Five Worst Ways For Devs To Not Finish A Game

While a company like Valve is allowed to take as long as it damn well pleases in making their games, other developers aren't so fortunate. They're sometimes forced to rush their products to market and often it results in an outright butchering of the game. Here are some of the most disgusting shortcuts they take:

[Nevers]

...for this aricle...

Kudos

I'm excited there is rumored to be a KOTOR MMOrpg in the works but very disappointed we will not get a true sequel for the "nothing ending" we were left with in KOTOR2.

[EvilCackle]

I am curious if they revisit the storyline in the MMORPG at all, though. Granted you can't sustain as tight of a story in that sort of a game but I'd still love to see the old characters.

[Nevers]

I hope they include a capper for all us KOTOR fans.

[Tomonobu Itagaki]

All those points correspond to Assassin's Creed.

[EvilCackle]

Except they never promised DLC. Or did they? Wouldn't surprise me.

[Tomonobu Itagaki]

They said "Oh just STFU PS3 owners, we know we are dumbasses, give us a month or two to correct nothing via a patch".

[BabyStomper5000]

Fallout 3. What ever happened to the NMA version? Are they still doing that?? Where's Meus he'd know what I'm talking about!

[TheColbertinator]

KOTOR 2 was amazing.The second best game on the Xbox.The first was KOTOR 1 of course

[Droid]

kotor 1 ruled. kotor 2 wasn't finished. it was glitchy and rushed. it sucked.

and besides the best games on xbox were riddick, halo, SC, fable, and so on.

[marichuu]

Yea.. Bioshock is crap, no multiplayer :(

Jokes aside... I agree with most of it, but the MMO/expansion part is lame.

[Charlie2688]

I have one worst than number 4...the "Forced Multiplayer" to avoid complains (aka B_tching) cuz of the made up "standards" devs have been developing this gen (things look worse when you know the single player might have been better or even longer if didn't had wasted trying to force a multiplayer)

I mean we have seen PLENTY of examples of "it also has multiplayer! YAY" and then we find out its some of THE most crappy excuse of a multiplayer (hell and some of them get even multiplayer DLC!) I think by now people would have learned that not all games HAVE to have multiplayer we already saw a certain game people were complaining about not having a multipalyer and when the sequel came we find out how "good" was the multiplayer -_- (funny how some reviwers said it was better off without it and other reduced the score cuz of it)...its even more disturbing when I can name more games that shouldn't have had Multiplayer than games that should have >.>

And even worse is seeing how this made up "standards" are effecting the reception (reviews and sales) of certain games that last gen would have probably done a lot better

[RyuStrife]

Assassins Creed has to be one of the worst ending ever. Seriously, it was a "to see the real ending, wait for part 2" kind of a thing.

[Gamekilla]

god of war 2 did that and it was still one of the best games ever made....assassin's creed just messed up on A LOT of other things.

[CouchKing0]

EA is guilty of doing all five things.