150°

Nintendo’s Secret War Against YouTubers Will Cost Gamers Considerably

FleshEatingZipper writes: Sometimes, there’s nothing more enjoyable than a Let’s Play video. They’re not always called Let’s Play, they’re Quick Looks, they’re our very own FEZ PLAYs, they’re whatever you like. If broadcast sports or Mystery Science Theater 3000 have taught us anything, it’s that almost any form of entertainment is enhanced by color commentary. A few years ago, a bill was introduced into US Senate that would to impose penalties on those who streamed copywritten material, which was construed as a government attempt to ban Let’s Play videos. While the bill’s creators have said that wasn’t the aim, it appears that Nintendo would have no issue with a variant of it as they’ve now sent out Content ID notices to Let’s Play producers like Zack Scott who rely on YouTube ad revenue to, well, live.

Read Full Story >>
flesheatingzipper.com
joxef3998d ago

This irks me so much, especially as a long time Nintendo fan boy. Definitely not buying anything from them for a while.

Phil323998d ago

Yeah. They should have threatened to take down channels like Microsoft.

If THIS is what pisses you off about Nintendo, your priorities are severely screwed up.

joxef3997d ago

I still like Nintendo overall, never said I didn't. I'm just saying, it's not a cool move either way. Sure, not as extreme as Microsoft or what Sega did with the Shining Force thing, doesn't mean I shouldn't dislike this action, though.

If you aren't at least a little upset about this, then your priorities are severely screwed up, as well, I guess.

DivineAssault 3997d ago

I stopped supporting them as soon as the wii u came around.. They have been making some very foolish decisions & arent doing anything thats appealing to me as a gamer so im done with them until i see change.. I have been a nintendo supporter since NES (even bought virtual boy) & have been there through thick & thin but enough is enough.. Its like they think ripping ppl off is funny or something..

RTheRebel3997d ago

You expect people to believe your response?LOL
cmon Divine you a Drone lol

ZodTheRipper3997d ago

I'd not call it ripping off, they still release high quality games once in a while ...it's more like they lost their focus long ago and that's why I'm not supporting them since I've sold my Wii. News like that certainly don't make it better.

gamer423997d ago

Wait people make money off Let's Play? That's ... I don't know how to feel about that...

TFXR3997d ago

They're incredibly popular. Quick Looks make up a lot of Giant Bomb's traffic, too.

MoveTheGlow3997d ago (Edited 3997d ago )

Yes, but GB gets actual permission. They have to, they're part of a much bigger company now. Some companies negotiate that they demo the game, or guide through it, which often turns into a Quick Look EX.

But yes, definitely they get traffic! Plenty from me, too!

scottd3997d ago

so if they were doing the videos and making no profit this would not be an issue??

dennett3163997d ago

Exactly...you can do LP's all you like but if you're monetizing them, Nintendo have put a stop to that unless you have some sort of deal in place.

It's odd. All the ones complaining about this are the ones who are making money using the assets of others without permission. People are saying that LP's are not about the game, but the commentary, and I find that massively absurd. Without the game - and all the assets and mechanics which belong to other people - there's nothing to comment over.

Machinima even had the gall to ask Notch for money because the videos made using his game amounted to free advertising for it, and they deserved a cut despite already making money off the ads they put in the videos. The greed and sheer balls it takes to ask that of the game creator is staggering.
A lot of LP'ers do it for the love of the game, or even to mock a terrible game in a funny way. Nintendo isn't stopping anyone from making the vids, they're just stopping people profiteering off their work.

If the LP'ers are so bothered, why don't they stop monetizing the vids, but charge for their commentary (which they DO own) in the style of Rifftrax...that way they make money on what they actually can call their own created content. If it's all about the commentary, then there should be no problem with that set up?

RuleofOne343 3997d ago

One thing for those folks to do is find a way around this crap or stop making vids & they can't do what their trying to do.

sloth33953997d ago

Nintendo doesn't have a problem with people making the videos as long as they don't try to profit from it. You can make videos all you want as long as their is no gain for yourself.

PopRocks3593997d ago

It's not even that. From what I understand this won't even affect all Nintendo related uploads. Just videos featuring certain games at a certain length.

For example, it probably won't hurt game videos of Super Metroid. But it would probably affect a Let's Play of Zelda Wii U when it comes out.

We don't know the specifics yet so I wish people would stop freaking out with their knee-jerk reactions. As Phil32 said, they could be removing videos and leaving strikes on people's accounts like Microsoft and Sega.

dennett3163997d ago

It's telling that they use MST3K as an example considering how Rifftrax operates now. They've monetized their content by offering up the commentary on its own for a small fee, which then must be synced up to the appropriate video file.

Notice how they don't actually use the movie footage to make their money? Well that's what these LP'ers who monetize their videos are complaining about....they want to be able to use assets that are not owned by them in order to make a quick buck.

Nintendo are not waging war on LP's, or on fans of their games, they're clipping the wings of the greedy few who think they're somehow entitled to use anything they want to make money...regardless of who actually owns the assets being used.

Show all comments (20)
50°

Megaton Musashi World Cup: Preview and First Round Results

Game Rant participates in the Megaton Musashi World Cup, checking out the game a little bit beforehand and winning the first round match.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
220°

Microsoft’s Surface and Xbox hardware revenues take a big hit in Q3

Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
darthv7218h ago

Xbox content + services up 62% while hardware down 31%... seems about right with the way they tout you don't need the hardware to play. People can play on their phones or smart tv or other means. I don't hardly play on my consoles directly since getting devices like the logitech g-cloud and ps portal. Which is to also say I have been playing more digital than physical because of these devices.

solideagle5h ago

you should apply in MS PR team buddy, I think you will do a great job in my humble opinion :)

Sonic18813h ago

I thought darthv72 and Obscure_Observer already work for Microsoft 🤔

dveio2h ago

MS: "Xbox services and content without AB up 1%, with AB up 62%. Hardware down 31%. In total a loss of 350 mill."

darthv72: "Seems about right."

MS: "Excuse m ..."

darthv72: "I don't hardly play on my consoles directly."

MS:

Cacabunga5h ago

I can tell people like you are an absolute minority..

If service is up means their fans and fanboys accepted this model and subscribed to it. The near future you will see a big decline because the service is saturated.

shinoff21834h ago

But that's been ms for years. When things aren't going their way they try to change the way things are said. For instance console sales are down, they stop telling how many sold instead telling us how many hours spent in halo or headshots. So it makes sense console sales down just say people are playing on more devices then previous. What they won't say is how many xbox players jumped ship to ps5.

Cacabunga3h ago

Hardware sales are so bad that Sony and Nintendo are blowing the sales off the water with their hardware.

If Xbox are losers, others aren’t..
Xbox already tried everything with Xbox live then subscriptions went down so much that they had to find something else. Their fans subscribed then reached saturation rather quickly.

Hardware and exclusive games is where it’s at! Keep gamers excited, announce decent software and people will support you

purple1018h ago

Xbox hardware revenue tanks to lowest point of Xbox Series generation

Profchaos7h ago

I'm not surprised surface is struggling they aren't relevant anymore

XBManiac6h ago

Too expensive hardware when others offer the same or more for less? Good work, Green Team.

SimpleDad6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

"Despite some early successes for Xbox games on rival platforms, Xbox hardware is down by a massive 31 percent this quarter."
"Without Activision Blizzard, Microsoft’s overall gaming revenue would have actually declined this quarter."
"Xbox content and services would have only been up a single percent without Activision Blizzard..."
"It looks like next quarter is going to be a similar story for gaming at Microsoft, too."

That is crazy... so A/B/K is carrying the whole Xbox gaming.
Oh and Microsoft will be fine. Windows, Office and Cloud are growing with each pc purchase.

purple1016h ago

Activision: "we gonna need a bigger rucksack/backpack please"

Microsoft: "why's that"

Activision: "to carry yo' weak ass'

Profchaos5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

Top brass have also wanted to start seeing returns on the 100 billion they have put into various Xbox related moves so seeing more multiplatform games is highly likely especially from abk

It's basically saying that PlayStation is the reason Xbox is afloat right now thinks to Ps5 versions of COD

Kornholic4h ago

So basically PS and PC gamers' money is keeping Xbox on life support.

Show all comments (22)
140°

Why Monopolies In Gaming Must Not Be Allowed

As of right now, there are no monopolies in the games industry, and for the sake of the medium as a whole, they never should either.

thorstein17h ago

Shouldn't be allowed in any field.

Inverno13h ago

And yet the biggest tech companies in America are essentially that. They buy up all the small comps only to kill them off and steal what they have, and if they can't buy em they bleed them to death.

jwillj2k412h ago

Eventually they’ll realize the value is with the employee not the company. Buying an IP means nothing if the people who contributed are let go. They’ll get it one day.

MrCrimson11h ago

tech is different because they buy threats and then kill them. Twitter bought Vine and did nothing with it. Despite people seemingly liking it. Could've had tiktok a decade before bytedance. go figure.

Zenzuu12h ago

Monopolies shouldn't be allowed regardless. Not just for gaming.

MrCrimson11h ago

They buy IPs not talent. That's why these buyouts never work and the IPs die. Right now it's too expensive to develop games - but I expect that to shift maybe as AI tools can make it easier. The best games have been indie games for awhile as big developers fuck their ips to death with "games as a service" -