1030°

Sony patented the 'Wii U style' tech in 2009 - Report

GB : According to a patent uncovered, it seems Sony already has the patent to the Wii U style tech.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
WhiteLightning5029d ago

Patent...

"A patent is a set of exclusive rights granted by a state (national government) to an inventor or their assignee for a limited period of time in exchange for the public disclosure of an invention."

...The more you know

Hazmat135029d ago

and knowing is half the battle!

gaffyh5029d ago

This does look a little worrying for Nintendo.

UltimateIdiot9115029d ago

The other half is red and blue laser.

HBK6195029d ago

You would have to think there could be a legal right here for Sony. But it all depends on how long and exactly how this patent works.

Nintendo may have some feature or specification that isn't in Sony's patent and therefore can get around it.

We all know that Sony basically can't do cross game chat on the PS3 because of a Microsoft patent (it's really not due to memory). So there's no reason why Sony couldn't nix this. It's amazing how much the pics of the tablet for Sony looks like Nintendo's Wii-U Tablet.

thorstein5029d ago

....Greatest American Hero! GI Joe is there.... GI JOOOOOE!!!!!!!

Karooo5029d ago

Yep, that's what the definition is.

Bull5hifT5029d ago (Edited 5029d ago )

Wheres the little star? Sony Has a spy in there network.... First nintendo ripped off the Move, Now This.... If it were SCARFACE the evil backstabbing Stool Pigeon Traitor Would Be Beaten And Hanged from A Helicopter , suggest anybody with a name tag that say OMAR SUAREZ'. /dis iz sarcasm

ATi_Elite5029d ago

G.I. Jooooe!

(as a small tear begins to form) Wow those were the good ole days!

blumatt5029d ago (Edited 5029d ago )

If you really think that Sony won't put Cross Game Chat in the PS4 because of some MS patent, you're delusional. lol The PS Vita has it, so the PS4 will too.

And I'm betting that the PS4 and PS Vita will be able to do Cross Game/Cross Platform Chat, so one person could be playing any given game on the PS4 and the other person could be playing any given game on the PS Vita and both will be able to talk to each other. It's possible.

UltraNova5029d ago

@HBK619

If what your saying about MS having cross gaming chat patented then why didnt they boast about it all this time? I dont think they wouldnt use such bragging ace

gcolley5028d ago

@Bull5hifT - "First nintendo ripped off the Move, Now This...." WTF? second thoughts, you're a fanboy, never mind

J_Cob5028d ago

@HBK619 There was an article on N4G a few weeks back on how cross game chat wasn't possible due to memory allocation. Straight from Sony itself. Nothing to do with a patent. That's why it's on the PS Vita and most likely will be on the PS4.

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 5028d ago
ShamefulDispray5029d ago

Nintendo Wii
Playstation Move
Clearly not the same thing, even the nunchu- I mean "Navigation" controller is clearly different.

iamnsuperman5029d ago (Edited 5029d ago )

Well no. The nunchike and navigation controller are similar but the actually motion controllers are done by different technology. The Wii uses IR along with 3 accelerometers . The Move is "The colored light serves as an active marker, the position of which can be tracked along the image plane by the PlayStation Eye. The uniform spherical shape and known size of the light also allows the system to simply determine the controller's distance from the PlayStation Eye through the light's image size, thus enabling the controller's position to be tracked in three dimensions with high precision and accuracy.The sphere-based distance calculation allows the controller to operate with minimal processing latency, as opposed to other camera-based control techniques on the PlayStation 3" (wiki) along with "a three-axis linear accelerometer and a three-axis angular rate sensor, are used to track rotation as well as overall motion. An internal magnetometer is also used for calibrating the controller's orientation against the Earth's magnetic field to help correct against cumulative error (drift) by the inertial sensors" (wiki)

Denethor_II5029d ago

@iamnsuperman

That was a very well presented and informed piece you wrote there, well done.

dkgshiz5029d ago (Edited 5029d ago )

They are very different. I really wish Nintendo didn't have to create all of these wonky controllers that nobody asked for. How about a nice standard analog controller? The best controller Nintendo had this generation was there classic controller for the wii.

5029d ago
n4f5029d ago

yeah some people are butt hurt with the PlayStation dild- err i mean move

joeorc5029d ago

How else do you design a freaking wand?

Hmm?

the Wiimote is designed along the lines as a "TV remote" the Move is designed along the line's as a "WAND" Now some could say they are both wands, which is true, but that does not mean they work the same.

@iamnsuperman

by the way spot on on how the two technologies work in contrast to each other. for one the Wiimote has no "magnetometer" to help offset sensor drift, the Playstation Move does.

which is along with the multi-colored LED's that the Move uses for markers was one of the very thing's that would make it very expensive to put out on the market, why do you think Sony had to wait. the Bashing Sony took for the price over just the PS3. what do people think would have happened is if Sony released the Move back in 2006?

you would have had to Add $30.00 to the price /unit of move.

That's the one of the very reason's why, but you never hear about it because many just want to drive home that Nintendo got it out first.

which they did, but they also cut corner's to do it if you do not mind the corner's cut than fine, but bashing the one's that did'nt just seems petty.

this case is the same an already people are going to still claim that Sony is just playing getting out the photo copy machine.

if there was a copy you can best be darn tootin they would be in court, so the idea that Nintendo or Sony is just making a copy of each other is silly , one company just so happens to get their's out first, that does not mean the other company was not working on a IDEA THAT WORKS ALONG THE SAME LINES!

People just need to get the hell over it.
Its Silly an Moot.

fr0sty5029d ago (Edited 5029d ago )

last time I checked the Wiimote couldn't do augmented reality, couldn't do 1:1 motion control with both hands, couldn't do 1:1 full 3D motion control at all unless you bought an adapter for it, couldn't do head/body tracking, couldn't do built in voice and video chat...

yeah, move is just a copy alright.

multipayer5029d ago

You say that as if 3D and having 1:1 wand controls in BOTH hands actually matters, or the crappy microphone builtin and video chat are going to effect your day to day gaming.. Maybe if they had analog sticks and could be used for normal controls on top of 1:1 motion in each hand. That's just not the case though... The navigation controller doesnt even have motion built in for normal two handed controlling games like wii(you'd think it would have sixaxis) and all the good move games control exactly like a wiimote+nunchuck combo, with the added bonus that you get forced to be centered with a camera and calibrate before every play session.

Defending the move, is not playing with one. Obviously. Even the crappy speaker built into the wiimote is a better feature than most of the "advance" functionality move has...

Dee_915029d ago

lol you guys ..... you guys fed those trolls way too much

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 5029d ago
Kkndo5029d ago (Edited 5029d ago )

If ever there can be a case for this patent, I doubt sony will actually sue them because nintendo is also a japanese company.. If you think about it economically, suffering on the 3ds and wii u will really hurt nintendo and japan as well. With all the castrophies that happened here in Japan, It would really hurt us if japan's businesses can't make profit.

ConstipatedGorilla5028d ago

They will sue their pants off.

J_Cob5028d ago

LOL @ corporations caring about people.

SonyStyled5029d ago

"We all know that Sony basically can't do cross game chat on the PS3 because of a Microsoft patent (it's really not due to memory)"

really? im not so sure because i remember reading years ago why PS3 games didnt have in game custom soundtrack at the time and it was due to a microsoft patent in 2005. motorstorm pacific rift, a 2008 title had custom soundtrack so it took at least 3 years for the patent to end and now games left and right have it. i would just figure if cross game chat was a MS patent it would have ended by now considering the PSV has cross game chat

betrayed gamer5029d ago

im not sure but it could be universal custom soundtrack thats patented not individual games. as in not all games can do custom soundtracks, but on 360 anything can have your music playing

SuperBeast8115029d ago

the music patent is basically sony cant overide the games and unlock it at any time the developers actually have to build in the feature to get around the patent ie red dead sp killzone 2 mp they have to allow it not the actual console like the original xbox

xxLuckyStrike5029d ago

Ya I heard Sony paton the wheel back in the 1700's

xxLuckyStrike5029d ago

I'm sure one can assume that Nintendo has been working on wii u tech b4 2009 Probably a year or so after the wii was released

Vaud-Villian5029d ago

This is more akin to screen augmentation than what the Wii U proposes. Apple has a patent as well though to use the iPad as a controller and supplemental screen while gameplay is on the TV. That one is a little more worrisome.

Maddens Raiders5029d ago (Edited 5029d ago )

Was Sony forward thinking again? tsk tsk tsk smh..

Gray-Fox-Type05029d ago

@hbk619

Sony confirmed ps3 cant do do cross game chat because lack of ram u dipshit

Disccordia5028d ago

From what I know, you can't patent an idea as general as cross game chat. Although you *can* patent the WAY you implement it.

Jdub895O5028d ago

so what happened with facebook?

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 5028d ago
fluffydelusions5029d ago

If true, I wonder if the 2 giants will battle it out in court

5029d ago
rabidpancakeburglar5029d ago

Or in an arena. Howard Stringer versus Satoru Iwata in mortal combat. Everything is far too civil nowadays.

SilentNegotiator5029d ago (Edited 5029d ago )

lol, oh U!
....but will they choose to "finish him!" or "friendship"?

That would be quite the legal dispute. And at the end of the day, the stakes would be much higher for Nintendo; a loss would be catastrophic and a license-agreement could be quite a burden on a company that's already seeing new stock troubles.

Although, the big three seem a lot less malicious and patent trollish than a lot of other companies. I could see Sony and Nintendo coming to a decent agreement.

JsonHenry5029d ago

It said "Wii-U style" tech. NOT "Wii-U tech". There is a BIG difference between those two statements. One implies patent infringement. The other implies something similar but not the same.

A ball point pen and fountain pen both write with ink and give you mostly the same effect. But both are very different technologies.

Xephon085029d ago

just because its different tech doesn't mean it won't violate the patent. if all it took was different tech to get around a patent companies would be doing it left right and center, this could still be a crap storm for Nintendo if it turns out Sony has the patent on their idea.

Soplox5029d ago

Same happened with the 3DS tech back in June and with SONY. SONY and Nintendo will have a long stay in the court.

gamingdroid5029d ago (Edited 5029d ago )

Yes, but it could also mean Nintendo is aware of the patent and made sure they aren't infringing.

Still, a patent can be invalidated if there are prior art and we all know controllers with integrated screen existed much earlier than this patent dates.

That said, these patents are so overly broad and obvious. Gone are the days when a patent actually meant innovation, not just obvious ideas locked up by a company. We see it all the time in software....

JsonHenry5029d ago

^^ Actually, in most cases all it takes is a small differentiators from the original patent to make it to market without fear of ever being found guilty of patent infringement. However that doesn't mean you will escape being taken to court over it either. It just means chances are a judge will side with the defendant. At least here in the States.

sikbeta5029d ago

It also exists something called *licensing fees* based on patent(s) to avoid infringements...

gamingdroid5029d ago

If there is enough similarity, the judge could still rule you are infringing on the patent.

That is why you have patent trolls. The change is supposed to be significant, but often times it is also dependent on the judge.

Eamon5029d ago

JsonHenry is right.

As far as I know, it's not the end result that gets patented, but the technology.

Logically it would also be correct. There are numerous devices in the world atm that commit the same function but were developed with different technologies.

I can patent flying cars with a theory design but does that mean nobody can make flying cars? Of course not. And also, Nintendo would be very careful not to make a major mistake like that.

Ducky5029d ago

... Nintendo had their D-pad patented, yet controllers still have d-pads because they're created differently.

A patent applies to the technique used to create an effect.

gamingdroid5029d ago (Edited 5029d ago )

***As far as I know, it's not the end result that gets patented, but the technology.

Logically it would also be correct. There are numerous devices in the world atm that commit the same function but were developed with different technologies. ***

From what I have seen, it depends on what was approved as a patent. In some cases it practically is indeed the "end result" that gets patented:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

Clearly it is stupid....

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5029d ago
Inception5029d ago (Edited 5029d ago )

With Sony history as an electronic giants than the tech are just a matter of time. But if you don't have any idea -in this case the wiiU style- to used that tech, than it will be useless tech.

btw, if this news is true than i really want to see what nintendo fanboys response. Cause all this years a lot of them always used the "Nintendo is the pinnacle of gaming and innovative tech. All company, specially Sony, ALWAYS copied Nintendo" attitude -_-

kneon5029d ago

Nintendo fanboys don't acknowledge patents. They still claim the Move is a copy of the Wiimote despite the Sony patents from over 10 years ago showing the Move, ball and all.

squallheart5029d ago

well said keneon. Thats something everyone seems to ignore for some reason.

DaTruth5029d ago

To be fair, it's not just Nintendo fanboys; 360 fanboys use it too and completely ignore the PSeye and Kinect connection!

Move is as close to the Wiimote as Kinect is to the PSeye! Obviously if any of these were clones, some lawyers and judges would have something to say!

evrfighter5029d ago

what pseye and kinect connection?

Seferoth755029d ago

KNoeon, You kids are funny. A patent is not a Youtube video released in 2008 with a 2001 date slapped on it afterwards.

What proof do you have beyond that video? Nothing because its the ONLY thing to ever come out and I am sorry, but while you may be simple minded enough to think that Sony held on to this video for years after Nintendo showed the Wii remote then so be it but don't cry because other don't blindly believe a company.

kneon5029d ago (Edited 5029d ago )

Kids? I was probably gaming before you were born.

You are probably too afraid to look it up yourself as it might contradict with your delusional view of the world so here is one of the relevant patents

http://www.google.com/paten...

So the basic shape of the controller and the technology behind the Move was already figured out before July 21, 2000. There are several other related patents as well if you care to search for them.

And as for the nunchuck/navigator it is simply the left side of a DS3. The Move takes over the functions of the right side. You can actually use a DS3 in place of the navigator. There is no rocket science there.

badz1495028d ago

"A patent is not a Youtube video released in 2008 with a 2001 date slapped on it afterwards."

NO FACEPALM BIG ENOUGH FOR THIS!

ChickeyCantor5028d ago

"Nintendo fanboys don't acknowledge patents. They still claim the Move is a copy of the Wiimote despite the Sony patents from over 10 years ago showing the Move, ball and all."

That's nice and all. But if Nintendo didn't bring out the Wii, Sony wouldn't promote their move product.

It would have been in the vault for a nother 10~20 years.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5028d ago
matey5029d ago

Some people are stupid your right wiiu style which means like the wiiu but not quite the same and prob not developed enough to bring to fruition.
Where as wiiu is almost ready to go and is a real product coming to market big difference is sony has a patent 4 a simular concept but most companys have all sorts of crap patented and it means nothing.

kneon5029d ago

It does mean something, that's why companies patent everything that seems patentable, and even some things that don't. It doesn't matter if Nintendo launch first, if it infringes the patent then they will end up paying, either through the courts of by paying a licensing fee.

Soplox5029d ago

Or taking the tech out of the market

joeorc5029d ago (Edited 5029d ago )

"Some people are stupid your right wiiu style which means like the wiiu but not quite the same and prob not developed enough to bring to fruition."

did you read the entire PDF?

because if you did you would know Sony already has such a device , well the reality is they have a few already, anyway. Sony like other Manuf. in smartphones an Tablets have been working on this connectivity for year's between a Handheld an a Remote Hub to the level that the PSvita an other such smart devices can connect to a central HUB.

Nintendo was not the only an also Sony was not
the only one. Apple, Microsoft, Samsung etc.

you went an already claimed this:

"prob not developed enough to bring to fruition."

really?...lol

it's already here with the PSP an Soon a more advanced evolution on this very function with the PSVita an Android Tablets an Smartphones.

@BladedTech

"Can't they block the release of the Wii U then?"

an

@geddesmond

Yeah well if Sony brings out a peripheral for this in the future Nintendo fanboys can shut there mouths about Sony copying Nintendo again. Oh no wait they'll say Nintendo made it sucessful. I forgot Nintendo fanboys are kids lol.

the point of the PDF is that what they are talking about is the connectivity between an handheld device an a hub to the tv or monitor. Remote play was already said function, an this expands more functionality to the core of remote play to <-> or reverse function from or to said Handheld device. this can be a Smartphone or Tablet, or PSP or even the new PSVita.

This has less to do about creating such device an more about the devices connectivity an remote access between the handheld an a Hub.

when the Hub can be many thing's the PS3 was used as an example.

it can send data or retrieving data off of such handheld for interactive functionality, that was already done with the PSP But now they have expanded the remote function further.

PSVita an Tablets an Smartphones are a good example of how's done. Apple has also done it with thew Ipod touch an Iphone remote access to the TV OR IPAD with another handheld.

This is along the same lines, Nintendo is doing something like this but the technology an connectivity functionality may not be exactly the same, we will see.

BrianC62345029d ago

Two game consoles play games but can do it different ways. This looks like Sony beat Nintendo to the Wii U. Nintendo might have to go back to the drawing board on this thing.

disgaeapuchi5029d ago (Edited 5029d ago )

Indeed. The Wii U controller doesn't have a rear-facing camera. This patent is about using a rear camera on a secondary device to "peek" into a game world and show AR-esque elements from it (if you look at the screenshot).

With what we've seen on Wii U, the tablet shows a DIFFERENT camera angle (like the one from someone throwing the ball on Wii Sports U baseball) to the action on screen, controlled via Motion Controls.

When it does have the same camera angle (like with the web browser magnifying glass), it's controlled via accelerometers and gyroscopes, not a rear camera like the patent says so.

Similar ideas, but implemented differently. Nintendo will be fine.

Lastly - this is a software patent, not a hardware one. Sega owned the patent for switching camera views in games while Super Mario 64 was in development, for example. Software patents are hard to prove in the videogaming world.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5028d ago
Les-Grossman5029d ago (Edited 5029d ago )

If this is true then this can be settled in one way & only one way

Mortal Kombat

Chitown712915029d ago

DUH DUH DUH DUH dumdum DUH DUH DUH DUH dudum DUH DUH DUH DUH Dumdum ..................MOOOOOOOOOOO OOORRRRTTTTTTAAAAAAAAAAAAALLLLL LLLLLLLLL KKKKOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMBBBBB BBBBBBAAAAAAAAAAAAAATTTTTTT!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

zerocrossing5029d ago

That's how corporate disputes should be settled imo ;D

DaTruth5029d ago

DUUUUHHHHHMMMMM.... "UUUHHHHHHH, AAAAHHHHHHH......" DUH... DUH DUH DUH DUMMMM....

Sony corp. WINS!

Flawless victory!

Chitown712915029d ago

DUMMM DUMM DUMMMMMMMMMMMM ...........................( gigi mama dah dah beeehhheehhheee) ..........

Nintendo wins....
Babality..........

SweatyFlorida5029d ago (Edited 5029d ago )

If they do battle out in court, I'll bring a boom box with that song loaded in and ready to blast. We'll see how civil both parties remain after hearing it start (even the judge). My guess not for long >:)

"Pssh Test your might"

Eu5029d ago

Were are the "Sony is the COpYer" BS we've been seeing since 2006 now? Theres nothing ABSOLUTELY new under the sun....the Wii tech had been under development since 1998 and up...same with the Kinect tech and so on...

As for the similarities....it will depend how much 'similar' they'll be to see if someone gonna get sued.

gamingdroid5029d ago

Nobody cares about what was done first as it is irrelevant, just what is successful.

The iPhone is hardly the first smart phone, nor is the iPod the first portable music player. They just both happen to be among the best (I don't like Apple, but acknowledge their genius).

Eu5029d ago

NObody cared and yet we've got lots of "Sony copies (insert whoever here)" since 2006....

BrianC62345029d ago

No way was the Wii in development back in 1998. You're making things up.

Eu5029d ago

The TECHNOLOGY used in the Wii was out and in development in the late 90's alright...people just like to think it was new back in 2006.

kikizoo5029d ago

sony invent more than the others, don't spread bc, they are making high end product, electronic, etc nto the other 2, so stop being a fanboy ignoring the fact that eye toy was here before kinect, move since 2000 and better than the other 2, bluray, etc

yabhero5028d ago

I love fanboys... may I ask, who made those projects successful? Wiimote ? Move? You know those operate different inside? The Wii is IR the Move is light sensing? Which was more successful? Kinect or Eyetoy? Which is more successful ?

Show all comments (164)
170°

Sony Aims To Sell 15 Million PS5 Units This Year, but Is Shifting Focus to Monthly Active Users

Sony CEO Hiroki Totoki and CFO Lin Tao talked about the state of the PlayStation business and the strategy and targets going forward, including how they're responding to the tariffs.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
1Victor29d ago

I wonder how the USA tariffs war will affect that projection. 🤔

S2Killinit29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

I think they take that into consideration when they announce their projections. Currently, after the xbox price increase, the PRO is cheaper than the series x! That is ridiculous, and it can’t last.

darthv7229d ago

you keep saying that but the price of a PS5 Pro is S699.99 (US) and the price of a Series X is $599.99 (US)

S2Killinit29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

The series x with 2 TB storage space is more expensive than PS5 PRO which also has 2 TB storage space.

darthv7229d ago (Edited 28d ago )

Oh so you are pitting a regular Pro with a special edition X... got it. If you are going so far as trying to compare apples to apples... please add in the optical drive and stand to the Pro. Seeing as the X has both of those by default.

I will help you if you are unable to do so.
PS5 Pro 2tb: $699.99, Optical Drive: $79.99, Stand: $29.99 = $809.97
Xbox Series X Galaxy Black Special Edition 2TB: $729.99

28d ago
S2Killinit28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. The series X with 2TB storage and much weaker, is… more expensive! So yeah, Im pointing out that fact.

Also, the PRO does not require a stand.

Ps: regular series 2TB is $749 (where did u get 729?)

darthv7228d ago

Its right here on the official XB site: https://www.xbox.com/en-US/...

Okay, so no stand for the Pro, but you might still want the optical drive. So $779.98 vs $729.99. A properly outfitted Pro is still more $$ than a 2tb X.

S2Killinit27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

Do I need to mention that the series x is not nearly as powerful as the PS5 PRO?

And no, the PS5 PRO runs just fine without a drive, and people don’t have to buy the drive right away, assuming they want it.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 27d ago
drivxr29d ago

I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU.

RaiderNation29d ago

Because that's where the real money is made, in microtransactions.

Profchaos29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

People are spending less time playing is a typical trigger for this.

The less time spent playing the less likely you are to spend more money on games and services including subs or even the next console.

Increased engagement equals more money.

29d ago
DarXyde28d ago

Same reason Microsoft does it: it looks better to investors and it's a solution when unit sales slow down.

Personally, I'm not a fan of this metric; and by using it, you're kind of signaling that you're moving into the "This is a PlayStation" era.

Z50128d ago

Because the PS4 also has users and not necessarily sales

Obscure_Observer26d ago

"I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU."

Because they´d finally realized that MS wasn´t wrong after all.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 26d ago
29d ago
28d ago
310°

Sony Announces Large Profits Growth for PlayStation; Expects Further Wins in Current Fiscal Year

Sony announced its financial results for the fiscal year 2024, and things are certainly looking up, despite a decline in PS5 sales.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
CrimsonWing6929d ago

Expect sh*t to slow down if prices aren’t kept in check.

Redgrave29d ago

Who downvotes the truth?

Even PSN itself is too damn high.jpg

S2Killinit29d ago

Gamepass is already at 20$ per month if im not mistaken.

toxic-inferno29d ago

@neutralgamer1992

Not all of us. I'm a big PlayStation fan, and have been since the PSOne. But I can't begin to defend what's happening currently.

At least Nintendo release a large number of games from their major franchises. Sony is just not banking on their established franchises, and yet are raising prices. Not great.

S2Killinit29d ago

Im pretty sure we are going to see a price increase for PRO. I mean think about it, its currently cheaper than xbox series x! That cannot last.

Eonjay29d ago

I'm absolutely sure we will not see a price increase. I don't think we should 'expect' to see price increase because it just adds validity to what Nintendo and Microsoft have done.

darthv7228d ago (Edited 28d ago )

Sorry to pop that bubble but the Pro is not cheaper than a series x... generally speaking (like you are). It is cheaper than one specific version, and doing so by not including the optical drive and stand like the X has by default.

So keep on trying to convince people you are right when everyone knows it's quite the opposite. A stock Pro is $699.99 and a stock X is $599.99. A special edition galactic black 2tb X is $729.99. And if you really want to compare apples to apples... adding the aforementioned optical drive and stand brings that Pro to $809.97 and then they would be on equal footing.

Twisting truths to fit a narrative... I expect better from you S2.

S2Killinit28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. And the series X with 2TB is more expensive. Which in my opinion is insane conseidering how much more powerful the PRO is. The PS5PRO does not need a stand, it can be used without a stand.

TheKingKratos29d ago

So the Pro is not offering any push in sales at all ?

CrashMania29d ago

It's still an expensive, niche product ultimately. And they exceeded their sales projections for units sold by half a million.

lawox29d ago

"18.5 million units have been shipped during the full fiscal year. This is actually ahead of the 18 million units target set by the company."

They beat their yearly estimate. It's not broken down by device, but it's clearly performing well enough. Since it's been released it's consistently been the second best selling SKU on Amazon only after the the Slim with disc.

29d ago
Bathyj29d ago

18 million a year is in the toilet?
I remember when 10 was considered good
Hell Microsoft would take that right now.
Probably pay $100b for it.

28d ago
BeHunted29d ago

If their profits fall next quarter, we'll probably see more price hikes. I can't imagine having to pay £20 a month for PlayStation Plus.

S2Killinit29d ago

I think gamepass is already paying that much.

29d ago
drivxr29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

Decline in hardware sales.
Behind on lifetime sales and decline in first party sales.
Third party content and PSN came through to save the day.
Things will improve starting with the next Ghost game.

Hopefully a steady flow of first party content by end of '25

rlow129d ago (Edited 29d ago )

I guess you get downvoted for stating facts from Sony’s own lips. What I’m curious about is what their top games of the year were and how much Xbox games contributed to the increase?

CrashMania29d ago

Well, generally 3rd party publisher games contribute the most anyway, so no different to capcom, EA and so on contributing to this figure.

lawox29d ago

That's because the report is actually really good.

They beat the console sales estimate that they set last year March, they have increased users both due to the record numbers of PS4 users and strong PS5 sales which is leading to great profits in sales and user spend.

This report is about the financial health of the PlayStation brand and as a platform PlayStation is stronger than ever. Heck they even have Microsoft putting their biggest franchises on the platform.

29d ago
S2Killinit28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

Well, the facts in the article are positive. Nothing wrong with his comment, but in my opinion it doesn't correctly indicate all the facts and nuances that give context to the reality of things. I downvoted for that only.

Make sense?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 28d ago
Lightning7729d ago

This is exactly what happened to Xbox year's ago. They had no first party and started seeing decline in 1st party sales, which effected their third party games which eventually effected their console sales. A slow decline across the board.

Calm down PS fans I'm not saying PS is becoming like old Xbox. I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. Look how Xbox finally has compelling first party and things are on a up swing(despite years going on a downswing). I know thanks to PS releases which helps a ton, (which is why Xbox hardware only dropped 6% instead of 30+% like it usually does) The point still stands despite what Genz Trends may go, first party and compelling games sell hardware and software still. Sony's financial quarter is an example of this, of what lower First party output looks like.

No matter they'll be right back on track in due time any time especially with DS2 (not my type of game but I know many like it) and Yotei. They're not Xbox and let things get bad for so many years on end.

crazyCoconuts29d ago

"I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. "
First party is mostly relevant for the sole purpose of creating EXCLUSIVES that are needed to stay competitive. With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important. PlayStation as a platform now has free reign to profit without the high expense of needing exclusive first party titles.

red2tango29d ago

Sony has been very lazy with 1st party games compared to the PS4 era. And even the PS4 era was nothing compared to the PS3 era in terms of games.

S2Killinit28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

We have Ghost and Intergalactic coming. And then Marathon which is not exclusive to PlayStation. I think Covid and that chip shortage put a speedbump in game development because game manufacturers dont want even more risk that their game will arrive to too little hardware, but the games are starting to show up.

Lightning7728d ago

"With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important."

Absolutely not. If that was the case then Nintendo would put Mario on Sega Genesis and Sonic on Super Nintendo. I know things are way different 30+ years later but not much has really changed in terms of exclusives and their impact on hardware. Especially early in the console life cycle.

Sony made all the money this quarter handover fist. Profits isn't a issue for them right now. I was just saying lower hardware sales and lower first party sales will hurt them or any console manufacturer of they don't have the compelling games in the long run. Just like it hurt Xbox. IF Sony keeps up not having lower first part output. Which we know they're not.

crazyCoconuts28d ago

Well no big exclusives in the last two years yet PS is doing great. What are people gonna do? Buy an Xbox?

S2Killinit28d ago

I agree with you. But they have had plenty of exclusives so far. Has it been ideal? Nope. I have a feeling we are seeing a resurgence with the effects of covid and that chip shortage now behind us.

Lightning7728d ago

No it's just like 360 where they had no games yet ppl still bought it because they sold ppl on the games early on that gen the fans were locked in and invested. They were riding the good will and was dubbed the shooter, racer box. The games dried up and they never recovered from it which hurt them in the long run. Same here with PS they still make the big bucks because they had games early on and the fans locked in and will continue to lock in for a little while longer despite lacking in first party.

S2Killinit28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

I agree. But the problem with xbox was that for some crazy reason MS thought game development wasnt all that important to a platform holder. They literally did not fund games with their own studios. When they lost marketshare they couldnt justify paying for exclusives with large install bases making it too expensive. That is not the scenario with PlayStation.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 28d ago
Show all comments (46)
150°

PS5 shipments top 77.8 million

PlayStation 5 has shipped 77.8 million units worldwide, Sony announced in its financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2025.

italiangamer29d ago

Perfectly in line to reach 100 million by March 2026.

Profchaos29d ago

Theys have to clear 22.2 million to do this.
When you average out the current number over 5 years it's unlikely.

If the console was going down in price it would be possible but they have not been able to reduce the cost in fact it's gone up so this is working against them.

gta Vi has also been pushed out of the financial year and there's likely millions of GTA v players still on ps5 that have not made the jump those players would for GTA vi

The overall poor market conditions and uncertainty doesn't fill me with confidence trade war, weak yen and the ongoing cost of living crisis. We're not talking core gamers picking up a new system were talking gamers who wait for the back 9 to enter a new generation.

I think 2027 they will but 100 not this year.

italiangamer29d ago

They will reach 100 million during 2026.

S2Killinit29d ago

It might actually get a boost considering that even the PS5 PRO is currently cheaper than the series x. This will of course be over soon as Im expecting a price hike for the PRO.

Travesty29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

I know Sony said they are considering raising prices.. Well as of yesterday China and the US lifted their tariffs standoff. At least for 90 days until they can agree on a trade deal that would benefit both parties. So with manufacturing in China and shipping them to the US I’m hoping it will not affect the prices.

Although I kind of doubt Sony will top 100 million since GTA 6 will be releasing next year by March. Could be wrong and I’ll be glad to be.

Xbox shooting itself in the foot or more like nailing their own coffin with rising prices. Hopefully Sony will stay put.. Ghost of Yotei is releasing for $70 still so that’s a god sign hopefully.

senorfartcushion29d ago

Is this a good thing for someone with no shares in Sony stock?

italiangamer29d ago

More PS5 on the market = higher chance of getting even more games.
It's not rocket science.

gold_drake29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

very nice.
in almost 5 years too.
some big hitters are yet to come

badz14928d ago (Edited 28d ago )

come on...don't say that! that slogan "Greatness Awaits" is haunting me everytime someone says this and yeah...1st party output has not been a highlight this gen which is a huge bummer! personally, I would rate their 1st party output this gen 4/10!

gold_drake28d ago

to be honest, when i typed it out, it did sound like a slogan for that ha