240°

Microsoft Might Bring Back Cut Xbox One Features That People Liked

When Microsoft announced it was removing certain restrictions from its next-generation Xbox, including internet connection requirements and region-locked software, the response was largely enthusiastic. But the company's Xbox One policy reversals resulted in some features — like the intriguing Family Sharing plan and playing without a game disc in the drive — being cut.

Fortunately, Microsoft corporate vice president Marc Whitten says some of those features, like Family Sharing, could ultimately return to Xbox One.

GameCents3957d ago

Do it. I still don't see why family sharing cannot be done for digital games.
It would also be nice to be able to sell/trade digital games with other xbox live users. Microsoft could charge a fee for every transaction but it is better than not being able to sell a game you're unlikely to every play again.

Blank3957d ago

You know I dont like this but its not all about me. So I was thinking what if you can choose? As a service? But whatever im going to keep tabs on this wishing for the best.

xHeavYx3957d ago

Find Angry Joe's interview with Major Nelson. He kept saying that you can" check" the game that someone else buys. " family sharing" is just a fancy name for "demo". Do you really think a developer/ publisher would allow one game to be shared by ten people?

Blank3957d ago

@heavy

Im aware of that but the thing is it never officially rolled out cant judge it but dont get it twisted im not for it. But if people really want this, put it as an option the select few that want it can do the sharing/demoing whatever thing among themselves. Idk I for myself would rather this not happen at all and just leave thigs be as it is the DLC became norm leave used games alone.

georgeenoob3957d ago (Edited 3957d ago )

Sony fanboys are gonna go to church tomorrow.

creatchee3957d ago (Edited 3957d ago )

@xHeavYx

"Do you really think a developer/ publisher would allow one game to be shared by ten people?"

Now that you mention it, that is precisely what happens with games now. We lend them to our friends. When that's done we trade them in and sell them. Then the new person does the same thing we did and the process repeats. All from the sale of one new copy.

Controlling that situation and limiting it to ten people would make developers and publishers happy. We get to share games without lending a physical copy, they get to sell a digital copy that doesn't have the same costs as a boxed copy AND isn't infintely transferable. It works for all parties involved.

And if you don't like that, you can still buy the disc version and do it the traditional way.

fr0sty3957d ago (Edited 3957d ago )

So, you lend every one of your games to 10 people? There is no way that you do, so enabling 10 to play full versions of all of your games will not fly with the publishers.

Even with the one friend at a time being able to play it, I still don't see it flying when 10 people can have access to that one game. Sony already lets you install your games on another PS3 if you sign into your account to download it on a friend's PS3, and will even let them play it on their account after install, but they make you deactivate it from one ps3 before you can install it on another. that used to be 5 ps3's, but publishers made them scale it back.

It's likely to be like what was rumored in those pastebin dumps, a demo of the game that requires you to buy it after an hour. Much akin to Sony's full game trials with PS+.

SpaZaA3957d ago

creatchee has absolutely no idea of just how badly a buy 1 share to 9 people system would work in a digital ecosystem.
Anybody with the audacity to compare sharing digitally to physically and actually saying publishers would RATHER digital sharing in a system where they would loose up to 9 sales per title is just...well.. fucking stupid.

Seriously, anybody who thinks the family sharing plan was even remotely like what MS alluded to, with the ability to share full titles with 9 friends, without restriction, well those people should not breed, there is enough fucktards around as it is.

Grown Folks Talk3957d ago

Yep, family share makes no sense. Sharing with 10 people? No way. What DOES make sense is making a restrictive DEMO sharing plan where people have to sit & hope 1 of 10 other people aren't playing a DEMO when you want to play a DEMO instead of using the marketplace that already has DEMOS you can play WHENEVER you want.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3957d ago
DigitalRaptor3957d ago (Edited 3957d ago )

Because this is Microsoft we're talking about. They know that they could have provided the family sharing for digital games. So why did they remove it?

My theory is that since they wanted console wide-DRM, their leveraging point (something to appease those complaining) was the family share. But it was never going to be more than a "demo mode". It just wasn't - if you think about the repercussions that would have on publishers and how Sony tried this with 5 consoles, and publishers complained, so now it's only 2 devices.

Microsoft definitely weren't expecting such a backlash, so now that they've had to remove all the DRM on physical and always-online connectivity - a key part of their plan - why would they let people have access to 9 free game licenses per purchase? They could easily make it only applicable to digital purchases. They won't because now there is literally nothing they consider appease-worthy.

DeFFeR3957d ago

"it was never going to be more than a "demo mode". It just wasn't"

Except when Whitten said explicitly that it wasn't a demo mode, and not to 'believe every rumor you read on the internet'. It was basically PS3s game share, improved.

SpaZaA3957d ago (Edited 3957d ago )

@DeFFeR
"Except when Whitten said explicitly that it wasn't a demo mode, and not to 'believe every rumor you read on the internet'. It was basically PS3s game share, improved."

Yes the same PS3 game share which publishers pressured Sony to change from 5 systems to 2.

Yes, just like that, publishers looked at how many people used or rather, abused the sharing ability on PS3, and after pushing Sony to reduce the number of active consoles, turned around and said, you know what, with Microsofts next console, lets allow it on 10 systems!

Not only that, all you have to do is add your friends to your "family share" plan, you don't even have to put all of your account details on each console!

What a brilliant idea.

That way for every game sold digitally, people can set up groups online (which actually had begun upon first reveal of the family share plan) and they can share to 9 other people, they could all share the costs within the group and pay 1/10th of the price for every game!

YES!
that would be such a great idea!!!!!!!!!

I shouldn't have to go to such lengths to explain just how stupid it is that people believed this shit. But alas, some people really are this thick.

Grown Folks Talk3957d ago

They posted the details on their Xbox Wire site on June 6th. Week before E3, 2 weeks before the policy changes. People just lack reading comprehension. Family share is exactly like current sharing only w/o being tied to your local area. If everybody could play at the same time, it would be an issue. They can't. It's no different than loaning a disc. Whoever has the disc can play, the others can't.

n4rc3957d ago

That's exactly what is was.. People are taking comments as fact again..

You had a list of 10 people.. They could share your games.. If I had halo on there, any one of those 10 can play it all they want.. Provided I'm not playing it..

That's exactly how lending a physical disk works now.. So why is it so impossible?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3957d ago
SpaZaA3957d ago (Edited 3957d ago )

From the original interview:
"And I understand people see things like Family Sharing and they’re like, ‘Wow, I was really looking forward to that,’ which is more of an engineering reality time frame type-thing.”

What in the actual fuck does that even mean?

"engineering reality time frame type-thing."

More PR fucking nonsense from Microsoft.

HammadTheBeast3957d ago

The meticulous time-proxy ambuxtroxations of the command scripts pertaining to the reductions in hallucinogens means.... you get this packaged with DRM or gtfo.

-MS

I really hope the people who believe that you'd get 10 copies of a game to just digitally share with anyone were joking or trolling.

n4rc3957d ago

Or you could learn to read Hammad.. Would save you from looking like such a moron all the time..

wishingW3L3957d ago

the only reason people want the "Family Sharing" it's because they'll be able to buy 1 game and 9 will play it for free... Or at least that's what they think. XD

GameCents3957d ago

Wow Captain Obvious, so brave of you to reveal your true identity like this.

fsfsxii3957d ago

Some people are actually that retarded. If you seriously think that MS or any publisher will allow their games to be givin away for 9 people minus the original buyer, then you need some reality check.

DeFFeR3957d ago

Except that it happens with physical discs all the time...

It wasn't as simple as 10 people borrowing it - there were limits to how many could be borrowing it consecutively - only one friend could borrow it at a time in addition to the original owner.

People just heard 'always online' and freaked their shit and drew worst case scenarios. MS shot themselves in the foot by sending mixed signals and Mattrick telling people to buy a 360.

There was good to some of the features, but they were overshadowed by the concerns and the snowball effect of people online who pull shit out of their ass and claim it as fact.

MasterCornholio3957d ago (Edited 3957d ago )

I don't see why people are so hyped for full game demos when we already have them on the PS4 with plus.

Do people honestly believe that publishers are willing to lose nine tenths of their sales because of an unrestricted family plan?

Motorola RAZR i

MysticStrummer3957d ago

It's a little different, since PS+ dictates which games get the demo, and the One's method would give you demos of games that other people bought.

But you're right, some people thought used games were a problem for publishers yet they'd allow full games to be shared with multiple people. It made no sense.

n4rc3957d ago

I'm really hoping they just scraped those features as a quick fix..

That they will find a better way to give consumers both options.. I was all for the original

HammadTheBeast3957d ago

There's a petition going around if you'd like to sign it.

nugnugs3957d ago

Yeah, go check out the comments, its rather amusing.

Godmars2903957d ago

You'd expect them to have been able to never remove them in the first place. They much have been that tied into the DRM.

As is, still they should be more than able to phase them back in within a year of release.

And still its going to look like they're playing catch up to Sony allowing to put a digital library on any PS4.

GameCents3957d ago

Pretty sure you can still play digital games on every Xbox One as long as you log in your profile.
Heck, you can do that on xbox 360!

GameCents3957d ago (Edited 3957d ago )

What's there to disagree with folks?
"As we previously announced, consumers will be able to sign on to any Xbox One console and have access to all their digital games," a Microsoft representative said. "Once the required data--a fraction of the entire game--is on their hard drive, they can jump into the action while the rest of the game finishes downloading in the background. And of course, on Xbox 360, consumers today can download their digital games on any console after signing in to their Xbox Live account." . . . http://www.gamespot.com/new...
For those thinking this was pre-180: "So, for example, while you are logged in at your friend’s house, you can play your games," Microsoft said at the time. Microsoft has confirmed with GameSpot that following the company's major policy reversal last month, this feature is UNCHANGED.

As you can see, Microsoft aren't the ones playing catch up with this feature. I personally didn't see why everybody was celebrating like it's a huge win for SONY when I've had this feature on 360 albeit without the play as you download option for years.
People like shutupandtakemymoney should shut up and inform their ignorant selves. It isn't game sharing, it's simply game accessing on any console and guess what, you HAVE TO BE LOGGED ON, ps4, xbox one or x360

shutUpAndTakeMyMoney3957d ago (Edited 3957d ago )

lol xboxers mad at ur comment..
"PS4 digital library accessible on any system"
http://www.gamespot.com/new...

sign the drm petition to get back shared library!!
https://www.change.org/peti...

20k in 3 days! Lets go!!

Death3957d ago

You can't put a digital library on any PS4. In order to keep games from being illegally duplicated Sony will limit the active consoles like they do now. Sharing accounts isn't the same as shared games. It's bypassing Sony's almost non existent "security" to keep this from happening. The idea was to make it so people with multiple systems in the same house could access their games from either console.

The proposed system by Microsoft had gamers ripping their entire library to the HDD and having access to them whereever they went by accessing their accounts remotely and redownloading the game. There was no limit to this, but the games wouldn't be playable from the remote console unless it was one of the 10 once the original purchaser signed off or signed on from a different console. The 24 hour check in was for consoles that went offline and couldn't have the remotely installed games deactivated in real time when the original user signed back in. Unless both consoles remained connected to the server, the shared game had a time limit that was not finalized. In order to play online, each user in the family share plan needed a copy of the game.

The scary DRM was the tool used to keep gamers honest by either deactivating games that were no longer connected or traded in. If you were the original purcheser and traded in your game, nothing would prevent you from playing the ripped game since the disc didn't need to be in the drive. The 24 hour check in verified your library was in sync with the trades that were processed at retail.

DigitalRaptor3957d ago

"The idea was to make it so people with multiple systems in the same house could access their games from either console."

I don't know about you but I don't know anyone with 10 family members in their houses. This was always going to be abused by extending it to your friends living hundreds if not thousands of miles apart.

Death3957d ago

I was referring to Sony's 2 console limit.

Microsoft's proposed plan was for up to 10 "family" members that came from your friends list. They had access to your library like a friend or family members does to your physical copy but with the benefit of digital delivery. If either console went offline it was a timed "demo" more than a shared game. Save data could be used if you bought the game after sharing and the online component would have moved additonal units if you wanted to play with your friends. Used copies paid publishers on resales also which was a first. With the restrictions/limitations the potential to get games out and played could help developers sell games more than anything.

shutUpAndTakeMyMoney3957d ago (Edited 3957d ago )

$400.

edit: ok xbox fans u win $600

GameCents3957d ago (Edited 3957d ago )

Edit, lol never mind, 2 bubble syndrome has kicked in. Feels the need to troll because he's down to so few bubbles.

Shadonic3957d ago

chill dude 2 bubble life is hard :(

Show all comments (59)
290°

More Job Losses At Xbox, “There’s More To Come”: Paul Thurrott

Paul Thurrott in a recent episode commented on the on-going Microsoft fiasco hinting at more job losses and that "there's more to come".

Read Full Story >>
spieltimes.com
Sonic18811d 14h ago (Edited 1d 14h ago )

There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future . Xbox has to pay Microsoft back. It might take two decades to do that.

sagapo1d 10h ago (Edited 1d 10h ago )

I don’t understand what you’re saying. Xbox IS microsoft so there’s no “paying back “.
And MS gross profit in 2023 was over 140 billion dollars so forget your 2 decades.

Unless you mean the money MS invested in Xbox (acquisitions included) and the time it will take for xbox as a brand to gain that money back on it’s own, then yeah, that could take a while.

romulus231d 4h ago

The better term to use might be return on investment, xbox is simply a division of Microsoft one that MS can easily do away with if profit margins are not met. So in that regard he's right, if xbox isn't showing the expected return on investment the higher ups are expecting than it's unlikely Microsoft will acquire any other studios any time soon, especially if they are spending billions buying developers just to shut them down in the end.

MrBaskerville21h ago(Edited 21h ago)

Xbox is a division that they discussed shutting down but doubled down on after Gamepass was pitched.

It needs to make money at some point. Big money.

rokos18h ago

According to Statista the net income of Microsoft is about $72.4 billion dollars which is a bit lower than last year profit. That is almost as much as Activision's acquisition but I assume that would be a one off since it costs so much plus I see how their focus has been shifted to AI, thus any major future investments will probably be in that area.

Markusb3318h ago

i think you are really missing the point

VariantAEC8h ago

@romulus23
That is not why MS buys studios. They might continue to buy because it's about taking that sweet sweet IP out of the corporate husks of their acquisitions.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 8h ago
SonyStyled1d 10h ago

“There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future”

No bro, there do be is for Microsoft not acquiring for what is now if not what it be is 😂

1d 8h ago Replies(2)
ChasterMies22h ago

Xbox isn’t a separate company from Microsoft. It’s all Microsoft.

Abear2116h ago(Edited 16h ago)

Let’s be real, this is the media spinning all the acquisitions and liquidations of said developers and spinning it to make M$ the villain.

This was bound to happen, a bigger slice of pie and cut costs, when the games come they stand to make more and that’s their agenda—it was the writing on the wall when the sales went through and legally all those who approved the sale and mergers knew this would happen.

Snowflakes need to realize business is ugly and you can cry all you want but this is how capitalism works. And it works.

That said, M$ needs to steer the narrative and grab hold of all this, make their plans known, hype the hell out of all those dead IP’s they plan to revive, and be honest about the timeline. This is likely to involve mobile and IP on other consoles, and most people realize that.

The problem is this company is incapable of being transparent and seems to often want to dissuade and confuse is customer base. The lack of E3 has hurt Microsoft and I don’t think they know how to properly or effectively market their brand anymore.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 8h ago
jwillj2k41d 13h ago

There really needs to be a class action lawsuit here. You buy these companies just to put people out of jobs. And it’s not like something happened to derail their plans this WAS the plan. Microsoft has no business in this space at all.

franwex1d 13h ago (Edited 1d 13h ago )

Microsoft has been doing this for years. They simply want the IPs. Look at Nokia. Look at Skype. This time it simply expanded to games. Gaming is not as important to Microsoft’s executives as it was to the founders too. Bill Gates was willing to sell the og Xbox at a loss. Steve Balmer approved the red ring of death fiasco. This CEO isn’t really a gamer.

-Foxtrot1d 12h ago

Maybe it's time though to put a stop to it and use a big giant like Microsoft as a huge example to the rest of these big companies.

There has to be a line drawn somewhere.

People like the FTC and the like went against Microsoft yet their Actvision deal was still allowed to go through yet look what's happened...it's not even Acitivisions studios aswell, it's Bethesdas.

VariantAEC8h ago

Years?

Try several decades, and in the gaming space 2.3 decades.

Jon6158617h ago

You do realize this happens in ALL industries? Or are you just saying this because it is Microsoft? In any case I feel for those that are being let go but the trch industry is suffering right now.

jwillj2k412h ago(Edited 12h ago)

This absolutely does NOT happen all the time. Let me know the last time 1 company with a terrible product track record spent 100 billion onto acquire MULTIPLE successful companies in under a year only to shut them down and stop making their products regardless of how successful they were. Not merge them, completely shut them down.

And you can’t use Microsoft in your example.

Notellin13h ago(Edited 13h ago)

Class action lawsuit? The law is on their side and protects them at all costs. There are no rules to protect the people at the bottom.

jwillj2k412h ago

Not true when it comes to mass layoff do your research.

RNTody1d 13h ago

Ninja Theory, Perfect Dark, Crash Bandicoot, Spyro, Wolfenstein 3, Dishonored, Prey, Doom, Quake... something tells me that bad things are going to happen to these entities under Microsoft.

MrDead1d 2h ago

ID software, the makers of Doom and Wolfenstein that have been with us since 1991 could be gone and MS will keep the IPs.

I hope some of these studios can buy their freedom from MS otherwise this is going to be even more devastating for the industry and gamers.

Yui_Suzumiya1d ago (Edited 1d ago )

That's exactly what I'm worried about. I've been a fan of id since Wolfenstein 3D and I'm honestly afraid.

lodossrage20h ago

Toys for Bob saw the writing on the wall and bought themselves out.

Wouldn't be the first time a company did that under MS either. Bungie and Twisted Pixel did the same. Considering what just happened, I can see some other devs trying to buy themselves out too.

anast1d 12h ago

Good thing the bosses of all those small studios made their money.

glenn19791d 11h ago

they cant do it right now they will get burned

XiNatsuDragnel1d 3h ago

Phil and his team need to be gone

lodossrage19h ago(Edited 19h ago)

Won't make a difference.

The whole structure needs to be overhauled. Anyone that replaces Phil will be no different than him, Mattrick, or anyone else.

Until the company changes how they go about business, nothing will change

glenn197917h ago

I just don't have any idea what they would do , they have done sooo much damage on their xbox brand, they have a show at July or June I think, but will it even matter even they show amazing games, idkn

lodossrage19h ago

True,

But they may as well get it over with. Whether it happens now or later, the burning is going to hit the same.

Reality is the ONE move that can alleviate a lot of this is the one move they can't make. Remove day 1 from gamepass.

Show all comments (68)
90°

Microsoft Opening Xbox Mobile Game Store in July

The Xbox brand is expanding, as an Xbox mobile game store is opening this coming July where Microsoft will brings its "first-party portfolio."

Jin_Sakai3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

“Bond adds that they will start on the web”

This will go nowhere.

Nice knowing you Xbox. This is what happens when the house never gets cleaned.

MrDead3d ago

The only this MS is expanding is the amount of feculence it sprays on everyone who just want to enjoy gaming and make games.

The best thing MS can do for the gaming industry is leave and never return.

XiNatsuDragnel3d ago

Good luck with this even it might not succeed.

Show all comments (7)
210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel3d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow3d ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo1822d ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie2d ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

1d 22h ago
Hereandthere1d 19h ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 19h ago
Notellin2d ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

1d 22h ago
Hereandthere1d 18h ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

ApocalypseShadow1d 4h ago

Lying to yourself is unbecoming.

Article link tells you all you need to know in Sarah Bond's own words.

Hereandthere1d 19h ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

ApocalypseShadow1d 5h ago

At least you and others get it. Note drank the Kool aid and asked for seconds thinking it was refreshing.

Most don't even know how it all played out but it's there in black and white for all to see. Microsoft brought it up for years until the MLB forced Sony's hand. It was a win win for Microsoft. Kill one reason to buy a PlayStation or kill the game by dropping it in a cheap service to kill Sony's sales numbers on PlayStation.

OtterX2d ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Cockney23h ago

They chose well, Sony gave them the backing to pursue their dreams with no restrictions even tho their games especially dreams have very niche appeal. Media molecule and Sony deserve respect for this in an age of risk averse publishing.

RNTody2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno2d ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Inverno2d ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

1d 22h ago
fsfsxii2d ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno1d 22h ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (29)