Activision and Ubisoft have confirmed new Call of Duty and Assassin's Creed games, but which series could use a break? Which needs extra time to retool?
"The Jyväskylä-based (Finland) indie games developer Act Normal Games today announced with great delight and thrill that their isometric post-apocalyptic point-and-click adventure “Rauniot“, is now available PC (via Steam, GOG, and GMG." - Jonas Ek, TGG.
The game, which has launched in early access, has been in development for years with more than 3,000,000 wishlists on Steam.
"The Spain-based indie games publisher Firenut Games and Granada-based (Spain) indie games developer Trigger the Monster, today announced with great joy and thrill that their dark fantasy adventure/management game “Search of Light” (AKA SOL), is now available for PC (via Steam) and consoles (PS5, PS4, and the Nintendo Switch)." - Jonas Ek, TGG.
The companies behind both franchises are going to run them both right into the ground.
uh heres the best answer possible, hows about both take a 5 year break, and ubisoft makes a prince of persia,rainbow 6,and beyond good and evil sequel, and activision makes some new ips.
AC3 was amazing, but Black Ops 2 online play was an INDUSTRY REVOLUTION. My opinion is COD should ride BO2 one more year, and just release new map packs and guns for an extra year. This was the release we've been waiting for, why not milk it and make it that much more amazing for another year?
Assassins Creed always tells a great story, so I welcome a new release every year.
Assassin's Creed.
The Call of Duty franchise has no possible way of redeeming itself. The talented developers who did 1, 2, 4, and MW2 are gone now. So, there is no hope.
i think call of duty can redeem itself, but they really need to get its crap together and fix what so many people have issues with, give it a rest for a year or 2 and return with a better engine/stories. assassins creed on the other hand continues to be excellent games because they atleast try to fix issues each year.