Modern Warfare 3 doesn't reinvent gunpowder, but sticks to the recipe of the previous games in the series. With a decent story and good multiplayer it's a game worth playing, but the lack of willingness to add improvements in gameplay show a laziness often found in a complacent game series.
The developers have provided a little band-aid while PlayStation players attempt to get back into MW3.
Recently, players of Modern Warfare 3 and Warzone were met with a new bundle featuring the B.E.A.S.T. Glove, inspired by King Kong's armament in the Godzilla x Kong movie. However, the $80 price tag attached to this themed accessory left many Call of Duty fans feeling underwhelmed.
Morons that allow themselves to be milked continuously by this company is the definition of irony.
Spend more $$ and you'll end up In easier lobbies so you win both ways when ya spend that cash
Controversy in the COD community feels like it happens within an alternate timeline. Activision will take the piss with something, there will be a momentary fuss about it, and then they will forget about it and carry on anyway. Repeat this cycle literally every year for the rest of time.
I'm so tired of hearing about what they're doing with this game, its never going to change and it's never going to value the consumer over money, furthermore the people who engage so heavily in the microtransactions I guess allegedly are having a blast and can't wait to do it some more this year when the new version of the game drops.
The famous comedy duo is the latest example of pop culture becoming one big grey blob
Certain to have some sort of reference to their online store for CBD/THC chews, which is advertising heavily online the last month or two.
The randomness of the multiplayer characters is one of reason I quit playing COD after briefly returning in 2022. We got Space Marines, rappers, tree monsters etc. all in a series called “ Modern Warfare”.
here we go...
who knows it could be the fairest review amongst all.
"decent story"
"lack of willingness to add improvements in gameplay"
"minimal changes to the graphics engine"
"It need not be a big problem as long as the game is good, but it makes them lag behind, above their competitors."
"a graphics engine that seems to be the same as two years ago"
"the developers do not seem to have labored especially hard to make the game look better"
now imagine if PS3 exclusive game came out with so many faults. i remember one particular reviewer who complained about the "bottle" in MGS4.
Oh good lord....
Good review
XperiaRay
How many of these games have we had now, yet none have improved from MW1....& the only one that actually was better due to the maps & weapons was the Treyarch made WAW, yet these games keep scoring off the charts, while similar games that do the same thing over & live by the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it mentality" get crucified for stagnating.
Probably one of the more honest reviews I've seen, as the only written dialogue that needs to be sitting beside the score is, "if you have one or all of the other 5 COD games released this gen, then save yourself the money, or buy Saints Row 3, Skyrim, or another more groundbreaking, original title, & if you don't own any of the other COD's, buy WAW for a quarter of the price of MW3".
That's a fair score for the game. Shame on reviewers giving more than 8 to this copycat game.