150°

Can We Still Consider Bethesda A Top-Tier Developer?

Bethesda has been one of the gaming giants present in the gaming industry for the past 30 years. It used to really mean something when a Bethesda title was going to launch. But the question is, is this a deserved reaction anymore?

Read Full Story >>
rpginformer.com
Jin_Sakai137d ago (Edited 137d ago )

If you’re having to ask yourself this question then you already know the answer.

-Foxtrot137d ago

I think the final verdict is waiting for Elder Scrolls VI

Skyrim was fantastic but I think that's where people started to catch on with the bugs and the like

Fallout 4 was a bit of a let down but maybe they'll will learn their mistakes and get a new engine, possibly stop streamlining the RPG elements to make it even more accessible.

Fallout 76 was grim, where you knew something was up and they weren't the same as before. Todd lying on stage like that, I will never not hear Little Lies by Fleetwood Mac and not think of that moment at E3.

Starfield just didn't deliver

So it's down to Elder Scrolls VI whether it's the final nail or not

I just find it funny with the way they are going, there's still people out there who scream for co-op in the mainline Elder Scrolls / Fallout games. Like they can't seem to even do a single player game, why do people still want them to take on more than they can chew. It's insane thinking.

isarai137d ago (Edited 137d ago )

Same, like as of now they definitely aren't, but I feel everyone is looking at ES6 as their opportunity to catch themselves before completely falling from grace. If ES6 doesn't deliver, I don't see them getting the same level of attention anymore, and people will start to look elsewhere for a similar RPG experience to what they used to deliver.

outsider1624135d ago

If they're still using their old ass engine then no way. If they change it then maybe they have a chance.

shinoff2183136d ago

Skyrim was loved by people. I can't play it it long playthroughs but I like it in doses. Fallout 4 was dope but man it was dumbed down, heavily. Fallout 76 was atrocious, although I've read it was better I'm still not attracted to online so I can't really rate the game. I ain't gonna lie I did play it for probably 20 hours total then I started realizing I had to pay for storage. Yea man fk that. I just wish atleast with Fallout they could've built on what obsidian was doing with new vegas. I don't really care about the engine stuff. Just make a less dumbed down game. No lie I never realized the ladders were not usable in their games though. I find that hilarious. Such a weird thing.

recoctimocassirnff135d ago

"then I started realizing I had to pay for storage. Yea man fk that."

As soon as I realised that, I sat the controller down and stared into space, trying to comprehend the greediness and stupidity of that design choice. My entire playstyle revolves around exploring and hoarding as much equipment and ammo as I can.

Once I snapped back to reality I immediately uninstalled the game.

thorstein136d ago

I agree with everything you said except Fallout 4. That's one of my favorite Fallouts.

anast136d ago

If they mess up ES6, which I will be able to play because the SX will be at a discount as I predicted, Bethesda is done.

ChasterMies136d ago

“I think the final verdict is waiting for Elder Scrolls VI”

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me 3 times and I will withhold judgment until the final verdict.

isarai136d ago

You weren't fooled if you seen it coming and never bought it.

Sonic1881136d ago (Edited 136d ago )

"So it's down to Elder Scrolls VI whether it's the final nail or not"

The only issue I have with that is that we're going to have to wait another 5-6 years before we play ES6. It won't be coming out this generation for sure

recoctimocassirnff135d ago

According to wikipedia, (which is not a reliable source in the least) ES6 will be using the creation engine 2. If that is true, the game is going to be terribly and BGS is dead to me.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 135d ago
anast136d ago

No, they are deving less quality than the reputable indie companies out there.

dmonee136d ago

Starfield left such a bad taste in my mouth im going to say “No!” to this headline. If Starfield was an xbox X launch title I would still be disappointed. Perhaps I set my expectations too high and it is what it is. Elder Scrolls 6, Fallout 5 or maybe even a new IP from them, could give them an opportunity to redeem themselves

Crows90136d ago

A huge disappointment. and then us real Bethesda fans have to try to get through the fanboy noise so Bethesda can get the message. Being an exclusive has hurt Bethesda badly.....they don't get the proper feedback

CrimsonWing69136d ago

Lately they haven’t been, so… if it quacks like a duck and walks like a duck 🤷‍♂️

Show all comments (30)
330°

Square Enix Declares $140m Loss Amid Game Pipeline Shakeup

Final Fantasy VII Rebirth publisher Square Enix has declared a $140m loss based on a shakeup of its internal development pipeline.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
Furesis17h ago

What are they doing over there? Sounds like they canceled something big. I read a rumor a while back about ff9 remake . Here "Final Fantasy IX has gone through a very challenging development, the game is still in progress but may undergo changes drastic enough that we won't hear about it for a couple of years."
This could be one of the reasons if the rumor is true. That was Silknight i don't know how credible he is but it's something and it would make sense.

-Foxtrot15h ago

I hope IX is still on the cards

Just a straight up remake which they expand a little bit nothing over ambitious

If IX dosent happen then VI and VIII will never be thought of.

Kakashi Hatake5h ago

6 and 8 were way more p popular games despite today's cult following of 9.

TiredGamer14h ago

What are they doing? Sales are falling and the costs are out of control. Big releases need to be absolute sales home runs now, and Final Fantasy sales have stagnated.

Now we know why Square didn’t fall over themselves to remake the original FF7 all these years ago. It certainly wasn’t a license to print money, at least not with what the expectations were. Each of these full on remakes drains an enormous amount of company resources for a razor thin profit margin.

TwoPicklesGood14h ago

Breaking the game up into multiple parts was a mistake IMO.

blackblades12h ago

The loses came from cancelling games nothing else.

shadowT16h ago

Do not miss Final Fantasy 16. Great game!

raWfodog15h ago

I'm waiting for them to release the complete edition bundle, but it's definitely on my list.

PhillyDonJawn15h ago

Wth is going on with the gaming industry?

mandf14h ago

Corporate investors taking everything

TiredGamer14h ago

Not rocket science. Compare sales numbers, development cycles, and budgets to the previous gens. We are all collectively burning up the industry from the inside out. Expectations are ludicrously high now for every release and sales are dropping for even the most prestigious of series.

We used to be satisfied paying $50-60 for a game that took 1/100th the budget and staff to make. Now gamers feel cheated if they have to pay the same for a game that took 100x the budget. We may be reaching the end of the line for this model of gaming.

wiz719110h ago

@tiredgamer I think your point is one that ppl don’t understand and you hit it on the nose .. some gamers don’t want to take accountability but it’s some of the gamers fault the industry is where it’s at .. we as gamers set the standards for the industry not the shareholders , ppl forget that the shareholders and the industry want and need OUR Money. Both the Xbox and PlayStation are seeing a drop in hardware , the industry is very stagnant right now.

Tacoboto11h ago

Speaking to Square:

Turns out their mismanagement wasn't related to the western studios they dumped to Embracer, but their own fault.

With regards to Xbox - a good way to kill your brand is to pull support on high quality titles and only dump B and C-tier titles to it

With regards to PC - Epic Games Story exclusivity for any duration and piss-poor optimization will hurt you.

With regards to FF Pixel Remasters - y'all messed up by barely releasing them on physical, like wtf that was free money!

And lastly, you don't help a franchise by releasing a mainline title that undermines every title that came before it. FFXVI was a DMC-like with bottom-of-the-barrel side quests and I can't imagine that helping Rebirth at all considering its marketing is directly tied to how big that game is.

Tacoboto10h ago

Sony is getting their best titles and with the most polish, so what about it? Nintendo gets their top properties too, for titles that can run on Switch hardware.

It's the other fanbases that get the second- and third-class treatment from Square. If that's due to agreements with Sony, that's not a Sony issue but a Square one for accepting those terms. Sony is doing its best to look out for Sony.

TiredGamer15h ago

The industry implosion is continuing. Sky high budgets, prolonged development windows, stagnant sales numbers, and falling currency values (inflation) are wreaking havoc on the legacy industry. AAA games will slowly become the rarity.

CS715h ago

Sad. Rebirth was one of my favorite games in a long time. Should have sold more.

CrimsonWing6913h ago

Oh I’m with you. What’s worse is they can say, “Well we tried to make this amazing game and spend all this money on, but not enough people showed an interest. So no more of these since we can’t take a hit like that.”

The industry is going to take a dramatic shift. Mark my words on this.

rpvenom13h ago(Edited 13h ago)

I think there is quite a large portion of individuals like myself who held out on buying it on PS5 because I can get it on PC eventually. To be able to mod the game and also have custom graphical settings to my liking

gold_drake3h ago

same

but im not sure if it matters at all. im sure they made sony pay a hefty sum for the 3parter to come on ps5 exclusively. so watever they made in sales, might have come bk in profits for square, but i dont know
and we dont know what "underperformed" even means for square.

Show all comments (32)
60°

Here's Everything I Expect From The Witcher 4's Combat

Danish from eXputer: "The Witcher's upcoming sequel needs to overhaul the series' combat system if it wants to make a big splash among gamers."

on_line_forever20h ago

after what we see ( 2015 - 2024 ) in dark souls 3, blood borne , sekiro , dragon's dogma 2 , rise of the Ronin combat they should really careful and bring very good combat in Witcher 4 this time

130°

Square & Bandai Namco Being Honest About Quality Is A Step In The Right Direction

Saad from eXputer: "After suffering from massive financial hits, Square Enix & Bandai Namco appear to be turning over a new leaf but I'm still unconvinced."

Nerdmaster1d 7h ago (Edited 1d 7h ago )

I was talking about games with some Japanese guys here in Japan, and it seems like around here Bandai Namco has a fame of making low-quality games, with the occasional gem.

About Square Enix, I believe they lack the capacity to improve. They should learn with Capcom (although even Capcom still makes some bad mistakes), but I don't think they ever will. They keep chasing whatever is new at the time (blockchain, AI...) to say "we innovate", without considering the public perception and if these things actually improve the games or not. Them releasing too many small games with no advertising also shows a lack of trust in its own products. Even with their biggest games, like turning FF into an action game with XVI and the very divisive plot changes regarding whispers and timelines in VII Remake, shows them trying to attract a new generation of gamers without understanding what made the series so big in the first place.

shinoff21831d 6h ago

I want a true ff7 remake. With thatcsaid I'm way happier with 7 remake then I was with ff16. I'd still prefer turn based but square keep chasing these Lil kids

Snookies121d 2h ago

Man, it is perfectly fine to prefer turn based. Turn based is amazing. But there's zero reason to call anyone who likes action games "lil kids". Liking one gameplay system over another does not make you more mature in any way.

VersusDMC1d 5h ago

People love the new FF's overall...the problem is the abundance of 7's they release that lose money or make very little like diofield, star ocean divine force, Valkyrie asylum, harvestella, foam stars, etc. Advertising wouldn't have saved those games. Apparently Forespoken had a big Advertising budget but we saw how that went.

shinoff21831d 5h ago (Edited 1d 5h ago )

Star ocean divine force actually sold well from what I've read not ff type numbers but well enough. Was a dope game to.

FinalFantasyFanatic1d 4h ago

Bandai Namco is going to Bandai Namco, I do believe that Square Enix can't change without changing the entire management, they've had these issues for more than a decade and haven't learnt, I have very little faith they can course correct. I'll still buy their better remasters/remakes like Star Ocean 2 though (not FF7R).

Asterphoenix1d 2h ago

Namco is just milking the same Sword Art Online with lack of budget as well as anime IPs that don't go to decent developers like Jujutsu Kaisen and My Hero Academia. Namco deserves their losses and no future Dot Hack or Xenosaga remaster :(.

Square allocated lot of their budget on Forspoken was a mistake. Square always had management issues. Star Ocean 2 was a great remake and I found their recent entries of FF(16 and Rebirth) better than 13 and 15.
I think they were better than 360/PS3 generation where Square went really downhill.

CrimsonWing691d 5h ago

I don’t know why NOW they decide on this, but I guess later is better than never.