450°

UltimateGameGorilla: Why The Xbox 360 Does Not Need Exclusives

Richard of UltimateGameGorilla writes: The year is 2007, barely a year has passed since the Xbox 360 and PS3 rolled of the production lines. Everyone wants one of the “next generation consoles”. Some gamers just purchased both consoles but for many consumers buying both was out of the question and the deciding factor between the consoles boiled down to the game line-up. At launch the Xbox 360 had an entire year of a head start with which to build a library of launch titles. The PS3 on the other hand had no such benefit and stuttered along with very few “exclusive” titles. The PS3's strange architecture had proven to difficult a task to program and most developers opted for multiplatform games. This resulted in the majority of multiplatform games looking and performing better on the Xbox 360. Things were indeed looking up for Microsoft's console, even with the bad reputation surrounding the console as the notorious “RROD” surfaced, the console continued to dominate the PS3 by a huge...

Read Full Story >>
ultimategamegorilla.com
asphogears4747d ago

Well written, unbiased article. I agree that fanboys overlook multiplatform titles.

Qwert1174747d ago

Why is this guy getting disagrees?

Active Reload4747d ago

Me personally, I only like a few exclusives on any platform. With that said, exclusives do give a platform an identity, so in general they are needed. I understand what the article is saying and it holds it's own truths.

Biggest4747d ago

Richard should also write an article saying "Why People Should Not Buy L.A. Noire From K-Mart." I mean, who cares that they have the most extras thrown in? People should be happy with the same game that every other outlet is selling. There is no reason to expect or look for the better package deal. Never look for more. Always settle for the median.

captain-obvious4747d ago

as an owner of all consoles
i say BS
because im more interested in Exclusives of each console
since i can play a multi plat on ANY system i have

so yah
bullshit

Istanbull4747d ago

why are you getting ignored?

rockleex4747d ago Show
bakasora4746d ago

When they have a lot of exclusives they say they have the best exclusives. Then when they don't have much exclusive, they say they don't need them. I just saying.

EVILDEAD3604746d ago (Edited 4746d ago )

Let's keep it 100% real..

It would be silly to pretend that Exclusives don't matter at all for ANY console generation..

Since November of last year there have been a dozen articles bashing the 360 for 2011's exclusives list vs. PS3.

And now as we are less than a month from E3 and the fact is the system continues to sell and without any exclusives 360 gamers played great games this year and the year is not over

After what happened to last year's Alan Wake getting trounced by Red Dead..Microsoft wisened up..

Bottomline..the top 4 exclusives on the 360 are Halo, Gears, Fable and Forza (in that order)

They successfully released Halo and Fable in 2010..and this fall they will release Gears and Forza..it's that simple

Sony definately clearly has the biggest number of 'announced' exclusives..but at the end of the day 2011's top 2 exclusives for the PS3 this year are K3 and the fall's Uncharted 3.

If you look at the first half of this year and you will see that multi-plats dominated the gaming world from the fans to the press with the releases of Dead Space 2, Crysis 2, Portal 2, and now the upcoming MONSTER LA. Noire.

So what could Micrasoft have released that would have mattered?

A Shooter?

COD: BO & Halo Reach still dominate Xbox Live w/ DLC updates and ridiculously huge online community and content..why release something to compete against Bulletstorm which tied to the Gears Beta..plus PS3 released the high profile Killzone 3

At the end of the day, for the first half of 2012..it turned out to be a wise decision.

On the 6th of June we will finally see if the rest of 2011 bodes well for Micrsoft as well.

I just say..own em' all..and game till you drop

Just my take

Evil

iamnsuperman4746d ago

Exclusives sell system. £60 sells because of the Halo effect. The PS3 sells because of Uncharted, GT, and other exclusives. Lets make it simple. Why should I buy a 360 if the 360 has not exclusive games (same goes to any gaming platform just easier to name one). Multiplat games are good but system sellers they are not. Of course other features have an impact but in the context of games exclusives sell system. So the 360 does need exclusives like all platform because then there is little reason to buy one console over another if there are no exclusives

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4746d ago
news4geeks4747d ago

There is no bias here but just wait for the sony fanboys, they'll find bias like a needle in a hay stack. Good article.

UltimateGameGorilla4747d ago

I think Richard is going to really appreciate your comment. Thanks!

awiseman4747d ago

I agree :D thanks for positiver insight guys!

DelbertGrady4747d ago (Edited 4747d ago )

I appreciate games regardless of exclusivity although it could be a factor when choosing what platform to buy (if only buying one). For me there are more factors than games though. Such as online, chat features etc.

I also think it would feel sh*tty if one side got to play games like L.A. Noire and Portal 2 and the others were left out.

Just 5 more days til L.A. Noire...!

NateCole4747d ago

Why should you feel shitty?. If anyone wants to play every game then they should fork out for every platform there is. Thats the way it should be. This is important to having variety and competition and having an innovative gaming industry.

Some of you kids really need to look at the bigger picture here.

Rynx4747d ago (Edited 4747d ago )

This generation has been a joke

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4746d ago
LOGICWINS4747d ago

The 360 doesn't need exclusives because the majority of its audience doesn't play exclusive games. Its really just that simple.

sack_boi4747d ago (Edited 4747d ago )

If that was the case Halo, Gears, Forza, Fable... would tank completely. Not so logical this time around.

EDIT : Or, were you being sarcastic?

Blaze9294747d ago (Edited 4747d ago )

http://majornelson.com/2011...

Xbox 360 Top LIVE Titles (based on UU’s)
1 Call of Duty: Black Ops
2 Modern Warfare 2
3 Halo: Reach
4 FIFA Soccer 11
5 NBA 2K11
6 GTA IV
7 Mortal Kombat
8 Battlefield: Bad Co. 2
9 Call of Duty 4
10 Red Dead Redemption
11 Halo 3
12 Gears of War 2
13 Portal 2
14 Call of Duty: WaW
15 NHL 11
16 Forza Motorsport 3
17 Madden NFL 11
18 Bulletstorm
19 Assassin’s Creed Brotherhood
20 Fallout: New Vegas

Top Arcade Titles (Full Versions purchased)

1 Outland
2 Castlevania Harmony of Despair
3 Portal: Still Alive
4 Pinball FX2
5 Castlevania: Symphony of the Night
6 Full House Poker
7 Section 8: Prejudice
8 DEAD RISING 2: CASE WEST
9 The Fancy Pants Adventures
10 Bangai-O HD: Missile Fury
11 DEAD RISING 2: CASE ZERO
12 MOON DIVER
13 Castle Crashers
14 The Dishwasher: Vampire Smile
15 Might & Magic Clash of Heroes
16 Trials HD
17 Game Room
18 Torchlight
19 TROUBLE WITCHES NEO!
20 Street Fighter II’ HF
The above arcade list is based on full versions purchased.

These lists are based on global unique users connected to Xbox Live

----------

Like he said, the majority of its audience do not play exclusive games. Microsoft sees that and if their audience is happy with multiplatform games, why should they feel the need to pump out 20 plus exclusives every year like Sony and pretend like their audience is going to buy all of those games plus multiplatform games in one year.

ProA0074747d ago

when served with statistics, pwnage is so sweet. as Blaze just did sack_boi

van-essa4747d ago (Edited 4747d ago )

@Blaze929
They don't play exclusive games because there are no (exageration off course) exclusive games to be played.
I don't see Uncharted on that list. Does that mean their audience doesn't want Uncharted?
I bet it would be right next to Gears on that list if it was on the X360.

Point being, your list only proves that there aren't many exclusives on the X360, not that they don't want exclusives.

captain-obvious4747d ago (Edited 4747d ago )

@ Blaze929
acually

you listed all the worthwhile Xbox Exclusives in that list (2 halos a gears game and a forza game )
loooooooooooooooooooooooooool

no wonder you wont find anymore on that list

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4747d ago
LOGICWINS4747d ago (Edited 4747d ago )

@sack_boi- No, people buy Halo, Gears, Forza, and Fable because they WANT to buy them. What I'm saying is that MORE people on the 360 spend MORE of their time on multiplatform games like COD.

Exclusive games like Halo and Gears HELP the 360 do well...but they are not NECESSARY for the 360 to do well since MOST 360 owners only buy two MULTIPLATFORM games a year(Madden and COD).

Check the statistics...numbers don't lie.

Qwert1174747d ago

I agree with the first part of your comment but I disagree with you when you write that Xbox 360 gamers only buy Madden and COD. I for one buy a shitload of games each year.

LOGICWINS4747d ago

"I agree with the first part of your comment but I disagree with you when you write that Xbox 360 gamers only buy Madden and COD. I for one buy a shitload of games each year."

YOU buy a shitload of games each year...MOST 360 owners only buy two games a year: COD and one sports game.

asphogears4747d ago

I also buy a lot of games each year and so does almost every Xbox 360 owner I know.

Oldsnake0074747d ago

than why does the 360 have the same / higher attach rate than the ps3 ?

Echo3074747d ago (Edited 4747d ago )

"MOST 360 owners only buy two MULTIPLATFORM games a year(Madden and COD)."

I would love to know where you're getting the info to state this as fact. I have a friend's list of 80+ people and not a single one of them only play one game a year. They might not buy every game that comes out, and most of them do buy the yearly CoD title, but each of them buy and play at least a handful of games every year.

And BTW, just so we're clear, the most popular game/series on both platforms is a multiplatform title. Guess that means PS3 owners only want to play CoD, huh?

Edit - Oldsnake007 hit the nail on the head. Most multiplatform games sell better on the 360... a lot better. AND the few exclusives the Xbox has sell better than PS3 exclusives, and the install base for both consoles is about the same. In fact, if we're to listen to all the PS3 fanboys out there, about half of all 360's are dead from RROD, meaning there should be a lot more PS3's than 360's out there.

LOGICWINS4747d ago

"Guess that means PS3 owners only want to play CoD, huh?"

No, MOST PS3 owners only want to play COD.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4747d ago
2fk4747d ago (Edited 4747d ago )

I WANT EXCLUSIVES...that's why i got the ps3, 360, and wii.....the exclusives identify the platform....when i think of ps3 i think of Uncharted, Killzone, MGS, GOW, infamous...and when i think of 360 i think of halo, gears, fable, forza, alan wake...WE NEED EXCLUSIVES.

Kurt Russell4746d ago

Not if those games were available at the same quality multiplat you wouldn't ^^

2fk4746d ago

then what would be the point of having a ps3 and 360 if their multiplat....EXCLUSIVES IDENTIFY THE CONSOLE....u obviously dont understand

Kurt Russell4746d ago

What great vivid and exciting use of capitalisation!

I do understand, but my point was we wouldn't need a PS3, 360, Wii and god knows what else under our TV's to play everything in the world ever... Because I can play them all on one. Exclusives do identify a console in the current situation of competing companies.

HOWEVER! <--- vivid and exciting yes?.. I think so.

You made no mention of this in your first post which said "WE NEED EXCLUSIVES" in a rather crass manor (of which I read in the style of how I talk on the phone whilst poo'ing)... and is the statement I was disagreeing with.

WE don't need exclusives at all, they benefit YOU and I none what-so-ever. However competing COMPANIES need exclusives to make their product stand out amongst the rest... So you and I shall part with our hard earned pennies in their favour.

I hope there is no more confusion, as I have no more bubbles to explain this further to you. I tried to copy your eclectic typing style so we're on the same page.

upturned24747d ago (Edited 4747d ago )

Agreeed. Plus, exclusives are usually geared towards hardcore gamers. With the exception of games like LittleBigPlanet and Viva Pinata lol.

Morbius4204746d ago

Maybe we don't play exclusives because thier aren't any.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4746d ago
NukaCola4747d ago (Edited 4747d ago )

This article just said that it doesn't matter how weak the line up is and how much MS is moving toward Kinect instead of core game, you will all still buy the Xbox anyway. Is it me or is this madness? I get the 360 audience loves multiplats just as much as the rest but exclusive stand a console apart. 360 had plenty of great titles. And the States and UK are the only countries that this article really applies too.

asphogears4747d ago

This article says how the multiplatform games these days are really good so exclusives right now are not that necessary.

NukaCola4747d ago

Well why does PS3 outsell 360 everywhere other than the UK and USA? I would think it is because Sony provides something MS doesn't. And Kinect is a huge boost to the 360 which is an exclusive camera with exclusive games. I think this article holds minimal ground.

LOGICWINS4747d ago (Edited 4747d ago )

"Well why does PS3 outsell 360 everywhere other than the UK and USA?"

^^Because the online is free and it has more value(Blu-ray player, gaming machine etc.) and its the same price as its counterpart 360 SKU.

Also, the 360 came out in 05', a shitload of people who are buying PS3s NOW, probably ALREADY have a 360.

If exclusives were the reason that the PS3 is outselling the 360, then why is Black Ops(a multiplatform game) the best selling Playstation 3 game in history?

jacksonmichael4747d ago

Oh, and Japan hates Microsoft.

MysticStrummer4747d ago

@Logic - PS3 has outsold 360 fairly consistently since launch, and it had a substantially higher price back then. Black Ops, like all CoDs, is an accessible FPS that anyone can pick up and do well at. Some would call that casual, some wouldn't, but the Wii has proven the power of the casual gamer's dollar. It's arguable whether that's good for gamers overall. I would say it isn't, but "accessible" has become the goal this generation and it's not surprising that CoD games sell well on any system. Regardless, if two systems play a bunch of the same games and only one of them has exclusives... real exclusives not on PC also... which would you say is the better system to buy? I'm not saying 360 has no exclusives by the way, I'm just saying to discount exclusives is silly. I know I bought a PS3 because I enjoyed the exclusives Sony brought to the PS2 more than what Microsoft brought to XBox. This generation has only enhanced that, so I'll be buying a PS4 as soon as it launches.

Biggest4747d ago

Multiplatform games have always been really good. Only a few exclusives made a difference. If you wanted Mario, you got Nintendo. If you wanted Sonic, you got Sega. If you wanted Bonk, you got TGFX16. The big thing with the Xbox in general is that most of the people playing it are people that weren't "gamers" before. They aren't concerned with games. They play what the cool kids play: Call of Duty and Madden.

sergiospain4747d ago (Edited 4747d ago )

Well I disagree. While most of my games are multiplatform, I don't know what would I do without my Uncharted 2, Metal gear solid 4, killzone 3 and demon's souls.

Those are the games I have played the most in this generation. Honestly, you can say whatever about multiplatforms, but having exclusives always adds variety.

inb4 a massive amount of xbox360 fanboys downvotes me for no good reason.

NateCole4747d ago

@asphogears. Truth is. MS dosent have the talent to produce exclusive content the same quantity as their rivals in any case.

@LOGICWINS. COD is the GTA of this gen in terms of accessibility and casual appeal. Regardless of platform it sells.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4747d ago
asphogears4747d ago (Edited 4747d ago )

This article is not dissing any other consoles. It is just stating that multiplatform titles are really good these days. The author of the article also wrote at the beginning of the article a bit of history about the Xbox 360. There is nothing wrong with that.

upturned24747d ago (Edited 4747d ago )

He's trying to downplay the 360's lack of new exclusives. Only recently have people been bringing up that problem. Whether it be in an article or in the comments. So it makes perfect sense to come out with a cleverly comprised unbiased article that gives the 360 room to breathe with its poor Kinect.

I'm pointing out the obvious. Doesn't make me a fanboy, and I hate how that word gets thrown around all the time now. Instead of intelligence in a discussion, people call "fanboy". Makes them seem moronic.

In 2007, the PS3 barely had any exclusives. In 2007, 360 had plenty. Now look what's happened.

Morbius4204746d ago

I thought Grand Turisimo was.

Otheros004747d ago

Then what's the point of buying one if you already own a pc or ps3?

asphogears4747d ago

I think that the main point of this article was to praise multiplatform games.

Qwert1174747d ago Show
Show all comments (136)
290°

More Job Losses At Xbox, “There’s More To Come”: Paul Thurrott

Paul Thurrott in a recent episode commented on the on-going Microsoft fiasco hinting at more job losses and that "there's more to come".

Read Full Story >>
spieltimes.com
Sonic18812d ago (Edited 1d 23h ago )

There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future . Xbox has to pay Microsoft back. It might take two decades to do that.

sagapo1d 20h ago (Edited 1d 20h ago )

I don’t understand what you’re saying. Xbox IS microsoft so there’s no “paying back “.
And MS gross profit in 2023 was over 140 billion dollars so forget your 2 decades.

Unless you mean the money MS invested in Xbox (acquisitions included) and the time it will take for xbox as a brand to gain that money back on it’s own, then yeah, that could take a while.

romulus231d 14h ago

The better term to use might be return on investment, xbox is simply a division of Microsoft one that MS can easily do away with if profit margins are not met. So in that regard he's right, if xbox isn't showing the expected return on investment the higher ups are expecting than it's unlikely Microsoft will acquire any other studios any time soon, especially if they are spending billions buying developers just to shut them down in the end.

MrBaskerville1d 7h ago (Edited 1d 7h ago )

Xbox is a division that they discussed shutting down but doubled down on after Gamepass was pitched.

It needs to make money at some point. Big money.

KwietStorm_BLM1d 6h ago

So you do understand it or..?

rokos1d 4h ago

According to Statista the net income of Microsoft is about $72.4 billion dollars which is a bit lower than last year profit. That is almost as much as Activision's acquisition but I assume that would be a one off since it costs so much plus I see how their focus has been shifted to AI, thus any major future investments will probably be in that area.

Markusb331d 3h ago

i think you are really missing the point

VariantAEC18h ago

@romulus23
That is not why MS buys studios. They might continue to buy because it's about taking that sweet sweet IP out of the corporate husks of their acquisitions.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 18h ago
SonyStyled1d 20h ago

“There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future”

No bro, there do be is for Microsoft not acquiring for what is now if not what it be is 😂

1d 18h ago Replies(2)
ChasterMies1d 8h ago

Xbox isn’t a separate company from Microsoft. It’s all Microsoft.

Abear211d 2h ago (Edited 1d 2h ago )

Let’s be real, this is the media spinning all the acquisitions and liquidations of said developers and spinning it to make M$ the villain.

This was bound to happen, a bigger slice of pie and cut costs, when the games come they stand to make more and that’s their agenda—it was the writing on the wall when the sales went through and legally all those who approved the sale and mergers knew this would happen.

Snowflakes need to realize business is ugly and you can cry all you want but this is how capitalism works. And it works.

That said, M$ needs to steer the narrative and grab hold of all this, make their plans known, hype the hell out of all those dead IP’s they plan to revive, and be honest about the timeline. This is likely to involve mobile and IP on other consoles, and most people realize that.

The problem is this company is incapable of being transparent and seems to often want to dissuade and confuse is customer base. The lack of E3 has hurt Microsoft and I don’t think they know how to properly or effectively market their brand anymore.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 18h ago
jwillj2k41d 23h ago

There really needs to be a class action lawsuit here. You buy these companies just to put people out of jobs. And it’s not like something happened to derail their plans this WAS the plan. Microsoft has no business in this space at all.

franwex1d 23h ago (Edited 1d 23h ago )

Microsoft has been doing this for years. They simply want the IPs. Look at Nokia. Look at Skype. This time it simply expanded to games. Gaming is not as important to Microsoft’s executives as it was to the founders too. Bill Gates was willing to sell the og Xbox at a loss. Steve Balmer approved the red ring of death fiasco. This CEO isn’t really a gamer.

-Foxtrot1d 22h ago

Maybe it's time though to put a stop to it and use a big giant like Microsoft as a huge example to the rest of these big companies.

There has to be a line drawn somewhere.

People like the FTC and the like went against Microsoft yet their Actvision deal was still allowed to go through yet look what's happened...it's not even Acitivisions studios aswell, it's Bethesdas.

VariantAEC18h ago

Years?

Try several decades, and in the gaming space 2.3 decades.

Jon615861d 3h ago

You do realize this happens in ALL industries? Or are you just saying this because it is Microsoft? In any case I feel for those that are being let go but the trch industry is suffering right now.

jwillj2k422h ago(Edited 22h ago)

This absolutely does NOT happen all the time. Let me know the last time 1 company with a terrible product track record spent 100 billion onto acquire MULTIPLE successful companies in under a year only to shut them down and stop making their products regardless of how successful they were. Not merge them, completely shut them down.

And you can’t use Microsoft in your example.

Notellin23h ago(Edited 23h ago)

Class action lawsuit? The law is on their side and protects them at all costs. There are no rules to protect the people at the bottom.

jwillj2k422h ago

Not true when it comes to mass layoff do your research.

RNTody1d 22h ago

Ninja Theory, Perfect Dark, Crash Bandicoot, Spyro, Wolfenstein 3, Dishonored, Prey, Doom, Quake... something tells me that bad things are going to happen to these entities under Microsoft.

MrDead1d 12h ago

ID software, the makers of Doom and Wolfenstein that have been with us since 1991 could be gone and MS will keep the IPs.

I hope some of these studios can buy their freedom from MS otherwise this is going to be even more devastating for the industry and gamers.

Yui_Suzumiya1d 9h ago (Edited 1d 9h ago )

That's exactly what I'm worried about. I've been a fan of id since Wolfenstein 3D and I'm honestly afraid.

lodossrage1d 5h ago

Toys for Bob saw the writing on the wall and bought themselves out.

Wouldn't be the first time a company did that under MS either. Bungie and Twisted Pixel did the same. Considering what just happened, I can see some other devs trying to buy themselves out too.

anast1d 22h ago

Good thing the bosses of all those small studios made their money.

glenn19791d 21h ago

they cant do it right now they will get burned

XiNatsuDragnel1d 13h ago

Phil and his team need to be gone

lodossrage1d 5h ago (Edited 1d 5h ago )

Won't make a difference.

The whole structure needs to be overhauled. Anyone that replaces Phil will be no different than him, Mattrick, or anyone else.

Until the company changes how they go about business, nothing will change

glenn19791d 3h ago

I just don't have any idea what they would do , they have done sooo much damage on their xbox brand, they have a show at July or June I think, but will it even matter even they show amazing games, idkn

lodossrage1d 5h ago

True,

But they may as well get it over with. Whether it happens now or later, the burning is going to hit the same.

Reality is the ONE move that can alleviate a lot of this is the one move they can't make. Remove day 1 from gamepass.

Show all comments (68)
90°

Microsoft Opening Xbox Mobile Game Store in July

The Xbox brand is expanding, as an Xbox mobile game store is opening this coming July where Microsoft will brings its "first-party portfolio."

Jin_Sakai3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

“Bond adds that they will start on the web”

This will go nowhere.

Nice knowing you Xbox. This is what happens when the house never gets cleaned.

MrDead3d ago

The only this MS is expanding is the amount of feculence it sprays on everyone who just want to enjoy gaming and make games.

The best thing MS can do for the gaming industry is leave and never return.

XiNatsuDragnel3d ago

Good luck with this even it might not succeed.

Show all comments (7)
210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel4d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow3d ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo1822d ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie2d ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

2d ago
Hereandthere2d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2d ago
Notellin2d ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

2d ago
Hereandthere2d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

ApocalypseShadow1d 14h ago

Lying to yourself is unbecoming.

Article link tells you all you need to know in Sarah Bond's own words.

Hereandthere2d ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

ApocalypseShadow1d 15h ago

At least you and others get it. Note drank the Kool aid and asked for seconds thinking it was refreshing.

Most don't even know how it all played out but it's there in black and white for all to see. Microsoft brought it up for years until the MLB forced Sony's hand. It was a win win for Microsoft. Kill one reason to buy a PlayStation or kill the game by dropping it in a cheap service to kill Sony's sales numbers on PlayStation.

OtterX3d ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Cockney1d 9h ago

They chose well, Sony gave them the backing to pursue their dreams with no restrictions even tho their games especially dreams have very niche appeal. Media molecule and Sony deserve respect for this in an age of risk averse publishing.

RNTody3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno3d ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Inverno2d ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

2d ago
fsfsxii2d ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno2d ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (29)