440°

The Top 20 Kinected Press Reactions

Kombo runs down the hilarious reactions to Microsoft's Cirque Du Solei, cult & Kool-aid event.

Nike5083d ago

"If any creepy dancing people touch me, I will fight them. "

That kept me laughing for a while. Along with "Microsoft now has a standing army" (in reference to everyone wearing the ponchos)

-Alpha5083d ago (Edited 5083d ago )

I'm so lost. Was THAT it for Kinect at E3? Where are all the hardcore games?? And I'm not trying to troll, I'm genuinely confused as to what happened. Correct me if I'm wrong but MS revealed Kinect with more casual games, and made no mention of any of the actual retail titles or projects I assumed we would see? Like games from Bethesda? Rare, etc?

Nike5083d ago (Edited 5083d ago )

Uh, I guess so. They didn't reveal anything else other than what's publicly known on N4G. They're supposed to be having something on Tuesday as well, but I don't know if they'll show more games than they did here.

Though it would make sense if they did - this event was clearly targetted towards the parents, the tweens, non-gamers and what-not. If they had a separate conference exclusively for showing hardcore games, then they could show off all the so-called rumoured games from Sega and Capcom. We'll have to wait till Tuesday it seems.

@eggbert: No, they do. They -

Oh my god, I think that's it. O__O

http://dlb-network.com/2010...

Edit: I don't know what's what any more. It's like I'm in Inland Empire. >.<

eggbert5083d ago

scheduled or something? The one on tuesday? Or am I just retarded?

poindat5083d ago (Edited 5083d ago )

...But I thought that Tuesday is just going to be the public airing of this conference (that just passed) on MTV and Nickelodeon, which is why the conference was a "no camera" event for bloggers and attendees. So nothing new on Tuesday.

But of course, correct me if I'm wrong.

EDIT: Yep, pretty sure I'm correct. Source:

http://majornelson.com/arch...

HolyOrangeCows5083d ago

Such positive reception.
LOL

Very funny article.

jkhan5083d ago

@alpha-male,
they already said Gears and Reach won't be supporting it. From the announced games so far, only Fable 3 will be using it and not to the fullest extent. I think people are taking it the wrong way. Never Microsoft once said they are going to catering for core gamers with Natal/kinect. The sole purpose in my opinion of Natal is to cater Casual market of Wii. We will see some form in hardcore games but it will be after thought. Microsoft just doesn't have the first party studios to push towards inventing new genre/software. I will happily eat crow if tomorrow Sony or Microsoft blow me away with there launch lineup for motion controls.

Rainstorm815083d ago

I think was always meant to be more for the "Casuals", Tomorrows press conf. is for the core audience and that is where they need to show more on star wars and a host of hardcore games for Kinect.

Besides...Ms said its sooooo many dev working on Na..Kinect that they cant get into the launch window so they must have more to show, that wasnt really in MS fashion no surprises no......nothing really for us Hardcore gamers

JD_Shadow5083d ago (Edited 5083d ago )

Yeah. As Greenberg said in the Joystiq interview, this was just to introduce Kinect to the press (or whatever the hell that mess was SUPPOSED to be). It was to show off Kinect in SOME way (still unsure what they wanted to accomplish, because it just left all of us confused and wondering what in the hell did we just SEE). That is more or less what we're gonna see out of the televised special on Tuesday.

Tomorrow (Monday) is going to include the meat of the entire thing: the usual press conference where we'll see Greenberg, Mattrick (you know, the guy that has that "I'm a dick and proud of it" smile to him. Can't STAND him, though I can handle anyone else on the MS PR team), and etc. talk about what games they have, what new Live features they have, reveal what they stole from Sony THIS time (sorry, couldn't resist), and reveal other things that you probably don't care about. There's no other NEW MS conference that is scheduled.

Thing is, that one WILL be televised on Spike TV (not sure HOW they were able to do THAT. G4 must've pissed them off somehow). That's the best chance to actually show the masses (the public) Kinect. To do that, you KNOW they're gonna use 3/4ths of their show to shove that thing down our throats. There'll be some of Halo, Gears, and Fable, but I don't think we're going to see much else in terms of core, non-Kinect games being shown unless that whole Versus to 360 thing comes to fruition (we can go on all DAY about THAT one). Seeing as how MS is very, VERY committed to this thing, you have to think that they will showcase the thing like nothing else.

I do think they have to be careful, though. Remember last year and how the whole thing with the avatar's shoe thing revealed the motion tracking to be rather buggy. If they have another showing like that, the thing will be dead in the water before it even has a chance to swim.

-Alpha5083d ago

Thanks guys:

Darkpower, Monday is supposed to be just Xbox 360 though... I don't think it's going to mention Kinect at all. In fact, Monday I believe is all about us "hardcore" gamers. And Tuesday is the recording of what was shown Sunday... Which means MS really isn't using Natal towards us hardcore gamers the least bit. And this makes me feel confused. Will we or will we not see games proper games? And I'm not talking about Burnout using it because I can do that already with a controller.

Ah, whatever. I'm just disappointed with what I'm hearing and sort of shocked because I was expecting more. For some reason I feel like I'm the only one. Anyways, guess I'll just have to look forward to the Xbox conference.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 5083d ago
Shang-Long5083d ago

Lol the creepy danceing had me going too. Alpha yea I think it is man

jack_burt0n5083d ago

"Now I know why Robbie Bach quit."

Lmao

Tony-A5083d ago (Edited 5083d ago )

@DanRyckert: According to tweets I've seen, the Kinect event seems to involve: KKK members, magic smocks, floating couches, and people dancing on flowers.

An array of the most random things ever. Is this the thing that's supposed to air on all those channels? It sounds like a huge acid trip. I should've gone!

Nike5083d ago

"Is this the thing that's supposed to air on all those channels?"

God willing. No, seriously. Please air it.

Cheeseknight285083d ago

I think it's airing on Tuesday, but for whatever reason I can't seem to figure out Microsoft's E3 schedule at all. I wish they would have kept it a bit more traditional.

So far, Kinect is making me very sad. I'm a sucker for cats though so hopefully the Nintendogsect game will be decent/good.

Shang-Long5083d ago

9. @GI_AndyMc: In any other place this many people in white sheets would be hit with tear gas. I hate myself right now.

dizzleK5083d ago (Edited 5083d ago )

i found a good quote-

So be patient. Be patient. Death is--I tell you, I don't care how many screams you hear. I don't care how many anguished cries. Death is a million times preferable to ten more days of this life. If you knew what was ahead of you--if you knew what was ahead of you, you'd be glad to be stepping over tonight. -Jim Jones

i think that sums it up. death is preferable.

eggbert5083d ago

what the point of the ponchos is?

GAM3R7l5083d ago (Edited 5083d ago )

... Gallagher was scheduled to a Kinect "Sledge-O-Matic" bit, but backed out at the last minute. Apparently there were several hundred black people there...and he only brought watermelons to smash. :p

The Great Melon5083d ago (Edited 5083d ago )

I think the ponchos lit up from what I have read. It just makes this event even trippyer

nathan_snake5083d ago

Space Ponchos for the 360 fanboys now!

ingiomar5083d ago (Edited 5083d ago )

well from what ive seen from the live blogs the event was awesome.. why are there so many negative reactions?

Man i wish i was there.

@Eggbert

Only microsoft knows.. i wouldn't ask too many questions if i were you

saint_john_paul_ii5083d ago

i want to know what blog you were reading. these blogs forgot to put /s at the end.

The Great Melon5083d ago (Edited 5083d ago )

The event may have been awesome in the sense that it was well put together and Cirque du Soleil did a great job, but most of the negativity is either coming from disappointment in the product or people acting like they are above this.

I would likely make similar jokes about the event if I were there, but that doesn't change the fact that I would have probably enjoyed being there.

Show all comments (73)
270°

Why Xbox believes it must cut costs and close studios

Companies, particularly public companies like Microsoft, need to grow.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
gold_drake15h ago

i mean its pretty simple, they spent close to 30 billion in acquiring activision, they thought they'd make it bk no problem, and that didnt happen.

its just shit that because of MS's miscalculation alot of people lost their jobs.

Jingsing11h ago

This is exactly what many people said would happen including the CMA and FTC. Lies lies and more lies and they allowed a $69 billion buy out to happen.

gold_drake11h ago

oh yeh it was 70 billion. that was my bad haha even worse.

thesoftware73011h ago(Edited 11h ago)

gold,

You can't be serious, right?

Do you think that MS thought they would make 80bill in a year & Half? They haven't even released titles under MS yet, lol.

But in fact, that A/B revenue is already paying off, look at the last earnings call. That $80 billion is long-term money, my guy, no sane person/company would think they would make that back in any short-term situation, it's a long-term investment.

Let's play silly then. If MS's reason for laying off staff and closing studios was due(which it really was not) to the A/B deal, tell me what Sony's reason was for past studio closures, the recent 900-person layoffs, closing Sony London, shutting down Dreams, and closing Japan Studio? Zipper? Psygnosis? cuts at all their internal studios.

Keep in mind, you are claiming MS's reason is because of the A/B deal; please explain Sony's reason.

Hofstaderman11h ago

You actually still defending them? Sheesh.....

gold_drake11h ago

this is not a sony vs MS debate. dont make it something it isnt.

and of course not, but im pretty sure they thought they'd make more money after the deal. they didnt, and closed off some studios.

its pretty insane to think there is any other reason for the closure of studios in this case.

romulus2311h ago(Edited 11h ago)

(It really was) due to the Activision Blizzard deal and the loss of physical sales due to gamepass. You keep bringing up Sony in all your posts about this, stop deflecting and trying to change the topic, this is about MS and what they are doing.

BehindTheRows11h ago

Has nothing to do with Sony. Stay on topic.

notachance10h ago

once in a while you see someone too invested in their make-believe console war that everything happened has to be connected to said war…

a bit of banter between fans is normal, this crusade you’re doing now isn’t.

Chevalier10h ago

Wow idiotic. You bring up very old closures not that there haven't been recent ones from Playstations, but, seriously stop deflecting. This has NOTHING to do with Playstation.

Does Playstation got $3 trillion behind them and daddies wallet? No they don't so stop making a fool of yourself.

Xbox has never been profitable really and they just keep losing money so between their worst hardware sales, terrible 3rd party sales and now terrible 1st party sales.

Gamepass numbers that are no longer being announced shows their numbers after 3 years of missed targets has flatlined. Plus their recent gains up to 34 million were ONLY because they folded Gold members in too. Absolutely take your idiotic rhetoric out of here. Keep on topic without deflecting.

S2Killinit10h ago

Ayayayay with these xbox/MS excuses.

Reaper22_5h ago

How dare you mention Sony! Everyone here knows when Sony closes a studio and lay off workers it was the right thing to do. Even when they bought Gaikai and fired almost everyone it was the right thing to do.

Gamers can be such hypocrites sometimes.

andy854h ago

Is it? That's revenue not profit. Completely different.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4h ago
thesoftware7308h ago(Edited 8h ago)

Drake,

"this is not a sony vs MS debate. dont make it something it isnt."

You are correct that it's not an MS Vs Sony Topic, but when exaggeration and imagination mix from a one-sided social group, similar examples are needed to ground radical thoughts; in this instance, the example was that shutting down 3,4,5, even 6 studios during a restructure/ buyout/acquisition is not some anomaly(it can suck) that has to be dissected or spell doom and gloom.

"But I'm pretty sure they thought they'd make more money after the deal. They didn't, and they closed off some studios."

But they did make more money, a lot, actually; the last earnings call showed a huge growth in profit, almost all due to A/B revenue.

"its pretty insane to think there is any other reason for the closure of studios in this case."

The fact that they did make money, kinda throws this out the window, and besides, you don't wake up and say, hey let's close a studio, you look at the output, you look at the dev as a whole, the long term and short term, you weigh it against all other studios and goals, you keep key members, ect..then you close if they are the weakest links...which by MS analysis they were.

Again, I will make a small Sony comparison, just so some of you can understand and see past the bias; Insomniac, ND, and Bungie have made some of the best games ever created, yet Sony saw fit to cut jobs in every of these studios, even tho Insomniac & ND are the biggest producers of PS games, leagues ahead better than Tango and Arkane, yet, they saw cuts, mind you, while being the TOP produces of PS first party. They were told to cut costs, and more jobs may be on the line, and Bungie is being threatened by a hostile Sony takeover. Put that in perspective, as I know that layoffs and dev closures are different, but if the best of the best is getting cut off, it is less than surprising, that lesser studios are closing.

@Cheva,
My response fits well with your comments as well. You even went on to prove that the dev closures are not just due to A/B acquisition. Then you point out Sony has less money than MS, inferring that MS should keep devs open that they see as lesser earners, while Sony having less money makes it okay to close them. lol...it doesn't work that way.

gold_drake8h ago

im not reading all of that. u have ur opinion, i have mine.

thats rly it.

but this aint sony vs ms.

ApocalypseShadow8h ago

You're trying to compare a 100 billion company to a company that has 3 TRILLION worth. SIE has to live or die on their own. And in turn, PlayStation has helped the main company again and again. Sony has to balance out what is working and not working in the company.

While Xbox has Daddy Warbucks footing the bill to keep the platform afloat. They have been bleeding money from Nvidia hardware in the OG Xbox, the RROD fiasco, the attempted 2013 DRM nonsense and the lies about being the most powerful console in the world and the losses of paying out millions to prop up a service hoping it catches on with enough subscribers to justify its existence.

They're not comparable if Xbox isn't allowed to live or die by its actions. It's subsidized. Revenue isn't profit. And if they were profiting on their own, they wouldn't be closing developers. If they were profiting, they wouldn't need Daddy Warbucks spending 80 to 100 billion buying up 3rd party publishers to sustain a loss leading platform.

They stopped announcing game sales, stopped announcing hardware sales, stopped announcing game pass subscribers, they are putting games on their competitors platforms but you're telling us that they are doing great even after killing jobs and closing developers at Xbox.

Stop drinking the Kool aid. You're drunk.

WelkinCole4h ago

I am pretty sure MS knew this would happen and this was part of their plan. I mean if anyone with half a brain can see this happening I am pretty sure a multi billion company like MS knew this would happen

The whole strategy in buying Beth and Acti/Blizzard is for

1. Buy established games they can have under xbox because they have done a horrible job in building their portfolio internally for the past 15 years

2. Following from 1, try and boost xbox competitivenss against a dominat PS which MS after 3 tries still can't crack

3. Follolwing from 2, try and weaken Playstation dominance by taking out these massive multiplats from the PS

4. Following from 3, try and profit off from the PS domiance with selected games they will still have on the PS to make money like COD

5. Obviously get the IP's by buying them instead of creating them which again as I mentioned in number 1 they have been woeful in doing

None of these had anyting to do with keeping all the devs they accuried. MS has always been very shitty to Devs under them. Look at what happned to Bungie for example.

I believe MS in court truely mean it when they said they had to do something because PS was just too dominant. This was their last roll of the dice.

And from the looks of things. It has not panned out as MS had hoped. PS5 is still as dominant as ever and xbox is still behind. Worse still their MP's they got is not irreplaceable as they thought. Starfield? lol!. There have not been any major shift in momentum in this console war in their favor so now its time to start cutting their loses and it starts with the most expensive cost for any company. People.

Michiel19891h ago

for a comparison, sony laid of a bigger % of it's staff this year than ms, it's what companies sadly do nowadays. If you think with GP and Bethesda + acti aquisition they were looking for quick cash, you couldn't be more wrong. It hasn't even been a year, "they thought they'd make it bk no problem, and that didnt happen." shows you have 0 understanding of how a business operates.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1h ago
anast11h ago

They are going to use AI for a large portion of the game development process. Upper management need bonuses and the shareholders need more money. So, people will lose their jobs.

Skuletor11h ago

Maybe they were already using AI to make business decisions, which would explain why they closed Hi-Fi Rush's studio, then said they need more games like Hi-Fi Rush not long after that announcement.

Crows9011h ago(Edited 11h ago)

They shouldn't have bought any studios. Some is okay...but they went on a shopping spree...stupid

Einhander197210h ago

The better question is why did Microsoft buy publishers for a service they were subsidizing they knew couldn't support.

And why are so many websites trying to make people feel sorry for Microsoft instead of truly criticizing the fact they are closing studios and killing jobs that would have been fine if Microsoft themselves hadn't gotten involved.

Quit feeling sorry for Microsoft and start feeling sorry for the industry and the all the gamers who are actually losing out.

THIS IS MICROSOFTS FAULT.

RNTody10h ago

The first thing that happens after any major acquisition or merger is a consolidation of the whole new portfolio, which includes cutting any excess, bloat or portfolios that don't fit the larger MO of the big boy. So far, it's been par for the course with Microsoft and that's why gamers have been so against this acquisition. Tango Gameworks is the beginning. You think Microsoft wants to pay to keep small timers like Ninja Theory in business?

There is absolutely zero evidence to suggest that Microsoft will improve any of these studios, but plenty to suggest that they will get rid of what they don't need and hold onto the IP. The real agenda of the acquisition was always to acquire The Elder Scrolls, Diablo, Fallout, Call of Duty, Candy Crush etc. that will create millions in passive revenue stream for Microsoft regardless of where the games release. Microsoft simply wants their cut.

Because of Games Pass Microsoft has no interest in investing in new IP which is risky and requires creative talent they can neither nurture nor manage. Game Pass has also not grown in the way Microsoft expected it to, even post acquisitions. Therefore the logical thing to do, without serious money makers to release, is to cut as much cost as possible.

Show all comments (35)
100°

Former Dragon Age lead writer David Gaider pours scorn on EA's AI dreams.

"They want you to believe the devs under them are super stoked to work generative AI into their processes," continued Gaider, "but I assure you what they took as excitement was really a veiled wail of despair not unlike the time that team was informed of their new 'really cool' live service mandate.".

LordoftheCritics3d ago

Publishers see gaming as another stock market.

isarai3d ago

I think anyone with some common sense knew this, im glad i don't support their games anymore, what a sh!t company.

Psychonaut852d ago

Friends don’t let friends buy EA or Ubisoft.

Chocoburger2d ago

I said this yesterday. AI isn't what we want when it comes to crafting artistry. Alas, these soulless corporate morons don't care about their work, only about cutting corners as much as possible.

120°

Phil Spencer and the Battle for Xbox’s Soul

Has the rapid growth of Xbox made the ship too heavy? Following the closures of Tango Gameworks, Arkane Austin, and Roundhouse, we explore what the future of Xbox could look like.

LG_Fox_Brazil3d ago

This ship was never meant to sail, this ship was made from the get go to sink as fast as possible. It almost feels that they want to lower the standards of quality in the industry so that they can fit in

rlow12d ago

I disagree, Xbox from the get go innovated and changed the industry. They did a lot of firsts and standardized a lot of others. It wasn’t till the beginning of the Xbox1 era that things started to go south.

Stevonidas2d ago

Yep, although I’d argue it started going to shit when they tried to hock Kinect on their audience instead of continuing to invest in their studios and IPs. 2001-2010 Xbox was peak gaming, though.

rlow12d ago

@Stevonidas
I agree they never should have focused on it after the 360 era. But you do have to remember they were faked out by the huge volumes of Kinects sold. To quote info on Wikipedia, “Project Natal, It was first released on November 4, 2010, and would go on to sell eight million units in its first 60 days of availability.” So if your Xbox and see these huge sales on a peripheral where are you going to put some money? Criticism in hindsight is worthless…..if only we could all see our future. In other wards they had no way of knowing. Plus they had engagement numbers and a lot of signs pointed to people wanting it.

Their biggest mistake wasn’t the Kinect, but unlike Sony after the PS3 debacle. They didn’t double on down on exclusive good games. The other huge mistake was letting Call of Duty go to Sony.

Hedstrom2d ago

Phil wants Xbox to be as soulless as him!

Tacoboto2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Xbox has no soul and Phil has no confidence, and it's impossible to say either do when they killed Tango and Arkane Austin.

Everything they've said since has only made them look worse to a point that they're actually less competent than Embracer.

Markdn2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Whe you release something like the series S and expect it not to hurt your business model, and developers have to have parity with games. Then you know Microsoft don't care. Series s is the final nail that broke developers,

Show all comments (12)