470°

3 Months On, Has Xbox One’s Backwards Compatibility Been A Hit Or Bust?

ThisGenGaming says "At E3 2015, Microsoft dropped the bomb of all bombs when they announced that your old Xbox 360 games are now going to be playable on Xbox One via backwards compatibility. Although backwards compatibility has been on Xbox One since last years E3, the official release for all Xbox One owners wasn’t until this past November. The service launched with 104 games to choose from. The launch and the games that came with it has been covered by ThisGenGaming enough over the past months. Now we’re going to “review” the first 3 months of the service since the launch."

Read Full Story >>
thisgengaming.com
crazychris41243000d ago

I'm enjoying it. Was playing Gears 3 and Halo Reach over the weekend.

3000d ago Replies(3)
FlipSwitch3000d ago ShowReplies(9)
green3000d ago

Same here. Started Witcher 2 over the weekend and i am really enjoying it so far. No way i would not buy Witcher 3 after this so i have BC and GWG to thank for introducing me to the Witcher franchise.

mark_parch3000d ago

it's been a huge hit for me. it would be amazing if they had a seperate marketplace with all the bc 360 games at low prices. imagine if they did it and made all the games £5 each, they would sell loads more that way. win win for everyone

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2999d ago
Neonridr3000d ago

How would you describe an added feature to a console a bust? It's always a welcome addition when your console can now do more than it could the day before.

Gazondaily3000d ago

Oh I've seen some people try and use one or two examples of BC titles that haven't worked well to snake their way into trying to make a bigger point about it being bust.

Silly but meh, what can you do.

MCTJim3000d ago

No complaints from my side.

DigitalRaptor3000d ago ShowReplies(1)
rmw2hot873000d ago (Edited 3000d ago )

Still be playing gears 3 multiplayer, will never get sick of that game it's a masterpiece.

bloop3000d ago

My favourite mp game of all time. Still play it regularly to this day.

3000d ago
2pacalypsenow3000d ago

In terms of gameplay wise it has been a hit since some people are enjoying 360 games on the xbox one, and bust commercial wise since it has not helped sales.

MCTJim3000d ago

The first part of your post I completely agree with, this is the part I dont agree: "and bust commercial wise since it has not helped sales."

you know this how?

2pacalypsenow3000d ago

Because if it did MS would of announced it by now, that's my opinion don't take it as a fact.

Mikefizzled3000d ago

http://www.icxm.net/x/red-d...
Unless you mean console sales. That it nearly impossible to prove.

Paytaa3000d ago

Why does every feature have to relate to sales for the consumer? It's a welcome addition that people wanted. All there is to it.

2pacalypsenow3000d ago

because the article is asking if it was a Hit or bust and the only way a Feature would be a bust is if it didn't help with sales.

donthate3000d ago

2pacalypsenow:

"because the article is asking if it was a Hit or bust and the only way a Feature would be a bust is if it didn't help with sales."

nah, that is only in your mind and your way of narrow thinking.

For us gamers, it is a hit! For MS, it shows goodwill (and a seed of trust) as opposed to charging you for the feature like their competitor.

Paytaa3000d ago

@2pacalypsenow A way it could have been a bust is if by chance the feature literally didn't work but it does and many people enjoy it. Sales, at least for me, don't dictate whether something is good or not or if I enjoy something.

slate913000d ago ShowReplies(1)
Rookie_Monster3000d ago ShowReplies(3)
Lennoxb633000d ago

Red Dead Redemption has charted due to word of it being backwards compatible.

2998d ago
2pacalypsenow3000d ago (Edited 3000d ago )

Everything MS,Sony and Nintendo do they do it to sell more consoles, If MS was leading the console market they wouldn't even worry about adding BC, they did it because they saw an opportunity that Sony wasn't doing and they made it possible. If you think they are doing it out kindness then idk what to tell you. and if people are gonna act like sales don't matter anymore because MS is not leading its main competitor then that's your opinion. Sales affect everything a console does and can do. Why do you think Sony changed their attitude with the Ps4 surely it had something to do with the Ps3.

Rookie_Monster3000d ago

Wait, isn't MS giving away Windows 10 upgrade for free even though they have like a monopoly on PC OS? Why are they doing that when they are the market leader in that space?

And are you saying and admitting Sony is charging $15 for old PS2 games emulated on PS4 simply because they are the leader and fans like you are accepting it as a hit? I am a bit confuse here.

Neonridr3000d ago

sales didn't matter last gen when Nintendo sold more than either two consoles.

If I asked you who won last gen you certainly wouldn't say Nintendo even though they moved the most units.

You would come up with some excuses like it was to mostly casuals or they didn't have enough 3rd party support, etc, etc.

Stop trying to make this about more than what it is.

BC is a welcome thing and any XB1 owner is glad to have it as a feature. Is it going to move millions of consoles? No of course not. But what it may allow is for the stubborn last gen crowd that haven't adopted next gen to maybe finally get rid of their old hardware knowing they can keep some of their classic 360 games and replay them on the XB1.

2pacalypsenow3000d ago (Edited 3000d ago )

They are giving windows 10 because of the screw up they made with 8 and want to bring people back to 10, Most people still use 7 and Ms knows they wont upgrade to 10 without an incentive, hell they are even forcing people to do it by making it an "UPDATE".

And Sony is charging for those games 1 because they are adding features to the game and 2 because they can make money from it since they know some people are willing to pay for it, its a "HIT" because we can earn trophies on classic games that didn't have them and a "Bust" because not many people want to pay again and Sony hasn't come out and said how successful it has been. I defend the fact on why they charge but not the way they have made their their BC since I wish they had BC like the Ps2/3 days but they don't and its a small thing to me I rather them focus on new games and features since I didn't buy the Ps4 and Xbox 1 to play older games.

@Neonridr and to me the 360 won last gen because they had the most impact and popularity than wii and Ps3, the Wii was released at the perfect time and took advantage of the new motion control fad and the casual market, obviously that died by the time Wii U came out. And don't say sales didn't matter because I can quote a more than a dozen times MS brought up sales and how the 1st to 10 million wins the war.

BC is a great addition to Xbox 1 but people need to stop acting like its a game changer and that its gonna shock the console world because it hasn't and it wont if Ps4 had the same type of BC I would accept it but I wouldn't treat it like a HUGE thing.

Xbox fans are just defensive this gen because Ps4 is leading, Last gen it was the same but with PlayStation Fans and next gen is gonna be the same with whoever's console is loosing.

AngelicIceDiamond3000d ago

@PSNOW "Seems like people are very sensitive this gen since if you don't automatically say everything positive then your labeled a fanboy."

Your simply in a Xbox article. If I did what you did on a heavy Sony article (and I have many times before) I get labeled a fanboy all the time and it seems to be way worse on PlayStation side when it comes to labeling. I'm open minded so I respect what your saying and your opinion.

2pacalypsenow3000d ago (Edited 3000d ago )

@AngelicIceDiamond

That's because Ps fans are still sensitive about the PS3 days and always getting hammered on By Xbox 360 fans, now that they are on the other side of the fence they are gonna let it be know, Im not condoning the attitude but just stating how it is. And just because you don't state something positive about Xbox does not mean you don't like Xbox.

3000d ago
freshslicepizza3000d ago

@2pacalypsenow
"Everything MS,Sony and Nintendo do they do it to sell more consoles, If MS was leading the console market they wouldn't even worry about adding BC, they did it because they saw an opportunity that Sony wasn't doing and they made it possible."

wrong. sony offered the service on both the ps2 and ps3 (early on) and they dominated sales. stop trying to pass off things like you know better than everyone why things happen. it is always in their best interest to try and fulfill the wishes of fans requests and bc was the top requested feature. sometimes they have to weigh the cost of offering these services and how difficult it would be. in this case the ps3 was way too different for sony to bother.

2pacalypsenow3000d ago

Everything i comment on here is my opinion not a fact, if I didn't own an Xbox 1 I wouldn't bother commenting.

AngelicIceDiamond3000d ago

"And just because you don't state something positive about Xbox does not mean you don't like Xbox."

Right that's how I feel on PS articles you know my pain now.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3000d ago
gangsta_red3000d ago

Can you point to the commercials or any slogan or any official corporate strategy memo, letter or email that says BC was going to be MS's ace in the hole to over take PS4 in sales?

2pacalypsenow3000d ago (Edited 3000d ago )

They don't have to say anything because they already stated they are not gonna catch up and that's something that people want that feature so MS saw the opportunity that Sony didn't offer this and took it, Ms current position in the Console market is the best thing that could have happened to Xbox One because otherwise it wouldn't be adding so many game related features every update if it wasn't, it would still be the TV,TV,TV console it was first announced as.

But like my previous comment said everything is made to sell more consoles and throwing that little jab about how they don't have to pay for the games they already own is straight to Sony, Sony did the same thing when they poked fun at the fact that you couldn't sell or trade your games and have to be connected.

Both Consoles are guilty of this, you think if Sony's lead started to decrease and XBox were catching up they wouldn't include free BC? Of course they would, MS only changed everything because fans reactions now MS want to be the "Good Guy" and that's a good thing because Sony went through the same thing with the PS3 and it made them change their attitude on Ps4.

freshslicepizza3000d ago

the article isn't talking about sales, it asked if it was a hit or not and like many pro-xbox articles people want to try and discredit it.

from the article,
"So to answer the question, the Xbox One’s backwards compatibility has been a hit. A major hit."

there you have it. of course those that aren't interested in the xbox one wouldn't really matter anyways. i'd say it's pretty impressive what they have done and all for free too i might add.

gangsta_red3000d ago Show
DigitalRaptor3000d ago (Edited 3000d ago )

Actually, it's probably helped spur software sales for last-gen titles to some extent.

Since the reasons for consumers to get an XB1 is not tied to simply backwards compatibility of 360 games, there's no way to know whether it's helped hardware sales or not. I wouldn't wager that it's had a grand system-selling impact, but you have to factor in software sales too. Of course, we don't know figures for that either. It's a bit vague, like a lot of things.

Although, some people have a serious problem when you bring up sales though. I don't think the multi-year investment from MS engineers to get BC working on XB1 was simply a piece of fan service - there was always going to be a financial implications. Would it be worth it to them, basically. Don't see the problem in bringing that up, cause it's just common sense. You can't mention anything with these guys without them thinking something's up. Even if you reflect the closing statement of the article and provide your opinion of it.

2pacalypsenow3000d ago (Edited 3000d ago )

'Although, some people have a serious problem when you bring up sales though. I don't think the multi-year investment from MS engineers to get BC working on XB1 was simply a piece of fan service - there was always going to be a financial implications. Would it be worth it to them, basically. Don't see the problem in bringing that up, cause it's just common sense. You can't mention anything with these guys without them thinking something's up. Even if you reflect the closing statement of the article and provide your opinion of it. "

Exactly what I was trying to say, these companies don't do anything unless it bring a return on investment (boost sales, popularity etc..). And from what I can tell many people aren't aware of that or don't want to believe it.

Christopher3000d ago (Edited 3000d ago )

I think a ton of people are overreacting to 2pacalysenow's original comment. Regardless of what you think of him personally, his comment is spot on.

1. It is a hit since some people are enoying 360 games on the XBO. Myself included.

2. It is a bust as it relates to sales. It didn't help MS beat Sony during the Holidays and it isn't the driving force behind hardware sales. Any value-added feature like this is intended to get more hardware sales. Perhaps this will change in the long run, but currently it's just not a selling feature of the hardware, which is priority for MS.

Sure, RDR shot up during the slowest period of gaming when it was leaked as BC for part of a day, but that's a sign of #1, not #2.

I don't see anything wrong with those statements unless you're looking for something to be wrong with it because you don't want to see it from the perspective of sales at all. But, sales is always a talking point here as it relates to the industry, so get over it and live with it. But, at least understand what a person is saying.

DigitalRaptor3000d ago (Edited 3000d ago )

I agree.

I think the problem some people had, or at least the way you put it "didn't want to see it from that perspective", is that the article itself didn't mention sales in the way that 2pacalysenow said.

As you also put, there is nothing wrong with talking about anything from a perspective of sales if it relates to what the topic of conversation is and if it interests that person and they wish to talk about it, why should they be muted? If somebody cares about the industry, any references to financial or sales data or implications of corporate decisions, should be no stranger to them.
--------

@ Gangsta_red

"Especially when BC was never marketed as a sales point from MS for their Xbox One campaign. "

If MS didn't market backwards compatibility as a sales point for their console, why on Earth would they have posted a video to their official YouTube (PR) channel stating it explicitly as a reason to buy their Xbox One during last year's holiday season. Selling point, horse's mouth, case closed: https://www.youtube.com/wat...

"Where? Show me where they said BC would improve sales. It's a feature for the Xbox One."

MS assigned several years worth of man-hours to implementing extremely complex engineering task, and you expect there NOT to be a financial/sales goal and repercussions to this in the long-term? Really? You're lost.

"he asked everyone if it was a hit or a bust."

A hit and a bust are different things to different people, and thus people can respond to those words how they please because that is their opinion.

"No one brought that up? You're kidding right, exactly who is Xbox One losing in sales too"

He never posted anything suggestively comparative. He mentions helping and improving sales of the XB1, not "to compete" or anything of the sort. You and your company overreacted and it's time to admit that.

"And no one still can answer that, why do sales matter in regards to this article?"

Should we pin-point where you've traveled off-topic in a thread before? You're clearly overreacting. Despite this, he still covered the XB1's BC in relation to the words "hit" and "bust" by his own understanding of the words. Whether that relates to what the author's perspective of those words are, is something else.

gangsta_red3000d ago

His comment is not spot on because ...

1. Sales isn't the topic of this article. Therefore why bring it up?

2. MS never marketed this feature as a major selling point to move Xbox One consoles or even to beat PS4 in sales.

3. MS brought the BC feature to X1 because it was the number 1 requested feature by their users on the Xbox forums. (at least the top 5 requested feature). MS listened to their fans and made this possible.

So I have to wonder when an article is discussing if Xbox fans are satisfied with what BC has offered to it's users why is sales brought up as an issue/topic? If not to steer the conversation way off course.

We all know PS4 is beating Xbox One is sales. We are told this in every article that talks about sales or sale related, now we have to be told this in an article asking if BC is great?

Christopher3000d ago (Edited 3000d ago )

***Sales isn't the topic of this article. Therefore why bring it up? ***

Sales is a factor in determining whether it's a bust or a hit. Whether you disagree with that or not, doesn't change that fact.

***MS never marketed this feature as a major selling point to move Xbox One consoles or even to beat PS4 in sales. ***

Every single feature MS adds to the XBO has a primary goal of eating away at their competition and gaining more sales in hardware and software.

***MS brought the BC feature to X1 because it was the number 1 requested feature by their users on the Xbox forums.***

Of course, and they did that to improve sales. They are a business. Same reason Sony added PS+ last generation. Same reason MS added GWG this generation. Is it a benefit and a sign of them listening to their consumers? Absolutely, but it's also a direct attempt to increase profits by encouraging more to buy hardware and even more to buy software.

***So I have to wonder when an article is discussing if Xbox fans ***

Regardless of the author's purpose of focusing on fans as it relates to the games, he asked everyone if it was a hit or a bust. He didn't just ask "fans" who would agree with him.

If you don't like someone's opinion, move on and let it go. That's all it is, an opinion. Or, reply on topic and don't try to make it a point that sales suddenly don't matter. Sales have always mattered and will continue to matter.

***We all know PS4 is beating Xbox One is sales.***

And no one brought that up until people started complaining about why sales matter at all.

gangsta_red3000d ago

If I cooked a pizza and asked people if it was delicious or disgusting would you first ask me how the sales of that pizza where?

This article is discussing if Xbox users think BC is great or has it been disappointing up to this point.

What in the hell does that have to do with sales?

Especially when BC was never marketed as a sales point from MS for their Xbox One campaign.

Show me commercials, a huge marketing blitz, Super Bowl commercials promoting BC from MS and then we can talk if it pushed sales and overtook PS4 or not.

But right now all this is doing is switching the topic of what this article is about to another completely different discussion.

"Of course, and they did that to improve sales."

Where? Show me where they said BC would improve sales. It's a feature for the Xbox One, it's bringing added value to the system as YOU even stated in a past comment.

"he asked everyone if it was a hit or a bust."

He asked for anyone using Xbox's BC are you pleased or not. So he IS asking MS fans who have USED this feature what they think, not if BC has or will push Xbox in sales.

"And no one brought that up until people started complaining about why sales matter at all."

No one brought that up? You're kidding right, exactly who is Xbox One losing in sales too, Michelin tires?

And no one still can answer that, why do sales matter in regards to this article?

ziggurcat3000d ago

@gangsta:

"And no one still can answer that, why do sales matter in regards to this article?`

because BC could be a selling feature for some people? and because MS might have been banking on people upgrading to xbox one knowing they could be playing X360 games they own on their xbox one as well?

maniacmayhem3000d ago (Edited 2999d ago )

People need to take into consideration that MS was working on BC long before it was announced.

That it was the number one most requested feature for the Xbox One.

MS had plans to make this happen the same way they had plans to make a new UI, a new dashboard and any other feature found on Xbox One.

If the Xbox One was losing in sales or if it was winning BC was coming to the system. So it's irrelevant to consider that BC has anything to do with sales or should push more sales of the Xbox One.

Does a new UI or an easier dashboard to navigate which are also features get put into consideration for pushing Xbox One sales?

So why should BC especially when it's also for the Wii U which is also not doing well in sales. And especially in an article that has nothing to do with sales.

@DigitalRaptor

Sorry Digital, but one promotional youtube video is not the same as MS mass marketing BC specifically to push Xbox One consoles. And they never said that BC was the sole reason to pick up an Xbox One.

"and you expect there NOT to be a financial/sales goal and repercussions to this in the long-term? Really? You're lost."

So is the Xbox One doing so horrible that BC was suppose to save it from utter mass failure? Who is actually lost when over exaggerating their points?

"A hit and a bust are different things to different people,"

Actually if you read the article and not just the title you will see exactly how this phrase was used. Not taken out of context like it clearly was in this case.

"You and your company overreacted and it's time to admit that."

So a title taken out of context and you say these people overreacted? Am I the only one who finds this extremely funny?

"Despite this, he still covered the XB1's BC in relation to the words "hit" and "bust" by his own understanding of the words"

So you admit it was a misunderstanding and it was out of context even though he was repeatedly told what this story was about. I'm sorry but there is no excuse for willful ignorance. It's not something else, it's literally what the article is about.

green2999d ago (Edited 2999d ago )

@Christopher

Microsoft released a new UI last November. Has it been a success or a failure? So, in your opinion, it was a failure biggest it did not push Xbox one sales past the PS4.

Microsoft is upgrading the TV tuner on Xbox One to allow recording of live TV. In a few months when asked if it was a success or failure, would your answer be NO, because it did not push X1 sales past the PS4.

Microsoft launched an Elite controller. When asked if it was a success or a failure, would your answer be NO, because it did not help push Xbox One sales past the PS4.

I can go on and on for every new feature added to the Xbox One over the past two years and i am guessing you will say that they have all been failures biggest they did not help to push Xbox One sales past the PS4 right?

You know, sometimes, things are done to not just increase sales, but to increase the value proposition of a product to its existing users and any future customer.

And speaking of success, for a product like a console is not only measured in hardware sales but also in software. BC has increased consumer purchase of last gen 360 game sales both digitally and at retail as can be seen by the jump in RDR at Amazon retail. And as we both know that software is the bulk of revenue for Sony, Nintendo, Microsoft and every single developer on the planet, that might be success enough for them.

But to sit and use console sales as a measurement of the success of any feature added to a console/product is very misguided and short sighted.

Christopher2999d ago (Edited 2999d ago )

***So, in your opinion, it was a failure biggest it did not push Xbox one sales past the PS4. ***

Umm... did you not read what I wrote at all?

I said: "1. It is a hit since some people are enoying 360 games on the XBO. Myself included. "

But, the question wasn't "is it a hit with people who want BC" but whether it's a hit or not. And, from an industry perspective, it's not a hit. It's value-added, but it's not drawing on anything else.

There are two sides here: people who care about BC and how it affects them in their personal desire and people who see it as an industry element.

*** So it's irrelevant to consider that BC has anything to do with sales or should push more sales of the Xbox One. ***

Every feature of a product has to do with potential sales. Every feature. We're looking at the overall picture here, things that many people do here and cite as "why they own an XBO". Those features often include UI, BC, controller, online, and games. Every single one of those items that people bring up as to why they own a console are selling points to those people and to others. Why would it suddenly not become a selling point here when the result isn't a major selling feature?

***So why should BC especially when it's also for the Wii U which is also not doing well in sales***

I am so massively disappointed in BC on my Wii U since it's so expensive. Overall, games can be way more expensive on Wii U if you don't normally buy games Day 1. And I think that's part of why Wii U isn't doing well in the home console business. The majority of console owners don't buy day 1 the mass majority of time. They look for deals and wait for games to go down in price.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 2999d ago
+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 2998d ago
Show all comments (113)
280°

Microsoft’s Surface and Xbox hardware revenues take a big hit in Q3

Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
darthv721d 8h ago

Xbox content + services up 62% while hardware down 31%... seems about right with the way they tout you don't need the hardware to play. People can play on their phones or smart tv or other means. I don't hardly play on my consoles directly since getting devices like the logitech g-cloud and ps portal. Which is to also say I have been playing more digital than physical because of these devices.

solideagle19h ago

you should apply in MS PR team buddy, I think you will do a great job in my humble opinion :)

Sonic188116h ago

I thought darthv72 and Obscure_Observer already work for Microsoft 🤔

dveio16h ago

MS: "Xbox services and content without AB up 1%, with AB up 62%. Hardware down 31%. In total a loss of 350 mill."

darthv72: "Seems about right."

MS: "Excuse m ..."

darthv72: "I don't hardly play on my consoles directly."

MS:

Lightning7711h ago

What he said was facts. How he plays games is no concern of you. Don't get too mad about it.

Cacabunga18h ago

I can tell people like you are an absolute minority..

If service is up means their fans and fanboys accepted this model and subscribed to it. The near future you will see a big decline because the service is saturated.

darthv725h ago

to you it may seem like the minority... but your bubble is shrinking because more and more are following suit. convenience is a hell of a drug and its also why physical sales only amount to 30% of overall game sales. times are changing, you either get with them or you get left behind.

neutralgamer19923m ago

Darth

30% physical sales: yet Phil and xbox division are in a rush go give up on that 30%. they don't have any right to give up any piece of the pie since the control such a little of the pie to begin with

also, the market is clearly speaking that the model Xbox is pushing isn't working right now the keyword being right now. you are right about freedom to play anywhere so i hope they put their games on steam

shinoff218318h ago

But that's been ms for years. When things aren't going their way they try to change the way things are said. For instance console sales are down, they stop telling how many sold instead telling us how many hours spent in halo or headshots. So it makes sense console sales down just say people are playing on more devices then previous. What they won't say is how many xbox players jumped ship to ps5.

Cacabunga16h ago

Hardware sales are so bad that Sony and Nintendo are blowing the sales off the water with their hardware.

If Xbox are losers, others aren’t..
Xbox already tried everything with Xbox live then subscriptions went down so much that they had to find something else. Their fans subscribed then reached saturation rather quickly.

Hardware and exclusive games is where it’s at! Keep gamers excited, announce decent software and people will support you

itsmebryan12h ago

@shin
Well keep it simple Sony 's operating income is down 26% and Microsoft's is up 32%. No MS spin there, just facts. 😉
Cheers

S2Killinit5h ago

MS is after diminishing consoles as a medium. They want to destroy this market because they couldnt win. MS’s vision is to dissolve console gaming.

romulus2311h ago

Odd that a company that touts you dont need the hardware to play is already touting another console in the works.

darthv7211h ago

They are not reliant on the HW but still want to maintain a presence (no matter how small) is a good thing. It shows commitment to the craft. It reminds me of SNK and how they made games for their own hardware (Neo Geo) while also making them for others because they knew there was a market to do so. They knew they would sell more to others but also sell to their own niche fan base.

TheEroica5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

Perfectly reasonable post down voted by insecure corporation friendly folk.... But not gamers. Real gamer want accessibility and ease of acquisition for all.... Company shills are the only ones still telling us that hardware locking people from games is good for us.

Chevalier9m ago

@Darth

You should stop parroting metrics like an idiot without context.

"Xbox content and services revenue grew 62% in Q3 from a year earlier, “driven by 61 points of net impact” from the purchase of the third-party video game giant, Microsoft said."

61 of the 62% was from their merger so net increase is ONLY 1%

https://www.mesaonline.org/...

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3m ago
purple10121h ago

Xbox hardware revenue tanks to lowest point of Xbox Series generation

Profchaos21h ago

I'm not surprised surface is struggling they aren't relevant anymore

DOMination-10h ago

In the last two years they've started exiting the consumer market altogether. All of the newest Surface products are business models only. They can't seem to work out what they want to do with it.

XBManiac20h ago

Too expensive hardware when others offer the same or more for less? Good work, Green Team.

SimpleDad20h ago(Edited 20h ago)

"Despite some early successes for Xbox games on rival platforms, Xbox hardware is down by a massive 31 percent this quarter."
"Without Activision Blizzard, Microsoft’s overall gaming revenue would have actually declined this quarter."
"Xbox content and services would have only been up a single percent without Activision Blizzard..."
"It looks like next quarter is going to be a similar story for gaming at Microsoft, too."

That is crazy... so A/B/K is carrying the whole Xbox gaming.
Oh and Microsoft will be fine. Windows, Office and Cloud are growing with each pc purchase.

purple10119h ago

Activision: "we gonna need a bigger rucksack/backpack please"

Microsoft: "why's that"

Activision: "to carry yo' weak ass'

Profchaos19h ago(Edited 19h ago)

Top brass have also wanted to start seeing returns on the 100 billion they have put into various Xbox related moves so seeing more multiplatform games is highly likely especially from abk

It's basically saying that PlayStation is the reason Xbox is afloat right now thinks to Ps5 versions of COD

Kornholic18h ago

So basically PS and PC gamers' money is keeping Xbox on life support.

MrDead11h ago

The only growth MS will get out of the console industry is if it supports it's rivals platforms. Xbox is a pointless machine now. I can see them on a big push for live next, and they won't give up on trying to buy Steam.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 11h ago
Show all comments (44)
300°

Microsoft Seemingly Closes Bethesda France

As part of its plans to cut 1,900 jobs, Microsoft has reportedly shut down operations at Bethesda France, letting go roughly 15 people

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
Hereandthere2d ago

Microsoft should have left them stay 3rd party

GamerRN2d ago

If they are let go, they can be whatever they want. They ARE 3rd party now... 🤦

Barlos1d 23h ago

Yeah, they're also jobless.

GamerRN1d 16h ago

They can form a company if they want, they are just as jobless as if "Microsoft had left them as 3rd party".

peppeaccardo1d 18h ago

"MIcrosoft leaves Bethesda do what they know how to do best" ... close! Oh the irony ....
(Citation from a week old article)

ChasterMies1d 14h ago

I think Microsoft and other game publishers are letting people go because they think ai will replace them. Doesn’t matter how much profit they make. They were always going to be let go.

PassNextquestion2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Bethesda France was made up of roughly 15 people... they couldn't of being doing much

Bethesda France mainly did publishing and marketing within the region

blacktiger2d ago

that's a shame for you to say that, i'm sure Elite loves hearing what you just said.

Mr Logic1d 12h ago

What a stupid thing to say. The elites give 0 fucks what we say on an obscure website in the comments section.

Crows901d 11h ago

You can always reach out and give them jobs at your company man. Don't wait

blacktiger9h ago

You own nothing snd be happy. I'm sure you heard that

Profchaos2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Bethesda France focused on publishing and marketing in the region. And 15 people lost their jobs as part of the closure.

I wonder if this is part of Microsoft's strategy to abandoned physical media or possibly gamepass advertising makes their roles redundant you don't need to market a game as hard when the majority of players get the game as part of a sub which already promoted upcoming games

Tacoboto2d ago

It's France too, there's a high likelihood only 1-2 people on the team even had an Xbox.

Profchaos2d ago

Possibly guven all the leaks we know the Xbox brand is really struggling in the region.

Yi-Long2d ago

Well, if your consoles and games are barely found in any stores any more, of course you're gonna struggle finding consumers ...

XiNatsuDragnel2d ago

Tbh Microsoft I think Bethesda being 3rd party same with Activision would probably more competitive than thus scenario imo

Profchaos2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I think it would have been better for all parties really especially gamers

TheColbertinator2d ago

The recently purchased Activision French offices might take over all the licensing and marketing for Microsoft in France from now on.

Show all comments (23)
280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple10113d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref12d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde12d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander197212d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville12d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff218312d ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos12d ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 12d ago
isarai13d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref12d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan12d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis00711d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander197213d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

13d ago Replies(3)
Einhander197213d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

13d ago
12d ago
Zeref12d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde12d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander197212d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier12d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto12d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff218312d ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto12d ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 12d ago
Hofstaderman12d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts12d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts11d ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic12d ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)