40°

Metal Gear Solid: Portable Ops (2006) MicroReview

Largely inconsequential Metal Gear Solid game paved the way for gameplay concepts later utilized in superior entries.

Read Full Story >>
pressplaytv.com
George Sears3219d ago

What a mediocre review from a mediocre site.

If you are going to review an old game, you shouldn't be comparing and contrasting on future releases. This game came out in 2006, how is it fair to compare it with future iterations? If you are going to make a late review like this one, you should at least set your mind that you are in 2006 reviewing it.

Secondly, it is completely false that Portable Ops is not canon towards the story. If you want to review a game, or a franchise as huge as MGS with your sites format, at least use your short sentences with right factual information.

The first thing Miller talks to Big Boss in Peace Walker was the incident that happened on Portable Ops.

Thirdly, your way of reviewing a game is completely mediocre. No information on story, gameplay, even suggesting emulation and then you decide to give a score on top of all this.

Pathetic. Word of advice, I've been in N4G for quite some time, I suggest you change your ways on reviewing games or don't expect an extra bump of traffic from us.

PressPlayTV3218d ago

Hey thanks for reading, but you missed a few key points from our review:

1. The review said it _is_ canon, not that it isn't canon...

2. Our "microreview" format is specifically designed to give a modern-day perspective on an old game. Sure it's important to consider context, but sometimes a game just doesn't hold up anymore, which is exactly what our reviewer thought happened with Portable Ops. We think if someone in 2015 is thinking about playing Portable Ops, then we can't discount the games that have come out since its release. You can read more about our "microreviews" under the score.

Of course we respect your opinion about the game and appreciate your suggestions, but we hope this shed some light on some of the things that you may have misinterpreted!

80°

Metal Gear Solid's David Hayter Reflects on the Legacy of Snake

David Hayter, the original voice of the legendary Solid Snake, opens up on the Metal Gear series, discovering the character's iconic voice, and why Snake is still so meaningful to people.

170°

The Metal Gear Saga is Complete, But Where Do I Start?

So you want to get into Hideo Kojima’s magnum opus of storytelling before being dragged into his newest trip featuring Norman Reedus and a fetus? There’s no other story-driven video game out there like the Metal Gear series and what better way to prepare for Death Stranding then by playing the games that skyrocketed Kojima to fame.

However, though he might be a master of storytelling in video games, understanding Kojima’s complete vision can be overwhelming.

Read Full Story >>
goombastomp.com
AnnaDea1751d ago

Play the in the order they were released...?

Gridknac1751d ago

Skip the whole thing entirely. There are better things to waste your life on.

Foxhound9221751d ago

I hope that you don't drive or reproduce because that's a scary thought. Telling other people they can't enjoy something because you don't find it enjoyable is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard.

Gridknac1751d ago

Foxhound922, telling other people they can't have an opinion just because it doesn't align with yours is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard! At least we don't have to worry about you reproducing, you'll never get a woman down in your moms basement. (Well not legally anyways)

goldwyncq1751d ago

It's not meant to be played chronologically. If you start with 3 you'll miss a lot of references.

Stanjara1751d ago

You can say the same thing about the reference if you start with 1st.

NapalmSanctuary1751d ago (Edited 1751d ago )

You left out Metal Gear 1&2. The proper chronology is MGS3, MGS5, MG1, MG2, MGS, MGS2, MGS4.

Lilrizky1751d ago

Yeah play the order they were released.

Some people suggest chronologically, but the way certain reveals happen in certain games the narrative was purposely written in a way that it makes most sense to play them in release order. There are certain callbacks or references in MGSV to the first metal gear solid for example. So if you played them in chronological order you will have no idea what those references in V are referring to

MTVBG1751d ago

Order of release, no question.

CorndogBurglar1751d ago

Start with Metal Gear and Metal Gear 2 from NES. Then play the Metal Solid series in the order they released.

Tross1751d ago

You can actually access the proper versions of Metal Gear 1 and 2 if you have MGS3 in some form on your device, and those are the canon games. I would recommend playing those first, yes, although MGS1 isn’t a bad jumping on point either. However, the NES games are an interesting curiosity, for sure.

Show all comments (14)
pietro12121764d ago

Without Kojima and Murita handling the writing what's the point?

343_Guilty_Spark1764d ago (Edited 1764d ago )

Maybe it wouldn't be a convoluted mess

pietro12121764d ago

Ahhhhhh it's the guy Kojima hurt. *show me on the doll where he touched you

Enigma_20991764d ago

What, Metal Gear: Survive not doing it for you?