The last gen console cycle was a complete opposite of the current gen. Sony literally struggled with the PlayStation 3 for the first few years with some terrible PR decisions and lack of quality games.
Atlus wins over gamers yet again.
TheGamer Writes "The tennis sim is as good as ever, but is lacking basic features that make this worthwhile at this stage."
Armored Core 6 is the modern, action-packed mecha game that deviates from the Soulsbornes formula orchestrated by Hidetaka Miyazaki.
599 dollars well spent
With this price the sony was very greedy and mercenary, so was the company that lost more fans from one generation to another.
Sony blew it with the PS3 price point.
And then Xbox did the same thing years later and were humiliated by Sony in front of everyone.
Something I've been wondering this gen regarding consistency.
This is the site (amongst other sites and users) that say the XB1 is doing fine, if not as well as the PS4.
Yet those same sites (and users) make statements like "Sony literally struggled with the Playstation3 for the first few years"
However, based on post launch sales charts, the XB1 is selling at the same pace as the PS3.
So if they're both selling at a materially equivalent pace why is one considered to have "struggled" whilst the other is apparently doing "great"?