Ray gives us the good, the bad, and the ugly aspects of the numbers given to game reviews, and the power they have.
Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.
Xbox content + services up 62% while hardware down 31%... seems about right with the way they tout you don't need the hardware to play. People can play on their phones or smart tv or other means. I don't hardly play on my consoles directly since getting devices like the logitech g-cloud and ps portal. Which is to also say I have been playing more digital than physical because of these devices.
Too expensive hardware when others offer the same or more for less? Good work, Green Team.
"Despite some early successes for Xbox games on rival platforms, Xbox hardware is down by a massive 31 percent this quarter."
"Without Activision Blizzard, Microsoft’s overall gaming revenue would have actually declined this quarter."
"Xbox content and services would have only been up a single percent without Activision Blizzard..."
"It looks like next quarter is going to be a similar story for gaming at Microsoft, too."
That is crazy... so A/B/K is carrying the whole Xbox gaming.
Oh and Microsoft will be fine. Windows, Office and Cloud are growing with each pc purchase.
As of right now, there are no monopolies in the games industry, and for the sake of the medium as a whole, they never should either.
And yet the biggest tech companies in America are essentially that. They buy up all the small comps only to kill them off and steal what they have, and if they can't buy em they bleed them to death.
They buy IPs not talent. That's why these buyouts never work and the IPs die. Right now it's too expensive to develop games - but I expect that to shift maybe as AI tools can make it easier. The best games have been indie games for awhile as big developers fuck their ips to death with "games as a service" -
GL compiles a list of some of the most mind-blowing video game narrative twists in recent memory, from The Last of Us to Outer Wilds
With articles like these cant you tag the games mentioned so that we can know ahead of time if there’s a spoiler to avoid?
Not clicking on your article otherwise.
They're basically made exclusively for fanboys trolling the internets.
A little bit of both. Though it will help developers get sales from those who rely solely on reviews to decide what games they should buy, It also hinders the game unable to sell better than it should if it is given a 6 or 7 of 10 from a mainstream review site. Like IGN for example.
reviews are really so pointless now adays. Mainstream websites are all bought. Smaller websites are unprofessional. Just form your own opinions people.
I think review scores should be done away with. Because what is a rating? What does that truly even mean? You can still have a review and leave the "scoring" totally up to the reader to decide after reading the interview. Which would actually MAKE them read/watch it than simply seeing a score and moving on.
Take The Walking Dead Survival Instinct. I think we all know how that was hammered by scores. But honestly, that game (as a fan) was NOT that bad and most people, will now probably never get the chance to know that.
READ the review, score means nothing to me without the words to explain