230°

Square Enix: Remakes and Social Games Saved High End Titles and New IPs; Eidos Acquisition Explained

Former Square Enix president and current Chairman of the Board Yoichi Wada attended a round table of the “Kurokawa School: Thinking the Future of Entertainment” and gave a few glimpses on the reasons behind the sudden influx of remakes, sequels and social games that affected the company in the past few years. He also mentioned the reasons why Eidos was pinpointed as the best purchase option to expand in the western market.

Read Full Story >>
dualshockers.com
-Foxtrot3752d ago

"In addition to that a lot of director level developers were required to participate to the remake of Final Fantasy XIV, making it inevitable to close some of the new IP projects and difficult to create a big hitting new IP."

So hang on a minute, because they redid FF14 it meant new IPs were cancelled.

What the hell I'd rather of seen something fresh from them then redoing FF14, they messed up the first time they should of just left it and fix the wrongs in the next online game they do in the future.

I want to know some of these "high end titles" social games apparently saved. They better not bloody say FF13-2 or Lightning Returns because I would of rather seen that money go to something else.

Seriously all I see here is Square spewing out a load of bullcrap on why they are delcined over the years.

Abriael3752d ago

"What the hell I'd rather of seen something fresh from them then redoing FF14"

Considering that Final Fantasy XIV is one of the best, if not the best MMORPGs on the market I fully disagree.

If those new IP were really that good, they'd have pushed them through. Normally the ones that are closed are those that are already walking on shaky legs.

-Foxtrot3752d ago

The best MMORPG, I highly doubt that. FF11 was better then FF14. Least with FF11 they got it right the first time without wasting resources, time and money correcting their stupid mistakes where new IPs suffered from.

They've never had big AAA IPs for years and when they did they threw it away for FF14. Those games shouldn't of had to suffer because of Squares mistake of it's terrible launch

Abriael3752d ago (Edited 3752d ago )

You "highly doubting that" is a tad inconsequential mate as quite obviously you never played it. Getting it right the first time has absolutely no bearing on the actual quality of a game. I play games, I don't play the past.

The current FFXIV blows FFXI out of the water on a number of levels, not even counting graphics.

And I loved FFXI, but XIV: A realm reborn is simply way better.

Also, it was the whole situation that caused the closure of new IPs, not just the development of XIV.

Games aren't people. They don't "suffer." Weak projects get canceled all the time, by every company.

Remaking Final Fantasy XIV is one of the best things Square Enix ever did. They gave a fantastic game to customers that already paid for it. And it's really rare to see corporations actually hauling ass to make it up to their customers.

Criticizing a company that gives its customers what their paid for because "games had to suffer" (lol) is ridiculous.

That's way better than other companies that never deliver: They just chalk a failed project as a failure, fire everyone, and if you already paid for it, well thanks for all the fish. Too bad.

Yeah. I'll keep my remade game that is giving me all the fun I paid for the first time, instead of the vapid promise of new IPs that probably weren't even good, and that's why they've been axed.

-Foxtrot3752d ago (Edited 3752d ago )

@Abriael

You know I was about to argue to you, I actually wrote a paragraph or so before I remembered that you defend the s*** out of Square Enix and Final Fantasy regardless so I'd be wasting my time. So heres a the shorter version

"You "highly doubting that" is a tad inconsequential mate as quite obviously you never played it."

" I don't play the past. "

Oh really so if a company, any company, f**** you over as a consumer it dosen't matter because it's in the past. That's the silliest thing I've heard.

Well done generalizing despite the fact you don't know me...

"Also, it was the whole situation that caused the closure of new IPs, not just the development of XIV."

Still wasted resources and money on it though, they could of gotten the best one of the bunch to go into production

"Games aren't people. They don't "suffer." Weak projects get canceled all the time, by every company"

lol I didn't say they were people, I just said they shouldn't have to pay the price because of a failed game. Some of us like new IPs that aren't IOS games. Why try and twist my comment to make it look like I said something stupid, thats kind of low.

"Criticizing a company that gives its customers what their paid for because"

Yes because Square Enix are sooooo reliable, they are the saints of this industry /s

"Yeah. I'll keep my remade game that is giving me all the fun I paid for the first time, instead of the vapid promise of new IPs that probably weren't even good, and that's why they've been axed."

How the hell do you know they've been axed because they weren't good, it's pretty much stated in the article that they got cancelled because of what happened and they needed to cut loses. Instead of investing in a new IP they couldn't be bothered and were too worried about sales, these are the same guys who called Tomb Raider a failure in terms of sales.

Abriael3752d ago

@-Foxtrot:

"Oh really so if a company, any company, f**** you over as a consumer it dosen't matter because it's in the past. That's the silliest thing I've heard."

if that company then comes around and gives me my money's worth, and more, Yes. The past doesn't matter, and I sure don't judge a game over another past game. Doing so is ridiculous.

"Still wasted resources and money on it though, they could of gotten the best one of the bunch to go into production "

They created one of the best MMORPGs on the market. That's in no shape or form "vasted resources."

"lol I didn't say they were people, I just said they shouldn't have to pay the price because of a failed game. Some of us like new IPs that aren't IOS games. Why try and twist my comment to make it look like I said something stupid, thats kind of low."

I didn't need to twist your comment. You did say something stupid without any help. I find it extremely funny that you like "new IPs" generically, regardless of their quality.

"Yes because Square Enix are sooooo reliable, they are the saints of this industry /s"

With remaking FFXIV into a great game, they demonstrated to be more reliable than those that just scrap a game and if you already paid them, well too bad.

"How the hell do you know they've been axed because they weren't good"

Good projects don't get the axe. The projects that get the axe in this industry are the shaky ones. Companies don't waste invested money unless they have solid reasons to.

Outside_ofthe_Box3752d ago (Edited 3752d ago )

As someone who personally doesn't care for MMOs, I agree with Fox. I'd take a new IP over a MMORPG any day.

Godmars2903752d ago (Edited 3752d ago )

The issue that keeps coming up with "former S/E fans" and FF14:ARR - is that "ARR' wasn't the first effort. The money that went into making FF:ARR was money which was taken from other projects because FF14 - just "FF14" - was a surprisingly lazy/expensive mess. If FF14 had been done right, FF14:ARR would not need to exist.

How is that not understood?

How is it not understood that this is the exact same company which released Final Fantasy All the Bravest: A game which literally used fan service as a method of raping the fandom's wallet?

-Gespenst-3752d ago

There's always a chance that they'll take those IPs off the shelf if things start looking up financially. They were also probably concerned with restoring the reputation of the Final Fantasy series - the brand name alone which they'll probably be depending on for many years to come (and have been depending on from pretty much the beginning). We might see all that new stuff that got shelved in the future either as it was or in a new shape or form.

SE are disgustingly corporate, just like most big game corporations, but they have some pretty good artists and creators under their wing and that's why I support them. While many game corporations rely on brand names to have people flock to the same game year in year out, SquareEnix merely use it as a seal of quality to attract gamers to diverse and new experiences - each Final Fantasy game is different, whilst each CoD game or Elder Scrolls game is very similar. I still find it to be a little bit cynical and manipulative, but it's still better than the kind of shit EA or Activision pulls annually.

DragonKnight3752d ago

@Abriael: I have FFXIV, and "the best MMORPG" it is not.

But aside from that, FFXIV is the reason that Versus XIII is now FFXV and a multiplatform title. We may never know what the real FFXV would have been had it not been for Wada insisting on FFXIV being fixed.

FFXIV diverted too many resources for a game that many won't play and many won't stick with. The FF audience, generally speaking, aren't fans of the franchise because of MMOs.

Abriael3752d ago (Edited 3752d ago )

@DragonKnight: "I have FFXIV, and "the best MMORPG" it is not." you're very free to have bad tastes in MMOs, and if you think what you said is true, then you do.

Also, FFXV is multiplatform simply because Square Enix knows that releasing on multiple platforms is good for sales. To think otherwise is extremely naive.

Final Fantasy XIV: A realm reborn is a monument to how a company should behave with its customers. It's a great success and it will continue to be, just like final fantasy xi was.

Haters will keep hating and FFXIV players will continue laughing at them while enjoying a great game.

torchic3752d ago

@abriel

don't waste your time on Foxtrot, he's just Square Enix biggest hater.

DragonKnight3751d ago (Edited 3751d ago )

@Abriael: Wow, you jumped right into the "bad taste in games" assault eh?

Look, what you think is good or the best is not the absolute definition of good or best so get over yourself. FFXIV is nothing special. If it were, I'd be playing it passed the free month that I got and I'm not.

"Also, FFXV is multiplatform simply because Square Enix knows that releasing on multiple platforms is good for sales. To think otherwise is extremely naive."

No, FFXV is multiplat because it's a "new" game. The game that it was was supposed to be an exclusive, and you have no idea what the sales for the game are going to be like. Just because a game is multiplatform doesn't mean anything if one of the platforms traditionally doesn't buy JRPGs. The cost to return ratio applies.

"Final Fantasy XIV: A realm reborn is a monument to how a company should behave with its customers. It's a great success and it will continue to be, just like final fantasy xi was."

Oh yeah, releasing a garbage game and then diverting resources to fix your screw up, thereby cancelling or postponing (possibly indefinitely) more games that could have been great is an awesome way to treat customers. Why give them, say, 3 games when you can put all the resources that would be used to make those games into fixing and releasing one game.

"Haters will keep hating and FFXIV players will continue laughing at them while enjoying a great game."

And thus you'll be judged the same way as the 12 year olds that play CoD. Undeservedly arrogant in your defense of an MMO that cost the rest of the world other games and attacking anyone that doesn't agree.

With people like you around, SE will never reclaim the glory of their Past.

hay3751d ago (Edited 3751d ago )

"Square big on reuse."

Three final fantasy XIIIs on the same assets, bunch of low level remasters( http://i.imgur.com/vPfazQJ.... ), and with FFXIV it probably went along "we invested but has no money?" lines, "this needs to make money, patch it up, lubricate and aim!"(yes, am one of those people who more struggled with boredom than challenges in FFXIV).

If they abandoned new IPs they probably been even worse than this MMO.

Not sure if any of us would be more pissed off wasting money on FFXIV than another Corridor Corrida XIII making idiots of own fanbase. I'm not.
We already know Square wants more, more, MORE, with Hitman and Tomb Raider whinings saying they wanted more, we can easily assume that they will do a lot of low cost/passion productions from now on.

This means re-releasing(monetizing on) every asset they have. Chceck.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 3751d ago
Snookies123752d ago

FF XIV Realm Reborn is a fantastic game, and was a big success in terms of both sales and reviews. They took something that they failed miserably with, and turned it into something really great. I commend them for doing that.

-Foxtrot3752d ago

But if they just did the new IPS and do FF16 for example as an MMO in the future to correct the mistakes everyone wins.

Abriael3752d ago

@-Foxtrot: No. People win when they get what they paid for. With FFXIV: A Realm Reborn people that paid for FFXIV got their money worth and more.

Finding something negative in that in the name of unknown, generic "new IP!" is ridiculous.

-Foxtrot3752d ago

It was your fault for buying it straight away knowing Square Enixs track record.

Thats what happens when you buy a game at launch, especially an MMOs where a ton of stuff could happen

Abriael3752d ago

@-Foxtrot: you mean Square Enix's track record of making awesome MMORPGs like FFXI?

You're just grasping for straws :D

-Foxtrot3752d ago (Edited 3752d ago )

@Abriael

FF11...really

That's when Square were still pretty decent and that was along time ago

Point still stands you knew the risks buying an MMO day one especially off a company with bad rep especially when it came out. The only person grasping for straws here is you mate

"Bu bu but...they owe us because of how bad the game was"

Well you shouldn't of bought it then, should of waited for reviews

Abriael3752d ago

"Bu bu but...they owe us because of how bad the game was"

The point is exactly that they don't owe us. And they still did it, which is commendable.

Thanks for proving yourself wrong.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3752d ago
3752d ago
Shinox3752d ago (Edited 3752d ago )

@Abriael Your giving FF XIV ARR so much credits as if its the only MMO exists on the MMO market just because its a multiplatform game , Also don't judge others tastes The game is CRAP compared to other MMORPG's !

All i say is wait for these titles to come on the west before blindly giving the crown to your game:

Archeage
Blade and Soul
Black Desert
Bless Online
EIN: Epicus Incognitus
The War of Genesis 4 : Spiral Genesis

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3751d ago
KingKelloggTheWH3752d ago

I hate to hear that New Ip's died....: ( I miss when we got games like FF tactics or Vagrant story

k2d3752d ago

"Remakes and Social Games _Saved High End Titles_ and New IPs"

Let that be a lesson. Dial down on the budgets:
Pay more attention to gameplay, let a younger generation unfold, and stop spending so much resources on cgi and "super realistic" graphics.

3752d ago Replies(2)
MegaRay3752d ago

If they had to cancel some new ips for kh hds, ff x hd and ff xiv then that was the best decision they did this whole gen lol
Some might will disagree but I like this "new squareenix" :)

Kalebninja3751d ago

so you would rather they just give some games slightly better textures instead of getting big new games?nice

Show all comments (42)
370°

Square Enix Declares $140m Loss Amid Game Pipeline Shakeup

Final Fantasy VII Rebirth publisher Square Enix has declared a $140m loss based on a shakeup of its internal development pipeline.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
Furesis7d ago

What are they doing over there? Sounds like they canceled something big. I read a rumor a while back about ff9 remake . Here "Final Fantasy IX has gone through a very challenging development, the game is still in progress but may undergo changes drastic enough that we won't hear about it for a couple of years."
This could be one of the reasons if the rumor is true. That was Silknight i don't know how credible he is but it's something and it would make sense.

-Foxtrot7d ago

I hope IX is still on the cards

Just a straight up remake which they expand a little bit nothing over ambitious

If IX dosent happen then VI and VIII will never be thought of.

Kakashi Hatake7d ago

6 and 8 were way more p popular games despite today's cult following of 9.

blackbeld6d ago

I want my FF8 remake! Can't believe they cancelled it.

TiredGamer7d ago

What are they doing? Sales are falling and the costs are out of control. Big releases need to be absolute sales home runs now, and Final Fantasy sales have stagnated.

Now we know why Square didn’t fall over themselves to remake the original FF7 all these years ago. It certainly wasn’t a license to print money, at least not with what the expectations were. Each of these full on remakes drains an enormous amount of company resources for a razor thin profit margin.

TwoPicklesGood7d ago

Breaking the game up into multiple parts was a mistake IMO.

blackblades7d ago

The loses came from cancelling games nothing else.

Tapani6d ago

They lost the magic in the remakes. And the story is incomplete. The original FF7 is still way better. The Remake / Rebirth are just fan service. Like an Anime/Manga with "optional" filler content. FF7 had pretty much zero filler, it was paced extremely well, and still today flows much better than the grindy story and spongey enemy battles in the remakes.

babadivad6d ago

If they released it at once on all platforms, they would have made all of their money back. Could have been on to an FF8 or 9 remake. Ready to cash in again on nostalgia like Capcom. This is their fault for trying to milk the title.

Once I head they were breaking it up into parts, I lost all interest.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 6d ago
neutralgamer19926d ago

I hope people understand usually when a loss is declared it means a game which had been in development got cancelled. For example Sony Santa Monica before GOW-PS4 had cancelled a project which Sony had spent 7 figures on

As far as square is concerned they release a bad game once a year. Forspoken anyone?

For those making comments on remake not selling well, I hope y’all realize that Sony is the only reason this remake is happening. If Sony didn’t fund it the remake wouldn’t be happening. Just like Konami didn’t want to remake SH2 because development costs of 100 plus million

shadowT7d ago

Do not miss Final Fantasy 16. Great game!

raWfodog7d ago

I'm waiting for them to release the complete edition bundle, but it's definitely on my list.

PhillyDonJawn7d ago

Wth is going on with the gaming industry?

mandf7d ago

Corporate investors taking everything

TiredGamer7d ago

Not rocket science. Compare sales numbers, development cycles, and budgets to the previous gens. We are all collectively burning up the industry from the inside out. Expectations are ludicrously high now for every release and sales are dropping for even the most prestigious of series.

We used to be satisfied paying $50-60 for a game that took 1/100th the budget and staff to make. Now gamers feel cheated if they have to pay the same for a game that took 100x the budget. We may be reaching the end of the line for this model of gaming.

wiz71917d ago

@tiredgamer I think your point is one that ppl don’t understand and you hit it on the nose .. some gamers don’t want to take accountability but it’s some of the gamers fault the industry is where it’s at .. we as gamers set the standards for the industry not the shareholders , ppl forget that the shareholders and the industry want and need OUR Money. Both the Xbox and PlayStation are seeing a drop in hardware , the industry is very stagnant right now.

Tacoboto7d ago

Speaking to Square:

Turns out their mismanagement wasn't related to the western studios they dumped to Embracer, but their own fault.

With regards to Xbox - a good way to kill your brand is to pull support on high quality titles and only dump B and C-tier titles to it

With regards to PC - Epic Games Story exclusivity for any duration and piss-poor optimization will hurt you.

With regards to FF Pixel Remasters - y'all messed up by barely releasing them on physical, like wtf that was free money!

And lastly, you don't help a franchise by releasing a mainline title that undermines every title that came before it. FFXVI was a DMC-like with bottom-of-the-barrel side quests and I can't imagine that helping Rebirth at all considering its marketing is directly tied to how big that game is.

Tacoboto7d ago

Sony is getting their best titles and with the most polish, so what about it? Nintendo gets their top properties too, for titles that can run on Switch hardware.

It's the other fanbases that get the second- and third-class treatment from Square. If that's due to agreements with Sony, that's not a Sony issue but a Square one for accepting those terms. Sony is doing its best to look out for Sony.

wesnytsfs6d ago

sales and stupid practices like exclusives.

TiredGamer7d ago

The industry implosion is continuing. Sky high budgets, prolonged development windows, stagnant sales numbers, and falling currency values (inflation) are wreaking havoc on the legacy industry. AAA games will slowly become the rarity.

CS77d ago

Sad. Rebirth was one of my favorite games in a long time. Should have sold more.

CrimsonWing697d ago

Oh I’m with you. What’s worse is they can say, “Well we tried to make this amazing game and spend all this money on, but not enough people showed an interest. So no more of these since we can’t take a hit like that.”

The industry is going to take a dramatic shift. Mark my words on this.

rpvenom7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

I think there is quite a large portion of individuals like myself who held out on buying it on PS5 because I can get it on PC eventually. To be able to mod the game and also have custom graphical settings to my liking

gold_drake7d ago

same

but im not sure if it matters at all. im sure they made sony pay a hefty sum for the 3parter to come on ps5 exclusively. so watever they made in sales, might have come bk in profits for square, but i dont know
and we dont know what "underperformed" even means for square.

Show all comments (43)
130°

Square & Bandai Namco Being Honest About Quality Is A Step In The Right Direction

Saad from eXputer: "After suffering from massive financial hits, Square Enix & Bandai Namco appear to be turning over a new leaf but I'm still unconvinced."

Nerdmaster8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

I was talking about games with some Japanese guys here in Japan, and it seems like around here Bandai Namco has a fame of making low-quality games, with the occasional gem.

About Square Enix, I believe they lack the capacity to improve. They should learn with Capcom (although even Capcom still makes some bad mistakes), but I don't think they ever will. They keep chasing whatever is new at the time (blockchain, AI...) to say "we innovate", without considering the public perception and if these things actually improve the games or not. Them releasing too many small games with no advertising also shows a lack of trust in its own products. Even with their biggest games, like turning FF into an action game with XVI and the very divisive plot changes regarding whispers and timelines in VII Remake, shows them trying to attract a new generation of gamers without understanding what made the series so big in the first place.

shinoff21838d ago

I want a true ff7 remake. With thatcsaid I'm way happier with 7 remake then I was with ff16. I'd still prefer turn based but square keep chasing these Lil kids

Snookies128d ago

Man, it is perfectly fine to prefer turn based. Turn based is amazing. But there's zero reason to call anyone who likes action games "lil kids". Liking one gameplay system over another does not make you more mature in any way.

VersusDMC8d ago

People love the new FF's overall...the problem is the abundance of 7's they release that lose money or make very little like diofield, star ocean divine force, Valkyrie asylum, harvestella, foam stars, etc. Advertising wouldn't have saved those games. Apparently Forespoken had a big Advertising budget but we saw how that went.

shinoff21838d ago (Edited 8d ago )

Star ocean divine force actually sold well from what I've read not ff type numbers but well enough. Was a dope game to.

FinalFantasyFanatic8d ago

Bandai Namco is going to Bandai Namco, I do believe that Square Enix can't change without changing the entire management, they've had these issues for more than a decade and haven't learnt, I have very little faith they can course correct. I'll still buy their better remasters/remakes like Star Ocean 2 though (not FF7R).

Asterphoenix8d ago

Namco is just milking the same Sword Art Online with lack of budget as well as anime IPs that don't go to decent developers like Jujutsu Kaisen and My Hero Academia. Namco deserves their losses and no future Dot Hack or Xenosaga remaster :(.

Square allocated lot of their budget on Forspoken was a mistake. Square always had management issues. Star Ocean 2 was a great remake and I found their recent entries of FF(16 and Rebirth) better than 13 and 15.
I think they were better than 360/PS3 generation where Square went really downhill.

CrimsonWing698d ago

I don’t know why NOW they decide on this, but I guess later is better than never.

80°

I’m Glad Atlus & SE Changed Dates To Avoid Competing With Shadow Of The Erdtree

Saad from eXputer: "I'm glad I don't have to choose between Square Enix, Atlus, and FromSoftware due to bad release windows and Shadow of the Erdtree."

H914d ago

More intelligent than guerilla games

raWfodog13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

Atlus is releasing their game one week before Erdtree, SE is releasing theirs one week after.

HZD released four days before Zelda, HFW released one week before Elden Ring.

It seems to me like they are still releasing their games too close to Erdtree.

VincentVanBro12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

What a word vomit, rambling, turd of an article that simply states the obvious. Classic exputer.