1150°

GameStop has information on Microsoft's next-gen Xbox

Microsoft has shared information about its next-generation Xbox with executives at US retailer GameStop, the firm's president has suggested.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
stuna14059d ago

Clue #1 digital goals! I think that's saying quite a bit!

Whatever Microsoft is planning they definitely will have to bring their "A" game.

Godmars2904059d ago

But is your idea of an "A" game *their* idea of one?

stuna14059d ago

So far what I've seen of the 360 in the last couple of years, and what Rumors are swirling about the next box, I don't think so.

Jek_Porkins4059d ago

That could go for any company, but if they say the words backwards compatibility, we're on the same wavelength.

The next Xbox will play 90+% of the same exact games as the next PlayStation, they will both be pretty similar in power, both will use key core exclusives (Halo, Fable, Forza, Gears/Uncharted, God Of War, Killzone, Infamous, both will mix a few new franchises in, both will have a camera and try to cater to every type of gamer.

So while I think you might not be happy with what MS has to offer, a lot of people will be, and I wouldn't take the end of this generation as a sign of what is to start the next. Even Sony broke out the casual games, and I'd say in 2012 Microsoft had a more core oriented slate of exclusives than Sony did.

Godmars2904059d ago

Except where Sony has shown consistent ability to create new IPs, MS hasn't.

And then there's to tired and old argument regrading Kinect. That MS have become overly obsessed with it while failing to deliver results. And now with their next system its not going to be a choice whether or not its used.

vet_medic4059d ago

Will be getting next Xbox but not earlier than 2015 unless they really will produce more exclusives

4059d ago
pete0074059d ago

godmars,

MSFT keeps up on kinnecting cause it was a tremendus success,
sony would do exactly the same if they had anything similar, as they did with super CELL, bluray, the overpriced ps3, the "it only does everything", try to understand they are both in business, not gaming charity

stiggs4059d ago

First, we get a mature, balanced assessment of the anticipated offerings from MS and Sony by Jek_Porkins.

Then, we receive a follow up post by Edonus which delivered an accurate critique of the gaming community's reaction to unbiased opinions such as the one from Jek_Porkins.

Where am I ? This can't be N4G.

ApocalypseShadow4059d ago

Let's make this simple edonus. what core game has Microsoft MADE and burned on a disc with all that money if you are an Xbox gamer who doesn't care for kinect?

How is it possible for them not to make games for 75-80 million games, but you expect them to put their all into a possible 1-5 million group of launch owners?

You might like kinect, others may not.

Remember, Microsoft MADE,not published as in Gears. as that is Epic's game.

stiggs4059d ago

Ideas, such as those from a typical fanboy (no offense to anyone in this thread), would put both Sony and MS out of business within a year.

I find it amusing that there are a multitude of people on N4G that think that they can run a multi-billion dollar media corporation better than the people that are currently in place. I have to laugh every time I read something like this:

"M$ got high jacked by the Sony press conference. They're scared."

"The Sony PS4 looks underwhelming. They're doomed".

"Stuff should be FREE."

I understand that the majority of people on N4G are probably passionate teens. But that is really no excuse for ignorance and senseless bombast?

indubitably4059d ago (Edited 4059d ago )

Don't worry @stiggs, Jek_Porkins got more dislikes than likes, you are still on N4G.

Skips4059d ago (Edited 4059d ago )

@Jek_Porkins

Lol, I like how whenever articles come up about Microsoft that aren't particularly positive. "Always On, Always Connected", Blocking Used Games, DRM, Kinect 2.0, Casual Focused.

Mostly from Edge, you know the guys who were practically SPOT ON with the PS4???

Hell even Microsoft themselves saying they lost their core or whatever and women are the NEW CORE. THEMSELVES saying they want to turn Xbox into a family friendly entertainment center etc. etc.

You say "bu buu buuuuttt!!! WE HAVE NO IDEA WHAT DIRECTION MICROSOFT WILL BRING NEXT GEN!!! because they haven't announced ANYTHING YET!!!!"

But here you are, acting like everything YOU ARE SAYING is a fact.

Hilarious, JUST hilarious! XD

"I wouldn't take the end of this generation as a sign of what is to start the next."

In denial much?

"and I'd say in 2012 Microsoft had a more core oriented slate of exclusives than Sony did."

How so? Microsoft put out like 2 core exclusives that year where Sony had a few. (Just not their HUUUUGE franchises). And even so. That's like ONE YEAR out of like what? Five? lol

delboy4059d ago

But the ps4 has a camera too, and it is bundled, so that the DS4 with its light can function.
So it's a spy machine like xbox.

Godmars2904059d ago

Whether or not its required and/or bundled is still unconfirmed, but if it is - ITS A DEAL BREAKER FOR ME!

stiggs4059d ago

The CORE gamer...I hate that term. There is no difference between playing a "hardcore" game and a "casual" game on a console. In each scenario you are manipulating a game pad while sitting on a couch in front of a TV. The content may be different but the exercise is still the same.

If I was to label someone a CORE gamer it would be based on their knowledge, enthusiasm and the longevity of their experience within the gaming world.

As it has been said "90% of the games will play on both consoles" but you are putting all of the emphasis on the exclusives with make up about 10% of the other titles. For some explicable reason you're even excluding games not MADE by the console manufacturer in your argument.

For a lot of people, myself included, that 10% is not going to sway their decision to buy a particular console. Most are going to make their decision based on allegiance, price, availability, expectations and marketing.

Don't get me wrong, exclusives can be great.
I bought a PS3 just to play some of the Sony centric game tiles. But over the 5 years that I've owned a PS3 I've only bought about 10 games compared to about 80 XBOX games. The reason is that I just enjoy the XBOX ecosystem better than the one offered on the PS3.

Unfortunately, exclusives do not drive the industry and the idea that one company will succeed over the other due to said exclusives is just a fallacy. Obviously a monster hit will temporarily bolster the sales of a particular console but the real importance lies in the other 90% of cross-platform titles which make up the majority of the sales.

So you can just stop with the "they got no exclusives" rhetoric as it's not an accurate assessment of the situation.

Why o why4059d ago (Edited 4059d ago )

To stiggs

What it is is a big goalpoast shift. 3rd party games were always by definition just that meaning even at the beginning of this gen they were available to play on the ps3 too.

The term no games was rife here on n4g and that was because Sonys 1st and 2nd party titles were supposedly lacking in either number and or quality. Some people like myself remember that it was the exclusives that were the differentiators and the reason some chose one console over the next. Now fast forward 4 5 6 years. And now exclusives dont matter anymore and relying on 3rd party is now just fine. The evidence is easy to find if you only look or remember and yeah its silly but for many of us its all about exclusives and always has been.

The flip flopping has of course coincided with ms's 'preparation for next gen' or lessening of 1st party support to the rest of us so some of the goalpost shifters then included the more simple casual games like kinect games to pad their lists when the origins of exclusives were based on core games with the xbl titles like braid (at the time) and the likes being accepted too and rightly so.

At no point am I saying kinect games aren't true enjoyable games BUT the language used by most of us here on both sides when the wii was tearing up the place was that it was for casuals thus not our types of games...obviously games like mario and zelda and whatnot weren't classed as casual but the wii fits and other games of a similar ilk were. So now their own words are being used back on them.

Both sides have been hypocritical from rumble not being important to blu ray and hdmi not being important to x game chat not being important to exclusives.. goes both ways but we are gamers and in our silly fanboy fights we battle with GOTY's and graphics and exclusives and sadly sales. Some of us have to reap what we sowed.... cant change the goalposts now just because its suits.. thats bs

stiggs4059d ago

I appreciate the lengthy and passionate rebuttal. Unfortunately, I can't properly respond to your comment without surmising what you are trying to say.

Please use proper punctuation so that one doesn't have to speculate on your position.

rainslacker4058d ago

So to summarize all the responses(half of which didn't even address your comment) and to address your actual question, yes, MS idea of an A game IS THE SAME as some peoples, and MS idea of an A game IS NOT THE SAME as other peoples.

Subjectivity and opinions are diverse, and when it comes down to it, all that matters is what an individual wants.

Why o why4058d ago (Edited 4058d ago )

sorry stiggs I thought I done well cosidering im using a tablet.. Not the best so my apologies.

1. Exclusives used to matter to many of those who now scream they dont. (biggest western media and fanboy led notion this gen)

1a. can you imagine why they would change their tune?

2. BOTH sides are guilty of being hypocritical (that was me trying to show some degree of objectivity and balance)

3. Where was you when 360 fans used to say the ps3 had 'no games' and by games they meant exclusives 'triple A' (yuk) not some casual wii type games?

3a. Why would they be complaining if the same 3rd party games were available? (bonus points)

Hope thats a little clearer. Guess it was just easier to ignore what was said and complain about punctuation like none of it made sense aey....ar well

Axe994058d ago

Lots of issues being discussed here, but the whole '90% of games' thing may or may not be the case, if MS doesn't follow Sony's approach of opening up to Indies and relaxing publishing requirements. If they don't follow this lead, then the difference in catalogues (outside of the back-catalogue of exclusives, which in the case of the Playstation brand is not negligible) will likely be more substantial than that.

Plus, don't write off the touch-pad in terms of allowing different styles of games to come over to console. It may or may not work out, but if MS doesn't have anything similar planned, it may be another point of differentiation in the available interactive experiences.

Either way, I'm sure both next-gen boxes will be great - but it may be a little early to assume they'll be that similar in game catalogues.

dcbronco4058d ago

@Axe99

If you want to start adding Indie games as exclusives then Microsoft has far more exclusives than Sony this generation. XBLIG has new games every day. There are thousands of games on there.

stiggs4058d ago (Edited 4058d ago )

"thought I done well cosidering im using a tablet".

Sorry kid, I stopped reading your follow-up response after that first sentence. I'm still trying to make heads or tales out of this mess:

"The flip flopping has of course coincided with ms's 'preparation for next gen' or lessening of 1st party support to the rest of us so some of the goalpost shifters then included the more simple casual games like kinect games to pad their lists when the origins of exclusives were based on core games with the xbl titles like braid (at the time) and the likes being accepted too and rightly so."

brave27heart4058d ago

@Jek
The reason you have so many disagrees is you make a perfectly valid, balanced point about multiplatform games, then finish with a claim that in 2012 MS released "a more core orientated slate of exclusives than Sony".

Whilst you were stating your opinion you failed to back this up in any meaningful way, therefore I disagreed with you. Had you said "more core games that interested me" or listed Sony and MS "core" exclusives to substantiate your point I wouldnt have disagreed.

If you're going to make a commemt that it potentially divisive choose your words carefully or back up your opinions.

Why o why4058d ago (Edited 4058d ago )

Ha ha. The auto correction isn't the greatest on these tablets. I contructed less than stella sentances and paragraphs and apologised but you deflected AGAIN.

Are you that much of a grammar nazi you couldn't read past the first sentence? Bit pretentious dont you think. I even put it in bullet points for ya and you ignored that too like you're my lecturer mulling over my dissertation. Lmao good stuff man. I dubb thee sir sidestep king of n4g grammar. Joker

Ritsujun4058d ago

My goldfish has information on Microsoft's next-gen Xbox. =O

CommonSense4058d ago (Edited 4058d ago )

You know you're on N4G because Porkins has 3 times as many disagrees simply because he didn't say "M$ is the shittiest company in hist0ry!!!"

This community is a joke. You're much better off on the r/games subreddit. And since N4G's contributors basically just camp Reddit for news and then post it here, you'll get information there sooner.

I'd also like to add that Sony has NOT "consistently brought good new IPs." They're just as guilty of milking their franchises as MS. They just don't sell as well, or have legs that are as long.

nirwanda4058d ago

Microsoft's A game seems to involve stopping most of the development of xbox 360 games and employing alot more staff for its studio's and getting them all to work on next generation projects for two years.
Don't believe me go and have a look for yourself first party has been quiet for a good reason over the last couple of years.
AAA games don't get built in a week.

Objective4058d ago

MS's A game is to be progressive in capturing a wider audience and expanding the gaming community. Your A game is the sad belief that only your version of 'conventional' gaming matters. Sony's A game is to retain people like you as fans and pray that cavemen do not evolve.

loulou4058d ago

lol @ the sony trolls.. gofmars, why o why etc. always the same faces and same nonsense that they have been writing for years.

why o why you must be a paid sony employee, surely. anyway, i will answer one of your nonsense rants about people saying the ps3 had no games at begining. it was nothing to do with their 1st and 2nd party games.

it was the fact that the 360 was with devs much longer than the ps3, thus meaning lots og games were being made before the ps3 had even launched.

also talking about people including kinetic games to pad their lists lol how sad are you? honestly. you write that rubbish with a straight face. only pathetic fanboys are worried about lists, writing them and comparing them.

get a grip kid

Why o why4057d ago (Edited 4057d ago )

'It was the fact that the 360 was with devs much longer than the ps3, thus meaning lots og games were being made before the ps3 had even launched.'

Lol. Really. Ok. That makes so much sense now why the some of the media, fans and ms spokespeople would say such a thing. I just prefer the other console yet own the 360 and the ps plus I was here back in the day talking crap then I calmed and reacted less got to know people..chilled. Got all the consoles but never forgot the crap that was spewed from ALL sides not just the ms camp to the point i even mentioned sonys fans hypocrisies too so for you to go on like the reason you gave was the only reason 'no games' was said is laughable.

Im not gunna lable you a kid cause I dont know you or care enough to start calling people trolls. Try keeping it civil even if someone speaks the stuff you dont like to hear alright mate. Sweet

Oh I wish sony paid my ass but Im nothing but a punter to them. They won't pay any of my bills if the s#it hits the fan .....its all about the games for me

+ Show (27) more repliesLast reply 4057d ago
miDnIghtEr20C_SfF4058d ago

So Gamestop is very excited for the new XBOX... Seems to me that means used games will still be played on the console. Otherwise, I'd imagine Gamestop wouldn't be so excited.

Oh, and in before the M$ has paid off Gamestop.

Nilemonitors134058d ago

Their A game is another dose of gears halo and forza, maybe they'll bring back viva pinata, the have to bring their AAA game this time, people are already thinking about flocking to the Ps4, believe that, im going to ask an Xbox person to answer me these question. Will you still buy x box 720 if it still does mostly kinect? will you still buy it even if the Ps4 now has cross game chat? even if they just rehash the same ips? even if they keep charging to play online? I just need an answer from a true x box fan, and please tellme reasons to stay with x box.

BlackTar1874058d ago

Xbox side of the fence has turned in to a bunch of whiny babies. Jesus guys have some self respect.

4057d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4057d ago
MadLad4059d ago

I love, but am extremely irritated by your avatar.
Just wanted to let you know that.

Prcko4059d ago

same here about yours :DDD

sandman2244059d ago

I have a feeling microsoft wont release there console till next year. I could be wrong, but I think they want to make sure they out do sony.

_-EDMIX-_4059d ago

That would be suicide. Fall is the biggest period for retail. To try and release it NEXT YEAR would kill them.

1. MS is not aiming to beat sony by numbers of exclusives, its quite clear they are beaten and don't care to fight Sony in that regard.

2. Kinect is there new baby, why on earth would it need so much power? MS is just trying to win in a motion battle, why would they need the better tech?

3.They don't have the teams to even support the extra power...SONY DOES! Why waste the time to add faster ram and a better GPU for the what....3 to 5 ips that will use it?

I just don't see MS doing that. They are last place this gen, They will be last place (or second...Wii U isn't setting the world on fire at all) next gen. By default, they will lose. JUST based on how they did near the ending of this gen.

They don't want to compete in terms of "exclusives" its quite clear by the number of studios they either shut down or let go.

rainslacker4058d ago

I'll likely be this year. Namely due to the fact that some games we know for sure are coming out on both next gen consoles just aren't getting talked about much by the publishers. Probably due to NDA's with MS and they don't want to out a release date for either console. With games releasing this year the only reason they would delay those announcements were if they know that it will come this year. Between E3(when console dates will be given) and the holiday season isn't much time to hype up a game.

BitbyDeath4058d ago

The Witness has already been announced that they'll be on PS4 first.

http://www.computerandvideo...

So chances are if MS do come out this year it'll be after PS4. Let's face it the game is no technical masterpiece and could easily be ported in the blink of an eye. Especially now that everyone is using similar technologies.

jay24059d ago

Oh near, download only then? uhoh.

Belking4059d ago

MS is being very slick about all this. Can't wait til they spill the beans. It's gonna be this gen all over again. MS will take the U.S. market again.

MariaHelFutura4059d ago

I think it will be this gen all over again aswell. They will focus on Kinect, advertise to the max, release the same few games in a consistant cycle, charge to play MP, have timed DLC and timed exclusives and add a TV service. I hope I'm wrong though.

stage884059d ago

@Angelica

Fanboy? He just stated exactly what MS did this gen. Some of you just can't handle the truth. Denial.

Root4059d ago

@AngelicIceDiamond

Don't get your knickers in a twist

4059d ago
kudakadere4059d ago

MS is not dumb ,yes their gonna do that but at the same time they'll include features that are similar to Sony so that they at least equal .

rainslacker4058d ago

@angelic

Typical fanboy retort. Instead of discounting everything he says by invalidating his comment by insult, respond why he's wrong.

@Maria
I think MS will have a bigger focus on Kinect, but I still believe they know that it is the core that will be buying this system most in the first year. Unless MS comes out with a very cheap console(unlikely since the Xbox still has $300 SKU's out), then it is us core gamers that will be their target audience. As such I have no doubt they will have some core games in their launch line up. Kinect will fill out the rest, and likely play a long term role in console adoption among the masses.

Advertising is pretty much a given, and rightfully so. Nothing wrong with promoting your product. Sony could take lessons from MS in this regard.

I really hope they don't fall back into the same cycle of sequel releases, and would like to see them release more core games and new IP's. This gen doesn't make me expect much from them in this regard though.

The other stuff is up in the air, and for the most part, I don't think gamers aren't really looking at added services for their purchasing decisions...that's more for the casual or all-in-one-device crowd.

DigitalRaptor4058d ago (Edited 4058d ago )

@ DK286K

Advertising is not a bad thing. Where the problem lies, and of course you won't like to admit it, but Microsoft spend more on marketing than they do creating games. I wouldn't know the exact figure, but on a basis of ratios, it's pretty clear how far the scale tips. They are more successful because perhaps they spend more to make more.

Similarly with Kinect, they spent more on the marketing than the making games for it. Imagine if that money was put into more games and new IPs. I know Kinect brings about new IPs, but that's basically pushing their consumer base into a corner, and saying that the only way you'll get new IPs is if you buy our expensive peripheral. That's not remotely respectful from a consumer standpoint.

If Move was more successful than Kinect, Sony would be bringing out fewer games for the core and more for casuals. Yet it would still be treated by Sony and gamers as an option for those who like motion control in their games, rather than a supposed revolution in gaming.

"Funny how you seem to have no problem with Sony buying DLC."

The difference is, it's not treated as a replacement for games and new IPs on their part. At E3, Microsoft goes through the exact same motions, treating multiplatform games as exclusive, creating little to no actual NEW games, and announcing exclusive DLC as if it can actually validly replace new games. Sony - new games. Boom. New IPs. Boom. Impressive gameplay demos. Boom. See where I'm coming from here?

Basically your whole argument is an assumption that he is bitter when in fact, he's just more open-eyed to Microsoft practices than you.

4058d ago
Sheikh Yerbouti4058d ago (Edited 4058d ago )

@DK2468

And Sony delivered games and continue to show new IP. Complaining about that would be nit-picking. Just real differences in corp strategy, is all. Not a value judgment.

Snookies124058d ago

@AngelicIceDiamond - What, and Belking right above wasn't making a "fanboy" comment. How could he possibly know that MS is going to win over the U.S. market again? I honestly think both his and MariaHelFutura's comments are a bit out of line. I hate speculation about these next-gen consoles though, so let's just wait and see when they're ACTUALLY SHOWN, okay?

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 4058d ago
Show all comments (100)
290°

More Job Losses At Xbox, “There’s More To Come”: Paul Thurrott

Paul Thurrott in a recent episode commented on the on-going Microsoft fiasco hinting at more job losses and that "there's more to come".

Read Full Story >>
spieltimes.com
Sonic18811d 16h ago (Edited 1d 16h ago )

There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future . Xbox has to pay Microsoft back. It might take two decades to do that.

sagapo1d 13h ago (Edited 1d 13h ago )

I don’t understand what you’re saying. Xbox IS microsoft so there’s no “paying back “.
And MS gross profit in 2023 was over 140 billion dollars so forget your 2 decades.

Unless you mean the money MS invested in Xbox (acquisitions included) and the time it will take for xbox as a brand to gain that money back on it’s own, then yeah, that could take a while.

romulus231d 7h ago

The better term to use might be return on investment, xbox is simply a division of Microsoft one that MS can easily do away with if profit margins are not met. So in that regard he's right, if xbox isn't showing the expected return on investment the higher ups are expecting than it's unlikely Microsoft will acquire any other studios any time soon, especially if they are spending billions buying developers just to shut them down in the end.

MrBaskerville23h ago(Edited 23h ago)

Xbox is a division that they discussed shutting down but doubled down on after Gamepass was pitched.

It needs to make money at some point. Big money.

rokos21h ago

According to Statista the net income of Microsoft is about $72.4 billion dollars which is a bit lower than last year profit. That is almost as much as Activision's acquisition but I assume that would be a one off since it costs so much plus I see how their focus has been shifted to AI, thus any major future investments will probably be in that area.

Markusb3320h ago

i think you are really missing the point

VariantAEC11h ago

@romulus23
That is not why MS buys studios. They might continue to buy because it's about taking that sweet sweet IP out of the corporate husks of their acquisitions.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11h ago
SonyStyled1d 12h ago

“There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future”

No bro, there do be is for Microsoft not acquiring for what is now if not what it be is 😂

1d 10h ago Replies(2)
ChasterMies1d ago

Xbox isn’t a separate company from Microsoft. It’s all Microsoft.

Abear2119h ago(Edited 19h ago)

Let’s be real, this is the media spinning all the acquisitions and liquidations of said developers and spinning it to make M$ the villain.

This was bound to happen, a bigger slice of pie and cut costs, when the games come they stand to make more and that’s their agenda—it was the writing on the wall when the sales went through and legally all those who approved the sale and mergers knew this would happen.

Snowflakes need to realize business is ugly and you can cry all you want but this is how capitalism works. And it works.

That said, M$ needs to steer the narrative and grab hold of all this, make their plans known, hype the hell out of all those dead IP’s they plan to revive, and be honest about the timeline. This is likely to involve mobile and IP on other consoles, and most people realize that.

The problem is this company is incapable of being transparent and seems to often want to dissuade and confuse is customer base. The lack of E3 has hurt Microsoft and I don’t think they know how to properly or effectively market their brand anymore.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 11h ago
jwillj2k41d 16h ago

There really needs to be a class action lawsuit here. You buy these companies just to put people out of jobs. And it’s not like something happened to derail their plans this WAS the plan. Microsoft has no business in this space at all.

franwex1d 15h ago (Edited 1d 15h ago )

Microsoft has been doing this for years. They simply want the IPs. Look at Nokia. Look at Skype. This time it simply expanded to games. Gaming is not as important to Microsoft’s executives as it was to the founders too. Bill Gates was willing to sell the og Xbox at a loss. Steve Balmer approved the red ring of death fiasco. This CEO isn’t really a gamer.

-Foxtrot1d 15h ago

Maybe it's time though to put a stop to it and use a big giant like Microsoft as a huge example to the rest of these big companies.

There has to be a line drawn somewhere.

People like the FTC and the like went against Microsoft yet their Actvision deal was still allowed to go through yet look what's happened...it's not even Acitivisions studios aswell, it's Bethesdas.

VariantAEC11h ago

Years?

Try several decades, and in the gaming space 2.3 decades.

Jon6158620h ago

You do realize this happens in ALL industries? Or are you just saying this because it is Microsoft? In any case I feel for those that are being let go but the trch industry is suffering right now.

jwillj2k415h ago(Edited 15h ago)

This absolutely does NOT happen all the time. Let me know the last time 1 company with a terrible product track record spent 100 billion onto acquire MULTIPLE successful companies in under a year only to shut them down and stop making their products regardless of how successful they were. Not merge them, completely shut them down.

And you can’t use Microsoft in your example.

Notellin15h ago(Edited 15h ago)

Class action lawsuit? The law is on their side and protects them at all costs. There are no rules to protect the people at the bottom.

jwillj2k415h ago

Not true when it comes to mass layoff do your research.

RNTody1d 15h ago

Ninja Theory, Perfect Dark, Crash Bandicoot, Spyro, Wolfenstein 3, Dishonored, Prey, Doom, Quake... something tells me that bad things are going to happen to these entities under Microsoft.

MrDead1d 5h ago

ID software, the makers of Doom and Wolfenstein that have been with us since 1991 could be gone and MS will keep the IPs.

I hope some of these studios can buy their freedom from MS otherwise this is going to be even more devastating for the industry and gamers.

Yui_Suzumiya1d 2h ago (Edited 1d 2h ago )

That's exactly what I'm worried about. I've been a fan of id since Wolfenstein 3D and I'm honestly afraid.

lodossrage22h ago

Toys for Bob saw the writing on the wall and bought themselves out.

Wouldn't be the first time a company did that under MS either. Bungie and Twisted Pixel did the same. Considering what just happened, I can see some other devs trying to buy themselves out too.

anast1d 15h ago

Good thing the bosses of all those small studios made their money.

glenn19791d 14h ago

they cant do it right now they will get burned

XiNatsuDragnel1d 6h ago

Phil and his team need to be gone

lodossrage22h ago(Edited 22h ago)

Won't make a difference.

The whole structure needs to be overhauled. Anyone that replaces Phil will be no different than him, Mattrick, or anyone else.

Until the company changes how they go about business, nothing will change

glenn197919h ago

I just don't have any idea what they would do , they have done sooo much damage on their xbox brand, they have a show at July or June I think, but will it even matter even they show amazing games, idkn

lodossrage22h ago

True,

But they may as well get it over with. Whether it happens now or later, the burning is going to hit the same.

Reality is the ONE move that can alleviate a lot of this is the one move they can't make. Remove day 1 from gamepass.

Show all comments (68)
90°

Microsoft Opening Xbox Mobile Game Store in July

The Xbox brand is expanding, as an Xbox mobile game store is opening this coming July where Microsoft will brings its "first-party portfolio."

Jin_Sakai3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

“Bond adds that they will start on the web”

This will go nowhere.

Nice knowing you Xbox. This is what happens when the house never gets cleaned.

MrDead3d ago

The only this MS is expanding is the amount of feculence it sprays on everyone who just want to enjoy gaming and make games.

The best thing MS can do for the gaming industry is leave and never return.

XiNatsuDragnel3d ago

Good luck with this even it might not succeed.

Show all comments (7)
210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel3d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow3d ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo1822d ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie2d ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

2d ago
Hereandthere1d 21h ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 21h ago
Notellin2d ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

2d ago
Hereandthere1d 21h ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

ApocalypseShadow1d 7h ago

Lying to yourself is unbecoming.

Article link tells you all you need to know in Sarah Bond's own words.

Hereandthere1d 21h ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

ApocalypseShadow1d 7h ago

At least you and others get it. Note drank the Kool aid and asked for seconds thinking it was refreshing.

Most don't even know how it all played out but it's there in black and white for all to see. Microsoft brought it up for years until the MLB forced Sony's hand. It was a win win for Microsoft. Kill one reason to buy a PlayStation or kill the game by dropping it in a cheap service to kill Sony's sales numbers on PlayStation.

OtterX2d ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Cockney1d 2h ago

They chose well, Sony gave them the backing to pursue their dreams with no restrictions even tho their games especially dreams have very niche appeal. Media molecule and Sony deserve respect for this in an age of risk averse publishing.

RNTody2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno2d ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Inverno2d ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

2d ago
fsfsxii2d ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno2d ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (29)