If they find a useful, easy and fun way to play an FPS on kinect, I say why not.
Maybe in a couple of years from now, graphics will look better, too.
Wishful thinking, maybe?
It may be a waste of money on the PS3, considering the amount of problems the game has but I've hardly had any issue on the 360. My only gripe against BO is when a match ends prematurely with no points.
I know it's a ripoff but I'm buying the maps first day. I don't know what to say, I'm a sucker I guess.
I recently paid $60 to renew my XBlive account. I paid for one reason; gaming online and cross game/party chat. I don't care much for any of the other features because all of those features like Netflix, facebook, among others are free regardless if you're a silver or gold member.
Even without the inclusion of the features mentioned, they're supposed to be free! All I have to do is hit the on switch on my laptop or desktop and the features mentioned are availabl...
It might only be estimates, but it'll be the closest thing you'll get until official numbers are released from the official company themselves.
Personally I couldn't careless about numbers. I'd rather there be a single console where all publishers including Sony, Nintendo and Microsoft have their teams develop games for this single console. That would be the end of fanboyism and I'd save money in the process.
Eh, only in my dreams.
Better things? Opinions vary, you know. What you may consider better doesn't mean everybody will agree with you.
Lack of comprehension..
If Sony were to implement cross game chat, it would be entirely optional. No one would be pointing a gun at you to use it. It's obvious that there are some PS3 owners who wouldn't mind having the feature.
Your lack of interest for the feature shouldn't stop other PS3 owners to ask Sony. Maybe if enough ask, Sony will finally give their users what they want.
People can sometimes be selfish. It's obvious that there are PS3 owners who would like cross game chat, yet those who hate and appose it would rather be without it even at the cost of those who would actually like the feature. Why? I don't get it.
They even fault them and beat them with sticks for mentioning the idea of cross game chat. They scream blasphemy and pray for their Gods to smite those who even desire it the slightest! Okay, it's obvious that you, gener...
He's in jail, not in prison.
Maybe it's not as accurate, but these arguments are as pointless as comparing keyboard and mouse to a controller. A controller may not be as accurate, but gaming on a controller is just as fun, if not more so.. opinions may vary on that, though.
Although not as accurate as the Move because there's an actual controller, it's the games that will make it count as a worthy purchase. As of now, there's one good game on the Kinect, maybe? I don't but we'll h...
Thanks for pointing out the obvious. Not many gamers realize that the PS3 is a much more powerful machine compared to the 360. We need more people to tell the masses that PS3 is one powerful machine.. when compared to the 360. Hell it goes both ways. Just look at the PS2 vs. Xbox fanboys.
And thanks for that list. It doesn't make much sense why people buy 360s when the selection of exclusive games on the PS3 is much better.. oh wait! Isn't the comparison between two ...
Would you be surprised if it got great reviews? It can go either way.
I'd be excited for ME2 if I haven't played it. They're adding so much content to the game it's going to be huge. Aside from that, I'm looking forward to Fable and Fallout.
Yes it can. If they were to port the game, they would have to downgrade the graphics and put the game in multiple disc. I wouldn't care if the graphics were inferior or in multiple disc, it's the game in general that interest me, not the graphics.
It's probably never going to happen, but with so many companies going multiplatform, I wouldn't be surprised. I'm not holding my breath, though.
From a developers perspective, the 360 is a lot easier to develope. Problem is, the DVD format the X360 supports lacks memory. Both consoles have their own issues specifically for developers themselves.
Technically, the PS3 is more powerful but I don't care. Both consoles produce beautiful graphics regardless if the game was made for both consoles.
He was obviously being sarcastic.
I hope you're right. After the release of Reach, the only other big exclusive title will be Gears, but even with such a big exclusive, the 360 is seriously lacking exclusive games.
I'd rather have games than Kinect or Move.
The Sony PSPGo proved that the "Digital only route" would be a failure. Maybe when digital distribution is more widely accepted, they'll release a limited amount of hard copies.
I liked ME more than I did MS2, but that's just my opinion. Both were great games nonetheless.
On a different note, the 360 is seriously lacking first party games. Microsoft better do something soon because it's looking very bleak for the 360.
And I couldn't careless if your PS3 is more powerful, fanboy.