140°

Does playing games on easy defeat the point?

OPM: It’s an age old question: is playing games on easy cheating, or in someway missing the point? We ask four of the Official PlayStation Magazine time what they think of ducking under the default setting. Playing smart or defeating the object of the challenge in the first place?

Read Full Story >>
officialplaystationmagazine.co.uk
GarrusVakarian3896d ago (Edited 3896d ago )

Ive found that i actually like the game more if i have a little bit of a challenge.

Playing The Last Of Us for a second time on normal difficulty and its just not as rewarding or as engaging as it was on hard due to less enemies and more supplies found, ive had the same experiences for other games too.

ArchangelMike3896d ago

Playing TLOU on Survivor is where the game really shines. I got friends that just breeze through games, skipping the cutscenes, and playing on the easiest difficulty. TBH I don't get why they even bother sometimes... am I just too hardcore ;)

GarrusVakarian3896d ago (Edited 3896d ago )

Why the hell would they skip cutscenes and play on easy?! That's crazy, you would miss out on so much story. Unless that's the point, in which case why are they playing videogames?

Zichu3896d ago

I couldn't do that... My brother skips cutscenes... I have to watch them and play on the hardest difficulty possible.

ravinash3896d ago

Some people just like to skip to the end just so they can say they have completed it.
Either that or they just don't have the time.

But I agree, you really do miss something if you pay it on easy.
It's just like these people who complain that dark souls is to hard. Thats the point!

_QQ_3896d ago

@lukas, well i'm guessing they are playing to have fun,after all these are games.I do agree skipping cutscenes in a game like TLOU is beyond stupid, but wanting a game just to play and no story doesn't bring up the question " why are they even playing games" like you stated.

Gster3896d ago

It definitely defeats the purpose if you are a gamer who has the ability to defeat the game on a higher difficulty setting. If you can beat the game on hardcore, you'll get very very little reward for beating the game on easy, or even normal for that matter.

On the other hand, depending on the type of person you are, if normal or easy mode presents a really good challenge for you, then it will be a meaningful undertaking.

Personally, I nearly always try a game on hard first, then after completing it move onto the next difficulty if there is one. I'm speaking from an experienced gamers point of view. For me it would be pointless to play on easy mode. I would get bored very quickly.

Ezz20133896d ago

i know they might do this just to have fun with the gameplay which i understand
but still don't make sense to skip the cutscenes in a story driven game like TLOU ?!

also i have a question
i finished TLOU on both hard and normal but only got normal trophy ...is that a trophy glitch or i'm doing something wrong here ?!

UltimateMaster3896d ago

Not everyone is an expert gamer and some of them needs the easy mode.

Easy mode is also good if you just want to engage into the story rather than having a difficult play trough.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3896d ago
3-4-53896d ago

Games on easy or easier settings allow you to play through and experience the entire game and enjoy it without being too frustrated.

I usually go with Normal difficulty.

A really hard game is almost always NOT fun, because the way difficulty scales in games still has yet to be perfected.

At least with easy people get to experience everything the dev's have to offer.

BLAKHOODe3896d ago

I tried playing Dead Pool on hard and had to drop it down to normal after so many cheap deaths. WAY frustrating!

ABizzel13896d ago

Answer No. Gamers come in all skill levels, and while most of us here are sure to play on Normal / Hard that doesn't mean there shouldn't be an easy mode for gamers who aren't as skilled or worse have a handicap that prevents them from being able to play on higher difficulties.

It's rare that I ever play a game on anything less than Normal (Hard if it's a genre I've mastered), but there are times when I need to rush through a game for a review or I'm renting it so I drop it down to easy just to get through it and enjoy the story.

But if it's something like a action game, shooter, etc... then I'm playing Hard or Normal.

If it's an RPG or Platformer that I need to get through then I might drop it down to easy since the enemy difficulty rarely affects the experience of these genres.

NYC_Gamer3896d ago

I have no problem with people who just wanna pick up and play without any kind of road blocks playing on easy

guitarded773896d ago

Agreed... it's their decision. I typically play on normal, and if the game is good, I'll reply on a higher difficulty. In some games, I'll replay on easy if there are hidden items I need to look for while getting shot at (ex Uncharted, CoD, etc).

grailly3896d ago

easy mode is really good for sand-boxy games. I had so much more fun playing red faction: guerrilla in easy, not worrying to much about dying just lets you have fun with the game mechanics.

ArchangelMike3896d ago (Edited 3896d ago )

Seeing that I'm abit of a trophy whore, I always start a new game of Hard. 2 reasons,
1) games these day are really dumbed down for teh casual crowd. Todays' 'Hard' is yesterdays 'Normal'.
2) It saves me having to play the game through twice just to get the trophy for 'Hard'.

user74029313896d ago

if its a renter and you need to return it in a week then yes for me.

hankmoody3896d ago

I never play a game the first time through on anything lower than the default difficulty. In a lot of cases, it's better to set it higher on the first play through actually, that way you can kill several achievements/trophies with one stone.

Show all comments (35)
90°

7 Deserving Games That Never Got Backward Compatibility

Backward compatibility works for many games on newer consoles, but titles such as The Simpsons: Hit and Run have been left out.

80°

20 Best Survival Games of All Time

From base building to swinging willies, here are the best survival games around, which include a couple of less than obvious picks.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel2d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga23h ago(Edited 23h ago)

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow1d 17h ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo18222h ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie12h ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

6h ago
Hereandthere3h ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3h ago
Notellin8h ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

6h ago
Hereandthere3h ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Hereandthere3h ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

OtterX1d ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

RNTody1d ago (Edited 1d ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno23h ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Inverno21h ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

6h ago
fsfsxii8h ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno7h ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (26)