5277d ago Replies(15)
badkolo5277d ago

agreed, if they do this, suck it activitision.

ia_studio5276d ago (Edited 5276d ago )

Killzone2 32 players + online dedicated servers, psn(free)

Edit: resistance 2, Mag have dedicated servers+more players, but I preffer killzone2

solidt125276d ago

Activision Execs need to STFU

vhero5276d ago

charging more for the game wasn't enough they wanna charge a monthly fee to play it now?? They got a good thing going right now why are they trying to commit business suicide? Would never happen anyways as users would just play the free games instead forcing them to go free.

mastiffchild5276d ago

We've jumped through so many hoops for these greedy tosspots who wouldn't even put in dedicated servers? And now this? So glad I don't buy anything Acti make anymore.

MagicAccent5276d ago

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAH!

...

PS3istheshit25276d ago (Edited 5276d ago )

one of the best games ive ever played next to COD4
but ill probably pay for a couple months then when its february, the cold will start to go away and everyones gonna be outside so...
what im trying to say is that if they start charging then MW2 is just gonna be those games that you play for a little while but then it goes to the dusty pile of games
me and my friends come home after school and play about 4 or 5 games of COD4
lol its kinda tradition
if it wasnt for COD then id be playing resistance 2 and killzone 2
but if the fees start coming then im only playing Playstation FPS

... theres GT5 god of war 1 2 and 3 ratchet and clank and so many other exclusives on PS3 which makes me not wanna play COD even more if i have to pay for it
UNCHARTED 2 :]
funny comment up there "they do learn well from microsoft"

krouse935276d ago

This is a stupid F'ing idea there rolling in money and If they do this I will ignore all other activision games that come out from here on in.

cyberwaffles5276d ago

"According to the Activision CFO, there is a demand from its core fanbase to pay for additional services."

what a load of horse ****. theres no demand to pay for additional services, they just want to play the damn game online for free like most games have been since the advent of online PC gaming. just when i was starting to give MW2 a second chance because of its TPS mode, Activision finds a way to take a million steps backward.

rockleex5276d ago

We will gladly pay for free services.

-_-"

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 5276d ago
alphakennybody5277d ago

Do it kotick ,I triple dare you and you'll soon know how hitler lost!!

komp5277d ago

In a bunker with a pistol and some cyanide for the wife?

rawrockkillz5277d ago

No he got a machine gun in the face from Eli Roth!

Elven65277d ago

Even if they do it you know the hardcore Call of Duty players will jump on it, they would essentially want to turn it into the Battle.Net of COD only difference being every game required a few for entry instead of one.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5277d ago
n4gn4gn4gn4g5277d ago

That's just silly.

//Dylai safonwyr sugno fy pidyn

TheMART5277d ago

"Saaking - 2 minutes ago
PM
Track
Ignore
1.1 -
It wouldn't surprise me if it. PS3 owners wouldn't be affected but it'd just be unfair. Imagine paying XBL TO PLAY ONLINE and then having to pay to play online...AGAIN. So basically you'd get charged to access the FULL game (SP and MP) twice?! WTF! "

Why wouldn't PS3 owners be affected if they had to pay for playing Call of Duty also?

I don't get your unlogical thinking at all. They didn't have to pay before and in the new situation they should. Sounds like being affected to me mate.

ZombieAutopsy5277d ago (Edited 5277d ago )

You obviously didnt get what he was saying so ill try to break it down for you.

Xbox users already pay to play games online and if they started to charge a fee to play Call of Duty games online Xbox users would have 2 pay twice. (yea they could work it out so you dont have to have live but lets face it no one buys just CoD games to play online)

Ps3 users dont pay to play online so they would only have to pay the fee to play Call of Duty games.

Saaaking was kidna wrong though in saying Ps3 users wouldnt be affected but they wouldnt be affected as bad is what i think he was getting at. Me personally though i would never pay to play CoD online unless it was something like 10$ a year and it had dedicated servers/free map packs/and clan game servers with good leaderboards.

The Iron Sheik5277d ago

Actually 360 owners would have to pay 3 times. Once to their ISP once for Live and once again for MW2. IMO if people weren't so complacent paying $50 a year for something that should be free. Activision would never have the nerve to even think about a monthly fee.

Pirateogta5277d ago

And PS3 owners would have to pay 2 times. Once to their ISP and once for MW2. And they'd still get a worse experience than 360 owners who are paying for LIVE.

ZombieAutopsy5277d ago (Edited 5277d ago )

Pirate i owned CoD4 on both Ps3 and X360 and their is really no difference in the online play (or any p2p online game), the only real difference was in the xbox version you could join peoples games and now you can do that on Mw2 on the ps3, you're just a fanboy thats why you THINK its a better service...I dont mind paying for live because 50$ a year isnt much to me but i know when it comes to online play for multiplatform games its the same experience and if there are any problems in either version they are usually fixed within a month of release and usually sooner than that.

The Iron Sheik5277d ago

If by a worse online experience you mean not being called f@ggot or the n word by 12 year olds you would be correct.

There are no dedicated servers for MW2 on live and the party chat was disabled, so how is it better?

BYE5277d ago

@Pirateogta

How is free wifi and online play, with most of the exclusives having dedicated server support, a worse experience?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5277d ago
Show all comments (149)
270°

Microsoft’s Surface and Xbox hardware revenues take a big hit in Q3

Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
darthv721d 2h ago

Xbox content + services up 62% while hardware down 31%... seems about right with the way they tout you don't need the hardware to play. People can play on their phones or smart tv or other means. I don't hardly play on my consoles directly since getting devices like the logitech g-cloud and ps portal. Which is to also say I have been playing more digital than physical because of these devices.

solideagle13h ago

you should apply in MS PR team buddy, I think you will do a great job in my humble opinion :)

Sonic188110h ago

I thought darthv72 and Obscure_Observer already work for Microsoft 🤔

dveio10h ago

MS: "Xbox services and content without AB up 1%, with AB up 62%. Hardware down 31%. In total a loss of 350 mill."

darthv72: "Seems about right."

MS: "Excuse m ..."

darthv72: "I don't hardly play on my consoles directly."

MS:

Lightning775h ago

What he said was facts. How he plays games is no concern of you. Don't get too mad about it.

Cacabunga12h ago

I can tell people like you are an absolute minority..

If service is up means their fans and fanboys accepted this model and subscribed to it. The near future you will see a big decline because the service is saturated.

shinoff218312h ago

But that's been ms for years. When things aren't going their way they try to change the way things are said. For instance console sales are down, they stop telling how many sold instead telling us how many hours spent in halo or headshots. So it makes sense console sales down just say people are playing on more devices then previous. What they won't say is how many xbox players jumped ship to ps5.

Cacabunga11h ago

Hardware sales are so bad that Sony and Nintendo are blowing the sales off the water with their hardware.

If Xbox are losers, others aren’t..
Xbox already tried everything with Xbox live then subscriptions went down so much that they had to find something else. Their fans subscribed then reached saturation rather quickly.

Hardware and exclusive games is where it’s at! Keep gamers excited, announce decent software and people will support you

itsmebryan6h ago

@shin
Well keep it simple Sony 's operating income is down 26% and Microsoft's is up 32%. No MS spin there, just facts. 😉
Cheers

romulus235h ago

Odd that a company that touts you dont need the hardware to play is already touting another console in the works.

darthv725h ago

They are not reliant on the HW but still want to maintain a presence (no matter how small) is a good thing. It shows commitment to the craft. It reminds me of SNK and how they made games for their own hardware (Neo Geo) while also making them for others because they knew there was a market to do so. They knew they would sell more to others but also sell to their own niche fan base.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5h ago
purple10115h ago

Xbox hardware revenue tanks to lowest point of Xbox Series generation

Profchaos15h ago

I'm not surprised surface is struggling they aren't relevant anymore

DOMination-4h ago

In the last two years they've started exiting the consumer market altogether. All of the newest Surface products are business models only. They can't seem to work out what they want to do with it.

XBManiac14h ago

Too expensive hardware when others offer the same or more for less? Good work, Green Team.

SimpleDad14h ago(Edited 14h ago)

"Despite some early successes for Xbox games on rival platforms, Xbox hardware is down by a massive 31 percent this quarter."
"Without Activision Blizzard, Microsoft’s overall gaming revenue would have actually declined this quarter."
"Xbox content and services would have only been up a single percent without Activision Blizzard..."
"It looks like next quarter is going to be a similar story for gaming at Microsoft, too."

That is crazy... so A/B/K is carrying the whole Xbox gaming.
Oh and Microsoft will be fine. Windows, Office and Cloud are growing with each pc purchase.

purple10114h ago

Activision: "we gonna need a bigger rucksack/backpack please"

Microsoft: "why's that"

Activision: "to carry yo' weak ass'

Profchaos13h ago(Edited 13h ago)

Top brass have also wanted to start seeing returns on the 100 billion they have put into various Xbox related moves so seeing more multiplatform games is highly likely especially from abk

It's basically saying that PlayStation is the reason Xbox is afloat right now thinks to Ps5 versions of COD

Kornholic12h ago

So basically PS and PC gamers' money is keeping Xbox on life support.

MrDead5h ago

The only growth MS will get out of the console industry is if it supports it's rivals platforms. Xbox is a pointless machine now. I can see them on a big push for live next, and they won't give up on trying to buy Steam.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5h ago
Show all comments (36)
140°

Why Monopolies In Gaming Must Not Be Allowed

As of right now, there are no monopolies in the games industry, and for the sake of the medium as a whole, they never should either.

thorstein1d 1h ago

Shouldn't be allowed in any field.

Inverno21h ago

And yet the biggest tech companies in America are essentially that. They buy up all the small comps only to kill them off and steal what they have, and if they can't buy em they bleed them to death.

jwillj2k420h ago

Eventually they’ll realize the value is with the employee not the company. Buying an IP means nothing if the people who contributed are let go. They’ll get it one day.

MrCrimson19h ago

tech is different because they buy threats and then kill them. Twitter bought Vine and did nothing with it. Despite people seemingly liking it. Could've had tiktok a decade before bytedance. go figure.

Zenzuu20h ago

Monopolies shouldn't be allowed regardless. Not just for gaming.

MrCrimson19h ago

They buy IPs not talent. That's why these buyouts never work and the IPs die. Right now it's too expensive to develop games - but I expect that to shift maybe as AI tools can make it easier. The best games have been indie games for awhile as big developers fuck their ips to death with "games as a service" -

70°

The INDIE Live Expo 2024 event is to feature over 100 game titles

INDIE Live Expo, Japan’s premiere online digital showcase series , will debut never-before-seen games & content updates across more than 100 titles on May 25th.