170°

Microsoft Encourages Game Developers to Have AI Write Their Code in Dystopian Super Bowl Copilot Ad

Microsoft's ad for its Copilot AI chatbot aired at the Super Bowl LVIII yesterday evening included a questionable message for aspiring game developers.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
XiNatsuDragnel75d ago

Oof I think that's a not idea to do because it screams imo less passion in development but hey that's my view.

EvertonFC74d ago

I think AI will be a great work horse making games ie; helping with code and bugs etc but I think and hope the story and animations, art is still humans.
I think using AI correctly could reduce gaming development of a 5 year AAA 1st Party game down to 3 years maybe.

solideagle74d ago

using AI to generate code is fine, as I use it to write trivial programs in web development. if they use AI to do everything then it will be a problem...I think Publishers will need to make a review team to see if the whole thing is auto-generated by AI etc or not.

Unknown_Gamer579474d ago (Edited 74d ago )

Since when has MS been passionate about game development? Either way, I do not like that they own so many IPs now, even if they do go third party.

XiNatsuDragnel74d ago

Monopolization and homogeneousity this type of stuff makes harder to come into the industry and make big waves ngl.

Vengeance113875d ago

Microsoft encouraging programmers losing their jobs to the soulless machine.

CantThinkOfAUsername74d ago

Programming is no longer about writing code. It's about delivering a useful software as a service.

Vengeance113874d ago

Errrrrr... no. Go try telling that to an actual programmer lol You'll get laughed out of the room.

Christopher74d ago

How the heck are you going to deliver software as a service without the software? How?

You essentially just said "Game Pass isn't about developing games, it's about delivering a useful game subscription service."

ApocalypseShadow75d ago

They're all going to use it in the coming years. To what extent where it eliminates jobs is the question.

I'm not scared of AI or robots. How they are implemented in our society to make things more efficient or better is what's the big deal. And who controls them behind the scenes to influence others. Or built to cause chaos, ruin and death. Because we know there are those that will build AI or robots to do that as well.

But I want to see the positive things that come from using AI to build limitless worlds and stories when it comes to games and VR. Anyone that watches Star Trek can see the Holodeck and the AI that controls it can be for good as an educational tool and entertainment. Or, it can also cause harm or even kill you. But it's how it's used that determines what happens.

But even in Star Trek, they still love the live performance of music, written word, theater plays and art done by human beings.

Abriael74d ago (Edited 74d ago )

Using AI to build stories is not using it for good. Stories should be built by developers.

We should not forget that generative AI is pretty literally theft (it plagiarizes human work on a massive scale and just remixes it to make it unrecognizable), and there is no such thing as "ethical" theft.

ApocalypseShadow73d ago (Edited 73d ago )

People build upon someone else's work all the time. If you believe that there's something new under the sun done by someone, you might have to think on that again. Very, very rarely do you see anything new.

Stories are changed around, plot twists that happen in the middle or the end of a story, bad guy turns good in the end, good guy turns bad. It's all been done. But changed again and again by humans that is no different than AI doing it. It just does it faster than humans.

No one wants to see others lose jobs. Including myself. But that's life. We've seen it again and again where humans or animals are replaced by automation or software. And it's going to continue to happen if you like it or not. My job might get replaced. Your writing for a website might get replaced. There's nothing new here.

You also have to assume that everyone is working hard or deserves a job. Some individuals don't work well with others. Some steal. Some are lazy when the boss isn't looking and others have to pick up the slack. Some are industrial spies. Some overwork their employees. Some employees harass other employees. Etc etc. To assume everyone working is good would be naive. There are also those that complain about others taking their supposed "jobs" but in reality, some of these individuals who complain would never do those jobs and think they deserve better or better pay. But complain anyway.

You have to see both sides of it. Just as I have seen that there's good that can be done with AI. Just as there are bad things that can be done with AI.

And, I wasn't the one who disagreed by the way.

Abriael73d ago

There's a massive difference between "building upon someone else's work" via inspiration and literally plagiarizing.

Generative AI literally uses people's work in its training without permission, and just remixes it, so it's a literal content theft.

I'm not even gonna go into the honestly weird rant about people deserving a job.

There are no "both sides." Generative AI is theft and should never be supported.

gold_drake74d ago

its more a ploy that programmers lose their jobs

Barlos74d ago

AI will kill creativity. No thanks

Show all comments (31)
250°

Steam’s Refund Policy Change Won’t Affect You Unless You’re A Lowlife

Steam is changing its refund policy, but you probably won’t be affected

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
thorstein13h ago

Should have happened a long time ago. People wanting refunds after 50 hours in game.

fsfsxii9h ago

Pc gamers will take this as an excuse to pirate things

KyRo8h ago

I'm not sure why you're getting disgrees. Whilst not all PC gamers are petty, an awful lot of them are lol

Crows908h ago

Entirely untrue. Not any more petty than console gamers. The only large difference is console gamers don't have much of a choice.

qalpha9h ago

Daily reminder that 'TheGamer' is a corporate-generated, anti-gamer, anti-consumer, clickbait web site. They are mostly A.I. generated articles that villainize gamers. They provide nothing positive and actively try to provoke and divide the community through extreme view points and politics. Do not give them any clicks.

Inverno9h ago

Only scumbags? As if people don't play their games on console put in the most amount of hours and return it to GameStop and trade it in for another game. But also how many people are actually do this? And what games have been allowed to be refunded?

DustMan8h ago

You can refund any game you've purchased as long as it hasn't been longer than two weeks, and you've played less than 2 hours. I wish they would change it to 3 hours because some RPG's have so much exposition that you may only get an hour total of complete gameplay. That's my only knock on it. I've refunded plenty of stuff I was just curious to try. I typically stay away from Early Access titles which are the only ones affected by this policy change.

Inverno8h ago

Apparently early access doesn't count, only complete games with a play early preorder bonus.

Gaming4Life19818h ago

I definitely know if I want a refund in 2 hours.

SegaSaturn6694m ago

I never liked refunding anything. Even if a film is bad, i dont want my money back. Sometimes things just aren't for me, and it's not the creator's fault necessarily.

Show all comments (12)
100°

Media Molecule’s Next Game is Going to be a New IP

A job listing published by the UK studio reveals that its next project will be another entirely new IP.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
Inverno1d 4h ago

The only PlayStation dev I care about tbh.

Inverno9h ago

Dayum did I hit a nerve. Sorry for not liking most of this gens games coming from PS, not really doe.

Cacabunga1d 4h ago

Hopefully doesn’t take them a complete gen to release it

TheColbertinator23h ago

Good. Something not boring, not one of those "make your own game" crap and also on Steam would be nice.

Stopac21h ago

I too like to look for things in the wrong places.

110°

Outriders Dev's Next Game Has Been Canceled After Publishing Agreement With Take-Two Fell Through

Outriders developer People Can Fly's next game has been canceled after its publishing agreement with Take-Two Interactive fell through.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Tacoboto2d ago

"the capital group of PCF Group S.A."

If you're getting funding from a group that needs two different ways of Acronyming itself, things will not go the way you want them to.

banger882d ago

If it was more online-only crap then good riddance.

jjb19811d 12h ago

Outriders was crap. They slapped that game together and threw in a loot system to get players' attention. This game was absolutely jank and the always online nonsense made it stutter like crazy. People Can't Optimize.

thorstein1d 11h ago

I liked Outriders but I could see where the artistic vision was compromised. The way the industry is now, it wouldn't surprise me that upper management would scrap something that didn't pull in money via gaas, mts, or other means.