I avoided EA Big titles like the plague. Apparently so did most everyone else.
This guy is still talking?
Nah, because in-game XMB wouldn't take into consideration the cutscenes. I mean, sure you could just pause it yourself, but it'd be just slightly better using the in-game iPod.
First of all, why are all the comments here regarding the 33GB? Who cares! It's still more than a DVD can hold anyways.
The real issue here is, we have to pay for extra characters?! Are you kidding me? So not only do we have to buy the online game separately, we have to buy characters too? Even as a PS3 fan, we are getting ripped off if this is true.
If this were to go to court, Bethesda would win easily. I was expecting to see "similar" images, but they are exact replicas. Something's definitely fishy here.
The Wii really is a fad. Who cares how much it sells? It only gained popularity because of how it was marketed as the "must have" item. How has it really been different than Tickle Me Elmo?
The only real software for it is all first-party and devs don't want to deal with it since it's not really next gen; it only pretends to be next gen. They could have made a wiimote for PS2 or Xbox, gave it a new cover, and have done just as well. It's just good marketing and...
WWII games were overdone in the PREVIOUS generation. So now everyone is jumping all over that and saying they don't want anymore. But personally, after seeing how well a modern combat game can be done, I would much rather have a WWII one done properly in this generation. Besides, there are too many FPS's in general, so who cares which timeframe they are set in.
Nah, don't force them to use an "acceptable" avatar.. just allow being able to decide who's avatars are shown and who's aren't. A simple "hide avatar" option.
Wow, enough with this "concern" from the Xboxers. They're really the only ones that care about PS3 installs.
I would rather pay than have more ads shoved in my face.
You don't have to like the movie or it's topic, but it has every right to be shown.
I just want to play my games online. On the PC it's free to do that, and I expect the same for the console.
Honestly, I think any gamer would rather an install if it will make the game run better. And he's complaining about 300mb? At least I try to hide the fact I like Sony better. But that whining doesn't accomplish anything.
I still haven't even beat the game. I can afford a 360 if I wanted to, but, I would rather not support M$.
I prefer the way Warhawk does online play personally.
What's wrong with his avatar? Why are you offended? It's just a guy holding a gun.
Well it wouldn't be much of an article to say "GTA IV is better than GTA 1".
"GTA IV's graphics absolutely kick GTA 1's ass!"
"WTF is up with this top down view?!"
"Where's the cutscenes?!"
etc. :D
Thanks, I didn't even think of using an ad blocker. I don't know how I surfed the web without one.
MGS has always had great cutscenes. I wouldn't watch 90 minutes straight of a cutscene, but otherwise it's fine.
All it really comes down is Sony fans dislike M$ because it's M$. That'll never change no matter what. M$ fans seem to overlook this fact. You'll never win an argument with a Sony fan because accepting anything M$ has ever done as "good" is simply not acceptable.
That being said, I won't give any dollars to M$. I bought a PC last year and it came with Vista.. and to get Word and all that other crap it would be an extra $400.
So, thank goodness there's...