"exactly gayboy...smh"
Exactly indeed
Says the guy crying about fake games🤣🤣
Doesn't matter. The article is about innovation not success. Lol the virgin Iceman100x Doesn't know how to read🤣🤣
Lmao. The fact that you can't tell the difference between innovation and success says enough here.
Dude the 2008 game did so much ahead of its time. Yes the originals were innovative. But this one was too.
Honestly, I enjoyed it. I like that the map was broken up and each area felt different. The combat was kinda fun and the gore was over the top. Story was meh but the game play kept me in it. Wish more games would drop the open world and do more bite size worlds and focus on the game play instead of bloat.
That's not native tho. Being able to download games makes it loads better.
So as I said. You have nothing that says otherwise and are blatantly trying anything that will ignore what's in front of you.
Neither does most in game trailers. Cut scenes are normally real time. There's even parts where the protagonist is fighting the giant that legit looks like it cohld be game play. Unless you have inside knowledge that nobody else does then yes this is in game footage. So yes you're harballing because you're trying to loop any way possible for this to be not in game footage whe it states it is. Unless you can provide something that states otherwise and not "well I don't thi...
In-game means captured from the game itself. In-engine means rendered from the engine (usually real-time)but not from the game itself. CGI is pre-rendered. Why are you still harballing when the facts are in your face?
@S2Kilinit
Wrong:
https://twitter.com/davidsp...
It said "in-game footage" in the traile...
It outright stated in-game footage when it was presented. The developers are also stating this.
Man you sound hurt. You're commenting on nearly all posts where people are praising the game lol
Why would they take notes from a game that took notes from them?
Wow, the amount of people here for a company going GAAS is ridiculous. All because it's Sony. This website users seriously love it when Sony does stupid shit.
This review is a primary example that people hate it when devs force them to try something new. They include all of these mechanics because it keeps you from doing the same thing over and over because you know it will work and you’ve done it in many other games. The recent Zelda games have been about “new” approaches and the tutorial in the first game was nothing but telling you to do new stuff.
So many people disagreeing but can’t seem to actually present anything that says otherwise
Name a single game that lets you utilize the world like BOTW or TOTK. People keep bringing up “repetitive combat” because they literally do not utilize the game world like the developers push you to do. Literally the first area I’m breath of the wild encourages you to utilize the environment to fight. But people can only bring up “but my weapons break and you just mad a single button! It’s not like Elden ring!” When Elden ring is not like these games where I can utilize the environment in lit...
“Sony popularized it when 2k, EA and Activision had all their games for 70 and Sony only had Demon Souls? I guess you can say Sony went with the flow as well. “
Again, Sony was vocal for the justifications as to why 70 was a good idea, something you’re ignoring. Because Sony’s voice outweighs Ea’s in the industry due to reputation. This caused EVERY PlayStation game with PS5 slapped on it to be 70 bucks including a remake of a remaster(ps4 version) of a ps3 game, so talk ab...
Wut?