I agree with him, perhaps not an incentive but a reward, so to speak.
While maybe we should pay for the work they did, in a way we kinda did.
We are the ones who originally paid to allow them to make the extra DLC.
Just like Call of Duty did with the 'Terminal' map, it was free to get.
The companies should have some sense to give back to the customers.
Again, they wouldn't be able to sale us DLC, if we didn't buy the game.
It doe...
I agree in a sense. Although, I don't believe little items should be priced and sold.
The problem seems to lie in that companies are withholding content intentionally to sell.
Also, there really is no way to know when the DLC was actually started in production.
Unless, of course, the developer states otherwise. And, release day DLC, obviously.
Content originally meant to be on disc could be held for 3 months after release.
Most game compani...
I really wanna try this game out, and get it. But, I'm not sure if I wanna pay $60, for it.
Hopefully they show more before it is released, and that there is a playable demo, as well.
I'd agree with Hellsvacancy, in that L.A. Noire was a bit .. bland, at times.
Besides the occasional crime scene, there was almost nothing to do in the city.
It was a huge city, had lots of promise. However, the story and all was excellent.
Awesome. While not the greatest games, it seems to be one the better straight up co-op games.
Hopefully this turns out to be the best in the installment, yet. Excited for upcoming news.
Well ... sounds good to me. There's plenty to come out, in the quite a few coming months, already.
I'm American, and I couldn't really give a piss.
In fact, I WANT a game were you play killing the Americans.
Such as, perhaps, playing the Germans in a WW2 based game.
I want to see a game based on the other side of the fence, for once.
Get over it, MikeCosgrove. It's a game.. x_x
People were complaining about no bluecoat kills, now you got one.
What's the problem?
If I'm gonna be stabbed and shot at, anyway, yup .. I'm gonna fight regardless?
What? It's GTA, lol. If GTA is released, people will jump.
They don't need to release details, videos, or screenshots.
And, to maximize profit? Again, it's GTA, the game will sell. :P
I think there is a fair line, between it all.
I mean, would you be okay with just walking through levels?
Sure, the story is amazing, the characters are cool.. but, y'know.
There needs to be a 'fun factor' there, as well. Some fun gameplay.
I don't wanna just walk around, like in Home, all day. Fun needs to be there.
I agree with the whole enjoying a game more with a story, though.
I think this would work as a 'gag' gift to a girlfriend, though, lol.
While the 'proof' you are giving is factual, as of right now.
There is one thing, though. You are missing the rest of the game.
You are only basing your 'proof' on the little snippets they provided.
UbiSoft say Connor is neutral, and they speak truth till proven wrong.
Perhaps they have really only shown one 'mission,' from the game?
But, in the end.. who really cares, as long as the game is good?
And, I do belie...
"I made it; I didn't get eaten!"
I'd definitely eat her .. out.
:D
If they make it xBox 360 exclusive, lol.
Seems like we have the same opinions on that matter; that's cool.
I think Egypt as a location, and time period, would be awesome..
I just don't think the .. landscape, city wise, would make for a good AC game.
And, indeed, I could see AC being pretty great in Feudal Japan.
Maybe one day they will make a spin off title that takes place there?
I could see India making for a decent game, not sure about cities there.
If it's like Consta...
This. Besides, the nerds and geeks are the ones to make our technology better(:
Jocks and preps, sure they may be "cool," but they ain't going anywhere after HS.
Yeah, I've seen that before, too. Which I don't quite agree with.
At least for one of em. I can understand WW2 not being a great setting.
Mainly because it's not just 'one' setting, and the tanks and gun thing.
Egypt.. the time period itself would be awesome, I would think.
The only problem there, was I don't believe they really had .. buildings?
Not large buildings, anyway, or city like layouts for that matter.
However, ...
Since when can you shoot at somebody directly, & they still run up and stab you?
That's what I hate about normal. It's way to easy to stab people..
Why would one expect any different now? It hasn't the been the case for the last 5 games..