Those games should have been released in their current state or at least be marked as alpha-/preview-versions.
No, you don't loose them. You get them back if you resubsupcribe. If you don't pay for stadia, you can't even play bought games until you pay again for stadia.
So you loose those free games you've got while the subscription was active and than after a few months you activate it again and the games are still "lost"?
That is no like PS+ oder xblive. You can't play those games while your subscription is inactive, but as soon as you reactivate it, you have again access to all your games (also those you've got free).
With stadia it is logical, that you can't play with an inactive subscription, but als...
In the DOS time there are some great Star Trek adventures (25ths anni & A Final Unity) but well, since than it was sadly always combat focused. :(. Bridge Commander was nice, but also included to much action and no ground missions :(
That's expected, because for xbox and pc it is included in the gamespass and you get the first month for 1$ if you haven't already got the upgraded gamepass from MS for free (mine runs until nov next year, but only paid till oct 2019 and gold jan 2020).
Would be interessting to know how much money the developer makes with offering the game via gamepass. I know it is now an MS studio, but would be interessting to know.
Well, they maybe meant xbox 1 … ehh… orignal xbox ^^, so the first one … oh MS what did you do ;)
mine, too. Never liked GTA: San Andreas
Well, xbox live numbers aren't good for anything now, that your xbox live account is used on switch (e.g. minecraft), your mobile phone, PCs, …
It just does not make any sense, anymore.
No, because Sony bought the studio, that made the game.
It was the studios IP and Microsoft just paid financed the development of the game.
Really you sony fanboys should really start thinking what you really want.
- "Why have MS bought the studio xxx?"
- "Why didn't they buy the studio?"
- "Why did they buy this ip?"
- "Why didn't they buy the IP?"
What do you wa...
They should just go back to their roots instead of making the next entry an action game. I don't buy a Fifa game to get a baseball game. FF XV just feels like that. A franchise should stick to it's root mechanics with its main line. For everything else there are spin offs.
Hoped for x1 compatibility or a Remaster-version of it. Was a great game.
Well 4k makes no sense with those games, because they are more or less just upscaled ports. 4k is not needed for this.
Just bring it to all systems and everybody is happy. Nobody expects for a ported (not remastered) version to be 4k.
sony officially only released player numbers for the game. Which is suspicious because normally they release sales numbers. Those are only estimates and there are only ~7.8 accounts ever created for GTS. So 8m sold is more than off.
Well numbers are wrong. Sony has just confirmed at the beginning of 2019 that there are ~8m players. Currently there are only ~7.8m profiles that were ever created for that game.
There is no way the game sold millions of copies just this years.
They also did not make all Forza titles compatible. This might be a licensing issue with music and cars.
But it seems like many publisher hadn't given their "OK" (or they just don't exist anymore) for a bc version. MS only needed their ok to make it compatible.
Really an article about something like this?
A new gen of consoles delivers better graphics than the old ones … well ...
Really? Why?
Current updated gen can deliver 4k or 1080p with updated graphics. Next gen should just get 4k right and deliver better framerates. 8k is just a waste of resources.
Lol, no BC is a thing ^^
Would have loved at least compatibility of digital games for PS3.
Lol, it is included in Gamepass since day 1. That means "classic" sales figures don't mean anything.