OXM UK: "Does Battlefield really need a campaign? Going by Battlefield 3's story - a visually splendiferous, but disappointingly cramped and by-the-numbers experience - DICE would do better to chop the feature and redouble the focus on multiplayer. Studio general manager Karl Magnus Troedsson and Battlefield 4 game director Stefan Strandberg insist that they've learned from their blunders, however, and feel the next instalment will put any doubts about DICE's single player panache to rest."
Cheaters & hackers have been causing grief on Battlefield 1, Hardline & BF4 servers, with nonstop DDoS attacks among other things. Unfortunately, EA has remained silent about it.
if this happened in 2042, they'd have something to say. which is weird, considering battlefield 1 has more players on steam right now.
Its so obvious that EA is doing this or hired ppl to mess up the games so that we’d be forced to have just 1 Battlefield working.
Honestly it’s probably the devs themselves. They did an update to bf4 way back that kinda made assault rifles doo doo in hopes that people would flock to BF1 cuz BF4 was too perfect
The shooter genre is one of the most beloved videogame genres in the gaming community, and rightfully so. From DOOM Eternal to Battlefield 4, passing through The Outer Worlds, the Xbox Game Pass has a lot to offer when it comes to amazing shooter experiences. Come check out some great shooter games available on Xbox Game Pass!
There's a bunch of great shooters on gamepass; both legacy and new.
A recommendation I have is a work in progress preview title called Anacrusis. It's a lot of fun, and has a cool aesthetic.
KeenGamer: "Sometimes a game starts out as a buggy mess and we all just stop and think, “that definitely could have spent a bit more time in the oven”. This is the case for these 5 games which infamously marked their place in recent game memory."
It's nice that they admitted that BF3's singleplayer wasn't that great.
Too Cod-ie. Not enough like Battlefield.
Why is DICE focusing on things that are unimportant to the market they're targeting? I'd like a good SP as much as anyone else, but the people that mainly play BF3 or any CoD are in it for the MP most of all.
This looks semi optimistic. As a person who does not play FPS single player campaigns for the sheer fact that it is so unrealistic, tied down, single path (or maybe multi-path but not free roaming) that it really doesn't work for me. If they try to improve on the flexibility of choice to accomplish a mission and ability to change paths if something doesn't work out. I would love a game like battlefield with missions as flexible as sandbox games (Not open world but open mission areas
I will have to try the campaign and see how they have "Improved".
I would put all their effort in the multiplayer and scrap the single player campaign all together that's where people spend 1000s of hours playing infact I didn't even finish BF3 campaign I just got bored with it but logged 100 of hours on the mp side