170°
6.0

Teletext GC: inFamous Review

IN SHORT: Disappointing superhero sim, whose meagre set of powers prove to be far less exotic than you'd hope.

PROS: Jumping around an open world is always fun and the final hours finally start to hit the right notes.

CONS: Unimaginative powers, unreliable controls and bland design. Unremarkable graphics and repetitive enemies.

Read Full Story >>
teletext.co.uk
blitz06235860d ago

"CONS: Unimaginative powers"

lmao. that's what makes this game fun. I guess the reviewer likes realistic powers, like, say... hey what's a realistic power anyway?

5860d ago
SL1M DADDY5860d ago

"I tried it and sucked at the game thus found myself hating it."

Sorry, but this is just another poor excuse for a review. If you suck at a game, you should be the last person to review it.

Genesis55860d ago (Edited 5860d ago )

Well that was a completely unimaginative and bland review.

DarK-SilV5860d ago (Edited 5860d ago )

this is what they said about KZ2"One of the best looking games ever, but also one of the least ambitious in terms of anything else" " Not a single new idea but instead an infinity of cliches. Weak plot, no co-op mode and annoying ally AI."

these guys are not gamers,nothing please them,they have nothing to do with games

Why o why5860d ago

same guy who writes for Eurogamer, same dislike for all things sony (unless the game is made by british devs) same BS. I found out that whole 'team europe' were harsher on sony a long time ago but at least they're consistent in their BS.

Tito Jackson5860d ago

..I didn't find this game to be all that great either. But Its surely better than a 6. Its atleast an 8. Its a good game.

PrimordialSoupBase5860d ago

Oh chill out kiddos. He substantiates his opinion pretty well essentially saying that Infamous' toolset is a shooter with a skin of electricity. Which just so happens is why I love it, but if that doesn't sit well with him, so be it.

It's a different perspective on the game, at least it makes sense.

locos855860d ago

I was on this game for 4 hours last night. I couldn't get enough of it. Love it and glad I bought it. I am taking the evil road!!!

Why o why5860d ago (Edited 5860d ago )

thats fair enough BUT the dude is consistently around and writes for sites/publications that always seem to give lower than average scores to sony games. He mentions that the story is similar to prototype as if its copying that game and not every other super hero game cliche. His review is just full of dislike where it counts for a reader to be informed. I mean I can make the sun seem unimaginative and its power meagre with the correct 'vocab' Its just an agenda behind great wording plus ive completed the game on the hero arc and the ONLY thing he nails is the same things the kotaku (dislike site, appreciate their reviews) + others sites say and they were that the graphics are the best for a sandbox game but not as impressive as other sony games and that getting down from places can be annoying. This guy is just full of gaming hate. When was the last time he actually enjoyed a game. What about the many great things about the game.

To the ones that scream averages but want to cling to the scores below it.......unlucky because this is a great game to play especially when you consider the competition that's come prior

xwabbit5860d ago

Hmm, all the sites i have never heard of give infamous a bad review lol

Downtown boogey5860d ago

Genetically enhanced supersoldiers, like Master Chief.
(I actually like Master Chief, but whatever...)

PrimordialSoupBase5860d ago

@Why o why

Offer me proof that he has it in for Sony published games. Otherwise it's like anything else that goes on in these ludicrous threads: Rabble.

TheRealSpy025860d ago (Edited 5860d ago )

your comment doesn't make any sense. unimaginative doesn't mean unrealistic.

and this review NAILED IT.

To the PS3 fanboys: you don't have to auto-love every ps3 exclusive. it's not blasphemy. this game is very average and looks like a ps2 game.

@darkzilv: yeah, they nailed kz2 as well. nice to see some honest reviewers out there.

EDIT: Just to preempt the inevitable accusations that i am a 360 fanboy or don't actually have this game or a ps3; if you don't believe me, just send me a message on here and i'll give you my psn name and you can see for yourself.

sumguy825860d ago

"i'm a huge ps3 fanboy who thinks everyone should blow a load at the sight of every ps3 exclusive. and if they don't, i'll attempt to take away their credibility by making completely false accusations."

Why o why5860d ago (Edited 5860d ago )

ill flip it around for ya. Bias exists in the gaming media period. Some in favour of a console, some in others. Check the websites i mention above scores for all of the codemasters games this gen and you'll notice that they are ALL above the average. Some who are quick to say things like 'but LBP got game of the year + high scores blah blah' I just say the devs are also from the UK, almost neighbours JUST like codemasters. Now look at all of the nitpicks that get labelled at games like killzone 2, Drakes, Ratchet and Infamous and tell me why these standards aren't applied across the board.

How some games have got the scores they have this gen just stinks plus sites like Eurogamer have been exposed just like gamespot and gametrailers so maybe you should be a little more open minded. Dont be conspiracy driven but at least open your eyes to the faults with the gaming media. Im sure you have ZERO proof that gamespot fired Jeff over his review because there is no proof you just have to rely on intuition and gut instincts influenced by the information available. Notice the trends towards talk of marketing, sales, attach rates etc and understand that manipulation of scores, reviews, opinions is almost as important as the product they trying to promote/downplay I mean it wont take long for me to find a comment by someone here on n4g that states something like halo or games.....wait for it..... 'having a higher metascore' than killzone 2. Its almost like the score is better or more important than the actual gameplay, quality.......sheep. Explain why some sites have more credence/weighing than others on metacritic, why they can allow film magazines affiliated to big players within the gen to affect averages yet omit dedicated gaming sites especially ones outside the US. Explain how a reviewer may write a review for 2 different sites and both scores may count towards the average. Too many flaws. Anyhow the game is great, not perfect by any means but great and that seems to be the consensus by the sites i trust. 'euroteam' sites fell off that radar a long time ago. Their scores are on average below the average for ps3 games. Ive provided the link above and if you do a little more reading you'll find that this reviewer has worked with both edge and eurogamer which is why i say they share the same opinions

PrimordialSoupBase5860d ago (Edited 5860d ago )

http://www.eurogamer.net/ar... He hasn't reviewed anything on Eurogamer.

Listen brother, there are problems in the media, yes, but the majority of the fervour surrounding supposed "negative" reviews is because the score and tone don't indoctrinate presupposed opinion. In other words, people who get angry and call "bias" (the large majority of N4G users, and beyond) are the ones who solidified their opinion about the game months before it was ever even close to release.

Games are not hardware, reviewers can't do benchmark and stress tests, it's far more subjective than that. If well written and substantiated, a negative review is food for thought which offers a new lens to view things from. The game is the game, you don't need a preacher to tell you how spectacular it is... which seems to be the only thing that people ever want.

Why o why5860d ago (Edited 5860d ago )

already completed the good karma arc. The game is far from perfect and I am not here telling you its the best thing since slice bread.
The lack of consistency and double standards is what annoys me 'consistently' about the sites I mentioned. Lets face it, these guys all know each other and that can interfere with objective reviews.
just as he is entitled to his opinion I am mine and it seems like ive played this game for longer/or more conclusively than he has. I asked you to look at the scores of the codemasters games, you've said nothing, i mentioned the jeff sacking, nothing again, I mentioned the scandals that have hit the sites ive mentioned, still nothing. Anyway just look at the games that have scored higher then maybe you can understand my critique of this dude and the sites ive mentioned Look at the scores for the codemasters games. You're right about people disagreeing with reviews without actually playing sh!t which is the silly side of n4g but when the general consensus is 'good to great' and somebody hits us if an 'average to good' then we're allowed to say something. The sites ive mentioned have consistently been harsher or have nitpicked on games and ignored those same 'flaws' on other games and im not buying into this whole 'hype' sh!t neither as reviewers are meant to leave that crap at the door. If they cant then they have failed in their primary job and thats to give us information. Long before these reviews came out the general consensus was that edge, euro'g even teletext (by me personally) would score this lower than the average. Ive already been through this teletext site with my close friend (we're from the UK) and i have shown him their inconsistencies and shown him that more than one person has affiliations with some of the others mentioned. All i ask for is consistency..... If the graphics are sub par for 'x' then they should be for 'y' where on earth did halo 10 graphics come from....honestly If its multiplayer is 15 out of ten that shouldn't boost its graphics score now should it. This goes both ways i might add, Ill point to the slight clunky controls of LBP and it still got 10's. Im not blinded by my preference, my eyes and ears are open.

unedited,sorry

raztad5860d ago (Edited 5860d ago )

@TheRealSpy

I need the ps2 you are using. I buy a 360 for you and you give me that awesome ps2. I want to play DQVIII in full HD. Gotta a deal?

Let me add, everybody is entitled to his own opinion. I for one think Halo is a very average fps (I still remember when I begun to play Halo:Evolved some years ago, just in the middle of the game I found something called CoD, Halo wasnt played anymore). GTA4 could look polished (though it runs at 640p upscaled, and its engine isnt capable to do what inFAMOUS's achieve easily) but is boring as hell. Those two games are really high ranked, what means that for me nothing. inFAMOUS is an amazing game dude if you dont like it, its cool, move on.

FamilyGuy5860d ago

Strangely i guess thats true but somehow that doesnt stop this from being the most fun game ive played this year. Single player wise it's one of the best this generation.

Eddie201015860d ago

inFamous is a very good game that deserves a much higher score than a 6, anyone with half a mind can find many flaws in this review, one being that the reviewer says he was not able to play the game because of the controls (the controls are very good and intuitive in infamous) seems that bitccching about the controls in PS3 exclusive games is a running theme these days, you have to be pretty inept at gaming to say that games like inFamous and Killzone 2 are hard to control, kind of like comparing pixels in third party multi-platform games, when in reality those kind of differences are only noticeable if you are sitting two inches from the screen. Half the people making game comparisons don't even know what they are talking about to begin with.

As for bugs and technical issues, this game has a few, none of which are game breaking or interfere with enjoying this game. Games like Gears of War 2, Fallout 3, and Fable 2 had bugs and technical issues, but media barely mentioned it and was not reflected in gaming scores and Gears Of War 2 was broken.

It is clear that these small site reviews are designed to get hits and to lower overall scores for games.

Fanboys seem to rally around these excessively low scores especially when they think it further increases there favorite consoles success, the only thing you do is hurt the gaming industry and the community that enjoys gaming. I enjoy gaming not name brands.

This game has gotten at least four or five perfect scores from sites that are more reputable than the this site or at least as reputable, and I don't see those scores on Metacritic, What is the deal.

TheRealSpy025859d ago (Edited 5859d ago )

you kidding?

go back and play san andreas again and tell me the npc character models aren't nearly the same as the ones in infamous. no only that, but the character animations in infamous are horrible.

then, you constantly get caught on invisible corners, fall through walls (i've actually fallen through the roof of a few buildings).

i'll admit, that parkour element is fun, but that's this game's only redeeming quality. when it comes to combat, graphics, sound, music, etc, the game absolutely fails. and the side quests have all the imagination of assassin's creed without the interesting setting or impressive graphics. in fact, the only really fun part of the game and well implemented element is searching for the hidden blood shards.

the game is a 6-7 TOPS. and it's the concept and parkour that make it that. if it came down to just graphics, sound, and animations, and creativity this game falls far under your average this-gen game.

+ Show (19) more repliesLast reply 5859d ago
xabmol5860d ago

I'm on the second island right now. I've been playing for over 8 hours and this game is way better than a 6. I'll have to agree with the 18 other reviewers that gave it a 9 or more. 9 seems about right for this game.

BTW who the heck is Teletext GC?

PirateThom5860d ago

They're an obsolete TV service.

vasilisk5860d ago

I cannot understand how this is a credible gaming site and is listed on metacritic.
They also gave Killzone 2 a 7/10 and they gave fable ii a 9/10. They have NOT reviewed Halo 3, Uncharted, Ratchet & Clank, Mass Effect and so on. And yet, according to metacritic they are a credible gaming site. They seem only to appear when they want to attribute a low score to a PS3 exclusive...

locos855860d ago

This is a reason why Meta is also flawed.

ThatCanadianGuy5860d ago

Metacritic does sneaky stuff all the time..
http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Yet, somehow gets away with it..

deadreckoning6665860d ago

look guys, uncharted 2 is comin in september,INFAMOUS has gotten a lotta 9's and alotta 7's. It got mixed reviews, get over it.

raztad5860d ago (Edited 5860d ago )

Guys I did a small research about inFAMOUS in metacritic (this is posted in another thread)

TOTAl number of sites: 42

The number of 90/100 is larger than any other score. There are 14 sites that think inFAMOUS is a 90/100 versus 6 thinking 85/100 is a fair score and versus 4 giving it a 70/100. This is very interesting cause it means that 90/100 is the most frequent score, so far, in the sample. If this was a pool the candidate 90/10 would be the clear winner by far.

The actual average is 85.76 so is being rounded up to 86.

The number of sites ABOVE the average is 25 (88+/100). That is more than half the sample.

Those 75-/100 reviews are a distortion of the sample, they are too far from the average and even more from the most frequent score. If you remove them, the average will be much closer to 90/100.

In conclusion, IMO, at least average and most frequent score should be used as a reference in any game ranking.

What do you think? make some sense?

BTW, dude above is lying. There arent a LOT of 70/100, just FOUR out of 42, that is about 10%.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5860d ago
Cyrax_875860d ago

What's funny is I've seen 4-5 perfect reviews for this game in the last 2-3 days and none of them have been added.

joydestroy5860d ago

i know, wtf!? this game is easily an 8.5. i played it for 8hrs straight and was still having lots of fun. unlocking/upgrading powers is addictive haha

Struz5860d ago

How was that up in like 2 seconds? Also, what's up with the lack of high reviews. Meta is worthless.

lh_swe5860d ago

But reviewers should nontheless be more objective with their reviews, from what I have played this game deserves no where near a 6, it has a couple of flaws, like pop in, but I'm loving the story so far and the gameplay is solid once you get the the hang of it. And saying the city looks bland is a retarded statement, the city looks great with many sights and beatiful architecture, I really couldn't disagree more with this review.

DMason5860d ago

Do you guys not get the concept that some sites are weighed heavier on Metacritic than others? If some random gaming blog gives it a 100, and say Gamestop gives it a 70, it will weigh Gamestop's score heavier because it is a more reputable site. If you look on the "How We Rate Stuff" page, you will find this:

This overall score, or METASCORE, is a weighted average of the individual critic scores. Why a weighted average? When selecting our source publications, we noticed that some critics consistently write better (more detailed, more insightful, more articulate) reviews than others. In addition, some critics and/or publications typically have more prestige and weight in the industry than others. To reflect these factors, we have assigned weights to each publication (and, in the case of film, to individual critics as well), thus making some publications count more in the METASCORE calculations than others.

Got that?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5860d ago
GamerPS3605860d ago (Edited 5860d ago )

Huh, Does this guy even know what video game is ?
"Unimaginative Power" haha

zenosaga045860d ago

Wow... sites like this are exactly the reason I always look at gamerankings over metacritic.

Too_Hyped5860d ago

Clearly websites like this one are the reason why metacritic scores are completely meaningless.

That's not even a real website, there's just the Infamous review on it right now... -_-

It's probably paid by MS to put bad scores on PS3 reviews.

DMason5860d ago

That's like me saying that your opinion doesn't matter because you aren't a recognized gaming journalist that has been writing video game reviews for 20 years.

Metacritic will not weigh this review as much as it will weigh IGN's, 1up's, or Gamespot's. Metacritic is a perfectly fine site to gather reviews. Just because you disagree with their opinion, doesn't make their review any less unjustified.

Show all comments (135)
100°

Infamous Franchise Deserves Another Chance From PlayStation

Sucker Punch rejuvenated the superhero genre with Infamous, a series that focused on the pure fun of wielding destructive powers.

Read Full Story >>
tech4gamers.com
shinoff2183354d ago

Atleast release a remaster trilogy or something to gage interest. I'd buy it. With that said I'm pretty over superheroes at this point. Infamous is still dope as fk though so it'd be a buy

isarai354d ago

Omfg i would go apesh!t for that 😩

jznrpg354d ago

I agree but games take 4-6 years to make so who knows when they would do it? After Ghost of Tsushima2? They could have something else in the world as well in early production who knows.

mkis007354d ago

It's a shame Sucker Punch finally figured out a good open world formula only while making Ghost of Tsushima. Infamous 1 and 2 were great for their time, but Second son felt too much like a checklist in It's design. I love the hell out of all 3 games (2 and 3 are just so damn good, while 1 shows it's age and the ps3 struggles), but I would love to see how they would do another infamous with all they have learned. Wouldn't hurt to release a remastered collection either.

Demetrius354d ago (Edited 354d ago )

This series, days gone, will continue to get ignored by sony, luckily we still have the horizon series, sly cooper not getting pushed anymore, speaking of that I'm bout to get on my ps2 and play some sly 2 anyways lol, but seriously I never woulda thought back then sony would ever cold shoulder most of their franchises I'm actually surprised they're still letting ratchet&clank be around

Show all comments (8)
230°

The inFamous games deserve more love from Sony

The inFamous games are an important part of PlayStation history, but the series is in limbo and playing older entries isn't exactly easy.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
LucasRuinedChildhood480d ago (Edited 480d ago )

Would like remasters of 1 and 2. I enjoyed them much more than Second Son.

1 & 2 had more of an emphasis on climbing and the traversal requires a bit more effort in a good way. It was rewarding. Second Son made climbing mostly obsolete so they put little effort into it. The traversal was just great in inFamous 1 & 2. There's a reason Sunset Overdrive copied and improved upon the induction grind mechanic.

Reminds me of how I felt about the decline of parkour and the well designed tombs (basically Prince Of Persia levels) that we saw in the Assassin's Creed games.

The story and atmosphere were also much better in 1 & 2.

Electricity is just a brilliant superpower for an open world city. It perfectly fits just like webslinging does in New York and it has many applications.

Cacabunga480d ago

For sure.. one of my favorite Sony licenses

Shane Kim480d ago

Loved one and two. I actually liked the story as well.

Minute Man 721480d ago

The standalone DLC was a sweet

jznrpg480d ago (Edited 480d ago )

I enjoyed Second Son but it was too short. The first 2 were great though

-Foxtrot479d ago

Second Son was alright but didn't touch the first two games

It felt short and lacking in comparison

Also I really thought Reggie would have made a better protagonist, someone who is anti-conduit as much as him and ends up becoming one would have been interesting to see. I kind of enjoyed his character throughout the game as his development.

badz149479d ago

why is it right now, the thing I want the most from Sony is to release remasters of inFamous (1,2 & SS), KZ (1,2 & 3), Resistance (RFoM, 2 and 3) and Motorstorm (1,2 & 3)??

The_Hooligan479d ago

All great choices. I would like to add Warhawk/Starhawk to that. The multiplayer in Warhawk was amazing. I am surprised Sony hasn't looked into MAG either. That game was ahead of its time.

Maybe Sony should make an internal studio like Bluepoint games and all they do is remake/remaster these amazing games, even going back to PS1,PS2,PSP, Vita portfolio. And because of the recent articles suggesting cost cutting, budget issues and releasing more games on PC, they could do that with these remakes/remasters. Do a day one on PC and PS5. At the end of the day Sony or any other company is going to do what makes them the most money.

Kiryu1992479d ago

Would love a remastered collection on PS5/PC

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 479d ago
kpgs480d ago

Wouldn't the onus be on the consumers? If they bought the Infamous games, then we'd have more games from that series.

KwietStorm_BLM480d ago

Infamous has sold millions of units. People have been asking for more. They aren't interested. Just like people have been asking for more Resistance or even a remaster collection, but insomniac isn't revisiting that either. Likely never getting a new sequel since they're a Marvel studio now.

LucasRuinedChildhood480d ago (Edited 480d ago )

No. Infamous was successful. But after a few entries (which are taking longer to make these days) a lot of Sony studios move on to new IPs. That's not a bad thing at all. They don't need to make inFamous games forever, just like we didn't need new Sly Cooper games forever.

But people would like to be able to easily play them on current hardware which is reasonable. Same for Killzone, Resistance, MGS4, etc. Good games shouldn't be trapped on old hardware. It's good that Bluepoint ported Uncharted 1-3.

kpgs480d ago

I'm not saying it wasn't successful. I enjoyed playing all 3 entries and DLC. But like you said, people move on, studios move on. But I don't think I've heard people asking for more Infamous in a long time.

Profchaos480d ago

The franchise was popular we got quite a few games but Suchet punch wanted to beach out I think that's why we got ghost of Tsushima over infamous 4

Tbh ghost is a fantastic game I'm not complaining about that but I'd love to see infamous handled by another team

jznrpg479d ago

Id take GoT2 over Infamous right now but after GoT2 or maybe 3 if they go trilogy I’d like a new Infamous.

badz149479d ago

that's the problem with Sony that puzzles me A LOT! they have studios specifically specialized in remastering and remaking old games for new gen hardware, but we are getting very few of them. SoTC, Uncharted collections, Demon's Souls Remake, TLoU Part 1...and?? that's it? why aren't they giving their old games new lease of life on the PS5 for the new generations of gamers to enjoy? they clearly have the expertise. for god sake, I can even accept lazy porting like Nintendo are doing for theirs if I have to.

FinalFantasyFanatic479d ago

There are a lot of games that consumers have been asking Playstation for, Playstation won't do it, so a lot of these developers have gone and made it themselves by any means possible such as Kickstarter (e.g. Armed Fantasia, Penny Blood, Ratatan, 100 Heroes, ect...). Developers have even asked if Sony could help them out with porting/remasters some of these older games for Playstation, they said no.

Crows90479d ago (Edited 479d ago )

Um...dude like you say that as if nobody bought them....the devs went on to do ghosts after 3 infamous games....3

People ask for new resistance and new infamous at every moment where it makes sense to mention it.

Having a remake of 1 and 2 would be very welcomed I'm sure.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 479d ago
chicken_in_the_corn480d ago

I would love to see a new game but a feel that would get a response similar to Saints Row.

TravsVoid480d ago (Edited 480d ago )

If they keep any of the characters from the previous games I think it would do fine unlike Saints Row which decided to replace fan favorites with less likable replacements. I wouldn't be surprised if that decision caused a majority of their buyers to be new to the series rather than returning players. I will say though, if Infamous Second Son or the first two Infamous games were remade I would be a day one buyer on PC.

ocelot07480d ago

Loved all 3 of them. I couldn't get on with the vampire spin off though. Wish they didn't move away from cole but I didn't mind the other character.

DefenderOfDoom2480d ago

Loved 1 and 2 , would definitely love a new INFAMOUS single player campaign.

Show all comments (39)
310°

Nixxes Software Can't Go Wrong With An Infamous Remaster

Nixxes' Remaster focus could set the stage to resurrect many obscure titles like the karma-centered, superpower-fueled sandbox of Infamous.

maniacmayhem696d ago

Infamous remaster? How about an Infamous re-Boot! This is one game that doesn't need a remaster, it needs either a proper equal of a reboot of the original. And since Sony is currently in development with Marvel, i can totally see them having guest marvel characters to appear in Cole's world.

BanginTunes695d ago

This is one of the worst things I have ever read

1Victor695d ago

I would prefer Warhawk or Starhawk ether or both will keep us fans happy for a looooooooong time

The_Hooligan695d ago

Warhawk would be awesome! So many good memories playing that game on PS3. They could do a massive 50v50 mode, battle royal with last Warhawk standing, classic 20v20 mode, so many options.

shinoff2183695d ago

I'd rather infamous. Sonys got enough online bs in the pipeline. No need to add more.

1Victor695d ago

@shinoff I disagree with you both of those games was extraordinarily fun to play just the satisfaction of transforming your plane into a bot and stomp a enemy then transform and fly off on Starhawk was a experience that hasn’t been replicated since.
The game was extremely valanced to the point you could go against a tank on foot and win with the ratchet or 1 shot a plane doing a massive attack with your tank. In Warhawk you could pick up half your team and fly them to a base and take it over but those are experiences you had to play to know how awesome those game was even YouTube videos don’t do justice to those game.
Anyways I’ll stop here or I’ll run out of words to post a wall text taking about those games

Christopher695d ago

Here's the thing, infamous and *hawk are such different games and with different audiences that Sony could... do both at the same time? Nixxes doesn't need to be involved in the shooter (that would be new for them I think since they usually do SP games) but someone else could and Nixxes could share support with development/engine needs.

shinoff2183694d ago

1victor

Ya know Christopher is right they are completly different games. Me personally I don't value online games I just don't care for them. Hell in another bubble I probably enjoy them. In this bubble nah I just prefer single player unless I'm playing Mario or Mario party with my girl and kids or something.

1Victor694d ago

@shin of course I know Chris is right but the games have to be approved first before assignment to a studio I didn’t mean this studio in particular making those game I meant the approval process and Sony harder push on MMO games.
I’m just one of the millions of players that loved those game and a top 800 word wide ranked on Starhawk and proud owner of its platinum trophy

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 694d ago
DankSinatra695d ago

A remaster would allow people who don't have access to a ps3 to experience the game since there's so many stuck on the ps3 that are exclusive to the console and Sony refuses to invest in backwards compatibility

darthv72695d ago

Who doesnt have access to a ps3? There were over 87m of them sold. They are cheap and easy to find. Just like wii and ps2.

shinoff2183695d ago

Or maybe it's just not ready yet, ps3 was a different kinda animal.

DankSinatra695d ago

@darthv72

Not everyone is willing to go out and buy a ps3 for a single game or a handful of games when they have a ps4 or a ps5. A port or remaster would actually help. Younger audiences who did not grow up with a ps3 would have exposure to these games that Sony has essentially left behind on the ps3 due to them not investing in backwards compatibility. If they would do backwards compatibility then we wouldn't need to shill out more money for the same games. Something I actually applaud microsoft for (the only thing they have done that's good).

zaanan695d ago

Agree, and PS3 is getting long in the tooth, so failure rates will be going up. I had to send my slim in for repair years ago.

shinoff2183694d ago

I had a couple extra dollars and came across I guy selling ps3s for 50. I bought all 4. Just felt it was a good deal. Now if I could find controllers. I swear I can't find any cheap controllers around me

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 694d ago
jeromeface695d ago

go back to marvel avengers, sounds like more your cup of tea

KwietStorm_BLM695d ago

You know what, now that I think about it.. yeah none of that makes any sense.

TheKingKratos694d ago (Edited 694d ago )

Lol 😂😂😂

Christopher695d ago

Yes to a reboot, absolutely no to Marvel characters in it.

maniacmayhem695d ago

*either a proper equal of a reboot of the original. *

Damn, there needs to be an extension on the Edit feature.

"Either a proper sequel or a reboot of the original"

And people aren't with Cole interacting with cameos from Marvel? Especially with Sony making Spider Man and Wolverine?

Why exactly would that be a bad idea? Especially with the multiverse being a huge deal and all.

Christopher695d ago

***Why exactly would that be a bad idea? Especially with the multiverse being a huge deal and all.***

There's enough Marvel. Let's not spread it everywhere and let other IPs be their own thing. Please.

neutralgamer1992695d ago

Infamous 1-2 collection would be amazing on current generation. God of War 1-2 and PSP games also playable on PS5 Yes please. And last but not least MGS4

There are so many great games which are on PS3. We need them to be remastered and released for current generation.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 694d ago
GoodGuy09696d ago

Idk why sony hasn't done remasters for 1+2 yet. Such great gems.

RaidenBlack696d ago

I'd like a Killzone 2 Remaster.
Keep the visuals style as is ... just improve the LoD and the resolution

ArchangelMike695d ago

Now that COD is in Microsofts back pocket, it's time for Sony to start investing in it's own 1st party shooters. I loved Killzone - even Shadowfall. But Yeah Killzone 2 was the high point of the Franchise.

ClayRules2012695d ago

Yes. KZ2 was the high point of the franchise and a strong, solid and just bloody fantastic shooter! Had so much fun those days with the game.

Neonridr695d ago (Edited 695d ago )

Shadowfall was my first introduction into the series as the PS4 was my first Sony console. Maybe compared to the others it was not great (personally I don't know), but I had a blast playing it and found it quite enjoyable. I'd love a Trilogy Remaster though so I could go back and enjoy the original 3 for the first time (with a new coat of paint + updated controls)

shinoff2183695d ago

Naw were good. There's plenty in the sea

zaanan695d ago

It’s about damn time for a Resistance trilogy remaster!

long-time-gamer695d ago

Most def the highest point of the franchise, the music, gameplay and story was awesome

ironmonkey695d ago

absolutely right! killzone has been quiet long enough since ps4 release date.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 695d ago
long-time-gamer695d ago

man id love a killzone 2 remaster, its one of my favorite games of all time, but who knows what shape that code in and where its at, prob wont happen under jim ryan though! you can keep your fingers crossed though and see what happens but GG is all about Horizon now

Vits696d ago

There is a lot of the PS3 era that I would love to see ported/remastered. But, unfortunately, they are probably not commercially viable and I have no idea who owns the rights currently. Stuff like Sire: Blood Curse, White Knight Chronicles, Tokyo Jungle, Folklore, etc.

Infamous on the other hand was never a series that I found good or interesting. Especially when compared with other contemporaries like Prototype. But, given how bare the subgenre is right now, I would dig a remaster.

BehindTheRows695d ago

Sony owns Siren. I can’t speak for the rest.

As for inFAMOUS vs Prototype, I feel the opposite. inFAMOUS mopped the floor with it, quality and gameplay. Just felt far more polished. That said, I enjoyed Prototype’s powers a little more.

Vits695d ago

Fair enough, I agree that the production values of inFamous were higher. But I found it to be a snore-fest.

darthv72695d ago

...no meed. Sony could add ps3 support to the 5 and then people can play loads of games already available. No streaming required. Rpcs3 could be adapted to run on the 5... it would solve so many problems.

Vits695d ago

No need, because they instead could do these two other things that they have shown no interest in doing? Sure.

Shane Kim695d ago

But then they couldnt charge you for remaster (even though I would love one for infamous) or charge you for PSN premium.

darthv72695d ago

It would be even funnier if the series x gets rpcs3 support and can play the ps3 games while ps5 still cannot (not without streaming them)

shinoff2183694d ago

Don't most people still have issues with rpcs3. It's not as stable as alot of emulators out there. From what I've read

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 694d ago
zaanan695d ago

My kids and I had a fun time in Tokyo Jungle!

long-time-gamer695d ago

prototype def was not on the same level as infamous far as gameplay or graphics

Pocahontas694d ago

It was legitimately bad game.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 694d ago
isarai696d ago

Infamous, Resistance, and killzine are so ripe for a remaster, I wish Sony would make it happen.

Show all comments (74)