Shortstop

Member
CRank: 5Score: 8910

Yeah that leveling system sucked. I can see what they were trying to accomplish in trying to make every level fun, but you never got rewarded for all that leveling. I stopped playing without finishing it because I preferred to just do my own thing and eventually got to a high enough level that I should have been able to demolish most of my opponents, but instead they were just more difficult than they were in earlier levels.

Simply became a "go invisible then run to goal...

5890d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Hahaha only if you're willing to pay a few million dollars for it!

Not saying it's not a good game (I found it pretty good honestly), but it just doesn't sell that well for some reason.

5901d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Not sure how much I'll care. I still own both Oblivion and GTA, yet I haven't been bothered to beat either yet. Seems to me, personally, if the game isn't MGS, then it will be pushed aside a month or so later for a better game anyways.

Still, it can't be the "right thing to do," when clearly it's just because money changed hands.

5901d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Yeah I agree with that, but at some point someone always goes on the attack lol.

5902d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I just don't like Microsoft period, and the Wii just doesn't have the games I want.

5902d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

There are already enough companies all over the world in different businesses that want to profit off of me, and I intend to keep as many of them as possible out of my pockets. As long as I can game online for free, you can bet your ass that I will.

Stupid? I don't know. At the end of the year I will have saved $50 more than I would have had with Xbox.

5902d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

And in response: Industry laughs

5902d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I agree completely. Onling gaming has always been free, except for MMOs (which require funding validly) and Microsoft.

Don't think for a second that Microsoft needs that $50 a year from you; they don't. But they know you'll pay it anyways like a sucker. I can afford $50 a year but the principle of paying to play online is wrong.

I will stick with free PSN.

5903d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

Well whether or not it's right or wrong, here's the way I see it: art is once again going to become what it needs to be.

You know how there are musicians on the street that play for money and only get paid based on the goodwill of the people that walk by. Well, that's how it should be. If you like it, you can show the artist some goodwill with your money. You can choose to listen entirely and not pay, and be somewhat of a jackass for doing so, but you're not forced to either...

5903d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Interested in seeing how this game is after the poor showing last year. 60fps is a major reason I'll consider getting back into Madden. I can't believe I actually made it the whole year without 08 lol.

5904d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Though it is easier to make the graphics better for the more powerful system.

5904d ago 7 agree6 disagreeView comment

Well he's right. Harddrive space isn't that important for most gamers, so even 20 gigs is good for some. 80 is just a bonus.

5905d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Oh no, an installation!

"Time to overreact wildly and attack the PS3, and to show I'm not a fanboy time to attack the 360 for doing the same thing as well, even though when it happens I'll enjoy the fact that is causes less loading time!"

5905d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Think about your comment for a second. How simple were the refs and chain gang in '93? They were just sprites essentially.

Now though, they not only have to design and create the ref characters, they also have to give them AI to avoid the ball, players, etc. Simply put, they were waiting for a year in which they weren't developing for more important areas (ie. gameplay) to do this.

5906d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

So developers should work harder to make a game for the Wii, using up valuable resources, when they could be making a much better game for the PS360? What's the point? Casual gamers don't care, only hardcore gamers do. Keep giving the Wii it's Shovelware because that's what it's audience wants.

If crap sells, a successful businessman will sell crap. It's just that simple.

5908d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

Plus 10 bucks in shipping.

Sometimes you just want to play a game from the past, nothing wrong with that at all. And much easier to just have it on your PS3 than to have to dust off and hook up the old PS1, if you still even have it.

If convenience can be offered by Sony (for a price of course), why not offer it?

5909d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

So what about Canada? I'm guessing we have it?

5909d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Why would it never be full? I guess no one would want to play a game that can have 256 people online at once by your logic.

5910d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

So if the winner of E3 is between losing a game's exclusivity which I MIGHT rent, or an exclusive game developed for 256 players online at once... I think it's clear Sony wins.

5910d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Hmmm, I'll counter it by walking 5 minutes to Blockbuster.

5911d ago 4 agree3 disagreeView comment