"The pro-firearms website JPFO took a Bullet Bill, an enemy from the Super Mario games, painted it gold with red eyes, and used it without permission for their cause."
Game Rant participates in the Megaton Musashi World Cup, checking out the game a little bit beforehand and winning the first round match.
GL compiles a list of some of the most mind-blowing video game narrative twists in recent memory, from The Last of Us to Outer Wilds
With articles like these cant you tag the games mentioned so that we can know ahead of time if there’s a spoiler to avoid?
Not clicking on your article otherwise.
While the mainstream media always sees things turning in favor of the hero, here are 6 games that own being a bad guy.
Pretty much all of these games listed are based around a morality system you don't have to be bad and you don't have to be good.
It seems to have left out some real amazing games like red dead redemption 1/2,ass effect and true crime la/ny
Armored Core VI?
Ok, I'm really missing something here. Just beat chapter 3 earlier this evening, unlocked A-rank Arena fights. I'm not seeing or sensing any branching paths or morality system and I've done every side mission and arena fight available to me up to that fight.
Is something big coming soon to branch the story?
No mention of Grand Theft Auto? Saints Row (original trilogy), Manhunt? Also The Suffering (depending on the ending you get).
Well at least someone is doing something possative with Nintendo's intullectual properties :D
The use of "things that can kill" is why America exists, and is also why we aren't all speaking German, and Jews aren't all exterminated.
In a world where people murder, rape, and steal; where governments and their armies attempt genocide, "things that can kill" are necessary. We don't have to like it, I sure don't, but putting our head in the sand doesn't make that fact any less true.
I'm stunned at how many fellow gamers are apparently supportive of blatant copyright infringement used in the service of a morally indefensible industry.
Both of these things are inexcusable.
Quite a gun control debate going on in here...might as well add my two cents.
I'm an advocate for stronger gun control, but not total gun control. People advocating that the common man needs access to assault weapons with high capacity magazines is ludicrous, but people advocating for the total removal of gun are equally crazy.
Gun control works in certain countries because of how the culture works, for example, gun control works in England because the English don't have any real sense of cultural identity tied to the firearm. They also have an incredibly low crime rate, so there's little need for guns for self defense.
On the American end it's a complete 180, America has from it's inception had some association with the gun, (American Revolution and all) hell in the south and the west ownership of a gun can be considered one of the cornerstones of the American identity. America also has a correspondingly high crime rate, one of the highest in the developed world.
You're never going to achieve the level of gun control in America that you find in England, the culture is too directly tied to the gun, but this may not be a bad thing. Examining statistics within the U.S. when we examine the two most populous states, Texas and California, known for having extremely lax gun laws and extremely strict gun laws respectively, we find that Texas actually has the lower crime rates (As taken from numbers from the FBI and United Nations).
In closing...there is no stock answer for gun control...you can look at the statistics till your eyes cross and you'll still be left wanting for answers. In my opinion in America we must first change the way the gun is viewed, not as a symbol of power and masculinity, but as the ultimate responsibility.
On Topic: That's kinda funny but it's clearly a copyright violation, so they'll likely take it down when Nintendo discovers it, otherwise they're in for some serious litigation.
First Yoshi appears in an app game now this. Lmao