460°

HD DVD Surpasses 750,000 Dedicated Players

Following landmark Black Friday promotions through major retail chains, the North American HD DVD Promotional Group today announced that sales of dedicated HD DVD players exceeded the 750,000 mark.
The data is based on retailer reports and other point of sale data, and includes standalone set-top players as well as the Xbox 360 HD DVD player.

"HD DVD continues to gain momentum and market share with consumers,"
said Ken Graffeo, executive vice president of HD strategic marketing for
Universal Studios Home Entertainment, and co-president of the HD DVD
Promotional Group. "With more than four weeks left for holiday shopping, HD DVD is turning out to be a perfect consumer electronics gift."

Read Full Story >>
prnewswire.com
Multigamer6142d ago

add me on to that list soon, and a few of my mates.

Mr Marbles6142d ago

Even the CEO of Sony is now admitting that this will probably end in a draw, both formats will co exist, especially once dual format players are cheap and common.

Grassroots6142d ago

Why are you buying a format that is on it's last legs for the past year. Think before you purchase, the amount of quality movies are found on Blu-ray. Get your moneys worth even if it costs more.

The video contained show the real future of Hd-dvd.

PS3PCFTW6142d ago (Edited 6142d ago )

The title should have read: "750k sold on black friday in USA, 0 hddvd players sold in other countries on the same day".

im sick and tired of all these twists and with held information.

Earths population stands at 6,602,274,812- 7 bill, thats EARTH not USA. stop thinking inside the bubble. Especially when the euro and yen are worth more than the dollar/ people prefer european cars/ and the east is 2 tech generations are ahead of us.

this is why other countries consider americans pigheaded. when ignorant people think we are the best at everything when clearly were not.

usa is not the end all deciding factor.

@1.4= i see ur analogy.....but 3/4 of hollywood is backing bluray exclusively........even after hddvd launched first!! where were 3/4 of hollywood when bluray was not around?1 whole year before bluray was launched.

@1.6= they cant add in ps3 numbers because then it will be apparent that hddvd is fighting tooth and nail to stay alive. They however have, can, and will continue to leave out these details in order to confuse the public.

@1.7= ok so almost 2 years later and they only sold 750k? thats not even double of the bluray numbers......with 100 dollar hddvd hardware.

I pity anyone who believes this hddvd false advertising. any joe shmo will believe this to the "t", but people in the know or avid audiovideophiles know the real deal.

same joe shmo who will buy a hddvd now, then buy a bluray player once he figures out cheaper aint better......or else we'd all be driving kia sophias.

I HIGHLY ADVISE ALL THE BLURAY SUPPORTERS TO +BUBBLE UP ALL THE OTHER BLURAY SUPPORTERS IN THIS THREAD. IT SEEMS THE MART/FIRSTKNIGHT/ZHUK/bladesta r are going down the line giving negatives to US. THEY WANNA PLAY DIRTY? WE CAN PLAY DIRTY AS WELL.

Rooftrellen6142d ago

More than just America matters, but America does matter a lot in this case. In the console war, why is Japan so important? Simple, the developers are almost all there.

Now, unless you move Hollywood to another country, America is going to be vital in this format war.

marinelife96142d ago

1. I don't want my $99 player only broadcasting in 1080i.

2. I still can't watch the majority of the movies I want to see in hi def because they are only on Blu-Ray.

3. Over a year and a half it took to get to 750k players? I can't wait to see Toshiba's financial's.

IntelligentAj6142d ago

Actually only the Euro is worth more than the dollar. One Dollar is worth about 110 yen. Also why is it that the HD-DVD add-on for the 360 is added to total sales for HD-DVD but the PS3's that are sold aren't counted towards Blu-ray players? Interesting...

Mainman6142d ago

HD-DVD players didn't sell 750.000 players on black friday.

After black friday, the number of total sold HD-DVD players surpassed 750.000 units. This is total number of HD-DVD players sold in America (or the world, not sure).

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 6142d ago
kingofps36142d ago

750,000 players, ok. Multigamer and his mates buy one each and thats about it. Case closed. BLU-RAY is the future, believe it.

ruibing6142d ago

So while they sold 750,000 players, Blu Ray has recently sold 1,000,000 movies while HD-DVD sold only 370,000, which means Blu Ray is leading 3:1 thanks to the millions of PS3s there.

http://www.electronista.com...

wil4hire6142d ago

(due to the cheap hardware)

Bluray makes actual disc-sales, and is continuing to. People that own bluray have the money to re-buy entire collections.

People that couldn't afford bluray.. aren't exactly rushing otu to buy $300.00+ worth of discs almost monthly.

Can we just end this HD-DVD crap already? I mean I want shrek, but not as bad as I want the entire pixar collection.

Vip3r6142d ago

I think Blu-ray has the better hardware number when you include PS3s alone not to mention the other standalone players too.

Death6142d ago

Capable Blu-Ray players out number HD-DVD by about 7 million players, yet Blu-Ray movies are only selling 2 to 1 with HD-DVD. These are real world stats, so apply this data to your statement.

-Death

Biphter6142d ago

but the body of the article says it includes Xbox 360 add on. So basically its contradicting itself. Put that against however many million Blu-Ray players (Including PS3, seeing as this article includes Xbox 360 addon).

And Death, the 2:1 ratio is still 2:1 no matter if there are 5 million Blu ray players to 1 million HD-DVD. Blu-Ray is out selling HD-DVD and has been constantly all year. Now put it into a bit more perspective, That 2:1 is in USA alone. Add to this Europes 5:1 and Japans 9:1 in favour of Blu-Ray and you start to realise the GLOBAL picture here.

DEIx15x86142d ago

When an Xbox 360 add on is purchased someone is spending money on the device for the sole purpose of watching movies, just like when buying a stand alone player. The add on is bought with the same mindset as a stand alone. When a PS3 is bought it is bought for the purpose of playing games (or at least as a gamin device it should be). So an Xbox 360 HD-DVD add on means movies while PS3 means games. So the 360 add on should always be included while PS3 should not unless a calculated curve is applied.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 6142d ago
Zhuk6142d ago

while it is great news, HD DVD is focusing too much only on the US, while Blu Ray goes unopposed basically everywhere else

jorellpogi6142d ago

Don't prolong the format war. Let's get this over with.

Show all comments (58)
190°

OpenAI unveils new o1 AI model that "thinks" and it can code a video game from a single prompt

OpenAI has introduced a new series of AI models, o1, that are capable of complex reasoning and problem-solving - including game programming.

TheNamelessOne5d ago

I'm very worried about where the games industry may be in a few years.

oldenjon4d ago

AI is completely unsustainable and expected to accelerate climate change. I expect government to take a harder stance on it within the next couple of decades, but by that point we may not even have a government or a gaming industry so….

Hofstaderman4d ago

When/ if it comes to this point, I have a massive collection spanning from the NES to current gen. No problem turning to retro gaming.

cthulhucultist4d ago

This is basically a more advanced model embedding the chain of thought technique by spending reasoning tokens while "thinking" before providing an output and is more suited for heavy specific tasks in coding, math and science.

I have used it for creating complex game puzzles (for role playing games) using tiered approach and multi step reasoning and it worked liked a charm.

It does not support vision at this point however or other multi modal features, nor does it generate images (no DALL-E 3 integration yet) and it has limits for plus and teams users in usage (20 and 50 messages per week respectively).

I have create an interactive guide for it for getting started here

https://view.caduceusapp.eu...

In any case, I believe that when the new models launch (GPT5 Orion, Claude Opus 3.5 and Gemini 2 along with Grok 3) we will see a big difference in gaming as well. Combined with text to video AI tools like Open AI's Sora, we will definitely see a decrease in quality in games and increase in. output, at least at the beginning.

In a few years where the models will be more fine tuned, we wont be able to tell the difference really

ZoboomafooFan4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Mostly but not 100% right. o1-preview and o1-mini both have a 20 request per minute limit. o1-preview also has a 30 message cap per week for Plus users, and there is a smaller model I mentioned earlier, o1-mini, that functions similarly on math and code problems and comes with a 50 message weekly cap for Plus users. Combined you essentially get 80 messages per week w/ Plus. I work in machine learning so I wanted to clarify those points. Also, o1 itself hasn't been released yet, just o1-preview, but evaluation results of o1 have been publicly released and are comparable to o1-preview and o1-mini. I agree with the remainder of your points!

cthulhucultist4d ago

Correct! the 30 (which is not 20 as i wrote) and 50 requests I mentioned referred to the two models which I did not quote in the same sentence so it makes sense that it reads as if I am talking about the types of users (Teams or Plus).

Besides in my guide I have this information noted down as per OpenAIs website (I already exhausted my limit but was reset by OpenAI)

Yes the OpenAI model is part of the new reasoning models and has not been released yet. We now have access (as plus/teams of API Level 5 user) to mini and preview which are quite capable but limited in the scope due to their focus on certain topics.

Since you are working on machine learning, I suppose you should be excited about the new PS5 Pro performance or the new AMD offerings

OneLove4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Well AI would be necessary for the sword art online VR experience ppl are expecting to exist somewhere in the future. Aka full body VR.

200°

Isn't $700 a little too much for a PS5 Pro?

Lex from Sirus Gaming wrote: The PS5 Pro boasts a larger GPU, advanced ray tracing, and a brand-new AI upscaling tech called PlayStation Spectral Super Resolution (PSSR). All of this translates to better image clarity and smoother performance, offering us consistent 60 frames per second with the best possible visual settings. The PS5 Pro also comes with a 2TB SSD and Wi-Fi 7. Question is, is a $700 price tag worth it?

Read Full Story >>
sirusgaming.com
Vits9d ago

Consoles definitely have their place because they're affordable and easy to use. But when you start changing those two things, that's when I stop seeing the value—especially now that exclusive content isn't really a big factor anymore.

When it comes to the PS5 Pro, I think Sony is asking for too much. That $700 quickly turns into almost $900 once you add the disc drive and taxes. Cutting corners by not including the drive and even the stand just makes the deal worse.

Still, there will be people who buy it. Some fans won’t mind the price. I just hope there aren’t enough of them, so Sony will rethinking this kind of pricing strategy for their future consoles.

9d ago Replies(2)
Scissorman9d ago

I hope they take a similar approach to the Portal and not manufacture too many Pros out the gate to really see if the demand is there for a $700 premium home console. One thing I don't see being mentioned is that there is a healthy amount of PS4 owners who have yet to make the leap into current gen. This also might be an opportunity for Sony to capture that audience.

Vits9d ago

I’m pretty sure they will, because it’s advantageous for them to be able to say that the console sold out at launch.

As for PS4 owners, considering that the PS4 Pro had around 15 million users and many of those have probably already bought a PS5, I don’t think the rest of the PS4 owners are really waiting for a $700+ console to make the jump. More likely, they’re waiting for the PS5 to get a price cut or for FIFA to stop being released for their console.

9d ago
Sarcasm9d ago

Regular PS5: $449 + 2TB SSD $150 = $599
PS5 Pro 2TB: $699

It would have soften the overreaction if they would have stuck with 1TB and priced it at $599.

Iceball20009d ago

But it could have went the other way too if they advertised it was a 2TB. After I heard that it softened the blow but the damage was done.

I would have taken a 1TB with a disk drive.

Sarcasm9d ago

Yeah that's what I mean. Sony fucked up here with their messaging and pricing strategy.

Sure we would have gotten memes about $599 being the price tag of the PS3, but at least the entry price difference would have been "only" $150 instead of $250.

OtterX9d ago

Especially bc I would have just taken my 4tb SSD that's in my current PS5 and moved it over to the Pro. But no way, this is priced out of my comfort zone. €799 here, which equates to $880 atm.

Michiel19899d ago

i didn't even think of that, if you're a loyal customer you basically get screwed over the most. you will have paid for 2 ps5's, and 3ssd's then and you wont even have a disc drive in your new one, They honestly need some kind of exchange program, that you can hand in your ps5 for a big discount.

--Onilink--9d ago

Not to mention a 2TB SSD at retail can already be found for $110-120.

The price they are getting that additional 1TB on their end is a fraction of that, so not even the extra storage is much justification for the price increase

Vits9d ago

You're kind of comparing two different things here. The first scenario you mentioned would give you a 3TB PS5, but there’s more to it. A consumer-grade SSD has a lot of parts that Sony doesn't have to pay extra for in the PS5 Pro. The main one is the controller, which can account for 20% to 40% of the total SSD cost, depending on the source.

Sony is really only paying for the extra memory modules, which would probably cost them around $40 at most. So, even if they made a 1TB model and discounted the price of the extra memory, the PS5 Pro would still be around $659, which would probably be received even worse.

Sarcasm9d ago

I'm not comparing to what Sony would have made in profit, but rather the consumer market pricing.

I already agree this was a bad strategy and up front price. Sony really messed this up by making it a default 2TB console. Nobody would have complained if it was 1TB. And yes they should have included a stand and the disc drive.

But again comparing to what's available, you have really only one other option. The $449 PS5, also no disc and no stand. Sony's mess up is making it a $250 gap instead of $100-$150 gap.

A PS5 Pro at $599 I think would have been more digestible with consumers.

darthv729d ago (Edited 9d ago )

Your comparison should be stock for stock.
PS5 digital 1tb: $449.99 (MSRP)
PS5 Pro digital 2tb: $699.99 (MSRP)
Disc drive: $59.99 (MSRP) optional / works on both
Stand: $29.99 (MSRP) optional / works on both.

As far as expandable storage, those come in various sizes and prices and will also work on both.

darthv729d ago

My bad... the disc drive is $79.99 (MSRP)

TheCaptainKuchiki9d ago

it should have been $599 at MAX and WITH the disc drive and 2TB.
Absolutely no one can defend this ridiculous price.

Sarcasm9d ago

Nobody is defending the price. Just looking at the facts here.

$599 with the disc drive and 2TB?

That's $599 - $79.99 = $520 - $50-100 for 1TB = $470-$420 making it the same or cheaper than the regular PS5.

That's not how this works. You'd be fired immediately if you were the financial analyst suggesting this.

Vits9d ago

@Sarcasm

You’re comparing apples to oranges here, which is why it doesn’t make much sense. You suggested they should have made it only 1TB and priced it at $599. That way, consumers might find it more acceptable, which is a reasonable idea.

But the $699 price isn’t just about the extra storage. They’re charging that amount because that’s what they’ve decided. So, having less storage and a lower price aren’t as closely related as you might think. You can get that amount of storage on a NAND chip for around $40, and that's the consumer price. For a big company like Sony that buys these chips in bulk, the cost should be even lower.

So even if they cut the extra storage, it wouldn’t bring the price down by $100. The only way to see such a big price drop would be if Sony changed their overall pricing strategy.

Sarcasm9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

Right but people are ignoring the actual performance uplift of the new machine. Everyone is acting like the SSD drive is the *only* difference. The bigger GPU has a cost.

I stand with the people, the price initially is too high. They messed up.

But when you take a subjective look at the device itself, it's not that surprising why it costs what it costs in today's economy. When $5 burgers are now $12-$15. Other than cavemen, nobody should be this level of surprised a new electronics device is overpriced.

Also at the end of the day, this is an OPTIONAL purchase. Nothing stops anyone from buying the base PS5.

IF Sony went full Concord, and the $700 PS5 Pro is the ONLY option on the market. Then let's all bust out the pitchforks and torches holding hands together.

ChasterMies9d ago

You only need to add 1TB to the PS5 slim to get it to 2TB. And the PS5 slim has intermittently been on sale. So less than $550 for a 2TB PS5 slim. Something else to consider is that adjusting for inflation, the PS4 Pro would be $525 in today’s dollars. If PS5 Pro hit that number, then even I would be interested in it.

Vits9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

@Sarcasm

No one is ignoring the performance boost, and honestly, you're the first person I've seen even bringing up the SSD. The problem is that Sony hasn’t done a great job of showcasing that performance. If I remember correctly, four or five of the games they presented were actually PS4 titles, and their later press release focused heavily on those other 8K games that will automatically get better, but many of those are PS4 games and by the description it doesn't look that much diferent from what the PS5 already does with those games.

There’s also the matter of expectations. Consoles are supposed to be the affordable and easy option for gaming, especially now that exclusives seem to be less of a thing. So when Sony releases a $700 console that requires at least another $80 to play physical discs, plus $30 just to stand it up vertically, they really need to prove why it’s worth that price to avoid backlash.

The way they’ve handled it makes them look greedy, and that’s where the real issue lies. Sony has a track record of becoming difficult to deal with when they hold too much of an advantage over the competition. So when people say, “It’s just an option,” they’re giving Sony exactly what they want. Those who adopt that mindset and buy the console are essentially telling Sony it’s okay to set prices like this. When the PS6 comes around, we might face another situation like the PS3 launch, but this time, without any real competition, and that’s bad for everyone.

Oh, but then we get mad and voice our frustrations. By that point, though, unless Microsoft really gets their act together, it’ll already be too late. Sony will essentially be the only option for console gaming, and you, me, and the average gamer will have to pay whatever they demand. Otherwise, we’ll be pushed out of the hobby altogether. As a PC gamer, I’ve already seen this happen with Nvidia GPUs recently and with Intel CPUs about a decade ago, and trust me, it sucks.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 9d ago
RaiderNation9d ago

I don't know, is it? Do we have an actual component cost breakdown of the PS5 Pro? Because until we do, anyone defending or criticizing the price is clueless.

Berenger9d ago

Yeah. I think the big miss is they should have just included the disc drive and dropped to 1tb for $599. At $699 plus additional expenses for physical games, it quickly got out of hand for most people to see the value.
Now, when you consider that it's considerably more powerful than the Series X 2tb sku but only $100 more, that's a deal. Problem for them is you add $85 after tax for the disc drive.
Still a better value but they should have mentioned 2TB in the presentation itself to soften the blow.
After thinking it over, it's still more affordable for me to upgrade to the Pro than switching to PC because all the games that are Pro enhanced, I already own. I would need to repurchase on PC and some aren't even there yet. Plus, I can sell my OG PS5 to cover half. Reasonable from there.

darthv729d ago

Adding stuff like wifi 7 and doubling the internal storage are things that they could have not changed. Wifi 6 is very viable and they could have saved 7 for the PS6. Also 1tb is perfectly fine, especially since they still allow you to add your own. Pricing it at $599 would have been far easier to swallow than $699. Because then it would only be $100 more than a fully fledged PS5 (or $150 more than a digital). Instead it is $200-250 more than the base models.

truthBombs9d ago

I would have compromised on storage space to meet $599 - include the stand too. The original PS5 wasn't 1TB anyways so it would still seem like an upgrade.

Show all comments (36)
40°

Star Wars Outlaws GeForce RTX 40 Series Bundle Available Now

For a limited time, buy a participating GeForce RTX 40 Series graphics card, desktop PC or laptop and you’ll receive a digital copy of Star Wars Outlaws, enhanced with ray tracing, Reflex and NVIDIA DLSS 3.5 with Ray Reconstruction.