850°

Microsoft's Earnings Release FY14 Q4

Computing and Gaming Hardware revenue increased $3.2 billion or 49%, primarily due to higher revenue from the Xbox Platform and Surface. Xbox Platform revenue increased $1.7 billion or 34%, due mainly to sales of Xbox One, which was released in November 2013, offset in part by a decrease in sales of Xbox 360. We sold 11.7 million Xbox consoles during fiscal year 2014 compared with 9.8 million Xbox consoles during fiscal year 2013. Surface revenue increased $1.3 billion or 157%, due mainly to a higher number of devices and accessories sold.

Read Full Story >>
microsoft.com
MightyNoX3560d ago

It's almost like I, and so many others, have been saying this for ages.

Hopefully it'll be a wake up call to some deluded people around here.

iamnsuperman3560d ago (Edited 3560d ago )

Launching a console does come with a lot of baggage (in particular cost) so the difference isn't unusal (expect maybe the size). What this does unofficially confirm is Microsoft really won't go with a price cut this early.

BiggerBoss3560d ago (Edited 3560d ago )

Yeah I agree that it's expected to lose money during the launch of new hardware, but dang. That much money could last me over 100 lifetimes.-.

Didn't Sony make profit off Playstation last fiscal year? Correct me if I'm wrong

@devwan. Ahhh that's right. Thanks+

Wizard_King3560d ago Show
devwan3560d ago

@superman The majority of those costs is r&d. xbox one r&d costs are included in fy 13-14 results? Are you sure?

@BiggerBoss Last quarter, not last year.

amiga-man3560d ago (Edited 3560d ago )

Hardly the sort of news investors will want to hear, there has been plenty of talk of people wanting MS to sell their xbox division, although I don't think that will happen it only adds more pressure on the xbox.

Why o why3560d ago (Edited 3560d ago )

. . .but Sony . . . . .

Ok . . . Nobody has said it yet but I'm well surprised Sony haven't come up yet.

I like the point iamnsuperman made below about ms not acquiring deep pockets by making huge losses. It's true. .

Personally I hope they stay in the game and believe they will. Not all competition is good but anyone who thinks ms didn't wake Sony up is a little naive. Sometimes bad competition can be good too.

pinkcrocodile753560d ago

I'm not in the least bit surprised by the loss at this point in the Xbox One cycles, I'd expect a similar story from both Sony and Ninitendo too

Can we have a copy of the financial reports from both Sony AND Nintendo for a little comparrison.

I'd like to see how the same period on the Wii U and PS4 cycle affected finances, NOT SALES mind, just the company yearly finance report.

kneon3560d ago

@Why o why

It wouldn't change things much if they sold off xbox, it would just change hands, it wouldn't go away. Companies like Google, apple and amazon are looking to get into this market.

ZodTheRipper3560d ago

Microsoft simply sucks at making hardware, no wonder they are focusing on the cloud so much. I completely agree with Wizard_King, I'd rather see another company take Microsoft's spot in the console sector.

UltraNova3560d ago

@ Above

Who Activision? EA? Amazon wont bite, Apple is out of the question...who could buy the Xbox division and be less 'evil' than MS? Tough question I know...

OT: 400 million is a drop in the ocean for MS, literally. Yes the shareholders don't like this but selling their gaming division is admitting defeat to Sony and we all know how much winning means to our American friends...

This loss is probably attributed to the R&D for Kinect 2 as the actual console is selling ok (when compared to the 360 in a similar time frame).

Xbox is going nowhere and we should all be grateful for this. Imagine letting Sony and Nintendo run wild! No thanks!

Double Toasted3560d ago (Edited 3560d ago )

Lol I believe MS will be fine. I can't say the same for their competition though.

sonarus3560d ago (Edited 3560d ago )

This news is almost irrelevant to gamers however, it his HIGHLY relevant to microsoft investors. The fact that the Xbox division has only accounted for about 1.5 % of Microsofts gross profit 2014 fiscal yr just shows how irrelevant xbox division is to Microsoft's bottom line. This is why investors want the xbox division sold, spinoff or shut down. Xbox division simply isn't part of Microsofts core competencies and knowing this off course investors will be pissed if its accounting for such substantial losses.

However, new ceo has said microsoft will keep xbox because of its potential as a home entertainment device.

GTgamer3560d ago

To all people saying ohhhh this nothing to MS they can brush it off while being true No company likes losing Money it doesn't matter how much they have so stop being naive, you think MS wouldn't drop the xboxOne like a five Dollar hoe if it keeps losing money in the next few years ಠ_ಠ.

mixolydian_id3560d ago

It's still a small drop in the ocean for a multibillion dollar corporate business.

That cost was probably incurred by the considerable amount of changes that had to be introduced following E3 (2013).

They had already planned to blow a load of money on Console development. If they had released a year later, that money would've still been invested into console development.

I imagine a lot of the team ran up some serious overtime payment this past year to boot.

Not a loss, it's nice to know my future console has been thoroughly invested in.

guitarded773560d ago

@UltraNova

Just for the sake of conversation, Google could, and would be less evil. I know they never would, but they could, and they're pretty open to devs and innovation.

Also, a private investment group could. It happens from time to time. Private investors buy a company and turn it around... but typically they run it into the ground. A positive example is Fender Guitars. They were run to crap in the 80's, but then a group of their workers bought the company and brought the standards up to the highest in the companies history (arguably) along with the greatest profits. They in turn bought many other guitar companies... some of which they shuttered, which was bad :/

Samsara823560d ago

In answer to BiggerBoss ...I might be wrong but the last numbers given by sony were not for the year but were trimestrial so their developments costs were not included...I think they were included in their previous trimestrial report...Will have to wait for a whole year report from them to really compare anything

xer03560d ago

@BiggerBoss

Yes - Sony in comparison made a profit.

UltraNova3560d ago (Edited 3560d ago )

@guitarded77

Although I get why you used the Fender Guitars example an interested investment group would take into account the negativity the xbox brand carries with it at the moment and should probably consider their own inevitable scrutiny that they will get subjected to from the media and gamers alike in search of similar 'evil' characteristics to Microsoft.

What I'm saying for the lack of better English is that who ever wants to buy the xbox brand must have a pretty clean floor under that carpet of theirs if they want to 'revive' the brand and profit from it.

We gamers are a stubborn bunch we don't forget and we hardly forgive!

darthv723560d ago

@ultra... "We gamers are a stubborn bunch we don't forget and we hardly forgive!"

That seems to be more of a newer generational sentiment. At least from an older perspective, those of us who have been around much longer when gaming was first starting to develop, dont follow that sort of thinking.

The way you describe it is more along the lines of the entitled way of thinking. the "i'll be damned" crowd which has been getting worse and worse over the course of the last few generations.

gaffyh3560d ago

Wow, that's a lot, however I'm sure they expected some of this. I think it's worse because they haven't sold as much as they thought they would.

UnHoly_One3560d ago

@Wizard King

MS has been a cancer on gaming for 15 years?

Basically every feature you enjoy on your Playstation console is a direct response to MS doing it first.

Not saying that NONE of it would have happened without them, but some of it sure wouldn't have.

Do you think you'd have PS+ without MS? Would online gaming even be anything like what it is now without MS pushing it?

gaffyh3560d ago

@UnHoly_One - Not saying that MS is a cancer as I'm sure they sped up development particularly on the network side of things, but they weren't the first to do it at all. The Dreamcast already had an online infrastructure way before Xbox even existed, and even the PS2 had network support with games like SOCOM.

The only innovation that MS introduced to consoles was the ability to play games online with matchmaking, and HDDs on the box. And I am 100% certain that these features would eventually have been implemented on Playstation without MS being a competitor, but that the competition, sped up Sony's response.

I'd argue that MS actually copied Sony a lot more, almost their entire console strategy was copied off Sony's PS1 launch. And without Sony launching into the market, MS would never have even tried.

Magnes3560d ago

@wizard_king nice anti American sentiment and people call us bad I'm not a MS supporter but people like you make me reconsider. Man did I love my Dreamcast though.

Visiblemarc3559d ago

@UltraNova

400 million dollars is an enormous sum of money for *any* company.

There is a persistant myth in forums that large companies with deep pockets scoff at gigantic losses.

Not remotely true.

Companies get big by being good with money (and most being publicly traded have shareholders to answer to). Losing massive sums of it, is the road to failure and it almost always leads to huge policy shifts, staff changes and re-evaluations of strategies.

I recall a few years back people were talking about RIM's (Blackberry) warchest. Many thought those massive stores of cash made them invulnerable. In fact, it was no defense at all to an incredibly poor strategy.

I'm not directly comparing MS to RIM though (for countless reasons), in fact the massive Surface losses of recent times have probably made them even more sensitive. I expect increased caution.

thehitman3559d ago

Kinect was a 400 million dollar disaster is whats that saying.

rainslacker3559d ago

@darth

I have to disagree. At least partially. I do feel that the "Never forgive, never forget" mentality is a bit much, but gamers of all generations seem to be able to apply what happened with what could possibly happen and how it will affect them over the long term. I believe MS initial policies showed this to a great degree, as people not only were upset about the immediate result, but what it could mean if it were successful.

For my part, I have no reason to have to forgive MS. They were honest about it at least, and I never actually purchased anything to be upset about. I didn't approve, and I voiced my opinion, and didn't bother to pre-order the system. But from all this, I didn't forget either. What they did put a bad taste in my mouth for the future of gaming, and how I consume my gaming content. Having watched MS for well over 30 years, even before I really understood how seedy they are, none of it really surprises me in retrospect. It also means I have less faith in them to do the right thing in the future, because again, I don't forget.

They can certainly turn things around. But taking Sony's missteps last gen, which were nowhere near as bad, it took them several years before they started to be back in gamers good graces. I expect MS will be in a similar situation. If they do everything right this gen, they may not win this gen, but they may have a better chance of becoming "The winner" next gen.

Bigpappy3559d ago Show
Death3559d ago (Edited 3559d ago )

According to the Earnings Release, Microsoft made 893 million in gross margin on sales of 9.6 billion in 2014. This in contrast to 956 million gross margin on sales of 6.4 billion the year before. The Xbox didn't lose money, the division which includes Surface made 63 million less than the year before.

HanzoHattori3559d ago

Playstation didn't make money last year because of the purchase of the Gaikai streaming service, which is now called Playstation Now.

+ Show (25) more repliesLast reply 3559d ago
lelo3560d ago ShowReplies(12)
TheWackyMan3560d ago

What do you mean exactly? While 400 million dollars is a lot, it's Microsoft. I'm pretty sure they can handle a few losses. If it keeps happening, you should be a bit worried of course, but they are MUCH MUCH better off financially than Sony by a long shot.

Wizard_King3560d ago

MS has been bleeding large amounts of money for over a decade now, nothing and I mean NOTHING has been going right for them in the business world. Windows 8 is a flop, the surface tablets and Windows phones are loosing money in every market and the console division hasn't been in the black now for about 3 years. Not to mention that the games that MS had pinned on selling large amounts of consoles never eventuated to anything real.

Things are not looking good for MS and I see them doing a large amount of trimming the fat in the near future. Even Amazon confirmed a while back that they where not interested in buying MS's console division. I mean who buys something that lost the owner 400 million bucks last fiscal year, oh right NO ONE.

Dreamcast 2.0 before 2015 mark the page.

devwan3560d ago (Edited 3560d ago )

Xbox 360 hardware is profitable. Xbox Live Gold earns lots of money. Royalties on software sales generates plenty of income.

Now offset all those and end up in the red by $400m.

That's one hell of a large hole brought about by xbox one.

"They can handle a few losses" is such an ignorant cop-out.

marlinfan103560d ago (Edited 3560d ago )

@wizard

its obviously not good seeing a loss like this but where have you seen MS bleeding over the last decade? they continue to post profits year after year

marlinfan103560d ago

for the people disagreeing with my other comment

http://money.cnn.com/2013/1...

SniperControl3560d ago

@marlinfan10

Wizard is right.

They wrote off $900 mill a year ago because surface bombed bigtime, in fact it still is, current figure is around $1.2 bill.
Zune lost them half a billion a few years ago, Windows 8 has flopped big style, there Win phone division is struggling against giants Google and Apple.
The only division making true profit is there Office products.

FITgamer3560d ago

I love these types of comments. It's like people think Microsoft doesn't mind losing money.

SonyMontana3560d ago

MS is surviving on money from their glory days. Virtually every product they have on the market is a failure (Bing, Smartphones, tablets, the now dead Zune, Windows 8). They need a big hit in order to make a come back but the problem is they are out of touch with what people want these days. The launch of the Xbone serves as a shining example of just how out of touch MS is these days.

Kribwalker3560d ago Show
TheWackyMan3560d ago

@Kribwalker You're a god among men. Thank you.

n4rc3560d ago Show
Dehnus3560d ago

@Wizard_King
And there you go again with deciding what I should like. You probably never worked with a surface or a WIndows phone and can already decide for me. Than this Dreamcast 2 crap like it is a bad thing!

NEWSFLASH SONY FAN! It is one of the best liked consoles of all time with some of the most original games ever produced! Yes the Dreamcast is still loved by many, including having one of the most active homebrew scenes available.

What you call Evil I can also say for Sony. That said I do not want an Xbox one either, but stop dragging everything non Sony through the mudd just because it isn't your favourite choice.

marlinfan103560d ago (Edited 3560d ago )

yeah they've had a few failed products but that doesn't change the fact that they post profits quarter after quarter. every company has had bad products that end up costing money, thats why they don't put all their eggs in one basket. name any big company like MS that hasnt had products that cost them huge amounts of money. id bet you'd be hard to find one. saying they're a bleeding company with nothing going right is just silly when you look at their yearly profits. obviously somethings working.

Evilsnuggle3560d ago (Edited 3560d ago )

dev..wan@

360 didn 't make any money in fact 360 lost money . That is why the ex-CEO Nokia wanted to sale the X box brand. In fact X box has lost billions Microsoft would sell the X box brand if they could. Don't be surprised if Microsoft spins off the X box brand. If Microsoft spins of the X box brand then X box brand wouldn't have deep pockets like X box brand has now with huge advertisement and money hating games. I think it would do more harm than good . But it's the best way for Microsoft to make the best decision regarding X1.

Any way you cut it doesn't look good for X box brand. I don't think Microsoft will make another console. I really think Microsoft will make a set top that is a cloud services.

http://www.neowin.net/news/...

user3672723559d ago (Edited 3559d ago )

Bottom line is MS continue to make money even with a predicted loss on the console side as expected during the launch year. Can't say that about the competitors though. Imagine the tone in this thread if another company that is beloved here all of a sudden have a record quarter even with losses in launching a new hardware. MS will be fine and Halo 5 will still be released next year. That id what matters to us gamers.

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 3559d ago
Gazondaily3560d ago (Edited 3560d ago )

Doesn't launching a console always have high costs associated anyway? Whether or not this loss is 'reasonable' is another question entirely, but some of the other 'deluded' lot may jump to conclusions as they get over-excited and giddy over the news.

Anyway, as the chap above me has quite rightly said, MS can take this hit (natural or not). Others in the game may not be in a position to swallow these kind of losses (if they do suffer from them at all).

iamnsuperman3560d ago (Edited 3560d ago )

It depends how many losses they are willing to take. Microsoft has deep pockets but those deep pockets didn't materalise from huge losses. The problem for Microsoft isn't the Xbox brand. It's the electronically products as a whole. It has been estimated that Microsoft has lost a combined loss of 1.7 billion on the surface endeavour. That is a big loss. If Microsoft don't pull this around next year's those little discussions about how Microsoft should not be a manufacter might get louder.

That is the biggest threat to the Xbox. They may end up being lumped into a problem the Xbox could easily get out of.

@below If the Xbox brand doesn't bring return or small, insignificant, gains, it definitely will. The problem for the Xbox is Microsoft's other electronic endeavours are doing so poorly they may just scrap the whole thing entirely. The Xbox is a surprisingly small part of Microsoft of which sits low on the priority list

Gazondaily3560d ago

Yeah that's a good point. I don't see the Xbox getting lumped into the whole electronics product anyway because the attachment and goodwill associated with the Xbox brand is tremendous (especially compared to failures such as Surface etc).

If however, the Xbox division continues to see losses over the course of this year and next year, then yeah, that's when alarm bells should be ringing at MS HQ.

Menkyo3560d ago

@septic "good will" are you kidding ? What good will right now their the step child of gaming.

Gazondaily3560d ago

"@septic "good will" are you kidding ? What good will right now their the step child of gaming."

Are you seriously telling me that the Xbox brand has no appreciable goodwill vested in it??

Spotie3560d ago

@Septic: Within the gaming industry? Not really. A couple of fans, like yourself, have forgiven them. But most gamers have not, I think.

Seriously, look at how they manage to piss off everybody but the most devout fanboys. Sure, they may have changed things now, but people's memories don't just vanish.

Gazondaily3560d ago

@Spotie

I'm talking about Goodwill in terms of the Xbox brand as an asset. Not just about consumer perception (of which admittedly it forms one part of it).

"Within the gaming industry? Not really."

Obviously its within the gaming industry.

brew3560d ago

Yes , and they have more launches yet to come !

mixolydian_id3560d ago

It's an expensive business. At least they haven't been sued yet!

To be fair, they would've blown a lot of that anyway... even if the console was released a year later.

There would've been some costs incurred from introducing the 180's so eagerly voiced by the brats.

I still would've preferred the old vision for the Xbox.

If thats just the annual spenditure number, I'm glad to see they've put so much money into the device. Actually makes it a more valuable commodity. Probably explains they're thirst for updates and new feature sets.

the 3 x operating system must've been a entirely new build. The first of it's kind ever. They pretty much wrote the book on it... I wonder how long it'll be until we start seeing multiple operating system devices pop up all over the place?

BABY-JEDI3560d ago

MS have good will as they are now listening to the gaming community & they are now acting upon them.
I would say this is good will (regardless of all the mistakes)

Revolver_X_3560d ago

"at least they haven't been sued yet!"

Google is your friend kid.

http://www.escapistmagazine...

Theres always some knitwit tryna make a buck off of strawman claims.

MysticStrummer3560d ago

"At least they haven't been sued yet!"

Wow. Such delusion.

rainslacker3559d ago

400 million isn't a whole lot when you take into account R&D, but I don't know if this figure includes that cost, as it was likely written off the year prior.

This particular figure is also from all their devices division, but I wouldn't doubt a lot of it is for marketing and R&D and distribution of the X1.

It's not the end of the world for the X1 by a long shot though. We're talking about a product that has a 5-7 year shelf life, and if they can make that money back in that time, or better yet profit, then investors will be happy-ish. If this is mostly X1 R&D, then going forward, it means they wouldn't post losses like that, as the costs have already been written off.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 3559d ago
die_fiend3560d ago

That's a lot of money to be losing on a console that is a categorical failure in every regard.

Maybe they should sell off this division after all

Gazondaily3559d ago

Oh how you and your fellow 'gamers' would love to that.

Letthewookiewin3560d ago

This in contrast to the PS4 already being profitable for Sony and selling almost double. This isnt good for Msoft and the X1.

Fanci3559d ago

Xbox One is selling better than the 360. Microsoft did well with the 360. So things are most certainly looking good for both companies, and not bad for Microsoft.

Magicite3560d ago Show
MultiConsoleGamer3560d ago (Edited 3560d ago )

EDIT: Sorry not taking the bait.

Author better check your math. It would really hurt your rep, possibly ruin it, when someone calls you out on your numbers. :)

Kidmyst3560d ago

If this is true, shareholders won't be happy and pressure might come to Xbox to make drastic changes or sell off the brand. This might explain all the leadership changes MSFT made earlier.

Anon19743559d ago (Edited 3559d ago )

You hit it right on the head here. Microsoft is a business and it's their job to run the company in a way that maximizes shareholder returns.

The Entertainment and Devices division, even when making money, pales in comparison to MS's other division when it comes to return on the money invested. To break it down simply (and this is just illustrative), if you invest ten million dollars each year into six different divisions, and five of those divisions return you 20% on the money invested, and one division continually brings in only 5% for a decade, at some point investors are going to revolt and demand to know why those investments aren't being put into more lucrative areas of the company. That's what we've been seeing from some of Microsoft's biggest investors and board members alike.

Launches are supposed to be expensive, but most of the expense is taken up with initial R&D and launch marketing. Those expenses were accounted for two quarters ago. These loses should be concerning to gamers as Microsoft is clearly in a period of transition, despite the lip service being paid to the Xbox brand. Microsoft PR seemed just as committed to the Zune back in the day as well. And we really don't even know how bad it's been historically as Xbox losses have always been masked by patent royalties in the past. To anyone paying attention, the XBox has never been more vulnerable.

system223560d ago (Edited 3560d ago )

ummm...

i agree that the xbox could be doing better in terms of sales but.... your comment is kind of naive. consoles are expensive not only to launch, but also to develop. look how much money it cost to develop the controller alone. also - margins on console margins are razor thin, if not losing money. it is expected that consoles make a lions share of the money through software and well... there just isn't a lot of great software right now.

granted this number is pretty crazy but i'm pretty confident a lot of it is not the result of poor sales, though more sales certainly wouldn't hurt.

the ps4's success is partially because of timing, partially because its a kick ass system but also partially because of luck. it had the perfect storm brewing for launch success.. people pissed at MS, pissed at xb1 policies and even more, some flubbed multiplat launch titles on xb1, people pissed about price with mandatory bundled kinect etc... had ms actually not made a slew of mistakes on their handling of the xb1 launch and promotion things would be tighter. at the end of the day the systems really are pretty close. xb1 just has a bad rep now.

iceman063559d ago

I'm sorry, but it is not luck when your competitor screws the pooch. Sony was just much wiser and less arrogant this time around. They didn't rest on their name and came out first. They created a machine with input from developers in the industry (listened BEFORE the launch). They even got in front on the reveal. None of this was luck. It was calculated and it seems to be working. On the other hand, MS was arrogant in its approach. It created a system that was hard to create a value proposition for in comparison to the competition. Even MS couldn't decide how to market their "All-in-one", "Always connected", "Only with Kinect" future. To compound that, they added in a dose of horrible PR blunders. Once again, this isn't tied to luck. It's directly tied to preparation and calculation.
That being said, these losses ARE probably tied to R&D, marketing, and licensing more than they are actual sales (unless MS severely over projected their sales). This is by NO MEANS the death knell that people imagine for MS. But, it can't make shareholders very happy because they want to squeeze every dollar they can out of the business. That's THEIR bottom line that MS is messing with.

chrismichaels043560d ago

I agree MightyNoX. A certain part of the gaming community loves to brag about Microsofts profits charts...but they ignore the fact that the majority of those profits come from Microsofts other non-gaming divisions.

gangsta_red3560d ago ShowReplies(1)
lawgone3560d ago Show
GiantEnemyCrab3560d ago

It's a console launch. You expend a huge amount of money. Gotta spend money to make money.

Orbertron3560d ago (Edited 3560d ago )

Money makes the world go round

3560d ago
Stoppokingme3560d ago ShowReplies(2)
RIP_Cell3560d ago

they didn't lose 400 million, they make 400 million less profit than last year, big difference

kenshiro1003559d ago

Did I read that right? 400 million?! Wow...

RIP_Cell3559d ago

wow? do you know how much Sony is on track to lose this fiscal year? 1 billion

kenshiro1003559d ago (Edited 3559d ago )

Is that for the gaming division? Because the last time I heard about it, they were profitable. In fact, Sony is recovering from their losses.

By the way, stop dragging Sony into this. This is about Microsoft.

otherZinc3559d ago (Edited 3559d ago )

It's amazing how many of you don't know a thing about business or how to read a financial report.

The XBOX ONE "is" profitable. It's been profitable from day 1.

The PS4 wasn't, maybe they should sell its games division. PS4 only became profitable "after" it laid off 100 ' of workers in each & every development house they own: Including, Guerilla Games, Naughty Dog, & Sony Santa Monica. Then they only made $12 per PS4 Sold, and that wasn't enough to remove Sony Stock from "Junk Status" by Moodys and Standard & Poors.

Some of you on this site are just silly.

Death3559d ago

It's incredible how no one is checking the link. The division made almost 1 billion in gross margin yet everyone here is saying they lost money. The cost of revenue increased which is why gross margin this year based on 3.2 billion more in revenue decreased by 63 million.

Revenue was up 49%, but the margin decreased 7%.

chaosx3559d ago (Edited 3559d ago )

https://www.worldpayzinc.co...

check this out , Doesn't look as if they should be too worried.

+ Show (20) more repliesLast reply 3559d ago
iamnsuperman3560d ago

That is an insane loss to be solely attributed to the Xbox platform. I doubt we are going to see a price cut anytime soon.

Tony-A3560d ago (Edited 3560d ago )

Agreed. It sounds counter-intuitive but keeping the price to at least $400 is really the only option they have right now and cutting price might only cause more damage.

I chalk it up to The Curse of the Third Console. Good or great debut, much more successful second coming and arrogance/pride destroys the third.

On one note, I would advise Microsoft to re-evaluate their goals and long term endeavors. They tend to always be that 12 year old kid that wants what the other kid worked hard for. Their software is a success because it was a user-friendly way of doing something that was already possible. But in today's generation, every market they've squeezed themselves into has come off as a "me too" approach. Phones, search engines, consoles, video game publishing, they all feel like a result of them seeing others making good money from it. Only difference is they don't really care if they do it better than others as long as they get a piece.

mmmmmmmmmbut I'm not a financial advisor...

Insomnia_843560d ago ShowReplies(3)
imt5583560d ago (Edited 3560d ago )

Around 100$ loss on each Xbone sold.

Well, don't expect pricecut anytime soon.

@Fishy

Quote :

"...Probably the same scenario with the 360 or any other company's launch of a major new product..."

Well, this gen Sony doing quite opposite.

@InTheLab

Quote :

"...Maybe I missed it but where does it say they lose $100 on each sold?..."

It is just pure calculation. 400 mil. loss and around 4.9 mil. Xbone sold ( i presume ). Well, maybe my calculation is wrong.

@Fishy :

Quote :

"...If they make a profit on the PS4 alone in its first fiscal year that's one for the books and they must of had a minuscule R&D overhead. Which seems unlikely..."

http://www.dualshockers.com...

http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...

InTheLab3560d ago

Maybe I missed it but where does it say they lose $100 on each sold?

Fishy Fingers3560d ago (Edited 3560d ago )

Well that good news for Sony then.

While I don't follow this as accurately as some I don't believe Sony posted outgoing revenue associated with individual products like is being done here.

If they make a profit on the PS4 alone in its first fiscal year that's one for the books and they must of had a minuscule R&D overhead. Which seems unlikely.

Fishy Fingers3560d ago (Edited 3560d ago )

Obviously a headline to grab attention. While revenue from the Xbox brand actually increased the outgoings did too. Like the article points out, your first fiscal year encompasses the additional R&D costs and marketing associated with launching a new product. Probably the same scenario with the 360 or any other company's launch of a major new product.

Show all comments (243)
490°

Microsoft Closes Redfall Developer Arkane Austin, Hi-Fi Rush Developer Tango Gameworks, and More

Microsoft has closed a number of Bethesda studios, including Redfall maker Arkane Austin, Hi-Fi Rush developer Tango Gameworks, and more in devastating cuts at Bethesda, IGN can confirm.

Moegooner1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

Hi-Fi Rush studio??? Seriously?? Goes to show quality matters lil to MS.

Worst gen ever. All big 3 battling are for who sucks the most. They just keep one upping one another.

-Foxtrot1h ago

This does feel like a “quick Sony is getting shit on for Helldivers, let’s announce it now to minimise impact”

thesoftware7301h ago

That is silly. Let's say there is some weird conspiracy. This announcement would effectively take ALL the attention away from the HD2 situation, especially since there is no longer an HD2 situation. I don't think anything will minimize this impact.

Tacoboto1h ago

... so they announce it on a Tuesday? 36 hours after Sony cleared up everything?

You people care more about the next conspiracy than anything else.

Nevermind that Sony followed the golden rule of minimizing impact by announcing horrible news on a Friday.

Eonjay1h ago

The constant weekly weird Sony drama is part of the industry's problem. Everyone else feels they can get away with murder. Also, what is the point of spending all that money if you just start shutting studios down. And... Redfall wasn't Arkane's fought. Microsoft new the shape the game was in but needed something for GamePass after a whole year of no releases into the service. Them taking it out on Arkane seems really disingenuous and distasteful. And WTF did Tango do? Didn't Todd just release a statement saying how he would never retire. Fire his ass.

romulus2358m ago

Well if that was the reason for the timing it didn't work.

darthv7222m ago

wow... i did not have them closing Tango and Arkane Austin on my bingo card.

Hofstaderman5m ago

Yes it does. Arkane Austin I can understand but Tango Gameworks made an excellent game in Hi Fi Rush.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5m ago
Einhander19721h ago(Edited 1h ago)

10/10 deflection, the ol' Sony too deflect...

Let's not discuss the fact that PlayStations struggles have largely been caused by the fact that game pass has reshaped how consumers spend causing them to spend less as they play what is on subscriptions and don't buy games as much because they either have become subscription gamers or they fear the game will come to a subscription so they don't buy things.

And it's not just PlayStation, the whole industry has been effected, many big studios are struggling across the board to match sales targets from pre-game pass releases which is especially apparent in things like sequels.

Heck the best example was Microsoft's own Starfield which should have easily blasted past 10m sales by the end of 2023 going by sales of similar Bethesda games yet was only able to achieve 3m which of course was almost entirely on Steam.

Moegooner1h ago

Or maybe it's because Sony hasn't released multiple worthwhile SP games like they normally do each gen and the ones they did released actually sold well.

Layoffs aren't because studios are struggling, but because major publishers want to maximise profit gains.

Profchaos1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

Absolutely it's a service that's changed the way we view and consume games overall for the worse games have little value when they are part of a sub and become disposable doubly so if they are a day 1 freebie often it's the kiss of death for a game to be day 1 on gamepass as PlayStation players look at it like why do I have to pay 60 dollars for back 4 blood, payday 3 or outriders it'll be on PS plus soon enough and funny enough those games always fail to meet expectations sales are poor and longevity is poor.

When I see a game get a day 1 tag outside of first party my first thought is always something is wrong with it and it can't stand on its own feet so the publisher has made a deal to recoup development cost.

Even first party games have dropped in quality noticeably so since gamepass with gears 5 being the only good release I can think of since gamepass started

Petebloodyonion9m ago

Wasn't aware that Gamepass is available on PlayStation.
Or are you telling us that a service from a console lacking in sales is so great that it affects the morale and buying habits of ppl lacking access to the service?

Also pretty sure that saying all of them competing for who sucks means the whole industry and not just Sony and MS.

HernerV0m ago

You were silent on Sony layoffs and studio closures.

So you don’t get to have an opinion on this one 🤡

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 0m ago
Nitrowolf254m ago(Edited 54m ago)

This is what people online want. They just don't know or understand it. So many have warned about consolidation, and exactly what they have fear has been happening

This isn't the end, expect more bought out studios to be closed in the next few years

Hofstaderman2m ago

Spot on. All in the name "growth" to appease investors and shareholders. Can't sustain the lie though...it will always implode as illustrated by these closures. Applies to MS and Embracer.

notachance14m ago

I just don’t know how the hell a company that can spend $67b to purchase a publisher decided that it’s okay to close the studio that produces their best game last year.

Whoever the higher up there that decides this is completely out of touch of how the game industry works, the damn xbox division as a whole would’ve been closed already if they weren’t sustained by other MS divisions.

shinoff218310m ago

I got in an argument with someone on reddit and they weren't haven't that Xbox isn't propped up by other divisions argument. They swore up and down that Xbox was pulling its own weight. I just stopped after a couple back and forths

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 0m ago
shadowT1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

Tango Gameworks and Arkane?

RaidenBlack1h ago

Arkane Austin (Prey developer)
Not Arkane Lyon ( Dishonored developer)

Crows9028m ago

Prey was fantastic. Red fall was shit because they were forced to do shit they didn't want to make.

Atkane Lyon did death loop I believe....I hated that one.

shinoff218310m ago

I personally liked prey more.

MrDead30m ago

Will be more soon, I've said it before I can't see MS keeping Bethesda. I think they'll strip it's IPs and slowly close everything, it's what they do.

Einhander19721h ago(Edited 1h ago)

Well xbox fans you got what you asked for... and honestly deserved...

It was so easily predictable that game pass was never going to be able to support all these studios.

If Microsoft can't win they are going to burn it all to the ground...

Countdown to Phil Spencer telling us "it's better for the gamers this way" yet again.

Barlos12m ago

Agree but gamers didn't ask for people to be out of work.

shinoff21839m ago

Xbox fans were to busy daydreaming of Ms curbstopping Sony they didn't look at the big picture.

Relientk771h ago

This is beyond wrong. Like wtf!? Especially Tango Gameworks with Hi-Fi Rush. I've heard nothing but good things about that game. Just because Arkane Austin screwed up one game release doesn't mean you need to close them. It sounds like they were forced to do a multiplayer game when they're a single player studio. They could have made a Prey 2 or some other game next.

Just wow awful news.

Einhander19721h ago

Apparently PlayStation owners didn't buy enough copies of Hi-Fi Rush...

romulus2353m ago

"Xbox says Hi-Fi Rush was a success "in all key measurements" amid rumors of poor sales. Following rumors that Tango Gameworks' Hi-Fish Rush didn't meet sales expectations, Xbox marketing VP Aaron Greenburg is defending the "break out hit" as a success by all metrics."

According to Aaron Greenburg it was a success so they shouldn't have even needed PlayStation owners to buy it. That being said, I bought it and really enjoyed it, it's a great game. Shame MS closed them down.

RpgSama41m ago

@Romulus23

All lies by the Green Bug, that just means that a lot of people fired bullets or whatever in the game, that's the key measurements they care to share.

Tango did NOT deserve to be closed down, they have not released a single bad game.

Crows9026m ago

That's usually what happens when you don't release it at the same time as other platforms....same thing happened with tomb raider reboot sequel. MS got exclusivity for a year and then when it came to PlayStation it barely sold. Nobody cared anymore.

shinoff21838m ago

Still waiting on the physical release pre order window

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 8m ago
CrashMania1h ago

I can only imagine the little amount of revenue both games generated, sent straight to gamepass and excluded from the largest current gen console userbase. Not to say both games would have done well if they were on PS5 too, but you heavily damage to a games revenue when you put it on a stagnating sub service for a poorly selling console, can't really see people going out in droves to sub to GP to play this.

shinoff21837m ago

Gamepass subs(most of Xbox players) don't buy games all like that so it's not sustainable. It's reality.

RaidenBlack1h ago

Yea Austin made one of the most creative game of last gen with Prey and were forced to take risk with Redfall and now the whole studio is being closed.

Aphrodia44m ago

Yes, that Tango gameworks/ Hi-Fi closure was an eye opener for me as well. Neither played it nor was interested in it myself but all I heard was everyone acting like it was the second coming of guitar hero or something.

I don't know what else to say other than modern gaming is an overwhelming sea of mediocrity and there's not enough voices of reason speaking up and saying that most games made these days are just not very good.

shinoff21834m ago

Your playing the wrong games then. There's always been shovelware type games. Going back to wii, snes, nes, ps1 Xbox og. That's a bs blanket statement. As an older gamer since atari days I'd personally say this is a great time. If you can't find anything to play. That's on you

With all that said in no way or form am I speaking of multi-player games, gacha, or whatever. I'm strictly speaking on single player games.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4m ago
CrashMania1h ago

Can't wait to see the usual try spin and play this down. So much for the heroic MS and Phil saving these studios eh.

Eonjay1h ago

By the end of the day IGN will be talking about how this is right for the industry. Don't worry, Microsoft's PR is making the call now.

RpgSama36m ago

Tango did NOT deserve to be closed down, they have not released a single bad game, and I'm sure Arkhane failed just because they were both rushed and pressured into making a GaaS game they had no experience in doing and no support to get it completed out of the gate.

PrinceOfAnger1h ago

Not a big deal only hi fi rush was good

Sony has closed
Manchester studio
Japan studio
Pixel opus
London studio
Ready At Dawn ...

RupeeHoarder1h ago

The difference being Sony has a large group of other studios that have done something positive. Microsoft just closed the studio to the only good game they released in the past year (Hi-Fi Rush).

CrashMania50m ago

They all suck as well of course. But MS spent 10s of billions on these publishers for mass consolidation, every made a song and dance about how MS would save them, using their endless Windows, 365 and Azure money to keep them open forever and how Phil was some hero.

Nothing is safe unless it makes money, even for MS.

romulus2346m ago

It is a big deal.

Microsoft has closed
Fasa Studios
Digital Anvil
Ensemble
Lionhead Studios
Press Play
Arkane Austin
Tango Gameworks

Einhander197239m ago(Edited 32m ago)

Wow how far back do you want to go back.

Lionhead Studios
Aces Game Studio
BigPark
Carbonated Game
Digital Anvil
Ensemble Studios
FASA Studio
Good Science Studio
Hired Gun
Microsoft Studios Japan
Microsoft Studios Victoria
Team Dakota
Xbox Entertainment Studios
Xbox Live Productions
Lift London
Access Software
Salt Lake Games Studio
Twisted Pixel Games
WingNut Interactive

And more before this, this was just their cuts during xbone era that Phil cut while he was at the head.

And some of those PlayStation studios were merged not closed, most of the UK studios were folded into each other.

Japan Studio was renamed to Asobi not closed, aAsobi was an internal team of Japan Studio the "closure" the press misinformed people about was more or less a name change, the studio is in the same building and when the change happened less than 5 people mostly leadership positions chose to leave the studio to form Bokeh Studio, which still works closely with Sony.

And even if your deflection stood on it's own, Microsoft spent 3 Billion 3 years ago almost to the date to buy Zenimax and has already closed 2 of it's biggest studios and decimated Zenimax's support studio structure.

It's no wonder Todd Howard was talking about "more frequent releases" and letting other studios make their IP's games. The days of big budget huge Bethesda games is over...

In fact sadly Microsoft has ushered in the end of big budget gaming as we know it with their obviously unsustainable subscription industry change.

And I feel fully confident that this isn't the end of studio closures from these recently purchased studios.

Abnor_Mal35m ago

Ready At Dawn was never a Sony owned studio, and only made a few smaller God of War games and a Jax and Daxter spin off, and of course The Order1866.

They are currently owned by OcUlus Studios.

MrDead34m ago

How many times has MS fired Bethesda staff since they purchased it? I think it's been three rounds so far

BehindTheRows20m ago

Deflection is the finest form of delusion.

shinoff21832m ago

London studio what have they made recently. Really the worst one was Japan studio. That sucked.

In reality though your deflecting. The fact of the matter is Ms just closed the studio that made their highest rated game in years. That's insane.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 2m ago
Tacoboto58m ago

Phil needs to step down. What kind of usual spin do you want?

More and more people lose jobs but the people at the top stay the same. Hardware sales tank despite billions and billions spent. The math is plain and simple.

Show all comments (74)
300°

Microsoft Survey Asks About Handheld

A new survey from Microsoft has further hinted at the possibility of an Xbox handheld being in development.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
EasilyTheBest7d ago

This is definitely happening, I just hope they have 2 versions one with a much bigger screen.

GamerRN6d ago

I'll be happy with this, and a PC console hybrid that rivals anything we have power wise

Number1TailzFan6d ago

The problem with bigger devices is playing them on your side in bed, Vita and before that was fine. Since the Switch you gotta have a gooseneck holder & controllers detached so you can lie down holding them, or your arm will quickly get tired.

1Victor5d ago

@thesofware: “A much bigger screen than what?”
A gaming laptop 🤷🏿🤣

Kosic5d ago

Than the screen originally planned...duh... :D

darthv725d ago

it kinda already did... https://www.xbox.com/en-US/...

They are just gauging interest in one of their own.

crazyCoconuts5d ago

A Xbox version of Logitech G-Cloud?
I mean, why bother? Not like the G cloud is flying off shelves and what would Xbox add to make it better?
They're surely not going to create bespoke architecture here and there are already a few Windows handhelds out there. I have little confidence in their ability to put together an attractive UI in the way Steam did. So I doubt anything will come from this.

KicksnSnares7d ago

Day One buy for me if they'll make a dedicated handheld device.

darthv726d ago

i have that logitech g-cloud. Its a sweet little piece of kit. I like that it can also install games from the play store unlike the other android based handheld.

mudakoshaka6d ago

It sure is! Don't understand why you get the down-votes. Whoever does not like the G Cloud must have been dropped down a well, head first, when they were of a younger age.

PassNextquestion6d ago

I wonder if Microsoft will perform better in Japan if they do actually make a handheld since everyone says handheld and mobile are king over there.

TiredGamer6d ago

This looks like the future of the game industry... all three platforms with a handheld option.

I wonder if the Playstation Portal is a technology test-bed/prototype for a future Playstation handheld?

rlow16d ago (Edited 6d ago )

It’s a possibility but I can’t help but think would that be the best way to go about it? Though it would give you data on how much it is used and game type. It’s still not a true portable device and so people approach it differently. I think that data on phones, tablets, and of course the competition would give a better indication.

But I really think if Sony is considering a new PSP that could play ps5 games, now would be the time to dive in. Honestly, if they do this, it would be huge.

Traecy6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

Doubt if Sony PS wants to support a new handheld with first party games. Something they lacked with the Vita. What they should do is have a handheld that is like the PS Portal which can play all games but play those games on the go as well as at home. Something like that is a better investment.

TiredGamer6d ago

Agreed that you will probably never see a separate line of games specifically for the handheld (a la PSP or PSVita). The modern economics and expectations of game development make that cost prohibitive. What makes more sense is if the full-fat game on PS5 or PS6 has a special "handheld" profile that is automatically optimized for the lower spec handheld. There would be some significant compromises compared to the bigger console variant, but it would be the same game overall and would only require a single purchase.... somewhat what the Switch does with a lower resolution when playing handheld versus docked.

Show all comments (51)
310°

Xbox Games Showcase Followed by [REDACTED] Direct Airs June 9

- Xbox Wire - Mark your calendars! The Xbox Games Showcase followed by [REDACTED] Direct airs June 9. More info inside.

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
bionicstar6d ago

Will they show Fable 4, Stalker 2, GoW 6 & Perfect Dark?

PhillyDonJawn6d ago

Crossing fingers for Fable and perfect dark. And State of Decay 3

RaidenBlack6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

And maybe Clockwork Revolution, South of Midnight, Contraband, Project 007 & OD? lol
and whatever happened to Everwild ?
+ that rumored Wu Tang RPG

Sonic18816d ago (Edited 6d ago )

Will they have official release dates and gameplay?

anast6d ago

Another game pass event with their plans to go all streaming.

6d ago
Lightning776d ago

It's an Xbox showcase that they have every year.

Make smarter comments for once.

anast6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

Tell me what a smarter comment is.

If they don't sell game pass the entire time, then I will be wrong. All of this can be proven once the show gets underway. Let's wait and see.

InUrFoxHole6d ago

@Anast
Anything you didn't type. Good day sir!

6d ago
6d ago
6d ago
6d ago Replies(1)
Lightning776d ago (Edited 6d ago )

Wow too easy.

You went from MS going all streaming to selling gamepass content in which we all know they are.

Which one is it?

Pretty clear you don't know what a smart comment is at least you admit you don't know.

6d ago
anast6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

"Another game pass event with their plans to go all streaming."

It's both. I would worry about your own intelligence at this point. It seems that there is not enough to go around for you to worry about how smart other people are.

Lightning776d ago

It's just a regular event announcing games. Nice one captain obvious they're gonna mention gp stuff like they do every year what else is new.

The all streaming part is just you, being you I guess. They have streaming options but going all streaming again is just you pulling stuff outta thin air.

anast6d ago

You don't know what a smart comment is or isn't. You're welcome for the help.

Lightning776d ago

No you said something dumb then you tried to back track and mention GP.

Again make smart comments for once.

anast6d ago

And we have broken record syndrome.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 6d ago
darthv726d ago

Wonder if they will address the handheld rumors....?

jimb0j0nes6d ago

For a brief moment I thought we might get a whole Direct for Gears 6 - seems like it's COD though!

Show all comments (44)