Approvals 20/3 ▼
JamieReleases (10) - 3358d ago Cancel
Bennibop (1) - 3358d ago Cancel
Nyxus (3) - 3358d ago Cancel
Hipp0 (2) - 3358d ago Cancel
DarkOcelet (1) - 3357d ago Cancel
VER1ON (2) - 3358d ago Cancel
alexjonh304 (1) - 3358d ago Cancel
450°

Ready at Dawn responds to concern over The Order: 1886 campaign length

Eurogamer:
Last week I had a chat with Ru Weerasuriya, founder, CEO and creative director of Ready at Dawn, to discuss The Order's length after a previous report indicated it could be completed in just a few hours.

"I know there are numbers out there," he said. "I know why the question comes up. I know numbers have been put out there that are actually not right. It's impossible to finish the game in that time, so we know the numbers are wrong.

"At the end of the day, we're not going to comment on it. We can't stop people from writing the things they do. And we're not going to jump at every single mistake that is made out there. Every time somebody has the wrong impression of something we made, or somebody writes the wrong thing about what we did, it would be a full-time job to be like, oh no, that's not right. We make games. We do what we do for the players. And, ultimately, that's where I want to leave it."

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3358d ago
Ballsack3358d ago

Ive never seen a game get so scrutinized in all my life

I think its fear that the opposition has no exclusives for like the first 9 months of 2015 and the ps4 has exclusives spread throughout the year which will probably boost its sales lead even further

Thats my take on the recent hate ps4 exclusives are receiving

Gazondaily3357d ago

"Ive never seen a game get so scrutinized in all my life"

Really? Seems likea gross dramatisation of what's actually happening.

Yeah its getting scrutinized hard but I saw the same thing happen with Ryse (and rightly so) and then Titanfall with its 6 player limit, which people blew out of proportion, especially on here and then the A.I stuff.

"I think its fear that the opposition has no exclusives for like the first 9 months of 2015 "

I think this is just a thinly disguised fanboy statement.

"the ps4 has exclusives spread throughout the year which will probably boost its sales lead even further "

And there you have it.

I do think its unfair on the devs because its obvious some people are misrepresenting the elements of the game, including campaign length but there are some real concerns regarding QTE's and longevity.

bouzebbal3357d ago

Some fair answers he gave there.
I just hope people don't get lured by these trolls. I finished Streets of Rage in 1-1,5hours but it had an amazing replayability. Arkham City can be finished in 5 hours or even less but has an amazing replayability as well as side quests. Other games are super long and you wish they lasted 2 hours just how painful they are to play (Assassin's Creep)...
In the end of the day it's all about the pleasure you get out of the game.

Gazondaily3357d ago

Yeah if I get even 4 hours of incredible memorable and fun gameplay, I'll be happy. But then again, for all the noise people are making regarding lack of content vs price for other games, I hope they don't show double standards regarding this.

Avernus3357d ago

It almost seems a full time job for you defending MS. I swear, if anyone has something remotely negative to say about MS, there you are telling them why their opinion is wrong...like only your opinion matters.

You call people fanboys but I don't think you realize you come off as one as well.

Anyway, you're probably going to go through my past comments in an attempt to call me a fanboy... i honestly don't care. Your whiteknighting is almost as if MS pays you to do it.

OT: Interesting he said it's impossible to finish the game in the times people posted (5 hours?). I was hoping so, but eitherway it would have took me longer since I'll play on hard, so dying is gonna be plentiful.

Gazondaily3357d ago

"You call people fanboys but I don't think you realize you come off as one as well. "

Oh I am aware that I do but I do it in a bid to maintain some sort of 'balance' on here. Why I bother, well I have no idea.

"Anyway, you're probably going to go through my past comments in an attempt to call me a fanboy"

No I'm not. The rest of your statement made it clear that your comment history will make it clear what side of the fence you sit at.

"i honestly don't care. Your whiteknighting is almost as if MS pays you to do it. "

Yeah MS pay me to go on TV and tell people why the PS4 is the better console. Makes complete sense. And that I do rip into them too.

The issue is Sony fanboys on here really cannot stomach any sort of defence against their points. That is all. You just want me to submit to that BS mob mentality and I won't ever do so. So deal with it.

Avernus3357d ago (Edited 3357d ago )

Actually I kinda wished you did check my comment history. You would see if I had the extra money I would have both consoles and a WiiU, and I'll be laughing at people like you all day.

Fanboys / whiteknights defend these consoles / companies like it's a real life battle for survival.

By all means continue Sir Septic. Be the brightest and bestest whiteknight you can possibly be. Instead of trying to neutralize the situation, just continue to add to the dump...excuse me, comment section.

I'm done. Just wanted to point out you're a fanboy calling people fanboys.

Gazondaily3357d ago

"You would see if I had the extra money I would have both consoles and a WiiU, and I'll be laughing at people like you all day. "

You'd be laughing at people like me all day, those who own all consoles?

"Instead of trying to neutralize the situation, just continue to add to the dump...excuse me, comment section. "

Instead of trying to neutralize the situation? And how did the first poster 'neutralize' any situation? If anything, me drawing attention to the fact that this kind of hate follows all platforms is a better attempt at neutralising than blaming the MS contingent in an insecure fashion and talking about a supposed deficit of games on that platform.

Of course, you wouldn't bother responding to him because his views align with yours and your extremely one-sided approach to all things 'gaming'.

"I'm done. Just wanted to point out you're a fanboy calling people fanboys."

Yeah you're done. I just want to point out that you failed.

thekhurg3357d ago (Edited 3357d ago )

The differences with Ryse and Titanfall is Sony/Ready @ Dawn never built this game up to be something it wasn't going to be.

Ryse was supposed to be 1080p/30fps, then got downgraded and still failed to maintain acceptable performance levels. Crytek told everyone that they would reduce the QTE, but all they did was change from icons to colors.

Titanfall was touted as the game only possible on the xbox one. Cloud servers and AI - all that awesome stuff. Six player limits basically confused people since other games have been doing that on peer to peer connections. The AI was viewed as a cop-out for cloud processing. Maps were filled with bots to give the illusion of being busy, *most* gamers didn't want them there since people rarely play competitive multiplayer shooters so they can shoot bots.

On the other hand, Ready at Dawn has been upfront and honest about everything regarding this game. They've been saying from the world "go" that this was a story driven game, single player, no multiplayer, cinematic experience, and was going to have quick time events. Hell, one of their first sneak peeks was a look at their branching quick time system where you could choose how the event proceeded by pressing X or Triangle.

I understand you're trying to maintain some silly "balance" but it's an absurd stance to take on the internet. There's no such thing. This gaming generation of fanboy/system wars is probably some of the worst we've seen. The hatred that a lot of gamers have for one another because they got a xbox one or a PS4 is just how things are now.

From the botched console reveal, to the promise of 1080p/60fps, to the promise of cloud, to no sharing games, to "can't flip a switch", to this game is 1080p until we're proven wrong months after release, etc... This has been a messy generation, you can't clean it up.

Gilettehad_3357d ago

Septics blog section:

1st blog: Uncharted 4 - A Visual Downgrade- Deal With It.

2nd blog: Infamous Second Son- The Ugly Side.

(Only blogs he's released on N4G)

----------------------------- -------------------------------

2 articles on his site, just about the black borders on The Order.

Another video called: "Drive Club is a flop, deal with it!"

----------------------------- -------------------------------

The guy admits he looks like a fanboy, but has the nerve to try and give ppl objective comments about games for the PS4. I actually prefer ridiculous fanboys on here compared to you, at least they aren't pretending.

Sadly for you guys this game is going to sell really well, and all the hypocritical comments on the games problems, while never having directed these problems at the games for your own console, will sink.

Balance? Pfft.. You don't know the meaning of the word.

Genuine-User3357d ago

@ Septic, could you possibly elaborate on some of the "real" concerns regarding QTE's and longevity.

Most "concerns" seem like gross dramatization.

"We need variety in our games. As more and more games become about stats and leveling up endlessly while repeating the same thing over and over (online MP games in general, or something like Destiny) we need games that can rediscover just what it's like to have a tailored experience that takes you on an auteurs journey. Gaming can happily accommodate both, but conversely that doesn't mean that all games must accommodate the tendencies of every single gamer out there. Some games will be for you, some won't, and the less we complain about what other people happen to like, the better." - Neogaf Member

Gazondaily3357d ago (Edited 3357d ago )

@Gilettehad

Firstly, I DID those two blogs:

1. Infamous- I shared a pic from the game and people accused me of purposely misrepresting the game. So what did I do? I made a whole VIDEO showing the issue. Btw, as a side note, I did this on other consoles too and the same issue cropped up.

2. UC4- yes and I stand by my view. Yes its an alpha but I was disappointed in the difference in visuals.

3. I didn't do The Order articles

4. We also have a Halo: TMCC is a failure video coming up. Will that make you happy?

5. https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Me at 2:00. Does this sound like a Xbox fanboy to you?

I've done various vids/articles being critical of MS too but you guys have selective amnesia.

@ Genuine-User

@ Septic, could you possibly elaborate on some of the "real" concerns regarding QTE's and longevity. "

Well I haven't played the game yet but the game apparently suffers from throwing too many QTE sections and you can watch the walkthrough video on the main page for yourself. The first 15 minutes are rife with them apparently. I'm not going to spoil my experience by watching the gameplay. I'm due to get the game tomorrow.

Longevity is an issue simply because I feel this could easily be a co-op game and for all the noise made about the price/content value for a game like Evolve, this game, which can be completed in 8 hours or so, its POSSIBLY an issue. Remember, there is no co-op, mp in the game. Once you've completed it, its done and dusted.

Regarding that NeoGaf quote:

" Gaming can happily accommodate both, but conversely that doesn't mean that all games must accommodate the tendencies of every single gamer out there"

I agree. That's why I laugh at those who say on here that MP-only games should not be made. I see so much hypocrisy in that statement from people on here.

Remember, I'm not the one of the guys writing The Order off. Not at all. I'm excited for it, and I'm paying DOUBLE the retail price just to get my hands on a few days early. But like all games, I have the right to be apprehensive or critical of elements of it.

Oh btw, why didn't you lot link this article that I did:

http://www.gameondaily.com/...

StarLord_Who3357d ago (Edited 3357d ago )

It's really annoying isn't it?

I am on every Order 1886 article attacking both the articles and the people who gush in the comment sections. This webiste is biased, it is so one seided that my body sometime sways physically to the left when i read the comments section.

As an owner of all three consoles, i feel the need to give this biased userbase a more truthful opinion of games nowadays. The best game i have played in the last 5 years is Super Smash Bros Wii U, i bought my Xbox One first because Dead Rising 3 looked more interesting than Killzone Shadow fall at the time and i bought the PS4 so i could play The Order 1886 (ironically) that is how my console journey has been since nov 2013.

The fact of the matter is, most gamers only care about nice looking games, that's all. Rogue Legacy, the new free + gae only has a small amount of reviews on the PS Store because people don't like "games that their phones could run."

I have had problems with 5 games since the new gen launched and all of them have had the same problem.

Ryse: good graphics, boring gameplay.

Infamous SS: Good graphics, boring, predictable story.

Driveclub: Good graphics, yet the "club" part of that game didn't open until 2 months after launch.

AC: Unity: Good graphics, buggy gameplay with an atrocious framerate.

Evolve: good graphics, next to no longevity.

All gamers care about are graphics, when gamers only care about one thing, the company making the games only works hard on that one thing.

Now we have The Order 1886, the graphics are good CHECK, but will that be all, will that game joing the plethora of "style over substance" titles that have failed to please me?

Another would be The Division, that game doesn't sound good, online only isn't an exciting concept for me, online isn't fun, it can be the sole reason for a game's failure, none of that matters though, because it looks nice.

The worst reply i have ever received on this site was "It doesn't matter if you have all three consoles, you still have to be a fanboy for one of them" Why would i troll when it leads to that type of stupidity on a daily basis? lol

Anti-PS4 articles get the most views so no wonder you would post them. I would too because 1000 angry people click and read without failure.

AdaptAndOvercome3357d ago (Edited 3357d ago )

@ septic

"Well I haven't played the game yet but the game apparently suffers from throwing too many QTE sections and you can watch the walkthrough video on the main page for yourself. The first 15 minutes are rife with them apparently. I'm not going to spoil my experience by watching the gameplay. I'm due to get the game tomorrow."

Even if it suffers from a wide variety of QTE sections, I fail to see how that is a "real" concern. You don't have to play the game if it doesn't fit your play style.

"Longevity is an issue simply because I feel this could easily be a co-op game"

That's just an assumption. I have yet play a great story driven cinemaic co-op game.

"and for all the noise made about the price/content value for a game like Evolve, this game, which can be completed in 8 hours or so, its POSSIBLY an issue."

Sure, it might be an issue for those that find repetition and levelling up to be fun.

"Remember, there is no co-op, mp in the game. Once you've completed it, its done and dusted"

Unless, you like to replay single player campaigns.

"I agree. That's why I laugh at those who say on here that MP-only games should not be made. I see so much hypocrisy in that statement from people on here."

I don't agree with those people either.

"Remember, I'm not the one of the guys writing The Order off. Not at all. I'm excited for it, and I'm paying DOUBLE the retail price just to get my hands on a few days early. But like all games, I have the right to be apprehensive or critical of elements of it."

That's great.

Genuine-User3357d ago

@ septic,

pretty much what AdaptAndOvercome said.

Primal3357d ago

I've been gaming for 25 years and I have never EVER seen so much hate towards any game. Many people are basically furious that it even exists and should be cast to the depths of Hades. Yeah I remember the Ryse QTE articles but not really that much hate and Titanfall was depicted as the second coming of Christ but it got most of its criticisms after it released.

And Sunset Overdrive was given too much credit after it released, people claiming it buried everything on Ps4 despite its 81 on metacritic.

The Order 1886 is the most hated game of all time to the point that I'm started to feel disgusted by all those fanboys and biased media outlets.

Ballsack3357d ago

Septic... It aint no thinly disguised fanboy statement..its MY opinion on a hobby that can no longer be trusted in the hands of journalists due to their hidden agendas and biasness

gangsta_red3357d ago (Edited 3357d ago )

This is why this site is so hilarious.

@Avernus
"I swear, if anyone has something remotely negative to say about MS, there you are telling them why their opinion is wrong."

And yet right above and below home we get a numerous amount of people defending this game and all things Sony. And if you say anything remotely bad about Sony or it's game you get called a troll and marked for trolling.

But to defend MS, he makes it sound like a bad thing. Even though all Septic was doing was comparing other games that were scrutinized and crapped on just as much as The Order is now.

Defend Sony and it's games...Awesome, high five.

Defend MS and it's games...Boooo, MS pays you.

Then we have this...

"The differences with Ryse and Titanfall is Sony/Ready @ Dawn never built this game up to be something it wasn't going to be."

And what isn't it going to be...because all I see from Sony and R@D is it's going to be a fantastic cinematic experience and all their fans are making it seem like the best game ever. The same way other anticipated games are portrayed to the public and on the net.

There's too much downplaying of this game by it's own fans to make it look like it's being unfairly criticized by the media. Like it is a victim of a cruel world and should be left alone.

It's funny that everyone can be critical of other games that didn't have certain features, graphics were good but lacked game options or a game with too many QTE's, but for this one we have to leave it alone.

Septic is right, let's see how many of you will be this forgiving when another long awaited exclusive game comes down the pipeline for another system.

"...on a hobby that can no longer be trusted in the hands of journalists due to their hidden agendas and biasness"

Then we have this gem that I keep seeing more and more. I would really like to know what is this hidden agenda and how will it benefit them in the long run. And what proof is there of a bias? Is it because they don't share your enthusiasm of the same games?

starchild3357d ago

@Gilettehad_ and Avernus

It's funny how much Septic gets under the skin of some of you. You scream "fanboy", but it's just silly.

I'm sure Septic isn't completely free of bias (nobody is), but I've seen his comments for years and he is vastly more fair and impartial than guys like you. He has good things to say about all the platforms and he generally has well-thought-out comments to add to the conversation.

I can't say the same thing for most people on this site who are in fact nearly completely one sided. These people are so biased that anybody that doesn't share their extreme one-sided bias is automatically labeled a fanboy. Every attempt is made to censor and shut up those who don't follow the herd. It's tiring.

4Sh0w3357d ago (Edited 3357d ago )

You guys either just recently joined n4g or have a very bad case of selective memory. Ryse and Titanfall were beat to death, what's worst many of the often mentioned criticism's like Ryse's QTE's and Titanfall lack of content due to no SP are the very things The Order is being called out for and NOW many of you say its unfair. Nooooo...I didn't agree with much of the criticism of Ryse and Titanfall but they open themselves up to such questioning because of choices *gameplay, *no SP, *QTE's, *gamelength so I understood it, still I enjoyed those games and its up to the individual to decide if they were worthy.

Avernus calls out Septic as MS PR yet Septic sounds more neutral in his response but Avernus says nothing of Ballsack comments bringing up more fanboyish talk about the competition lacking exclusives. lol, couldn't sound more 1 sided if he tried.

thekhurg is spewing more fanboyish recreation of the facts about Ryse and Titanfall. Crytek were never definitive on Ryse resolution saying it will be 1080p at launch, and as far as fps is concerned, many devs have "targeted" 60fps in dev but went lower, remember KZ shadowfall??? Yet, you won't fault those devs, end result of the choice is a game that is still superb and 1 of the best next gen graphics games even still today, plus it has multiplayer....so what is the problem with Ryse but of course The Order is above questioning? Titanfall was hyped because Respawn's past success with COD and it was mixing up the gameplay with Titan's and vertical gameplay, I've played my fair share of Titanfall and no most folks were not against bots being in the game, speak for yourself, both games did what the dev's stated.

lol, you guys attacking Septic for only the negative sony related comments, yet he also makes plenty of negative Microsoft comments, IRONICALLY he sounds a lot more level headed than all of you. Sure the Order has seen some unfair criticism since of course its not out yet but mostly in reference to the game length and QTE's with a gamer playing normally with a full walkthrough available those criticism seem very fair given that EVERY major exclusive is scrutinized. Stop crying, The Order will either prove the criticism right or wrong on its own merits, just like every other game.

DragonKnight3357d ago

Septic man, you're so transparent. You always comment the same way. You get super defensive about the slightest criticism about the Xbox brand in any way, then at the end you try to close with some neutral statement trying to get people to avoid thinking of you as an Xbox fanboy.

It's a good thing you brought up Ryse because that's still the reigning champion of short QTE games but guess what, who the hell cares?

Ryse and Titanfall have not received 1/10th the criticism that this game has. From the day the resolution was revealed, to "why aren't they talking more about it", to beta and demo impressions, to a guy who claimed he beat the game in 5 hours then it was revealed he didn't. The list goes on and on. In fact the only thing in recent history that was talked about more than this was the Xbox One launch itself.

Even Watch Dogs hasn't received the kind of hate this game is getting. That's not a gross exaggeration, that's verifiable fact. Search it up on the site yourself and while you're at it stop acting phony. Everyone can clearly tell you're an Xbox fanboy, that last ditch attempt at neutrality in your comments isn't fooling anyone.

UKmilitia3357d ago

to be fair and honest here.

Ready at Dawn havent said things like what MS,respawn and crytek said.
they was saying alot of lies.

regarding only possible on xb1,resolution and visual drop,qte events .

Ready at dawn have been honest from day 0.

end oif day titanfall was crap and it couldnt run on xb1 because it had screen tearing constantly and other issues.
rise was a decent game imo and The order will be too.
but i cant remember a game getting so much hate from start in last 2 genrations.

Gazondaily3357d ago (Edited 3357d ago )

Ha DragonKnight. Look at the pot calling the kettle black. Please tell me you don't think you're neutral.

There was nothing wrong in my first post. I said the same standard should be applied everywhere as all titles get that kind of hate. But no, in your paranoid world, you couldn't even stomach that.

Why don't you take issue with the plethora of Sony fanboys on here btw? Like the first comment for instance? Of course you don't. Hardly any of you lot did. Thats because you're not fooling anyone. You're transparent trolls who's mind boggling double standards are hilarious. You guys don't even attempt to be neutral. So of course I'm gonna laugh at most of you lot and your inability to come up with a remotely objective response.

Look in the mirror first before accusing others. Yeah I brought up Ryse. And yeah who cares? EVERYONE did hence all the memes and mick taking for months on end. I even said it was justified in that instance.

You say that this games didn't attract 1/10th of the hatred this got. Can you even quantify that statement??

Youre a prime example of a Sony fanboy on here. One who dishes out loads of criticism but can't stomach any kind of one to Sony's beloved platform especially when compared to Microsoft.

Your long crusade on here speaks for itself.

And please don't even try to compare your 'objectivity' to mine. You don't even come close in either sincerity or the ability to even make an objective assessment at all.

DragonKnight3357d ago

@Septic: Never claimed to be neutral, but let me show you something.

http://n4g.com/user/blogpos...
http://n4g.com/user/blogpos...
http://n4g.com/user/blogpos...
http://n4g.com/user/blogpos...
http://n4g.com/user/blogpos...
http://n4g.com/user/blogpos... (special)
http://n4g.com/user/blogpos...
http://n4g.com/user/blogpos...

Those are 8 blogs in which I either focus entirely, or partly, on criticizing stupid things Sony has done and the blog marked special is where I praised Microsoft for coming to their senses regarding the Xbox One.

See, I don't pretend. I very clearly prefer Playstation. I very clearly detest Microsoft. I don't write posts where at the last minute I throw in that final neutral statement so I can go "see, I'm neutral and you Xbone fanboys are the worst".

"There was nothing wrong in my first post..."

Right, because crying that Ballsack said "the competition has no exclusives for 9 months" and calling it a "disguised fanboy statement" is perfectly fine and neutral. How did I miss that?

"Why don't you take issue with the plethora of Sony fanboys on here btw?"

A) This is a Sony game isn't it? Wouldn't you expect to see Sony fanboys in this comment thread? Am I supposed to tell every one of them to be careful not to hurt the feelings of Xbox fanboys like you do in Xbox related articles? Oh wait, you don't do that. Instead you call PS fanboys the worst fanboys in existence.

B) Did I even talk about my expectations as to this game? Nope. So what double standards have I employed Septic? Go ahead, I'll wait for you to quote them.

"Look in the mirror first before accusing others."

Read my reply to the first quoted aspect of your comment. I don't pretend, you do.

"You say that this games didn't attract 1/10th of the hatred this got. Can you even quantify that statement??"

Didn't I also say "look it up on this site yourself if you don't believe me"? I'm pretty sure I did. Is it hard for you to type in, say, Titanfall in the search engine, count the negative or overly critical for no reason articles and compare?

"Youre a prime example of a Sony fanboy on here."

Just showed you 8 whole blogs of my Sony criticisms Skeptic. Kinda completely refutes your "you can't take criticism of Sony" claims.

"Your long crusade on here speaks for itself."

This quote paints you as an overexaggerating drama queen Septic.

"And please don't even try to compare your 'objectivity' to mine. You don't even come close in either sincerity or the ability to even make an objective assessment at all."

You alluded to yourself being objective after your pitiful lists of things you don't like about the PS4/Xbox One? I have but one response to that.

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Ballsack3357d ago (Edited 3357d ago )

@septic....'fanboy comments like the first for instance'....this coming from a microsoft troll like yourself?....

I own both consoles (XBL ruggeddabawse)..my preference is still the ps4..AND WHAT?

You really think your fooling anyone? Acting like your neutral and calling everyone a fanboy because they are in a SONY thread defending what Has been non stop hate against a game yet to release...

Its easy to throw around the word fanboy..but your in a glass shed son...so let me throw a stone...your a blatant microsoft fanboy hiding in the shadows,kudos... Youve fooled some,I see through your bullshit.. Now if you dont like us defending a sony game in a sony thread..f**k off...simple

bouzebbal3357d ago (Edited 3357d ago )

Some people have a console or brand they prefer to another, trying to make the big flaws of one look banal to make it look like a tie. Owning all consoles still doesn't prove any neutrality whatsoever.

XBLskull one of the most blind labelled fanboys has a PS4 and at the same time he's the first one talking trash about PS4 games.
To me xbox fanboys are by far the worst species in here. They clearly neglect reality of power differences, games less optimized, numbers of exclusives, MS promising them things they never keep (Natal, cloud computing...) but they are yet still blindly defending their brand by talking shit about the competitor's games.

Cloud is a big deal, direct x12 is a big deal, halo collection best ever... you guys are so naive and you get bainwashed so easily. Facts is what it's all about...

The difference with Order is that it has always been revealed as a SP only game. If we put RPGs aside, SP campaigns turn around 8hours as an average and The Order seems to last longer than that which is a plus.

If people like to label me as a fanboy because i am defending games that have been hated on purpose (Knack, DriveClub...) and now The Order is fine with me.
Pretending being neutral and objective and only talking about worries actually shows the true intention =====> TROLLING

The amount of injust hate The Order is getting is over the roof. It overshadowed everything that got released in the past 5years. Why? just for fun...
Some people clain being neutral but as soon as you "insult" their cherished brand their true personality takes over... funny :D

iluvmaPS33357d ago

Who complained about titanfall 6 vs 6? Ryse was bashed for being to repetitive and not being good

Gazondaily3357d ago

"See, I don't pretend. I very clearly prefer Playstation. I very clearly detest Microsoft"

Lol so why on earth should we take what you say seriously or how can you even come into this to question my objectivity?

"Right, because crying that Ballsack said... is perfectly fine and neutral. "

Yes it is actually. The chap complete side-swiped the issue and placed the blame on the Xbox contingent (and got marked as Well said...surprise surprise) but that's a lot more netural than my post is it?

"A) This is a Sony game isn't it? Wouldn't you expect to see Sony fanboys in this comment thread? "

I don't just mean this thread, I mean the whole site in general.

"Did I even talk about my expectations as to this game? Nope. So what double standards have I employed Septic? Go ahead, I'll wait for you to quote them. "

Eh?? I'm talking about your double standards regarding the way you approach the MS contingent, but then again, you've just admitted you're a fanboy above so it's all good I guess.

"Read my reply to the first quoted aspect of your comment. I don't pretend, you do. "

Hey Dragon. Why didn't you say anything about this article that I wrote?

http://www.gameondaily.com/...

"Just showed you 8 whole blogs of my Sony criticisms Skeptic. Kinda completely refutes your "you can't take criticism of Sony" claims."

Oh really? Well then by your logic, I'm the most objective person here because not only do I routinely defend Sony when it counts:

http://www.gameondaily.com/...

I critique MS SEVERAL times:

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

And then went on a FRICKIN TV explaining why people should pick the PS4 over the XBOX ONE:

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

"Your long crusade on here speaks for itself."

This quote paints you as an overexaggerating drama queen Septic."

Lol no it doesn't mate. You're obsessive to the point of ridicule. At one point I offered you an invitation to write for our site (what MS fanboy would do that huh?) but then I noticed your strange and over-bearing insistent nature where you were so stubborn and completely unwilling to have a proper discussion.

"You alluded to yourself being objective after your pitiful lists of things you don't like about the PS4/Xbox One?"

Ha! Are you using that against me??Let the others see your comments shall we:

http://n4g.com/news/1650625...

Comparatively, you guys don't have an ounce of sincerity. I welcome ANY of you guys to come to our roundtable discussions if you want to pit your so-called objectivity against mine. But beware, you will lose. So much is my confidence in my sincerity and objectivity, at least when compared to yours.

@abzdine

"Some people clain being neutral but as soon as you "insult" their cherished brand their true personality takes over... funny :D"

Ah yeah so very true ;)

DragonKnight3356d ago (Edited 3356d ago )

@Septic: "Lol so why on earth..."

A) I'm sorry, do you think the only way someone can or should talk about Microsoft is if they like them? Well if everyone had that opinion, we'd still have that 24hour check in, Kinect requiring console that nobody liked wouldn't we?

B) Are you suggesting that pretending the way you do is actually the correct course of action?

C) Opinions aren't objective.

"Yes it is actually..."

A) https://www.youtube.com/wat...
B) Did I say his comment was neutral?

"I don't just mean this thread, I mean the whole site in general."

Say what you mean then. And I would return the question to you about you and your fellow Xbox fanboys. Don't pretend like you're saints.

"Eh?? I'm talking about..."

Again, say what you mean. And no, actually, I didn't. I said I have a clear preference. You are reaching wanting to put people on the same level of fanboyism as you.

"Hey Dragon. Why didn't you say anything about this article that I wrote?"

Because I didn't read it. Having now read it, a proper commentary would take more space in this comment that's already reserved to address your other "points" but here's a small "gist" of it. First, you prove my point in going on the defensive about the Xbox brand, even when you're talking about a Sony game. Second, you pretend you have objectivity and say the lack of it is not condoned at your site, but your lists exist with PS4 fanboys officially claimed as the worst fanboys by your site.

"Oh really? Well then by your logic, I'm the most objective person here because not only do I routinely defend Sony when it counts."

Ok, so you linked your Order article again, not sure if that's a mistake or not so I'm not going to comment on that. In the first video the extent of your criticisms against Microsoft were "the Xbox One is weaker and don't get rid of the Kinect." Oh wow, how could Microsoft ever hope to recover? You criticized GTAV more.

Third video. "I think the controller is better." Do I really have to lace into you for that one after the list articles? Do you expect me to believe that at a Playstation Launch event you'd tell everyone to get the Xbox One instead and that that opinion would be allowed on tv? Wow, if you think those are good examples of your "objectivity" and "neutrality" they aren't.

"Lol no it doesn't mate...."

Translation: I didn't accept your offer.

"Ha! Are you using that against me??Let the others see your comments shall we:"

Go ahead and be a comment historian. I'm not running away from what I said. If your answer to your fanboyism is to point out what you consider to be others fanboyism, you must understand that you're proving my point for me. Obviously you completely agree with your own reasons in those lists, and you expect anyone to then think you're neutral? Lol.

"Comparatively, you guys don't have an ounce of sincerity...."

I don't live in the UK. I've seen your "objectivity" in your roundtables. I think you need to look up what objectivity means. Also, try and find a smaller room to do them in, there's too much echo.

4Sh0w3356d ago (Edited 3356d ago )

Septic they are attacking you because you don't join the mob mentality:

On a negative Sony related story you MUST defend and label points raised as media/xbot driven BS with no merit.

On a negative Microsoft related story you MUST believe rumors are fact, Micro is the devil, any words of defence makes you MS PR.

On positive Sony news, you MUST take every word as gospel.

On positive Microsoft news, you MUST question everything, attack source, suspect micro paid them.

There is no middle ground, its black or white. Loyalty clouds objectivity= where most reasonable people would acknowledge this game got undue hate (stuff I try to avoid) for things like downgrades, linearity, gameplay since of course its not out yet but at the same time thats not unusual scrutiny for any big game, especially exclusives. Then there are *perfectly legitimate questions raised about the gameplay length vs value proposition. If an individual does not care at all about a game being very short as long as its fun for $60 then great but it sounds arrogant/silly to act surprised that many gamers do care. Its like going sky diving and saying to someone who isn't willing to jump out of a plane "You must be crazy."

-Not all sony supporters are like this just as not all who prefer X1 like me are not xbots, wish n4g had more rational people on both sides, Id love to have discusions arguing "mine is the best" without hating on the other.

-Why cant we agree that this game has been unfairly bashed like most exclusives but there are also legitimate negative questions about the game....nah who am I kiddin' just continue the fanboyism.

DragonKnight3356d ago

@4Sh0w: Bzzzt. Wrong. The only thing I'm "attacking" Septic on is how disingenuous he is. I don't care if he is hates this game and hates on it in this thread, doesn't matter to me. But don't pretend that you're a neutral person when you're clearly not. Septic has a habit of making posts where most of it is filled with his fanboyism and then at the very end tries to cover it with the most neutral statement he can come up with. That's the problem. Why be phony about what you prefer? I know Septic prefers Xbox, but he tries to pass himself off as something else and attacks others sarcastically without a single shred of self-awareness.

+ Show (27) more repliesLast reply 3356d ago
Crimzon3357d ago

I've seen a lot of games scrutinized like The Order (Evolve, Assassins Creed Unity, Destiny, Call of Duty etc. the list goes on...) but I've never seen a game defended this heavily from scrutiny before.

Plenty of games receive criticism, a lot of it very justified, but people are falling over themselves to defend The Order for some reason. Where were you when other games were being scrutinized? Or did you not care because they weren't PS4 exclusives?

slappy5083357d ago

But what exactly is there to critisize?
There's no content hidden behind a paywall, it's functional, we all *know* its not Open World, we all *know*there are QTEs , games have it it's not like it's a QTE sim and we all know its not 50 hours.
Its not exactly like any of these things are bad for industry, if it's not to your taste or on your platform of choice great move on. Evolve, games that are broken should be getting a lot more critisism and bad publicity than it currently is.

Saijahn3357d ago

The criticism's are valid. I can understand if the game was being nitpicked to death like oh this texture looks too dark or something like that like what happened with Ryse. I mean people were literally photoshopping screens of Ryse just to make dissenting posts lol.

It honestly feels like if The Order isn't getting 10s for reviews some of these diehard PS4 players are going to kill themselves.

Two-Face3357d ago

Evolve may be a huge ripoff. But I would take that game over Order anyday everyday.

I saw some of that playthrough on youtube + the ending. I think I have never cringed so much from a videogame ending. If you like QTE, cutscenes and few gameplay section inbetween. Then go ahead.

I prefer games with no cutscenes or as few as possible. Half-Life 2 managed to tell a good story without using cutscenes, so don't tell me it's not possible.

OrangePowerz3357d ago (Edited 3357d ago )

I defended Destiny, Watch Dogs and CoD in the past alonger other games. Hell, I even defended ME3 against those entitled games that vehemently demanded a new ending and made petitions for it.

Unity can't be defended it's a buggy and glitchy mess, not as bad as BF4 for tje first 6 months but still buggy and glitchy.

Evolve doesn't intereste me much, but the DLC model they use doesn't seem to be very good.

@Two Face

Standing in a room and waiting for a conversation to finish isn't really that much different to having a cutscene.

MysticStrummer3357d ago

None of those games you listed were scrutinized like The Order.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3357d ago
hellothere19773357d ago

Actually, the answer is simple. You know this is a hot topic for a huge AAA game coming out soon. Those articles and 6hours play throughs on YouTube and gamesites get money for clicks and views. Of course you're going to get people making these statements to get people to click on them.

I'm guessing we'll have to wait for the bigger websites to give some numbers. Yes, trusting game reviews is a sticking point too, but I'm inclined to believe that the bigger publications will be more inclined to give factual numbers since they have a lot more at risk for doctoring numbers and data... from a legal standpoint.

Lev19033357d ago

Did TLou received hate like this? Did LBP? Did Infamous? Does Bloodborne have dislike this? NO! Driveclub did because the game was not finished. But geus what, so did Halo.

Maybe the game has some flawes and gamesites react on it.

But can you guys stop with the that the PS4 is the victim here. And that the opposition makes these kind of articles. Its really childish.

Re-versed3357d ago (Edited 3357d ago )

you cant justify hate like that!the hate is coming out of the people who cant play the game cause they dont have PS4...You talk about childish behaviour in ps ownwer who defend the game???Lol!what about an army of trolls who havent even touch the game yet and claim that it is rubbish ??dont make yourself look like fool son...

Lev19033357d ago

What the hell are you talking about? Im not saying you are childish because you defend this game(Which you didnt play btw). Im saying your childish because you act that everyone is conspiring againt the PS4. And that the game is a victim.

You will see in 4 days if this game is great or not.

Crimzon3357d ago

@Lev1903

You make a good point and I agree. I see people complaining that all PS4 games are somehow victimized, yet general consensus for Bloodborne seems to be that the game looks great and hands-on impressions are all positive.

Re-versed3357d ago (Edited 3357d ago )

yeah...like all the world has the same taste...and we are about to have a result about how good it is...how old are you my friend?

@ crimzon
If this game was multiplatform it would have been labelled as a fresh new start as an ip and a great developer achievement..AND YOU KNOW IT.

Lev19033357d ago (Edited 3357d ago )

Seriously, what are you trying to say to me?

You wil have the result about how good the game is. YOU. And then you can make up your own mind if the game is great or not.

seeing your comments i notice that you have a conspiracy theory going on that the best selling console is the victim of hate. Just like TLOU and the hate which Bloodborne and uncharted is getting.

Im 26, how old are you 14?

Re-versed3357d ago

I just cant believe the hate this game got...Thats all!!

Let me tell you one thing...There is a big difference between ps4 success and the media hate...People slowly learn about how us media work and avoid their ''profesionalism'

Just look at the GTA4 reviews among many many examples even in recent memory and you ll understand that the gaming journalism must have a painful death...

I only like the angry joe for being honest in his opinion and fights the commercial gaming side!

So a big F@CK YOU to IGN GAMESPOT POLYGON and all the other shit professional idiot who decide for us whats cool or not with their completely dishonest reviews like yearly COD, Titanfall ect...

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3357d ago
Gazondaily3357d ago (Edited 3357d ago )

The Order is the next big PS4 title so yeah, fanboys will jump at the opportunity to hate on it. Expect this for almost all big titles that are platform exclusives; Blodborne, Uncharted,Quantum Break, Halo etc. Its par for the course really.

himdeel3357d ago

Sony exclusives are always scrutinized this way, so this is nothing new. Sony exclusives are expected to cure cancer, make eyes explode with graphics and have game lengths that rival that of the longest jrpg. This just seems to be the case since the PS3.

andibandit3357d ago

"Ive never seen a game get so scrutinized in all my life "

I dont think I've ever seen a game receive so much praise either.

One side of the fence says, how can you hate it so much when you havent played it.

the other side says, how can you love it so much when you havent played it.

It's the neverending story.

Multiplatguy3357d ago

What does Xbox have to do with The Order?

Does that mean that Ryse was only scrutinized by PS fanboys then? This is the only exclusive that seems to be recieving hate and it's because it's said to be 5 hours long. Xbox has nothing to do with and you trying to blame Xbox fanboys just shows you off as a PS fanboy.

jcnba283357d ago (Edited 3357d ago )

Sounds like a lot of damage control to me. Have you not seen any early reviews yet online? There are some obvious flaws in the game.

I'm still picking the game up but please stop the damage controlling.

NuggetsOfGod3357d ago

"We know the numbers are wrong and we won't comment on it" - dev

So they don't want to combat the negative perception?

If the numbers are wrong then what are the damn numbers lol

Simple answer they are beating around the bush lol

Maybe the numbers are right...

If this wasn't a sony dev they would seem kinda shady.

But of course sony gamers won't see that.

iceman063357d ago

They already HAVE commented on it. They gave a range of time about 2 weeks ago. Since then, the internet has been abuzz with attempts to prove them wrong. So, they just aren't going to repeat it ad nauseum.

UKmilitia3357d ago

i cant wait for this but i have just noticed for the first time alot of screen tearing which hasnt been in any other videos

Helloween133357d ago

man I so agree with you here, Its a shame that there are so many wankers out there trying there best to make people believe all this crap about what will be one of the games of the year

NeoTribe3357d ago (Edited 3357d ago )

Your exactly right. While shit games like evolve scores a 9 for its evil buisness practices, ready at dawn is getting scrutinized for a misplaced pixel. "Gaming 2015"

468893373357d ago

"Ive never seen a game get so scrutinized in all my life."

I've never seen a game recieve so much damage control in all my life. God.

"I think its fear that the opposition has no exclusives for like the first 9 months of 2015 and the ps4 has exclusives spread throughout the year which will probably boost its sales lead even further."

Yeah. Nevermind the numerous criticisms from Sony fans about the games length, generic gameplay, QTE's etc since E3 last year.

DragonKnight3357d ago (Edited 3357d ago )

double post.

boodi3357d ago

it's just full boat bloat advertising

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 3356d ago
DarkOcelet3358d ago (Edited 3357d ago )

I am pissed on how much flak they are taking with this game. How come no one said anything when the Bioshock Infinite landed with only single played campaign and got 9's and 10's everywhere?? And it was a masterpiece. Infact, i remember people were actually hoping it would be Single Player only. That also happened with Dead Space 2 and Dead Space 3. Nobody asked for multiplayer or co op. And many people were pissed off about it.

Some games dont need MP as long as it had a good replay value and a good story. And i think this game will do.

I swear if this game was multiplatform, no one would give it as much flak. I mean look at $hitty Evolve. Very few talked about its $hitty DLC practices before the game landed and people said that they can experience everything in the damn game in less than two hours! I mean WTF!

I f**king hate this new gen where everything has to have a stupid shoved in half @ssed multiplayer. GOD! That makes me so angry, i just want to play a single player only game, is that a damn crime now?

slappy5083357d ago

agreed on all counts, some games dont need to have multiplayer in it, DA:I is proof of that.I guess the west just like to shit all over PS exclusives, remember Driveclub, just couldnt help themselves, yet Master CHief received praise and the multiplayer was broken too.
This game can be bug free, gorgeous graphics, great story (objectively that ticks most gamers boxes) But they'll go looking for fault in it.

Volkama3357d ago

Erm Dragon Age Inquisition might not be the best citation if you're trying to make a case in favour of The Order...

isa_scout3357d ago

So true slappy. MCC has been and still is a mess several months after launch. At the rate it's being fixed they should've just called it The Master Chief Campaign Collection. Halo is my favorite FPS franchise. I bought a XOne just for Halo and Gears. So you can imagine how pissed I've been. Not very game needs multiplayer, and not every game needs a single player. Battlefield is one example of a game that's single player actually lessens the overall package. I'm pumped for The Order 1886. Sometimes it's nice to just relax and focus on a story instead of competitive MP. I'm sure most of us not in our tween years remember a time when all we played was SP games, and it worked out fine.

Father__Merrin3357d ago

nobody would bother if it was multiplat, Pc and xbox owners would have been looking forward to a title like this. but they cant play it hence they have to spew out nonsence to fill the void that they have nothing new....

xbox owners will have the new games for gold, and pc owners will have to wait for the next indie bundle....

starchild3357d ago

I could name lots of multiplats that got tons of hate before they were ever released. Sometimes the concern was justified and sometimes it was unwarranted or overblown, but it happens all the time to multiplats, so I don't know what you are talking about.

EvilWay3357d ago (Edited 3357d ago )

You listed games with a significant campaign length. This has been beaten in 5-6 hours, that is the problem. People have the right to be upset because it is $60 and even more in other companies. People aren't accepting half assed experiences anymore (atleast I hope).

I have no problem with games having multiplayer but that means the game should have that development time to work on the single player.

I don't know how this game will score and I am eager to play it myself but I expect it to be short I will beat it in 2 days of minor play than never touch it again

Ryse is in the same boat short, linear, and boring gameplay (even though I enjoyed it). It has good graphics but not much substance. The story might be great but the length will hurt it in the long run

3357d ago
fei-hung3357d ago

I remember a game called Metal Gear Solid 4. Game was 75% cutscenes with very little gameplay and the story wasn't even all that great unless you followed the series. Gameplay itself was around 4-5hrs the rest was down to cutscenes. This game was given 9&10's.

God of war games have had campaigns that are not longer than 8-10hrs and they never had these issues.

With the order it seems to be looking for excuse after excuse to give it negative press. First it was about graphics, then the qte's, then the variety of guns, the linearity, the gameplay and now the length. People forget it wasn't long ago they bought a demo called ground zero for £30-35.

DarkOcelet3357d ago

I have beaten Vanquish in four hours the first time btw with all the cutscenes and whatnot. And it was a pretty damn good game. I replayed it tons of time.

Its not always about the length.

isa_scout3357d ago

Who said it was a half assed experience? I'd take a game that lasted 5-10 hours with a rich world,vivid art style, and well crafted narrative over a game that lasted 30 hours but is a pain to play through. Some games over inflate the length to the detriment of the story. I loved Alien: Isolation, but I'm sure most people would agree that it felt entirely to long.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3357d ago
SaveFerris3357d ago

I really can't recall the last video game that had this much negative press before release?

DarkOcelet3357d ago (Edited 3357d ago )

I remember Ryse was getting flak but it was no where near as much as this. And they were getting it for a good reason.

Crytek wasn't exactly known for giving a good gameplay, hell they actually said '60% Graphics, 40% gameplay or something like that.

hello123357d ago (Edited 3357d ago )

Ryse had multiplayer and it still is visually one of the most impressive games on console. Ryse storyline is a lot better then what people claim on here too. The main issue with Ryse too short.

I watched the Order footage on Youtube.

The first 12 minutes you be worried about the lack of gameplay, but it improves a lot after the first 12 minutes. The campaign is roughly 5 to 7 hours at most depending on how you play.

The graphics are top notch some of the best seen on console- however you can see where they cut the corners. The city of London is lifeless for the most part very few people walking around the streets.

Seriously compare the Order to ACU and you will see what i am saying is true. ACU is an amazing looking game,just look how vibrant Paris is and observe the number of people walking around. This is what a next gen city should feel like.
https://www.youtube.com/wat...

QTEs are pointless surely you know what button to press after you use it the first time?

Cutscenes and transition to gameplay is flawles really good work from the devs.

The storyline is good.

Is the game worth the price for me no

Was Ryse worth full price no, but it had multiplayer so there was added value.

blockcoc3357d ago

Titanfall was easily just as bad and rightfully so.

MasterCornholio3357d ago (Edited 3357d ago )

@KNWS

"Ryse had multiplayer"

Tacked on multiplayer that really has no purpose in that game. No idea why you brought that up as an example.

Snookies123357d ago

I think it's a good thing. Look at all the super hyped up games that ended up crappy. I'm very confident The Order is going to be an amazing game. :]

tanukisuit3357d ago (Edited 3357d ago )

Well, however things go down, in the end, I think Sony understands the value of RAD and this IP. What happens afterwards though, is up to those execs.

Show all comments (108)
350°

The Order: 1886 pushed visuals hard in 2015 - And still looks stunning today

Digital Foundry : Released in February 2015, The Order: 1886 was a stunning PlayStation 4 game at the cutting-edge of rendering technology, with visuals that still hold up today. The game's release pre-dated in-depth Digital Foundry coverage, something we're looking to address with this new video! Ready at Dawn's game never received a sequel and never received a PS4 Pro upgrade, but thanks to developments with exploited, older firmware PS5 consoles, we can now show you the game running locked at 60 frames per second.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community261d ago
VenomUK260d ago

The gameplay was bland and extremely frustrating at times with unnecessary QTE combat at points. But the world and the lore and the characters and the story were fantastic. I’ve always wanted a sequel. I still hope Sony will surprise us one day.

shadowT261d ago

Sony missed the opportunity to acquire Ready at Dawn Studios.

Tacoboto261d ago

But... Sony didn't want Ready at Dawn. Clearly

mkis007260d ago

I'm guessing had 1886 turned out more positively they would have.

RaidenBlack261d ago

And let's not forget,
Ready At Dawn showcased The Order 1886 running on PC at 60fps at SIGGRAPH 2015
https://www.dsogaming.com/n...

isarai261d ago

I still stand by my theory that this game just released at the wrong time. Almost every outlet spent a lot of time in their reviews ragging on the game for not being an online experience, everyone was in the Destiny hype train and at the time they wanted EVERY game to follow suit, bashing any game that didn't. If this were released after everyone realized how much that wasn't future, people would've appreciated it more. I loved it, and I'm always disappointed that we'll never get a sequel

Tacoboto261d ago

That doesn't seem to be true about outlets complaining on the lack of online. The review summaries on Metacritic are very consistent: Amazing graphics, but shallow gameplay and a very short length with little reason to return.

Here's an example of how *little* time IGN spent talking about multiplayer:

"With no multiplayer, and no reason to revisit the short and stunted single-player campaign once it’s been completed, there just isn’t a lot to it."

It's the final sentence. They don't even take the time to say "online multiplayer"

MrChow666261d ago (Edited 261d ago )

"Amazing graphics, but shallow gameplay and a very short length with little reason to return."
You are right, that's what everbody was saying at the time, never heard anything about it not being online.
I've been thinking about trying this game for years, I may get it now that it's dirt cheap, no big loss if it sucks

MrChow666261d ago

Oh, add to that bad enemy AI, I remember that from the reviews, I saw a video of a wherewolf boss fight with a very weak AI

thorstein261d ago

And there we glowing reviews for shorter games. It was one of the times where hating this game was "cool."

CrimsonWing69261d ago

Can you show me the reviews that rag on it for not having an online experience?

I’m not doubting you or anything. I’m just being lazy.

isarai261d ago

Sorry, not multiplayer, open world is what I meant.

Tacoboto261d ago

That's also fake news, isarai. Again, the game was consistently criticized for what it was (Pretty but extremely short, extremely linear, hand-holding, no replayability), not for what it wasn't (multiplayer/open-world)

isarai261d ago

Nope, every review uses the term "linear" several times as if it's some inherently bad attribute. Not fake news at all. Since then there's veen plenty of short and sweet single player linear games that get lots of praise, again after the reality of everything being open world set it and it wasn't as great as everyone thought. But at the launch of the last gen everyone had open world fever, and especially the first couple years "linear" was a con in many games reviewed

Tacoboto261d ago

That's your own contortion assuming criticism of its extremely linear design is suddenly a call for it to have been open world.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 261d ago
zumlauf14261d ago

You totally made up a claim regarding an overall review consensus that isn't true. And, instead of just ignoring being called out for it, you respond with "oh actually i ment to say OPEN WORLD". Which literally isn't true either. You can't show us one review that bashed the game for "not being open world". And, somehow the other guy is getting downvoted. Over a bullshit liar.

isarai261d ago

Games were being criticized at that time for any game that wasn't open world or online. So yeah I got one mixed for the other, doesn't change my argument one bit that it would've been received better if it released later. People are agreeing because if you were not riding the "online and open world" hype train at that time, it was blatantly obvious there were biases in play for how games were criticized. Now after all that has happened since people want to say "oh wait these games were actually pretty good" cause they know better now

Rude-ro261d ago

The gameplay was very shallow and when one says repetitive, it is by the very definition for some fights. As in, completely identical but different setting.

The game has amazing potential.
The graphics, the lore, characters…
This could most definitely have been all corrected with a sequel and became a franchise hit…
Still would love to see an attempt.

Ie fantastic premise and moments that shine…
But it had its downfalls that deserved the negative marks.

thorstein261d ago

It was the "game to hate" when it launched. And right here, on this site, we saw people posting stories that were outright fabrications about the game. It was weird. The game launched, it was fun, a really cool game but the hate was too much. And so were the lies.

Minute Man 721261d ago

It was just too short....but I loved every minute of it....double dipped and grabbed the ultimate CE

babadivad261d ago

That isn't true. I remember people talking about how incredibly short it was and the somewhat janky gunplay.

KwietStorm_BLM260d ago

First I'm hearing of this. I don't know what multiplayer has to do with anything. The game was just dull. Amazing graphics, great narrative, great lore, boring gameplay sprinkled in pieces between cutscenes, and lackluster AI and controls.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 260d ago
anast261d ago

People cried this game was too short. No people are crying because games are too long.

isarai261d ago

Pretty sure everyone is complaining about bloated games lately but ok

anast261d ago

Thank you for the ok. I needed that.

RaidenBlack261d ago

Games like Ubisoft open worlds not enjoyable lengthy games like Elden Ring or Baldur's Gate III

anast261d ago

I get it, but people also complain about the main stories being too long or just games being too long in general because they are "adults".

Show all comments (50)
230°

The Curious Case of The Order: 1886 - A Retrospective

Ready At Dawn cut their teeth developing spin-offs for PlayStation Portable and porting games to consoles. When they got a chance to establish their own with The Order: 1886, its poor critical reception ostensibly halted their trajectory. Can one middling game really sully one’s reputation in the eyes of Sony?

Read Full Story >>
lordsofgaming.net
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community727d ago
Changed: title
moriarty1889727d ago

Wanted a sequel for this game so much. It was left wide open for one with the ending it had.

porkChop727d ago

Sony did file a new trademark a while back, so you never know. Though if I were to guess it would be a reboot rather than a sequel.

REDGUM727d ago

The Order was great from my playthrough and really enjoyed it. The same with Days Gone. Both, amongst others out there, deserve a follow-up. Anyone who actually played through the complete games knows there were hidden gems in and around these 2 games. Too many out there put too much faith in reviewer's opinions instead of thier own and get put off or join the hate bandwagon.
Seriously, gamers need to game & not read or view other people game with added opinions thrown in.
Honestly, if you haven't played either of these 2 games yet, do yourself a favour, pick it or them up, forget anything you know about them & just play it for yourself & create you're own opinions.

Ninver726d ago

I ignored the reviews and went straight to the store to but the game. Thoroughly enjoyed it I might add. If only Sony had the balls to summon enough faith to reboot or give us a sequel. Maybe even a prequel done right and make it a 3 part series. Wasted opportunity for a really different exclusive if you ask me.

barom726d ago

Days Gone is really an exceptional game though it feels like it took a bit of time for it to get interesting.

The Order 1886 was unfortunately not very good. Super beautiful game with beautiful cinematics but felt incomplete and don't really remember much happening at all in the game i.e. it was kind of bland. A sequel where they learned from their mistakes would be very intriguing though and I would have bought it.

monkey602726d ago

I loved Days Gone and I would have loved a sequel.

I didnt like The Order. There was enough there for me to give a sequel a chance if they improved on bits but I'm losing no sleep over the absence of it. I thought the 1st one was genuinely terrible for a multitude of valid reasons.

S2Killinit727d ago

I really enjoyed it. I was hoping for a game in the same world but less linear. With lots of that sweet lore.

YoungKingDoran727d ago

Yeah with the tech sorted and expanding on the existing assets, they could/should have been able to do a trilogy that gen. What happened..

moriarty1889726d ago

Agreed. Such an interesting title just abandoned. Makes no sense. As I said the ending of the game sets up for a sequel perfectly.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 726d ago
porkChop727d ago

Incredible graphics and presentation. Great use of photo mode. A really interesting premise. The actual gunplay felt solid. The game just needed to be longer, and the levels could have been a bit less constrained. More enemy variety as well. At full price it just didn't have the value, at least in my opinion.

I would like to see a sequel or reboot, which I think is more likely. It would need to be a new dev as Ready at Dawn are part of Oculus now

robtion727d ago

I think Bluepoint could do a good job. They have the technical capability if Demon's Souls is anything to go by.

MeatyUrologist727d ago

Agreed. Because of all the bad reviews I waited until the end of last gen to buy it, but was really surprised. The only knocks against it were length and linearity. Really loved the visuals, atmosphere, story, and characters. The gunplay was actually really well done with unique and fun weapons.

You mentioned the photo mode, and this was one of the best examples I have seen. They actually allow you to add filters and modify the visuals in the photo mode, and then apply those to the game. I have never seen that before or since. I really wish more games would allow this. Give the users more control over how the game looks to cater it to their tastes.

uth11727d ago

This was a weird one in that the community hated the game but also demanded a sequel

SonyStyled727d ago

Because it’s literally a 5 hr game, yet had the same quality offering of the other AAA Sony games that are tens to hundreds of hours of gameplay.

I used a walkthrough trophy guide for the platinum to not miss any collectibles in one run, it took 8hrs. I thought it was actually a pretty great game, but always wonder why that level of game development didn’t continue for a 15hr single player campaign.

robtion727d ago

I'm part of the community and I loved it.

I think a lot of the hate was from people who didn't even play it jumping on the bandwagon. Clearly there was the usual hate from xbox fans but also from insecure PC players as the graphics were (still are) phenomenal.
The game is a flawed gem. A new entry on PS5 would have great potential (doubt it will happen though, Sony isn't into risk taking these days).

Eidolon727d ago

All the early hate was a people who haven't played it and were quick to call it a QTE game.

AuraAbjure727d ago

I'm an Xbox fan and I'm planning on getting a PS4 pro one day to play this game along with gravity Rush 2 and others.

coolbeans726d ago

-"I think a lot of the hate was from people who didn't even play it jumping on the bandwagon."

Can we please stop retreating back such tired defenses? It's had a heavily mixed reception ever since critics PLAYED the game back then, and justifiably so. Even trying to rope in "insecure PC players" just shows how shallow this view actually is.

727d ago
Shiore2u727d ago (Edited 727d ago )

Can't ever forget those terribly designed lycan fights.

ClayRules2012726d ago

Ugh, I love this game! But yes, those lycan fights were terribly designed, for real.

Overall though, solid gameplay.

Show all comments (37)
540°

Sony Files A New Trademark For The Order: 1886

The Order: 1886 has received a new trademark filed by Sony. The trademark application is for a video game, implying that they want to extend it.

Read Full Story >>
novicegamerguides.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Other
The website did not provide photo or direct link to prove of trademark change.
MaximusPrime_862d ago WhoDisagree(1)Agree(2)
+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community862d ago
zsquaresoff862d ago

I hope they give this game another chance, it had an incredible story and gameplay, It was just unfortunate that the game length was extremely short.

Magog862d ago

The team that made it was bought by Facebook. I don't see why they would continue the series with a new team rather than just make a new IP.

Neonridr862d ago

I guess it's still possible that another studio could take another swing at it. But yeah, Ready at Dawn was bought by Facebook.

darthv72862d ago

would be cool to see an oculus version.

CrimsonWing69862d ago

It wouldn't be the first time this has happened. Bungie and 343 come to mind with Halo.

Magog862d ago

@CrimsonWing69 the difference is Halo was still successful. In my mind they should have put the series to rest when the original creators got tired of it but Microsoft love to flog the series so there you go.

ALMGNOON862d ago

am pretty sure Sony owns the IP so that doesn't matter at all.

GamingSinceForever862d ago

So what other great games has that studio produced since being bought by Facebook?

Magog862d ago

@GamingSinceForever they made Lone Echo a well received VR game.

Lord_Sloth861d ago

The team was, but that doesn't mean all of them left Sony. It's entirely possible that several of the employees still work for Sony.

Rhythmattic861d ago (Edited 861d ago )

"The team that made it was bought by Facebook."
Yes.. Not the IP...
Personally, The IP has soooo much potential for exploration.......If done right.....
Which brings me to your post... Unlike FB... Sorry, Meta.... A team is not IP, and with an even better team working on such said IP, It could be a winner...

Def wont be 1886 infinite,

deleted861d ago

Exactly @Rhythmattic Could you imagine if The Order was handed over to a studio like Santa Monica?! The Order 1886 set up a really nice setting and lore... now the idea could be pushed to the next level by one of Sony's high tier studios. It may be too much to ask to get one of the big dogs on it, but one can dream.

It could even work out that someone like Santa Monica create a smaller team just for creative vision, then hand over the busy work of building that world to one of their subsidiaries like the newly acquired Valkyrie Entertainment, which specializes in high tier support work.

Magog861d ago (Edited 861d ago )

@Lord_Sloth Readyatdawn were never owned by Sony so no, none of their employees stayed with Sony. Order 1886 was a second party game funded by Sony but developed by an outside company.

Neonridr861d ago

@GamingSinceForever - Lone Echo and its sequel are some of the better VR games out there with a great story and some awesome VR integration. The second game only came out in October of this year, so it will be some time before we see their next project.

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 861d ago
_SilverHawk_862d ago

Hopefully playstation-5 will have a sequel to the order 1886.

FlavorLav01862d ago

Please let one of the big boys take a swing at it and slay us with an awesome game. Naughty Dog, Sucker Punch, Sony Santa Monica, and Sony Bend could all do this IP justice.

Magog862d ago

Why would any of Sony's teams want to take their time and resources to work on another studios unsuccessful IP instead of their own unique ideas? Generally speaking Sony doesn't assign their top teams games to make they let them make what they want and are passionate about.

senorfartcushion861d ago

It’ll be just to hold on to the rights. They’re not making a new one. A remaster in 5 years is most likely, but until then, no.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 861d ago
FlavorLav01862d ago

If it had been marketed correctly as a strong narrative experience and sold for $30-40 instead of full price, the game would’ve big a huge success and we’d have guaranteed sequels. Loved the game, hope more from this IP is on the way.

Rhythmattic861d ago

It def cut corners though.. The Wolf fights where copy and pasted, the gun mechanics, decent... But the World was what made it... Maybe your standard gun mechanics, but never the guns....

The round table needs to be fleshed out....

ChasterMies862d ago (Edited 862d ago )

Short games are ok with me. Everyone loves the Titanfall 2 campaign and it was only about 5 hours. The issue is gameplay, and frustrating controls that did not need to be frustrating. Other than that, the look and feel was fantastic.

porkChop862d ago

Titanfall 2 also had an excellent multiplayer mode though. As excellent as the campaign was, no one would have paid full price for just that.

Ramboforlife862d ago

Totally agree. If it was a 20-30 hour campaign, it would have sold very well. It deserves another chance.

Livingthedream862d ago

Nah it had mediocre to terrible reviews. Don’t really know anyone who actually loved the game, but there was potential. They should give it another go same studio. Lol

Rude-ro862d ago

This is not that type of game.
I can not think of a single story driven game that does not have endless fetch quests in a forced open world type game that comes close to 20 hours.

Let’s be realistic…
Either way, the game had issues that can easily be remedied and make for an amazing sequel and I hope it happens.

senorfartcushion861d ago

It was good but had a terrible
Cliffhanger. An actual second half would have skyrocketed the game’s status. TLOU 2 was over 30 hours long for some people.

porkChop862d ago

It really just needed to be twice as long. I can put up with super linear, tightly scripted gameplay as long as I feel like I'm getting my money's worth. But the game was so short with little replay value. And the length prevented the lore from being properly realized.

I'm interested as long as they can flesh out the length. Possibly open up the gameplay slightly without detracting from the movie-like scripting.

-Foxtrot862d ago

Yeah I really liked the overall world and Sir Galahad

(SPOILERS)

Having Werewolves and then vampires opened it up to so many possibilities, who's to say other mythical beasts couldn't be introduced.

EmperorDalek862d ago

The story was good until it ended on a cliff hanger, I wouldn't call it incredible. The gameplay was dreadful. I would like to see an improved sequel however.

itsmebryan861d ago

@zsquare

Maybe I'm missing something but, wasn't that game panned after much hype as not very good and poor gameplay? Metacritic is 63% and user rating of 6.7 and by no means consider a hit.
Actually a new developer could be good for the game.

Flewid638861d ago

Limited gameplay mechanics too but I REALLY enjoyed what was there.

alb1899861d ago

Yep, I always liked the atmosphere and characters of this game. I think it can be a really good game if they put emphasis on the gameplay.

DarXyde861d ago (Edited 861d ago )

I don't know if I would say the gameplay was "incredible." The lore was fine and the weapons were awesome (and truly a standout visually, no questions asked). I'm impressed they got a game looking this good to run in such a stable condition when you consider the tech last gen. I only played it on base PS4, and that was really a marvel.

But that all said, the gameplay didn't stand out for me at all. Felt like a pretty standard affair and, as you said, the length was pretty short. Granted, I got it on sale for $12, so I don't feel bad about that purchase. It didn't really linger so the point was really to tell the story they wanted to tell, which I can respect.

I also hope they give it another chance, but I would prefer if they really made it stand out. There's a ton of creative talent over at PlayStation, so if Ready at Dawn had learned from the shortcomings of the first game and they're willing to solicit feedback from PlayStation studios, it has great potential.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 861d ago
NovusTerminus862d ago (Edited 862d ago )

I really want another one, I bought it day one zero regrets. I enjoyed it a lot and has lots of room for a sequel.

HOWEVER

USPTO policy is that a trademark only be updates with visual proof once every ten years after initial filing, and since the game is still for sale on the PlayStation Network it is likely just a paper work error that will be corrected so that they can continue selling the game digitally.

RaidenBlack862d ago

Yea ... I initially though this might be for a near-future res+fps boost and/or a PC port, paving way for 1887.

GhostofHorizon862d ago

It was a really good game but there was a ton of room for improvement all around. If they had another crack at it, it could be something special.

Eidolon861d ago

A lot of games before and since have made absolutely shameless attempts at making a great experience that ended up falling short. This game gets the worst of it because of hype. And it's actually has really good narrative and gameplay. Tell me one thing NOW that it did wrong that other games aren't doing. Tell me.

BenRC01861d ago

I really like it, bought the special edition years after release, expecting an average game but was very pleasantly surprised

Relientk77862d ago

I really liked the concept, but the game wasn't perfect. It definitely had some flaws. The graphics not being one, they were insane. The coolest guns in the game were only usable for a short period of time. I believe there were like 2 werewolf fights that were basically identical which people pointed out. I'd love for the series to get another shot.

masterfox862d ago

hope there is a sequel, first one was and still is stunning from every aspect, from gameplay, visuals , music, etc, you name it, it literally the whole game is realtime cgi!, imagine what a PS5 can do to it!

Show all comments (88)