Here is some stunning Crysis gameplay from the newly released single-player demo powered by DirectX 10 along with maximum settings.
almost as good as Ratchet & Clank Future.
But has anyone but me stopped and noticed that no one in the world gives a crap about this game? And it's suppose to be the most high tech graphics ever or something.
oh believe me ive noticed to
"no one in the world gives a crap about this game?"
dude just because pc fans dont troll this website doesnt mean 'no one' cares about this. n4g is primarily a site directed towards console and their fans *cough*fanboys*cough*, im still not sure why you guys seem to think pc gaming is on the decline, its actually the not.
not trying to be offensive to anyone, but pc gamers dont feel the need to spam websites with the whole my pc is bigger than your pc, like alot of console gamers.
Three goods reasons why no one is hyped up for this:
1) It won't run on most computers.. I get 60 frames per second and max settings on Bioshock yet this game runs very poorly for me with low resolution and medium settings
2) Electronic Arts.
3) This site is mostly for kids to cry about consoles, and PC games aren't as popular as on other sites.
Lol this game is hawt
This the first game in years I have considered upgrading my PC for.
But I'm no gonna do it. The money is not a problem.
I just don't wanna spend a ton of time buying and installing all these upgrades when my PC's are running great for all the other stuff I use them for.
Of course if Call of Duty and Unreal Tournament wasn't coming to the PS3 it would be a different story. But with those games plus Ratchet, Uncharted, Haze and what not I would probably play the single player then spend some hours on the multiplayer and then return to the comfort of my couch to play on PSN or LIVE.
Looking great non the less.
Very very pretty!
Yes all it will cost you is a measly $1000 to either upgrade or purchase a whole new rig to play this game on the minimum setting LOL.....i think not
Let me clear something up
1. It looks better than Ratchet, ratchet is stunning but crysis is the next level of graphics
2. It won't cost you $1000 to run crysis as the media will tell you, a PC which will run it on medium (which still looks better than every console game out there) will cost you roughly $300
3. Crysis has already gone gold, trust me people care about this game and PC gamers are most unlikely to visit a site rife with console wars banter, unfortunately apart from Crysis, CoD4 and UT3 PC gamers don't have much to look forward to.
Games shouldn't be made to be played on medium settings.
Fu*k that game if I have to give whole salary on upgrading PC. I'll stick to consoles.
" almost as good as Ratchet & Clank Future. "
You got the Best fanboy comment in N4G award. Bravo
Crysis is the best looking game in existence.
and believe me when i tell you that graphically on max settings that this game is so far beyond whats currently capable on any console. the videos do not do this game justice, im lucky enough to have a pc capable of running it well and my friends (big console fans like you and me!) jaws literally dropped.
this isnt me trying to bash consoles, most of you probably know me on here and you'll probably also know im a huge ps3 fan, but i love my pc, and its for reasons like crysis.
could some one please point me in the direction that i can find the specs needed for this game, me and a mate are going to build a new pc and i have around £850 pounds to spare on it, just wana no whats needed to get this game to the max.
recommended specs: (anything lower really isnt worth it)
dual core (what ever make)... 2.2ghz
nvidia 8800gts.... 320/640
2gig... for vista 1.5gig....for xp
well thats^^ the important part.
850 quid huh?
right dude, if you want ill have a quike look and see what i would buy for 850, i could build you a good pc for that. if you want any help, PM me dude.
man u suck ass :)
changing the weapons remonds me with something................ ya...ratchet and clank! KZ2 has better graphics, this game doesn't have chance against KZ2. I swear if crysis is a PS3 exclusive, it would have been bashed to the ground.
You are a drunk bastard, Killzone 2 is not even close to Gears of War in terms of graphics. Read the previews of EGM or 1UP. (And the PS3 is supossed to be a more "powerful machine". LMAO
with what graphics will look like next generation on consoles (5-10 years out). crysis just can't be done on xbox 360 or ps3 it's memory requirements are too high. crysis levels are huge. maybe if crytek redesigned all the levels and use streaming technology you might be able to play it on medium settings on consoles but there is a big difference in graphics quality between medium and high on this game. high setting is what this game is meant to be played at. I'm fortuate to be able to play this great game at very high setting @ 1680X1050 rez at 30 fps and it's amazing. It even works with the xbox 360 controller so maybe an xbox 360 port....lol
really? you can use a controller??
either ways, if you have a decend pc why the hell would you want to use a controller?!?!
controller.I hooked up mine & it works just fine.
You are right it is a stunning gameplay.
I wanted to play this on my pc but i dont think my pc can handle it.
The storyline, the environment, the setting. This will make the game a best selling game on PC.
For some reasons, i can see that this game will be coming to consoles if it sells well on PC.
Thanks for the link, Moron. (no im not calling you a moron.)
"why the hell would you want to use a controller?!?! "
I find it a nightmare trying to use a keyboard to play a game.. I find it better with the 360 controller because its very comfy and easy to use.
well for one you might wanna try adding a mouse to that keyboard....
and 2.... NOOB!
Keyboard and mouse just dont do it for me.
And no Im not a noob, Ive been gaming since gaming started.
omg i was saying the keyboards are a nightmare to use... ur a typical lil 10 yr old on here!!!
in graphics just graphics period, there are several games including ratchet and clank that kill crysis, if your talking about vastness, crysis is the best graphics, or so it seems, and who is the idiot that said that glitches of ware looks better than killzone 2? the cg trailer of glitches of ware doesnt even compare to killzone 2, crysis and glitches of ware are really in the background in killzone 2's camp, killzone is easily in movie range with that amazing polygon count that it would take 3 crysis environments to match, toooooooo bad
You Sir are beyond stupid if you think rachet blows away crisi running on high setting - go find a bridge and do the right thing..... the global gene pool will thank you.
ratchet and clank looks like cg, and basically is, crysis is not this, so it beats ratchet no time
Anything you see on any console all the way back to the beginning is CG, or the proper term is CGI.
I think you are talking about "pre-rendered" there is a difference.
But honestly I cant tell what you are talking about.
And for $2000 less.
thank you shakka
ps3 is no console, and the only cg on console or pc was in the beginning cutscenes, then the separation to gameplay, the gameplay before ps3 was 1/5 of the cg in the scenes prior to the gameplay, maybe you should get a clue kid
Im saving my measly pennies to get a dell xps m1730 just for this game, I need a total computer upgrade. This game would blow up my desktop if I tried to run it.
That is... its nowhere NEAR the level of Killzone. Oops! Sorry, guys- dazed off on my computer.
Just kidding, I really wanted to see what being a fanboy felt like.
thank you kuest
are very welcome, Aizen.
Glad I could help!
tsk, tsk- where are my manners? Sorry, Aizen.
Bubbles (cause that's how I roll).
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.