so you did not need to add the resolutions for base vanilla xbox. BC normally uses the xbox one version, as opposed to the xbox one X "patched" version to answer your question about resolution.

Either way, all games will use the built in upscaler on either your TV, or the xbox series X to display an upscaled 4K image (not native).

That along with Auto-HDR should result in a good enough reason to replay these games at the new improved framerate.

Show all comments (25)
90°

Crysis 3, Mirror's Edge Catalyst, Dragon Age Inquisition & more are now available on Steam

Electronic Arts has just released twelve games on Valve's distribution service, Steam.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com