190°

Sony’s Perfect Playstation Plus Trifecta

It’s abundantly clear that Playstaion Plus offers ridiculously good value to the consumer but generally speaking; a gain on the one hand is a loss on another. In this article we take a look at who, if anyone, is taking the knock for Playstation Plus. Is it possible that Sony has created a win-win-win scenario?

Sharius3728d ago

back then, i bought ps+ just because im too lazy to update my ps+ by myself

but now, just look at how awesome ps+ become

shivvy243728d ago (Edited 3728d ago )

i got ps+(EU) for the first time with my ps4 and its been amazing, this month i got Bioshock Infinite and MetroLL on PS3 and Outlast on PS4! THIS MONTH ! JUST 1 MONTH ! in australia both metro and bioshock are like $30 bucks each, and outlast is probz 10-20$ ! 1 month just pays itself and i cant forget last month i got DMC and Borderlands 2 !
EDIT : also got Rezogun, Contrast and some other game last month too

MRMagoo1233728d ago

That was my reaction when i got ps+ for the first time prob about 7 months ago now , i signed up for a year because of the news about ps4 needing it for online mostly, and from the first day it has paid for itself and probably paid for itself about 5 or 6 times now lol. It is by far the best pay service i have ever used.

You dont even need to buy another game again with the ones they give you on the network.

ZodTheRipper3728d ago

I got it since release and every month there is a war between games where the winner will earn the free hdd space. Not only on PS3 but PSVita, too.

BigFnHooters3728d ago

It certainly has grown in the number of things you get for the price. However, from the very start PS+ has been awesome even if it never grew beyond its initial state.

From the very start you got more out of PS+ than you payed in every year in discounts and free games.

ExtoVert3728d ago (Edited 3728d ago )

I have been PS+ for over a year now. At the start I got it for the same reason, the automatic updating, instead of waiting for that long intall. I set my ps3 to update at 2am, i turn off the ps3 and when I wake up in the morning every thing was updated and all my games saved in the cloud. Also now all the games they have put up. discounts on games, dlc, themes and exclusive access to betas. I have enjoyed what PS+ has to offer n will keep on doing so for the foreseeable future.

DualWielding3728d ago

I just hope this continues onto the PS4 era.... I mean, they can copy Microsoft's model of just charging for online with no added value and it's likely to make more money than plus... sad but true..... I hope I'm wrong since I don't care about multiplayer and would only pay for plus if the games keep on coming with the same quality they did on PS3/Vita

MarioAna3728d ago

I think they have started off pretty well for the PS4. Resogun is high quality and most people seem to be enjoying Outlast quite a bit. We also know that at some point we will get a truncated version of Driveclub on launch.

ZodTheRipper3728d ago

Resogun, Contrast, Don't Starve & Outlast ...I enjoyed 3/4 from those so I think it's great so far.

GribbleGrunger3728d ago

They'll keep on coming. Eventually we'll get more than one PS4 game a month too. The only reason they can't offer more at the moment is because it's only just released and there isn't a substantial back catalogue. Don't be surprised if we also get one or two free PSNow games a month too eventually.

DualWielding3728d ago (Edited 3728d ago )

hope you are right, is just that I wonder if they'll bother to make more than a token effort with games, knowing people are willing to happily pay just for multiplayer (millions and millions of Xbox Live subscribers)...

I'm still shocked less than 20% of PS3 owners have PS+ when its such an amazing value......when xbox live is like 80% subscription rate... If everybody had gotten PS + and really can't think of a single reason any PS3 owner should't then things would be different. But at this point just charging for online and offering just token games seems more lucrative than the awesomeness PS+ is on PS3/Vita

MightyNoX3728d ago

If I'm correct, there should be a 'Dying Light' beta coming to the PS+ subscribers on Feb 11th.

corvusmd3728d ago

Since this is an opinion article, and I have a PSN account I must say that PS+ is actually the worst value in gaming today. It's essentially the same thing as free PSN, but now they charge for it. True, there are "free" games now but rarely do they mean anything. You pay $50 a year for games that are typically very old/not worth it...or when the rare gem comes along it's over a year old, and chances are that if you are interested in it, you've already played and beaten it. Other than that, there really isn't anything special about PS+ at all, it hasn't been upgraded at all.

DualWielding3728d ago

PS+ the worst value? not even Michael Pachter would dare say something so crazy.... You can argue its not value if you only have a PS4.... but on PS3/Vita is the greatest value ever in the history of console gaming.... I don't see how can anyone think otherwise

BigFnHooters3728d ago

Yes, it is a bizarre thing to try to claim.

The value of PS+ isn't something up for debate. It's simple math:

The value of the discounts and free games >>> the yearly fee.

End of story. There is nothing to debate.

My_precious3728d ago (Edited 3728d ago )

PS+, once was a worst value, back then (before PSN got hack) all PS+ did is give you the option to auto update your PS3 and 10Mb of cloud store for you to keep your save file

but after PSN got hack, sony begin to give away game monthly and PS+ value slowly change till it become godly service like today

bobtheimpaler3728d ago

ROFL. There's a clear reason you only have one bubble, troll. PS+ is tremendous value. I've been able to play games I otherwise wouldn't have tried and will now purchased subsequent entries in franchises, or even buy physically so that it will be part of my collection. The ps3 alone is tremendous value with PS+ I have a ps4 and vita as well. And the indie games that have been released on PS+ on the ps4 are fun and addictive.

GarrusVakarian3728d ago (Edited 3728d ago )

I really have to question if you know what you are talking about.....

" It's essentially the same thing as free PSN"

No, it really isn't.

"True, there are "free" games now but rarely do they mean anything. You pay $50 a year for games that are typically very old/not worth it.."

Yeah, i mean who wants to play Bioshock Infinite, Metro: Last Light, Borderlands 2 and Outlast ( and that's only a few from this month alone)? No one. /S.

I don't even know how you honestly think PS plus is the worst value in gaming.....I don't even understand how your mind must work to come to that conclusion. The value from the games you get for "free" easily outweighs the sub fee. You are just plain wrong.

TheGrimReaper00113728d ago

And fuck Gravity Rush, Uncharted 3 and Uncharted Golden Abyss
fuck far cry 3 and motorstorm
Fuck little big planet 2 and wipeout on both systems and fuck DMC
Also fuck okami, Ico, Shadow of the Colossus, Infamous 2, metal gear rising, demon's souls

/s

I almost feel like a criminal
Just look at these games! and even more I haven't mentioned yet :D

ravinash3728d ago

Not everyone is going to get every single game when it first comes out. So this encourages people to try games they would probably not have bothered to try.
Plus there are a load of games I was thinking of getting but hadn't gotten round to playing yet, so when they turn up and I can play it for free, then that's great.
It'll take time for PS4 to grow the same library that PS3 has at the moment, but after a year it will be even better value.
Until then, I'm enjoying all the games I'm getting on my PS3, and just marking the games I will play once I get my PS4.

If your spending all that money getting all the games as soon as they come out, I'm sure the cost of PSN+ will not make much difference to you.

Why o why3728d ago (Edited 3728d ago )

Yeah murda dolls. We believe you. You were quite happy to pay just to play online with the bi yearly freebie yaris car type game yet now, you get games less than year old but still find issue. Great impersonation of a tool if you as me. M's fledgling attempt just can't compete yet. Luckily they have spokespeople who will downplay PS+'s obvious value whilst lauding 4 and 5 year old games that you probably already sold.

badz1493728d ago

@corvusmd

LOL if you think PS+ is the worst value in gaming today, I wonder what that make XBL Gold to you? worst scam in gaming since the dawn of gaming itself, right?

RandomDude6553728d ago

How is his comment marked interesting? It's insane...and people complain about this site being playstation biased....lol yeah right.

MarioAna3728d ago

@cchum insanity is interesting.

NeoTribe3728d ago

Free games that barepy mean anything? Old games that nobody wants to play? You realise were talkin about ps plus, not xbox live gold right? Your opinion is absurdely backwards from the truth. You are either a massive troll, or a.... well, massive troll.

johndoe112113728d ago

Ok Hyrb, this has got to stop. Stop trolling the ps4 articles.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3728d ago
BBBQ_BYOBB3728d ago

I've had ps plus for a couple of years now, for both US and EU and I have literally hundreds of games as a result. Initially it was a lot of PSone games (which I was happy with), now many more new titles. It's funny how people only realize how good it is after they are forced to use it.

MarioAna3728d ago

Do you think it would be plausible to become a developer solely for PS+.

Meaning Sony would pay developers a set fee for a game to be release day 1 for free on PS+. This is basically what happened with Resogun.

Show all comments (30)
150°

Sony Patents To Prevent You From In-Game Harassment By Reading Your Emotions

A new patent recently published by Sony wants to gather biometric data of gamers to track whether one is being harassed using AI tools.

Profchaos1d 12h ago (Edited 1d 12h ago )

I hope this is one of those patents that never comes to fruition.

I already dislike the fact you can pay a significant amount for a online service buy associated games and content on said service and get banned from that service over potentially a misunderstanding the bans are already handed out for flimsy reasons

I'd rather see money invested in a ban that simply removes the offensive players ability to communicate with unknown players allow them to continue party chats with friends but not with Joe blow on cod.

exputers1d 9h ago

Agreed. Blizzard recently banned a college Overwatch 2 player who's dependent for saying "shit." Pretty harsh.

Profchaos17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

How rediculas really. You can't say a word that's allowed in most PG films and prime time TV but the game is based around killing the enemy team using guns, explosives etc.

It's just backwards.

just_looken19h ago

What your talking about is called block list

In 2006 a spaceship dropped of the playstation 3/xbox 360 i say that that generation was the last great gen with game functions/tech that has yet to comeback

Anyhow the playstation 3 if you block listed a id they could not talk to you in chatroom with either text or voice. But that was pre mind fucked 2018 when people were more human than sheep.

But hey gta 6 is coming out billion dollar budget without a single player custom character creator and without singeplayer coop off/online something saints row 1-3 had on the xbox 360.

z2g1d 5h ago

Take my social security and bank account numbers too! Here’s a picture of my wife and our address.

phoenixwing1d 4h ago

Cmon where's the pictures of your children. Don't hold out on them.

H91d 5h ago

At this rate I feel Sony will eventually sell a room to play games in it where they can monitor your every breath

jambola1d 1h ago

I genuinely get a bit worried sometimes when a friend says something that could be offensive In a party
Because I have no trouble believing some bans would happen when in a private party for saying something wrong

SegaSaturn6691d 3h ago

I want them to censor erotic content by measuring my groin temperature so i dont get too distracted while playing black ops 2.

Popsicle1d 3h ago

Terrible idea. Not only do I not consent to providing my biometric data, the potential for mishandling biometric data is almost a certainty. Positive stress and negative stress can produce similar changes in biometrics. Interpreting the precise emotion a person is feeling is not only invasive but could be easily misconstrued. I hope this never comes to fruition.

Show all comments (14)
130°

Sony Could Increase Your Game's Difficulty If It Sees You Complain About It

Sony has recently published a new patent that wants to dynamically handle the games' difficulty and gameplay based on the player's emotions.

jznrpg1d 21h ago

This is something I might use. Sometimes I play some good games but they don’t have difficulty option and are a little too easy.

Profchaos1d 20h ago

Souls games will be like that players struggling make it harder

PassNextquestion1d 19h ago (Edited 1d 19h ago )

I think if used correctly it could work well

jambola1d 15h ago

cool idea
cool idea for horror games especially
the way it's explained here sounds like it could never be forced hopefully, so that's ok with me

Show all comments (8)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
ChasterMies22d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken21d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga21d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken21d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6421d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long21d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197221d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic21d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 21d ago
DivineHand12521d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91321d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer21d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91321d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit21d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 21d ago
Christopher22d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6921d ago (Edited 21d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit21d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal22d ago (Edited 22d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher22d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken21d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197221d ago (Edited 21d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic21d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2321d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218321d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder21d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts21d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)