Try our new beta! Click here
Submitted by TheArabGamer 634d ago | news

Watch Dogs 1080p on PS4, 960p on Xbox One (both 30 FPS). Up to 4K on PC.

Ubisoft have revealed during their Watch Dogs press conference that the game will run on the following resolutions and framerate for next gen systems. (PC, PS4, Watch Dogs, Xbox One)

Alternative Sources
« 1 2 3 4 »
Majin-vegeta  +   634d ago | Well said
1080 4 my PS4 nice.
#1 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(126) | Disagree(34) | Report | Reply
Hatsune-Miku   634d ago | Trolling | show | Replies(6)
SilentNegotiator   634d ago | Off topic | show | Replies(12)
SoapShoes  +   634d ago | Well said
Higher resolution and 1 hour of extra content, It's a no brainer
UnHoly_One  +   634d ago | Well said
For you maybe.

I'll take lower resolution to play with the far superior controller, better online service, and better twitch streaming.

To ME, that is a no brainer.

It's all opinion, bro.
Qrphe  +   634d ago | Well said
If you own both system yes



I can smell the tears from over here
No_Limit  +   634d ago
I own both systems and it all depends on the online function. If this game has a killer online mode, then I'll buy it for XB1 because that is the pay service I have and I think it is superior to that of the PSN+. If it is like Assasssin's Creed 4 online mode, I'll pass on the online portion and get the PS4 version. It is nice that I can choose.
NeloAnjelo  +   634d ago | Well said
@unholy... Better twitch streaming? It just came, and it's only Twitch. PS4 can broadcast on PSN... More choice.

Better online... You mean it used to be. Service? PS+ beats it hands down.

Lower resolution? For $100 more?

Get real
PLASTICA-MAN  +   634d ago
I read in an old Examiner article, that the devs clearly stated that the PS4 version could run at 60 FPS, but they wanted to maintain parity between all consoles.

But seriously, neither the resolution nor the FPS is the problem now, I think the game has been downgraded compared to the E3 reveal and the first PS4 demos because of the lowest common denominator in this new gen. Just watch the latest trailer.
#1.3.5 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(35) | Disagree(14) | Report
cozomel  +   634d ago | Well said
Higher resolution and 1 hour of extra content, far superior controller, better online service for cheaper and with way more goodies and freebies, and better streaming with both Twitch and Ustream and all from a cheaper priced system with a company with a far stronger 1st party record. It's a no brainer. And mmm are your tears good Unholy one
Godz Kastro  +   634d ago
Yup, no brainer... Going X1
PraxxtorCruel  +   634d ago | Well said
I know what I'm going for...PC. Have fun trailing behind and arguing.
dantesparda  +   634d ago

Please explain to us how it has better streaming when PS4 can stream to both Twitch and Ustream, the only thing Twitch on X1 can do that PS4 doesnt is archive, but come on now, you know that'll just be patched in. Also, how Live is better? And better controller? really? Do you undrstand that subjective opinion is not fact?
HiddenMission  +   634d ago | Well said

So a service that gives tons of free AAA blockbuster games is inferior to one that doesn't really offer anything compared to it's competitor...yeah okay...very subjective based opinion.

I'll take my superior service, superior controller, superior resolution on every title and my extra $100 any...

Just opinion k
T2  +   634d ago | Well said
here come the obvious comments.. now again all of a sudden "sony lies" and resolution doesn't matter it's all about the lies.
"you can't just flick a switch to remove DRM"
ring a bell?

now the arguments turn to the obvious opinion based since no factual arguments will work once again...
"xbox controller is better"
"xbl online is better (5 year old argument and widespread fallacy) "
" i just don't like any of sonys [massive library of] games"

so salty, so expected, so hilarious.
RiPPn  +   634d ago
@dantesparda: Silly Xbox fans still think Xbox live gives them a better connection even though most games they played on the 360 where the same peer to peer connections used on the PS3. But whatever makes them feel better. smh
#1.3.12 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(20) | Disagree(11) | Report
osprey19  +   634d ago
960p to 1080p? Ud need a magnifying glass and 50inch tv to notice any difference at all, first it was 720vs1080, then 900vs1080. Now 960vs1080. The gap is shrinking.
Locknuts  +   634d ago
Keep your extra content. I'd rather play at 60fps.
Why o why  +   634d ago
From 'resolutions dont matter' to 'Gaps closing'

You guys, make up your minds, you're all over the
UnHoly_One  +   634d ago
Nobody is crying. All of these "tears" comments are just showing your immaturity and fanboyism. Your incessant need to be "winning" this nonexistent competition.

I have a PS4. I have an XB1.

I have PS+. I have XBL Gold.

I can choose either version. It's strictly up to my opinion and preference.
starchild  +   634d ago
FFS guys, all this fighting...and for what? Both versions pale in comparison to the PC version at 60fps with high quality anti-aliasing and whatever other advantages it will have.

The difference between 960P and 1080p is very small compared to the advantages the PC version has over both console versions.

You guys fight over basically nothing.
fr0sty  +   634d ago
There are other factors that remain to be seen. Which version has the most stable frame rate? If XO hits 960p (which isn't "barely" less than 1080p just because it's a number not far from 1080... you also have to count in the number of vertical rows of pixels in the image that are being left out) but keeps a better frame rate, it'd be the preferred version. However, if (as in the case of games like Ryse and Tomb Raider) it drops down into the teens, skip it.

And this whole argument over Xbox having the better online service is kinda dated. I'm not seeing any feature one has that the other doesn't at this point, though PS4 does give you more and better games IMO, even if they are only there for the duration of your subscription.

Those saying they'll get it on PC, sure. Enjoy that slightly better AA or 60fps on a machine that cost 3 times as much as a PS4. Just at min. spec, you're already looking at a min. of a $600-800 machine. Then you have the fact that drivers for the particular video card you chose don't work as well with this game as drivers for that other company's video card do, so you'll take a performance hit there until they bother to patch it, if they do.

For every advantage PC gaming has, it also has a disadvantage.

Arguing over any of it is dumb in the end. Just play your games. You liking it doesn't make it better, them not liking it doesn't make it worse.
rdgneoz3  +   634d ago
@Osprey "The gap is shrinking."

When the game is nerfed from the original reveal and the graphics are still only 960, their might be a problem.

p.s. PC and PS4 say thanks for gimping their versions.
Cueil  +   634d ago
it's all a matter of perspective
SGodsend  +   634d ago
What is the 1 hour of extra content?
DOMination-  +   634d ago
Yes because ubisoft have such a great track record when it comes to pc ports. Didn't they only just patch black flag last week so that you could play it properly on high settings?
DevilOgreFish  +   634d ago
PC all the way, there's no point in bickering over resolutions when it's all at your finger tips. plus i don't have to repurchase it ever again once i change hardware.
palaeomerus  +   634d ago
"HiddenMission + 9h ago

So a service that gives tons of free AAA blockbuster games is inferior to one that doesn't really offer anything compared to it's competitor...yeah okay...very subjective based opinion. "

Free "AAA Blockbuster" PS4 games on PS+ so far:

Outlast (year old budget steam game)
Don't Starve (year old budget steam game)
Contrast (newish budget steam game poorly reviewed)
Dead Nation Apocalypse Edition (port of old PS3 DL budget game)
Resogun (at least it's both good, and new! Kind of budget/arcadey though.)

Yup. No hyperbole at all in there.

Oh wait, you wanted older PS3 and Vita games to somehow count when assessing an online service for PS4? Well, if you have Flower, Flow and Soundshapes you will get a PS4 version as part of the cross buy program I guess. )
#1.3.24 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(8) | Disagree(4) | Report
EditorAtGNG  +   634d ago
Exactly. 4k resolution + unlocked fps... PC all the way.
Unspoken  +   634d ago
This is true, a no brainer would be to buy this on the best platform possible: PC.

I keep hearing how powerful the PS4 is and how it is the superior gaming system to have but it can't maintain steady frame rate at native resolution. What happened to this console generation?

PC>PS4 forever and that will never ever change, no matter what any fanboy says. Facts are facts and the PC will always be better.

So glad I didn't waste $400 on a crap console and put that money into my PC.
morganfell  +   634d ago
The downgrade isn't what people think. That gif everyone keeps reposting is one small section of the video. Here is what people are crowing about:

That is one small piece lasting a few seconds. And the lighting looks weird because the bridge is being selected and is being hacked. Look at the rest of the night run:

And if you notice those are two different cars - look at the tail lights. They may actually be from two different builds - last gen vs current gen. The video jumps around a lot like it was pieced together. Either way, I am getting it for the PS4.

And look at other parts of the video:

And joystiq's impressions confirmed on PS4 were quite positive:

And Arabicgamer remarked how the PS4 looked: saying, " This game is absolutely stunning across the board with HD textures and beautifully rendered animations. For next gen systems, including PC’s, each rain drop will be an individual particular. This can be seen more clearly when using the focus mode or slow down feature."
#1.3.27 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report
QuickdrawMcgraw   634d ago | Off topic | show | Replies(3)
gapecanpie   634d ago | Trolling | show | Replies(3)
Utalkin2me  +   634d ago

Well Superior system is a fact not a opinion. But the online thing i agree with.
mediate-this  +   634d ago
Asinine statement by a a...
#1.6.1 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(5) | Report
Utalkin2me  +   634d ago
If you would care to indulge me in how the Xbox1 one has just as good or if not better hardware then the PS4, please by all means do so. Otherwise your comment holds as much water as a broken glass.
vigilante_man  +   634d ago
Wow - they could make a movie from this Watchdogs Saga.

# Game ready to Release with Sony advertising for PS4
# Game gets delayed at last minute for no clear reason
# XB1 releases with inferior GPU grunt than PS4
# Game bucks trend and issues almost parity graphics
# Did MS pay for game delay despite Sony's advertising?
# Did MS pay for parity in graphics to mask superior PS4?

Some shady goings on here. The power of the $$$!
fermcr  +   634d ago
"Watch Dogs 1080p on PS4, 960p on Xbox One (both 30 FPS)"

Well, I guess X1's games resolutions are improving (or increasing) as time goes by.

As for me, PC version.
BX81  +   634d ago
There were two future games that were confirmed by the devs to be 1080p on xb1 so I agree. I believe they were multi plats as well. That's what happens when the system is harder to dev for.
Lior  +   634d ago
ill choose my own resolution on my pc thank you (1440p)
cell989  +   634d ago
not gonna argue with that one
Locknuts  +   634d ago
1440p @ 60fps when high end Maxwell comes out baby! Woo!
tee_bag242  +   634d ago
Yes please. I normally always but both consoles at launch. This is the first gen I haven't because they honestly both suck eggs. Where's the games ?! Where's the 1080p 60fps we were promised. Seriously. Tired of hearing X1 vs PS4 cheerleaders claiming superiority when neither can achieve such a hallmark.
I don't care if PC even costs more. At least don't run like slideshows.
#1.8.3 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(2) | Report
Shabutie13  +   634d ago
I'll be going 1080p 144FPS. :)
mrmarx  +   634d ago
at least the xbone fans can watch tv while they play the inferior version
jcole97  +   634d ago
so is the ps4 inferior since it cant do that? if so, you cant say inferior system because they both do something that the other cant...
Nemo88  +   634d ago
TV is dying a slow death everywhere only the USA still bothers watching the crap (in dying numbers) and.. surprise surprise.. also about the only country in the world interested in XBone. The future is the internet not frigging cable and the PS4 has got apps down pat. Get with it. Its not about snapping TV=== while playing a game!!! The masses have spoken xbones
#1.9.2 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(8) | Report
morganfell  +   634d ago
Maybe its true if you bought a TV system jcole. I bought a gaming system. This is N4G - News For or Gamers. Superior gaming system. Maybe you should post your question at N4TV.
ifistbrowni  +   634d ago
im glad ubisoft got this out of the way early. Now the speculation articles will not exists, which will be nice.
showtimefolks  +   634d ago
Higher resolution
1 hour of bonus content
playing with dual shock 4

its still amazing how things have turned around, last gen xbox360 had better 3rd party games and now its ps4. This is what happens when you make a cable box more than a gaming machine
TRD4L1fe  +   634d ago
Better twitch service
better OS/multitasking
playing with the XB1 controller

see I can name cool things too
I enjoy my cable box that can play games too
beebap  +   634d ago
Better twitch is this the new thing to say for fanboys? how so or you just mad ps4 users have been using it and ustream from launch. Better os/multitasking how so please explain.For me ps4 controller win hands down as it xbox controller has always been so uncomfortable for me to use seriously always give me hand cramp after short use and had to stretch my thumbs.So their is no best controller it depends on your hands.
koston3647  +   634d ago
Higher resolution FACT
1 hour of bonus content FACT
playing with dual shock 4 OPINION

Better twitch service OPINION
better OS/multitasking OPINION
playing with the XB1 controller OPINION

please....please keep going this is like batting practice.
Cueil  +   634d ago
@Koston while you are indeed right that the Twitch is an opinion I think that he's got a more then strong case on this one as for controller... I prefer my XB1 controller over my DS4 and as soon as a real DS4 controller comes out in the same make as a Xbox controller I'll quickly replace my current DS4. Also the XB1 does have better multi tasking... that is a FACT. It can run any application and a game at the same time. The PS4 does not boast this ability.
BitbyDeath  +   634d ago
'It can run any application and a game at the same time. The PS4 does not boast this ability.'

Yes it does. All you have to do is open an Application and hit the PS button, then open a game. Bam you have two things open at once.

I've even had 2 applications and a game running at the same time before. Have not stress tested any further yet though.
showtimefolks  +   634d ago

better controller lol yeh right, almost every gaming site has agreed that Dual Shock 4 is the better controller

Twitch oh that service that we have been enjoying since launch?

better OS no way in hell. MS designed this OS for kinect so its crappy and like windows 8 which also sucks.

get real man ps4 will sell 12-15 million by year's end. Its only gonna improve with more games so keep thinking of way to hate on ps4, all its gonna do is dominate like PS2 did
Raider69  +   634d ago
I have to wonder something ,but from the latest footage its more than obvious that the game has been downgrade in the graphics departemant!I dont know from what platform this last trailer is taken off but the graphics have taken a downgrade when compared with what they shown months ago has the PS4 VERSION!I hope that this 30fps are steady lock and not 30 fps with dips on new gen systems,especially seeing that the overall graphics,effects and etc.. have been downgraded.And frankly regarding resolutions and framerates better a full lock 30fps at 960p that 1080p with 30fps with dips below that.I guess im paying to see what will be the more stable of the next generation console versions.
#1.12 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
vivid83  +   634d ago
I noticed that too but tbh I wasn't gonna buy it anyway
Prime157  +   634d ago
Makes sense, but that's a developer optimisation argument.
CapsLocke  +   634d ago
Not 60 fps though. What happened, greatness has been depleted?
Locknuts  +   634d ago
It still awaits....and awaits....
Master-H  +   634d ago
Parity happened
tee_bag242  +   634d ago
Yeh all this 'untapped power' and were stuck at 30fps like last gen. What a joke.
palaeomerus  +   634d ago
" Master-H + 4h ago
Parity happened "

Oh? Did it happen with first party exclusive games like Killzone: Shadow Fall single player (1080P 30 fps) and inFamous: 2nd Son (1080P 30 fsp) too? How about Knack? (1080P unstable 30-ish fps)
Unspoken  +   634d ago
No more quick we noticed the PS4 just could not keep up in the high end anymore.

Frame rate took the biggest hit along with some lighting, texture, and shadow detail. 30fps it is then. No more buttery smooth, more like coarse grits.

Funny how the Xbox is improving over time and the PS4 is losing its potential over time.
solar  +   634d ago
1080p at 30fps is nothing to brag about. every game for both next gen consoles should run at 1080p/60pfs. it is tech that has been around since before last gen.
#1.14 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(24) | Disagree(12) | Report | Reply
serratos27  +   634d ago
This is my argument as well. I understand WHY people bring up resolution but since last year were we not expecting 1080p/60fps for all games on PS4?? Why is this still relevant? Only to talk down the XB1? When I see a headline such as this it baffles me! We all know what to expect from BOTH consoles.
#1.14.1 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(11) | Disagree(8) | Report
PygmelionHunter  +   634d ago
Couldn't they just lower the resolution on PS4 to make it run at 60FPS? I mean, on the Xbox One I understand because draw distances might be affected if it goes below something like 900p, kind of what happened with Battlefield 4, but from 900p to 1080p there's not really THAT much of a difference, what makes a true difference in action games is the bump in frame rate to 60FPS... I'll take that any day over 1080p.
tee_bag242  +   634d ago
Exactly. 30 FPS is criminal.
ITPython  +   634d ago
960p on XB1 and 1080p on PS4, with both running at 30fps? No way the PS4 can only do 30fps when the resolution of both consoles is that close.

Seems to me MS was able to buy partial parity on this game, and if I find out that this is the case, I am most definitely not going to buy this game new so that the publisher/devs/whoever don't see a dime of my money.

I think we can safely assume that this is in fact a parity thing, unless we find out that the XB1 version is gimped in other ways, like AA, texture-res and other things. But if both games have the same specs, except resolution, then we will know 100% that the PS4 version was gimped.

It sickens me to think that this parity BS is probably going to get worse as the generation continues. MS wants people to think that the tiny improvements via an updated SDK, or otherwise, will somehow make their console super powerful... when in fact it only looks that way because the PS4 versions are being intentionally gimped due to MS throwing tons of money at the right people.

This is why MS needs to GTFO. It's one thing if they release a sub-par console and people purchase the console knowing that fact, but it's another to ruin the experience for people who own the more powerful console by paying for parity.
BakPAin  +   634d ago
Dude you suck!! So its 1080p/30fps because MS paid Ubisoft. Seems to me thats all they could get out the PS4 at that resolution. You have the better version out of both and your still mad. I notice fanboys always say dumb shit to start a wars. No different than what you just did!
Sevir  +   634d ago
These are first gen next gen titles that are tailored to scale per platform, since it's a cross gen release it speaks wonders that this is what they got with only a year of development on these platforms who's specs became final late August 2013... Give it a rest! The delay benefited the game! MGS5 is open world and it's 1080p at 60fps on PS4 with realtime dynamic weather,global Illumination dynamic lighting, smoother particle effects and time.

The PS4 is capable, time with the machine and proper optimizations will bring out the best...

None the less, it's good Ubisoft came out and said it and I'm glad the devs aren't buying into platform parity, they've taken the tools and have made each machine sing to there most stable performance!

PS4 > XBO the END!!!
TRD4L1fe  +   634d ago
MS paid for parity!?!?!? Serious something is wrong with you if you believe that. Get your head outta sonys ass
andibandit  +   634d ago
Damn it, now i have to buy a 4K Resolution monitor or tv
Azzanation  +   634d ago
PC Watch dogs at 4k > 960 and 1080p, that's a no brainer. Now that's true next gen right there.
Nemo88  +   634d ago
Gosh. What do you expect from XBONE. LOL
XboxFun  +   634d ago
Interesting, little moderation, at the top of the web page with the highest heat which was actually way lower than some other certain artcile which was mysteriously removed from the top page.

Bdub2000  +   634d ago
LOL, Hatsune won't "be around a lot" with only one bubble, thank goodness. I'm all for supporting your system of choice, but that guys way out in left field, and he doesn't seem to represent the majority of the rest of the ps4 users here.

1080p would be nice on X1, but I still just really hope the game kicks ass, then x1 and ps4 owners alike can just get back to what we love (gaming!)
TAURUS-555  +   633d ago
i feel sorry for all those xbox1 fans.....they must be so dissapointed.
Bdub2000  +   633d ago
Those ps4 fans must be so worried that at 1080 they'll probably have super low frame rates just like Thief...
Xsilver  +   634d ago
That SDk Really helped 960p anyway PS4 version it is well already made that decision before the game was delayed.
#2 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(48) | Disagree(17) | Report | Reply
IcarusOne   634d ago | Off topic | show | Replies(4)
corvusmd   634d ago | Off topic | show | Replies(4)
SilentNegotiator  +   634d ago
Because some games have been announced higher resolution than some of the games that came out in the mere first four months? And the logical conclusion is that the SDK did that? How poorly done would the original SDK have had to have been in order for that to be the case?
DoubleM70  +   634d ago
I will take that 960 30 chugging along nicely. Most likely will be patched to run on the new SDK.
ddgaming820  +   634d ago
Imagine this on 4k, droooooooooool.
zeal0us  +   634d ago | Funny
Now imagine the price of 4K monitor and a card that can run it smoothly.
#3.1 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(103) | Disagree(7) | Report | Reply
ddgaming820  +   634d ago | Funny
I can imagine!

That is all I really can do :(
mushroomwig  +   634d ago
£1200 for a low end 4K monitor and around £600 for a card that could run it at a playable framerate (7990). It's fair to say my wallet is happy I'm sticking with the PS4.
Stapleface  +   634d ago
Nothing if you already have them!! lol People act like you have to buy a new pc and all new hardware for every game. Stop. You don't hear people saying stuff like, "Infamous looks good, too bad it costs $460 to play..." People care too much about other peoples money when it comes to gaming, that's for sure. I think my 780ti dual Classified might run it at 4k, IDK, am I mad I paid that much for a card? Not at all, it's a beast.
#3.1.3 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(11) | Disagree(23) | Report
Lakerman  +   634d ago
Actually there is a 28" 4k DELL monitor coming on march 17th for $700.

Its a TN panel and it can only do 60hz via displayport, but it bodes well for the future. Lets hope it wont be too long before we see affordable 4k/IPS/100hz panels..
Stapleface  +   634d ago
@Lakerman, Dell makes great monitors too. Your right, it won't be long, they will get better and cheaper. I'm not worried about 4k myself, the next monitor I'm buying is a 1440p G-sync when they come out. No more worry about refresh rate as that will change with what ever is being displayed.
Lakerman  +   634d ago
Sounds good, I think g-sync will be a big gamechanger. My plan is to wait until you can buy a 27-30" 4k IPS panel with g-sync for about $1500 or less and then buy a really good gaming pc at the same time. I guess that will be about 12-18 months from now. Havent been gaming on PC for almost 10 years, looking forward to it a lot because of 4k and g-sync :)
GrandTheftZamboni   634d ago | Trolling | show
esemce  +   634d ago
Yep Im ok with 1080p+ and 60+fps on PC, 4k games are not really worth it yet.

Ah and the poor weedy Xbone can't run this at 1080p 30fps that's just pathetic for a console that is going to be on the market for the next 5-8 years.

So glad I cancelled my Xbone pre order and kept the PS4.
#3.1.8 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(13) | Disagree(7) | Report
solar  +   634d ago
you pay for being a gaming enthusiast. you settle when you game on consoles. not knocking console gamers with that true statement.
ABizzel1  +   634d ago

Most PC gamers don't have high end rigs, they have low or mid rigs, and even a high end rig is shaky running games in 4k resolutions, and generally require two high end cards in SLI / Xfire or as you said a 7990 or 690. So yeah it can be expensive to most consumers.

Then having to buy the monitor as well. Most of the people on here are likely teenagers / college aged, and your average teenager or college student doesn't have $1000+ to spend on gaming in 4k.


You'll probably be better off waiting for another 2 - 3 years. Larger 4k G-sync monitors should definitely be out by then and priced reasonably, and NVIDA Volta or the refresh should be out as well, which is rumored to be the first true 4k single GPU allowing you to max out the majority of 4k games on a single graphics card, so SIL two of those, and you should be good for a looooooooooooooooooooong time :D
webeblazing  +   634d ago
seem thats all people can do to downplay it, is say the price for the gfx card and that they cant afford it. instead of embracing things that always come first to a platform they downplay, then praise it once its on their console.
BitbyDeath  +   634d ago
Wouldn't 4K be wasted on a 28" monitor?
Thought you need at least 50" and above to see 4K properly?

Anyone know?
Detoxx  +   634d ago
And 60FPS.
Shredmeijster  +   634d ago
Or more.
TheGrimReaper  +   634d ago
I'd cap it at 60 fps. I hate fluctuating framerates (e.g.: dropping from 100 to 60 is destroying my immersion)

If your system is capable you could cap it at 120 fps (don't know how taxing Watch Dogs will be)
Letros  +   634d ago

No need to cap FPS with G-sync.
starchild  +   634d ago
Yeah, without G-sync you will get stutter at any framerate that isn't a factor of your refresh rate (i.e. 30fps, 60fps, 120fps). But with G-sync framerates between 60fps and 120fps can be enjoyed without stutter/judder.

I'll definitely be getting a G-sync monitor later this year or early next.
Corpser  +   634d ago
Jealous of people that can play this in 4k, but I will too eventually
FlyingFoxy  +   634d ago
4k is a waste of time, you'd be upgrading every 2 years and need 2 cards minimum to get good fps.

1080p 60/120hz and a single high end card for me.

Theres a new 1440p 120hz sceen coming soon which is kinda affordable, has 120hz and g-sync. Rather get that than 4k, at least with 120hz there's no downgrade in visuals if you can't hit 120fps, while 1080p or 1440p would look like crap on a 4k screen. LCD's are good if you stick to their native res. But they are still a step back compared to CRT since you always gotta stick to native res to maintain a HQ image.

4k would force you to stay at that res, so if you get crap fps you are stuck with it, or make the image look like ass by going below native res. No thanks.
#3.4 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(6) | Report | Reply
thereapersson  +   634d ago
I agree, flying foxy, CRT monitors are the way to go if you're a serious gamer. unfortunately I had to get rid of my old Viewsonic CRT due to space constraints, but I always enjoyed it's fast response time and various native resolutions. The only real downsides are size, weight and limits on maximum resolution.
MidnytRain  +   634d ago
2 cards? The benchmarks I've seen so far for the 780ti can run games at 4k with good frame rates at ultra presets.
djtek184  +   634d ago
Not really surprise at all
gillri  +   634d ago
PS4 for me, I shudder to think how much I need to spedn to get 4K on PC, plus I hate playing where I work anyway
ginsunuva  +   634d ago
Even though I admit have a modest (nothing amazing) pc AND a ps4, you don't need to make sour-grape excuses. It's an unhealthy habit I used to do when I was young that I regret since it made me look like an obvious idiot.
#5.1 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(18) | Report | Reply
Christopher  +   634d ago
Actually, his reason is exactly why I've moved to consoles as well. I work from home and I need to get away from my desk as often as possible or I end up just working all day long. Moving things around helped. Heck, even just putting a console on my desk and connecting it to another monitor helped.

It's not really a sour grape excuse so much as trying to prevent a lifestyle of work work work. Change of environment helps one's attitude a lot sometimes.

Anyway, that's just me. And I still game on PC and console about 50/50. I still haven't gotten over my habit of working as I start a PC game and end up keeping it paused 75% of the time while I do work. So, not working well on my whole thing, but that's still the goal. Stop working too much.
BABY-JEDI  +   634d ago
Well. Some things never change... LoL
; D
T2  +   634d ago
how is this sour grapes? I work on a computer everywhere I go for work and I don't even own a pc at home, just do not even care. i do my home stuff on my smartphone and game on consoles. They're cheap, convenient and i love my tv with yamaha dolby digital dts.... nothing sour grapes about it, it's a fact.
ABizzel1  +   634d ago

You should build an office PC, and a gaming PC away from your office. I work from home too (although I'm usually traveling 90% of the time), and I have my "office PC" which has a bare minimal GPU in it just in case. And I also have my gaming PC which is in my entertainment room so I have to get up and leave to another room.

It works for me at least.
Christopher  +   634d ago
My Office PC requires expensive components and is expensive enough as it is. There's also not another room for me. Our townhome gets hot so desktop PCs with gaming equipment go in the basement where my basement and our entertainment center are located. So, I'd be walking 10' to another gaming rig that my wife would kill me over since she doesn't want something like that next to our fireplace or the stand we use for our entertainment devices. I already get in trouble with all my gaming peripherals taking up storage space.

I'm happy with the consoles. I talk about technical comparisons between similar consoles, but I'm fine with quality games on last gen or current gen consoles. That and I tend to not buy most games until they hit $20 anyway.
GraveLord   634d ago | Trolling | show | Replies(1)
staticdash22  +   634d ago
960p? What's with the weird resolutions on Xbox One now? Anyway, I welcome another 1080p game on PS4 :D
Nero1314  +   634d ago
Atleast it's not 720p :)
TheTwelve  +   634d ago | Funny
It's an "almost there" resolution.
Crystallis  +   634d ago
GUTZnPAPERCUTZ  +   634d ago
Anything over 900p is acceptable to me! :D
stuna1  +   634d ago
You have to wonder though, what would have happened if the fps were 60, what would the resolution have on the Xbox1? probably 792p.
I_am_Batman  +   634d ago
That's really a weird resolution if it really is 960p. It has to be divisible by 9 if it runs in 16:9. It's probably 1712x963 but since 963p sounds even weirder they just said 960p.
Software_Lover  +   634d ago
My opinion, and guess, is that they are just trying to get the highest resolution they can get at a stable rate.

They could've just ran it at 900p, but they saw that they could push it higher. I don't understand why do that, but I'm not a developer.
AngelicIceDiamond  +   634d ago
@Dash "Anyway, I welcome another 1080p game on PS4 :D"

Where did we go wrong? Instead of hying a game we're hyping under the hood technical features like resolution?

You know the game looks pretty nice to. Lets not forget the most important thing here.

We're playing a game here not resolution.
maniacmayhem  +   634d ago
I guess some on here have learned nothing.
staticdash22  +   634d ago
Lol and?

In the end I will play the game because I like it, and who the heck are you to tell me that I shouldn't care about resolution. Get out here with that. You don't drop 59.99 because a game isn't fun, resolution is a bonus. Getting real tired of you people trying to tell me what I should and shouldn't put importance in as an individual consumer.
#7.5.2 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(20) | Disagree(7) | Report
TheGrimReaper  +   634d ago
Valid point BUT this article is about the resolution differences so I think it is okay for people to talk about the matter at hand.

If you've wanted to learn about the gameplay you are on the wrong article ^^"
LeCreuset  +   634d ago
A game with better resolution AND gameplay on the PS4 than on the One.

Ironically, I am against that which gives it the slight edge in gameplay: deals for exclusive content.
MAULxx  +   634d ago
Probably because the game looks like a bore.
What is there really to hype about the game at this point?

"We're playing a game here not resolution."?
Ok Phil, whatever you say.
BakPAin  +   634d ago
Ive learned there are more Sony fans than MS fans on this site. Also my friends scored a PS4 and BF4 looks AMAZING!! and thats only 900p. So there is no doubt WD will look great on Xbox. Im getting it on PS4 but just saying.
BX81  +   634d ago
No one said you should or shouldn't but it's not the most important thing. You may welcome another 1080p title but that doesn't mean it'll look or play great was the point being made. You could wipe your a$$ with your money. It's yours to spend it how you like. Just don't buy black market kidneys..jk...seriously don't.
ABizzel1  +   634d ago

It's because it gives you the best middle ground between graphics and performance. The better the resolutions the cleaner the image, and they want to get it as high as possible without affecting framerate / performance, and obviously that was it.

It seems weird but I'm glad they're doing it, because it means resolutions on the PS5 / XB? will be less of an issue as those console move between 1080p - 4k, so we'll have some games 1080p, some 2k, some 4k, some 3k, some 2.5k, some 3.5k, etc...
Flyingdog670  +   634d ago
960p? That's a weird resolution, never even heard of it CX . Game looks awesome though! Definitely day one
izumo_lee  +   634d ago
Maybe Ubisoft is using the Guerilla Games method of rendering?

Still a little at odds with this cause it looks no where as good as it did during e3 and that was the 'wow' factor that made a lot of people hyped for this game.

I'll have to see more to make a decision if this will be in the library.
I_am_Batman  +   634d ago
This has nothing to do with what GG did. 960p means 960 vertical pixels while with killzone SF it is 960 horizontal pixels in the rendering pipeline (wich still results in 1920 horizontal pixels in the output without upscaling).

960p will have to be upscalesd however it's pretty close to 1080p so it'll probably look almost identical unless you're lookin at both versions side by side on a large screen.

Also I'd like to point out that I was and still am hyped for this game because of it's hacking mechanics not because of the graphics. It's also natural that the hype level sinks when a game gets delayed especially when it was as hyped as Watch Dogs.
#8.1.1 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(17) | Disagree(1) | Report
Sammy777  +   634d ago
KZSF is 1080p native but Guerilla is using a different technique to achieve that. This one is 960p so not the same thing.Ofcourse this is no brainer that the game could have been downgraded for parity's sake since devs want their games to sell well on all platforms. Also Guerilla's method of achieving 1080p was taxing on the ps4 hardware ,which is impossible on Xbox One because of its much weaker GPU and ram
No_Limit  +   634d ago

"KZSF is 1080p native but Guerilla is using a different technique to achieve that"

Did you just made that up? It is either 1080P or 1080i, there is no such thing as using a different technique to get 1080p for interlacing. LOL
Sevir  +   634d ago
960p is progressive, both lines are rendered at that same resolution! What GG did was render the vertical lines at 1080 and the horizontal lines at 960. The result is 1080i with overal picture which is then complimented by the Hardware upscaled present on the PS4...
960p = 1600 x 960. You're welcome
elliou_unto  +   634d ago
Sammy777 - you have no clue what you're talking about, as usual, so please stop repeating something that you don't comprehend. 1080P native means EACH frame is 1920x1080, and all at once, which is not the case. Killzone interlaces sideways for a hybrid resolution, that's more in line with "i" than "p". They couldn't get the game to run at 60fps and 1080P, and the visual degradation is very apparent, especially with fast motion.

Sevir - 960P is actually 1712x963, because that preserves the 16:9 layout, just like Titanfall's 792P was not 1280x792, but 1408x792.
#8.1.5 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(2) | Report
GUTZnPAPERCUTZ  +   634d ago
As an X1 owner, Im just glad it's not 720p lol
cell989  +   634d ago
very good point lol. See I wish more xbox fans were like this guy, less butthurt and more optimistic
jasonc1213  +   634d ago
Me too, man!
T2  +   634d ago
my only question around these xbox resolutions, is about tv's ... if your tv doesn't support 900p then what is the result? does xbox upscale or is that not possible? is your tv still set to 1080?
elliou_unto  +   634d ago
If you have a 720P tv, then you would set the xbox to output 720P native and you would probably get better framerates too.

If you have a 1080P tv, then it can support any resolution by simply upscaling it to 1920x1080, which doesn't even matter because the xbox would upscale the signal first and output it at 1080P to the tv.
#8.3.1 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
Jazz4108  +   634d ago
I have a ps4 and a one and im getting this on the one. The ps4 seems to have alot of other issues on most games just trying to hit 1080p. I will take consistant fps, no screen tearing or drops which is noticiable in alot of ps4 games according to df.
#8.4 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
rpvenom  +   634d ago
what else is new? haven't we already come to a point where we already know how resolutions are going to be now?
press-start   634d ago | Trolling | show | Replies(3)
GamersHeaven  +   634d ago
Going to look beautiful on the PS4.
AutoCad  +   634d ago
going to look nice on both..
if BF4 looks amazing at 900p on ps4 960 should look good on xbox.

either way glad it finally has a release date.
cant wait to play this game
Sammy777  +   634d ago
but better on PS4. Ofcourse why would anyone choose 960p over 1080p . 1080p still has around 25% more pixels than 960p . PS4 version would likely run at a more stable frame rate and have better visual effects
bosoxs505  +   634d ago
We know. No need to brag.
xDHAV0K24x  +   634d ago
going to look beautiful EVERYWHERE*
Azzanation  +   634d ago
Going to look better on PC.
Applejack  +   634d ago | Well said
Wow, I can only imagine what this game would look like at a 4K resolution! Anyway, I'm fine with 1080p but I wish I was still excited for this game when it was revealed.
jcole97  +   634d ago
Did you see the new trailer? My hype has been restored. lol
curtis92  +   634d ago
1080p/960p.. .I'm a ps4 guy but come on this will look awesome on both and I'd be willing to bet most of you all couldn't tell the difference. And if you can tell then... please give me the name of your optometrist so I can get an appt. :)
Software_Lover  +   634d ago
I've said it before, they should do comparison videos and not display the resolutions, frame rates, or console that the versions are on. Let the people argue, then make them eat crow as 90% wouldn't even be able to tell the difference unless it was told to them.
TheGrimReaper  +   634d ago
I'd be happy to be part of your 90% :/

I've seen the differences in COD (or GTA IV or Red Dead Redemption or FIFA etc.) games last gen, and these differences were tiny compared to now.
Did I enjoy the games? Of course! Did it bother me? Yes. Did I buy another console just to have better multiplatform games? No.

Better world: machines performing the same on multiplatform games, only exclusives matter.

Ideal world: One console with games from Sony, MS, Nintendo

Utopia: Same as ideal world but despite having monopoly, creative games & not ripping of the customer xD
#12.1.1 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(2) | Report
clockward100  +   634d ago
Let the pixel war begin lol
cbuc1125  +   634d ago
PS4...Its kind of a big deal.
bumnut  +   634d ago
Unless you have a decent pc.
cbuc1125  +   634d ago still is. PCs dont play the best exclusives gaming has to offer like God of War, Heavy Rain,Uncharted, TLOU, and Gran Turismo. You cant call yourself a real gamer when you dont play the best genre defining games. Now what awesome PC exclusives am i missing out on as a console gamer?
sorane  +   634d ago
If a couple short linear third person action games, a qte game, and an arcade racer are the best exclusives gaming has to offer then I declare gaming dead. One game of Civ 5 has more gameplay then all those combined, and then I can go play Rust, Dayz, Starbound, 7 Days to Die, Starcraft, Warcraft, Loadout, Path of Exile, DoTa2, LoL, Assetto Corsa, FTL, EU4, Total War, Killing Floor, Banished, Stalker, Nether, Sins of a Solar Empire, Warhammer, Trackmania, Galactic Civ, The Banner Saga, Balders Gate 1&2, and well I'd be here for a month if I named them all. Hell, Just today 10 exclusives were released on Steam. It just never ends on PC.
#14.1.2 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(9) | Report
webeblazing  +   634d ago
be quiet theyre gonna get you if you keep talking like that.
roland82  +   634d ago
Its funny when games like red dead redemption was in 640 on ps3 and 720 on xbox resolution wasn't important.
Legacy212  +   634d ago
Or when bioshock ran higher res on 360 then ps3. Like 960p to 1080p is not noticable. PERIOD
ExPresident  +   634d ago
Your apparently skimmed over all the XBOX fans gloating about how 360 was better because multiplats looked and performed better on it.

I'm not promoting fan boys and their arguments either way, but don't pretend this was ever one sided. Regardless of resolution the PS4 has better hardware, and at a better price which is a win for the consumer. The shame, on both sides of the fence, is when fanboys act like resolution is all that matters.
gamer2013  +   634d ago
You're definitely in denial if you think that you're not a fanboy. First of all you're posting on N4G which is a huge fanboy site and secondly you single out one side while praising another.

In my opinion both have obvious strengths and weaknesses. One has better hardware and offers better value with it's online subscription while the other offers a better online overall and more games - excluding indies of course. Take you're pick.
#15.2.1 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(2) | Report
ExPresident  +   634d ago

Posting on N4G doesn't make me a fanboy, it makes me someone who likes following gaming news and takes the time to post on articles I read. You are just taking the chance to assign label someone.

Your opinion and yours alone. Better online is subjective. I said PS4 has better hardware, and that is a proven fact.
XabiDaChosenOne  +   634d ago
Yup I remember that, it was a huge deal back than, and a couple of missing patches of grass missing on the PS3 version almost broke the internet also.
scott182  +   634d ago
Exactly, people like to claim that it is not important and it never was.

But resolution has always been a huge argument for Xbox fans, now all of the sudden it isn't important and nobody can tell the difference.
Sammy777  +   634d ago
that was because of an unconventional hardware . PS3 was more powerful than Xbox 360 as revealed by games like Killzone and Uncharted but programming on it was a nightmare. Same can't be said for Xbox One and PS4 . PS4 and Xbx One are based of same PC architecture and PS4 is way more powerful than Xbox One. MGS/COD for instance run at 720p on Xbx one and 1080p on PS4. Almost all multiplats are either running at a higher rez on PS4 or like 2x the frames as in case of tomb raider with more visual effects

ofcourse 960p to 1080p would be noticeable. 1080p has like 25% more pixels
#15.4 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(14) | Disagree(10) | Report | Reply
DoubleM70  +   634d ago
I'm going to say this again. RYSE 900P 30FPS nothing has out done this game graphically.

yezz  +   634d ago

Shadow Fall is graphically at least on par with Ryse, while having a higher frame rate..

curtis92  +   634d ago
Oddly enough it WAS a big deal for me. I remember playing the 360 version quite a bit and later on I bought it on PS3 and was very disappointed with how blurry it looked. I do think though that after you hit 900p and beyond it gets harder to tell.
#15.5 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
MCTJim  +   634d ago
Right after TitanFall is going to be Infamous and WatchDogs for me :D

Nothing else really in the pipeline that really peaks my interest afterwards till the fall season.
#16 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
MightyNoX  +   634d ago
Woop~ woop! Here we go! Here we go! Neogaf thread, check! Tab for N4G, check. One tab for reddit, check.

Meltdowns, we are GO!!

(Ps: saw this coming a mile)
Legacy212  +   634d ago
Ummm what meltdown? 960p to 1080p is still higher then what "insiders" said and the differences are small and unnoticsble. But please continur like 960p to 1080p is a night and day difference
MightyNoX  +   634d ago
Console warriors like Misterxmedia (whom I'm assuming is related to you) and other people from reddit who keep insisting the Xbone is strong as (if not stronger) than the PS4. These type of news sends them into spin mode and can be quite hilarious to watch unfold.

I don't blame you for having failed reading classes. You're young, inexperienced and innocent. Keep up, dearie, there's a whole world of net celebs out there. I'm more interested in watching them spin than green X-tatooed shill you see in the mirror. :)
Dlacy13g  +   634d ago
@MightyNoX you cast stones and call out others should look in the mirror.
lameguy  +   634d ago
Well, anyone who believed shinobi602's leak from 3weeks ago also saw it coming:
Convas  +   634d ago
What meltdowns are you expecting?

The only ones I'm seeing are how much of a downgrade the game has taken even on PS4 footage.

Low res shadows, no AO, missing specular maps, 2d looking smoke effects and weak alphas.

Yeah. There's definitely a LOT to celebrate here. /s
#17.3 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
TheGrimReaper  +   634d ago
That's what I've been thinking since seeing the new trailer.

The downgrade is very obvious.
Exactly. A few comments have said that they downgraded because of the X1. EA didn't downgrade for BF4, Activision didn't downgrade for Ghosts and Ubisoft didn't downgrade for Assassins Creed but now they do it for Watch Dogs. I said it before these pixel counters and fanboys have ruined this gen. Developers and publishers will get away with almost anything as long as they keep the focus on resolution. No one is even remotely blaming Ubisoft for the downgrade or asking hard questions.
aragon  +   634d ago
any mods going to monitor this resolution reveal?
My friend Aragon. Haha, you wish. I thought I was the only one thinking the same. No update on here about how moderation is stricter now because N4Gs almighty PS4 is 1080p. What a joke.

Disagree all you want but just look for the first post on the KZ 1080i debacle and see the difference.
XabiDaChosenOne  +   634d ago
No surprises here except for that glorious SDK bump from 900p to 960p, so much more pixels!
True_Samurai  +   634d ago
Can't wait for this titanfall and watchdogs on my x1!!!!!! :-D
xDHAV0K24x  +   634d ago
amen brother
CrossingEden  +   634d ago
Definitely not gonna pretend that there's a noticeable difference between 960p and 1080p unless you look WAY too into things, like the font on the bottom of a generic npc is slightly more clear.
AnEwGuY  +   634d ago
I'll still get it on X1....and probably PC as well, later (forget that 4k crap though). I'm struggling to enjoy Killzone:SF because I still can't get used to the DS4 controller. Hopefully Dream Gear makes another XBOX-style controller for PS4, like they did for the PS3.
PrinceOfAllSaiyans  +   634d ago
So what did you do when Xbox wasn't out yet ?

OT- Can't wait. I'm getting the PS4 version. Exclusive 60 minutes of gameplay should be nice.
AnEwGuY  +   634d ago
Before XBOX, I struggled with ALL controllers...the N64 especially. The Controller-S for the original XBOX was the first one that finally felt right to me...and then the 360 made it perfect. I have very large hands....can easily palm an NBA basketball...and the offset joysticks and large, real triggers feel very comfortable and natural. The DS controllers always force my thumbs and fingers into an uncomfortable position, and I feel like I'm trying to strangle a midget.
#22.1.1 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(11) | Report
SoapShoes  +   634d ago
Yeah I'm 6'6" with large hand as well and don't have a problem with the DS controllers. N64 had a controller that was large so I don't see the problem there. ALL controllers? Yeah I doubt you used ALL controllers because if you did you would have used the Dreamcast controller which was large and had the stick at the top as well. I really am not buying this but if it's true I'm terribly sorry. It must suck not being able to adapt to controllers so you can enjoy gaming.

Btw the Xbox controller has been getting smaller and smaller and the X1 controller is smaller than the 360 controller(not to mention the DS4 is now the same size as the 360 controller)... I'm just saying it must be getting harder and harder for you to play Xbox.
SoapShoes  +   634d ago
I've been a PlayStation gamer since PS1 and strongly prefer all of them over Xbox controllers but this is ridiculous! I have no problem adapting to them or any controller. I call b.s.
#22.2 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(14) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
kingdom18  +   634d ago
Exactly, I would switch between playing Lost Odyssey then back to something like Star Ocean on the PS3 and I couldn't feel a difference. All though now that I've used the DS4 I prefer it much more than the DS3. Don't like how big the 360 controller is, but still doesn't make much of a difference playing games for me.
bleedsoe9mm  +   634d ago
why the hell is the arab gamer the first to get this info out , just weird
KnownAsEpic  +   634d ago
Why not?
bleedsoe9mm  +   634d ago
because if "Ubisoft have revealed during their Watch Dogs press conference" every other site would have picked it up and reported it
#23.1.1 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
DEEBO  +   634d ago
You mean after titanfall i will be playing metal gear,infamous,mlb,ufc,spider-m an and watchdogs.i luv being a gamer.
1lawrence  +   634d ago
N u dont need xbox1 to play any of those
LoveOfTheGame  +   634d ago
You also don't need a NES to play does the X1 have anything to do with what he said.
christocolus  +   634d ago

Lmao..was about to ask him the same question..kind of sounds insecure.

Ontopic: im glad they've finally announced the release dates and i believe both console versions will look really good but i will wait for reviews before making up my mind about purchasing it though. Ive got a friend who plays primarily on his souped up pc. I hope he gets the game cos i wouldnt mind seeing it running in 4k,actually this may be the first game ill be seeing at 4k res.
#24.1.2 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(3) | Report
pyramidshead  +   634d ago
I think it's time to take bets on the next multiplat game that's going to be inferior on Xbone. Could make a nice game out of them.
cbuc1125  +   634d ago

bumnut  +   634d ago
You forgot to add the PS4 camera to bring it inline with Xbox One.

Cue come back saying its optional, which is true but its sold out everywhere which shows everyone wants it.
#26.1 (Edited 634d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(8) | Report | Reply
cbuc1125  +   634d ago
Okay you got me there but i got mine day 1 cause i knew it would be popular. so now its:

See, for me...even if they were both MSRP $399 or $499 the one that has the better hardware still wins. But more money for less hardware is simply unacceptable.
nerdman67  +   634d ago
You are not looking at it properly. The Xbox One is not a game console, it is an entertainment system.
It does a lot of different things, which is why it is expensive. The PS4 plays games but lacks the features, so it is cheaper.
The Xbox One was made to appeal to a broader market of people, while the PS4 was made to appeal to gamers.
gnomefighter3d  +   634d ago
You're not looking at this properly, if that's the case then sell the XB1 next to the Roku players. As a gamer all I want is a system that is stable and can play video games on not an all in one set top box to watch TV on.

Gamers are very simple people, give them what they want, make it reasonably priced, deliver the software and games and were happy. This is why you're seeing the PS4 killing it.

I understand Microsoft's approach with the XB1 but as you can see it is not working out well for them. I'm sorry but Sony nailed this next gen. console release this time around and it is well deserved. I tip my hat to them : )
nerdman67  +   633d ago
As do I, I support it all, especially after the PS3 launch.
Im not saying like the Xbox One, I am just saying that you need to understand its target
bienio  +   634d ago
Pc for me😉
worldwidegaming  +   634d ago
now that i escaped the achievement/trophy addiction its PC all the way.
I would love exclusives though.
SPARTAN3  +   634d ago
So now the rez is out of the way how long will it take for you guys to shut up? and we can see if this game will even be good. Hope its more like ac2 instead of 1.
kingduqc  +   634d ago
1440p 60fos for me. Cannot wait.
Pluggedcube  +   634d ago
I don't mind having 960p instead of 1080p, that'll be unnoticeable to me. If it had been 720p I would've been upset (even then I can barely notice the difference)
brich233  +   634d ago
The developers who been putting 720p games on Xbox one are lazy if they put the same game on ps4 at 1080p.
« 1 2 3 4 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

Xenoblade Chronicles X Review | TSA

12m ago - TSA: Having long been in development for Wii U under its understated codename, X, Xenoblade Chro... | Wii U

Xenoblade Chronicles X review | GamesRadar

13m ago - Xenoblade Chronicles X offers a resplendent world, fantastic combat, and transforming mechs, but... | Wii U

See what games are coming out in 2016

Now - Visit our release calendar to see what games are coming out in 2016. | Promoted post

Just Cause 3 Review - Viva La Revolution | Game Informer

13m ago - GI: Rico Rodriguez comes home in Just Cause 3, bringing revolution and his arsenal of devastatin... | PC

Xenoblade Chronicles X Review - Stabbing Dinosaurs in the Butt | Escapist

13m ago - Escapist: Xenoblade Chronicles X is a fantastical space opera about exploration and the humanity... | Wii U

Xenoblade Chronicles X Review: Broad and expansive and sometimes annoying | Post Arcade

13m ago - PA: Xenoblade Chronicles X is a huge game, teeming with complexity, open vistas and lots and lot... | Wii U