120°

Pikachu 3DS XL debuts at $40 off, Xbox 360 gets gift cards at Target this week

XMNR: The Pikachu Edition of the Nintendo 3DS XL hits retailers this week and Target is putting the entire line of handhelds on sale for $40 off their regular price. And yes, this include the bold yellow Pokemon flavored one too. The retailer also has a discount and gift card offer for the Xbox 360 plus deals on PS3, Xbox 360, Wii U, Wii and PC games.

Read Full Story >>
examiner.com
Krimmson4050d ago

Regular 3DS is for $130 and the 3DS XL is $160. Damn, I've been looking to get a 3DS for some time.
I could use an opinion. If anyone out there wishes to comment, which 3DS is all-around better to use? I hear complaints about hand cramps with the original 3DS but I also hear the graphic don't look as nice on the XL due to the larger screen.

Any awesome person out there willing to share an opinion?

RTheRebel4050d ago

I really want to buy a 3DS badly, but just wait until E3 I know they will announce some collector editions 3DS

admiralvic4050d ago

Why not just get the Pikachu one? It's a CE, it's an XL, you can buy it today to enjoy Monster Hunter (or some other game I guess) and get it for $160 bucks.

Williamson4050d ago

On amazon.ca the original 3ds is 99$. I'm thinking of getting it, but should I be better off waiting for a price drop on the xl? Is the bigger screen worth the extra cash?

Munnkyman4050d ago

I got the original 3ds a week ago for monster hunter but the screen was way small. It played fine but i brought it back and got the xl. Its a huge difference and well worth it. I have not notice any differences between the 2 in the grapics deparment. Atleast not for monster hunter

deafdani4050d ago

I have both. The XL is hands down the best all around. The graphics look about the same, which is impressive considering the resolution is the same. Whoever told you it looks worse is a liar.

The XL has a tad better battery life, it's more comfortable for your hands, the graphic quality is the same (not better nor worse), the select - start - home buttons are ACTUAL buttons, the 3D slider now has a "click" to it so you have a clear tactile feedback when you turn it on, the d-pad and shoulder buttons all feel a bit better. Not to mention that the screens are actually almost twice the size of the regular 3DS, despite the 3DS XL itself being only about a third bigger than the normal sized 3DS.

So, almost everything on the XL is better. The only 2 (or 3) things the normal 3DS is better at is:

1. The screens on there have a bit "cooler" tone to the colours, but that's only really noticeable when you put both of them side by side. The 3DS XL's screens output a bit warmer colours, but it's actually a non issue at all, it's just a stupid nitpick.

2. The volume slider is better positioned. On the XL, the volume slider is at the side of the circle pad, and sometimes I crank up the volume accidentally playing, something that never happened on the normal 3DS.

3. More pocket-friendly due to smaller size (well, duh). Personally, that third point is a non-issue for me because I NEVER carry my handhelds on my pocket, I just put them in my handbag - backpack - whatever.

That aside, the XL blows the normal out of the water. Seriously, it's a no-contest, so I strongly advice you to get the bigger brother. :)

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4050d ago
Starbucks_Fan4050d ago

I got the Pikachu one this morning. Very happy with it.

140°

EA’s best multiplayer games have now shut down for good

Battlefield Bad Company 2, Dead Space 2, Crysis 3, and a handful other EA games have finally had their online services shut down.

Read Full Story >>
pcgamesn.com
OtterX137d ago

I had no idea that Bad Company 2 was still running, and only now that I know, I want to jump on! 😥

SonyStyled137d ago

I was able to find games in the Vietnam dlc on ps3 the last week. There were articles on here about the server closure when it was announced in April

DaReapa137d ago

BF1943 is the only online MP game that I was genuinely interested in. Been playing since launch 14 years ago. Hate that I couldn't put in as much time to play as I'd hoped for during the final week.

Inverno137d ago

I got really into 43 when I bought Bf3, and preferred it. Everything that I disliked or found annoying about Bf3, wasn't an issue in 43. Too bad they never bothered releasing it on PS4 or PC.

1nsomniac137d ago (Edited 137d ago )

Dead Space 2...... I wasn't even aware that had multiplayer. Nevermind that it was apparently one of their best multiplayers!

anast136d ago

Once people stop buying micros, these companies close the doors.

Xenial136d ago

Dead Space 2 multiplayer had been hanging on for years - I'd boot my PS3 up to see some familiar names in lobbies. This will definitely be missed!

70°

Our Favorite Villains in Gaming - Roundtable

There have been plenty of great villains in video games over the years. Now it's time for the VGU crew to name a few of their favorites.

90°

Which Far Cry Should I Start With? - A Beginner's Guide 2023

If you’re new to this long-running franchise, we’ve got you covered.

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
masterfox409d ago

Farcry 3 and literally thats it! lol

GamingSinceForever407d ago (Edited 407d ago )

I recently tried 3 for the first time but the frame rate was a turnoff.

I liked 5 and 6 though.

banger88407d ago

If you have a Series X or S, the Xbox 360 version runs at 60 fps with fps boost. It's a shame the remaster doesn't.

isarai409d ago

2 and 3, pretty much the only ones i really enjoyed. 1 was amazing for the time but aged quite poorly. 4 has the elephant gun, all i can praise from any entry after 3 lol

cooperdnizzle407d ago

Ummmm 3 than stop.

Okay maybe two as well. But yeah probably 3 and then move on.

JEECE407d ago (Edited 407d ago )

Far Cry 2. People constantly rant about games now being too easy, holding your hand, having too many unnecessary RPG-lite leveling features, etc. People specifically complain about open world games being too focused on tons of collectibles and "checkmarks" that just waste time.

Far Cry 2 is an answer to all of those complaints. It was made by Ubisoft before they fell into all the traps discussed above (and before they started inserting towers into their games to defog the map). It has respawning enemies, weapons that degrade, and the collectible diamonds are very useful in the game (which you find in a similar way to the way you find shrines in BOTW with a radar system). The map you have is an in game item you pull out while playing, not a pause menu that is unnecessarily detailed. Also the enemy AI and physics are much better than later entries in the series.

It has a mixed reputation because people at the time said it was too hard, the weapon degradation was annoying, and then respawning enemies were annoying. FC2 came out in 2008, so this was before games like Dark Souls and BOTW had come out and made it cool to like these types of features.

XbladeTeddy406d ago

Far Cry 2, the one with the AI that find you through walls and trees, can one shot you from a mile away and have 100% accuracy? That was frustrating not fun because cheap AI.

JEECE406d ago (Edited 406d ago )

Uhh, I mean, it isn't one of these games where once the enemies have detected you they will magically forget you exist because you walked behind a wall or went into a bush. And yeah the AI isn't stormtrooper level accuracy. Again, these are positives, not negatives to me.

To be fair, I'm really directing this at the people most critical of "Modern Ubisoft" or "Modern Open World" design elements. Like the type of people who fawned all over Elden Ring because it had a clean UI because they are so burnt out by the "checkbox" type of open world design.

If you like those types of games, then a later FC game like 3 and especially 4-5 would be more your style.

Show all comments (11)