Love it as a quick reference, hate it for reducing your work to a two-digit number, or sweat bullets over it when your bonus is on the line, but there is one unavoidable truth: Metacritic is a powerful force in the video games industry.
The review aggregate has, for better or worse, become our standard measure of a game's performance. But is Metacritic killing the video game review? And if so, what can be done about it?
Chained Echoes is getting slammed, and its devs have no idea why - Calling on Metacritic to do more.
Who doesn't have anything bad to write in these blank reviews and would benefit from sympathy sales?
I still say they should just get rid of the user score. They are untrustworthy of both good and bad review and honestly user reviews arent even a review. Of course tie it with the psn/xb account would be better.
That is simply horrible! The game is one of the best games, if not the best game of last year. Play this! Forget the bugged and rigged system of review bombing, just buy it and support Matthias and his team. These guys are superb!! We need to fight this stuff as a community, because small indie devs are the ones who least deserve this type of mistreatment.
User reviews are screwed for obvious reason and so are “professional” reviews because of money that companies throw around in many ways.
I just buy games that I think I will enjoy. Some devs you know make good games. Some long lasting series I know I will enjoy. Mostly I know what a game I want to play looks like. On rare occasion I get it wrong but I just sell it on eBay but that’s rare these days.
By most accounts this is a good game. I haven’t played it yet waiting for my physical copy.
Put it this way, I love jrpgs, but usually I play for 10 hours and move on. I had 80 hours in chained echoes and 100 percented it. The story is great and the game is beautiful. If you have game pass play it right now! If not buy it!
Fandom Acquires Leading Entertainment & Gaming Brands Including GameSpot, TV Guide and Metacritic
Starting with the top 128 best rated games on Metacritic and putting them head-to-head tournament style! The round of 16 for the March Madness Podcast. Vote for which games you think should go through!
I have no problem with Metacritic. A game usually gets the score it deserves. If a game is bad then it's just bad. Steel Battalion: Heavy Armor got a 40 because it flat out sucks. Kinect Star Wars and Fable Heroes got a 55 because they are both equally atrocious games. Don't blame Metacritic. All they did was average out the review scores. Great games get great scores. Journey got a 92 metascore. Why? Because it's a great game.
EDIT: You guys disagree with facts?
Too many devs have been wrongly fired over metacritic scores, this system is a broken conundrum, aggregate scoring sabotaged by bias and trechery. There is NO fixing it now, it's too late, the damage already done.
GTA 4 has a 98 on Metacritic. I love the game but c'mon LOL
I haven't looked at Metacritic in so long. It just doesn't factor into anything meaningful.
It's not just metacritic it's the entire scoring system that needs to be fixed.
Most reviewers go through the following which i'll use IGN as the example-
Presentation - This header is way too bleak, it could mean anything from menu layout to story flow. Get rid of it and replace it with Story. Menus and HUD don't need to be counted.
Graphics - Makes sense, but reviewed incorrectly most of the time. It should represent overall quality not does it look like Crysis/Uncharted.
Sound - Sound should not be included as it doesn't represent much of anything for a scoring basis, i don't care if the person reviewing wants to hear Lady Gaga and gets Justin Beiber. It doesn't impact on the game just the persons interest in music.
Gameplay - Makes sense, nothing needs to change here
Lasting Appeal - Should be scrapped. It's basically stating will you play again after the story is finished which should be irrelevant to the overall game itself.
Who cares, if it tells a brilliant story then yes likely it will be replayed. No need to include here.
Personally i think reviews should consist of-
Story /10
Graphic Quality /10
Gameplay /10
Innovation /10
Yes games should be judged by doing or not doing something new/improved.
/Rant