180°

Stats Show Oculus Quest Dominating Other VR Headsets

The Oculus Quest has been rapidly rising to become the most successful VR platform yet as shown by sales of certain VR titles.

ApocalypseShadow883d ago (Edited 883d ago )

Article just...ends. Abruptly. Leading nowhere. Talks about other things not related to the sales of Quest. Like Half Life on PC and RE7 on PSVR. The focus should be sales for a standalone headset, what it means for Facebook, VR as a whole and where it could lead the emerging platform next. If the writer would have mentioned something like Quest being used on PC as a cheaper entry to *PLAY* Half Life, then it would have made more sense to include mentioning the game.

Anyway, Quest seems to be doing well for a subsidized device that has no competition in its area. Like Nintendo basically having the mobile game console market to themselves, Quest has no competition. But it is a quality device if you can get past Facebook requirements and Zuckerberg's end goal. It does have enough marketing for a new product. And, is getting support by developers in the lull between new devices offered by others.

We'll just have to wait and see if they can maintain that momentum when newer, better devices show up with just as much marketing dollars, just as much tech quality and a higher level of first party development.

Buying exclusivity for old games and playing them in a different way is fine. But Facebook(by any other name is still Facebook) needs to start making games in-house sooner than later than buying up Indy companies. Games like Beat Saber, like any other music game, is not enough to carry the product and will fade into obscurity like DDR, Drum mania, Rock Band, etc. New games are a necessity for growth. Even when newer headset buyers are purchasing the older released games.

Neonridr883d ago

the same goes for Sony though. Remember that a vast majority of the PSVR library consists of games that are also available for PCVR too. Facebook has plenty of studios under their belt and have put out some good really good content. I haven't owned an Oculus headset since my original Rift (now use Index + PSVR) but I can see the appeal to the Quest 2. Having the option to play wirelessly or tethered is a great feature.

ApocalypseShadow883d ago (Edited 883d ago )

Wireless is a nice feature. And Quest is doing well for now. But wireless won't matter as much as you think. Never said the tech sucked. Read what was said above. Standalone is just under powered for what's coming.

Quest right now is flourishing between the high price of PC headsets and PSVR on its way out. Besides Facebook "price dumping." But just like the 5 year old PSVR, Quest 2 will start to look quite old real quick playing PS2 games against what PS5 will deliver. Which will benefit PC gamers with cross platform. Which as a side effect, will benefit Quest PC users. But they won't get everything PS5 will offer. Quest only really is piggybacking off of PC. If it wasn't for Valve's openness, Quest would not be doing as well as you think. PC gamers are just buying it because it's a cheap alternative to Index and the rest. Indy developers are doing well there because game development is 2 to 3 gens ago and costs little.

Wireless won't matter when you see the games coming that Quest can't do. I mean, it can't even do Skyrim or RE7 today. No amount of programming or that extra optimisation that was found recently will change what's inevitable. That's why Facebook will release yet ANOTHER headset like Cambria because Quest 2 won't be able to keep up. Just like certain games don't end up on Switch. It just can't handle current development unless you stream the games or downgrade extensively. Which will hurt Quest owners when they won't be able to play some Cambria games like Quest can't play Quest 2 games like RE4.

As for first party, you really think Facebook has the same level of game pedigree as Sony's? You might want to look again. Nope. Not unless they buy some more developers. Microsoft is worth 2 trillion and that has not stopped Sony from dominating them on games. Also, when games like GTA 5 get announced, or even Spider-Man that won't be on Quest, or smaller sized games that look almost as good as that Matrix demo minus the huge city, you'll then understand it won't even be close. The SSD streaming gigs and fast load times, the sound of Tempest 3D, the haptics that are exclusive are just going to make Quest look old. Quest will still sell as a standalone because it has no competition. But watch the port beggars as they wish they will have the games on that *WIRED* PSVR 2 headset. Or hope they come to PC so they can play them. You'll see.

Neonridr883d ago

I mean the Quest 2 can easily just plug into a PC and achieve much better results than what the Q2 can do standalone. It's the versatility coupled with the low price point that attracts people. You don't need a high end PC to enjoy good VR, most people don't need photorealistic graphics while playing as your brain can get easily tricked by the simplest of graphics (see something like Superhot or Beat Saber for example). But if you want a better experience, you can connect it to your gaming PC should you own one and get much better results.
Don't get me wrong, I love that my Index can push really high resolution VR games coupled with my PC, but I love VR for VR, not because a game looks as good as Half Life Alyx.

Naturally newer headests like PSVR 2 or whatever else on the PC side will come along and make the Q2 feel dated, but you don't think FB doesn't have a successor in mind? Guaranteed we will see a Q3, they may never make a tethered headset again though.

As for the games, FB studios have put out some really high quality titles, and that will only continue moving forward. Thankfully they are one company that is serious about putting money in and pushing it forward. Sony has done a great job for the PSVR ensuring there is some quality content to play. This is the biggest thing about getting this tech to stick and without either, we wouldn't be where we are today. It's never going to replace regular gaming though, so it'll never be as big, regardless of how much you or me enjoy it.

I'm excited about the future and will no doubt get a PSVR 2 when the time comes.

Atom666883d ago

It'll be interesting to see if Sony keeps PSVR2 tied to PS5 (figuratively and literally). A wireless option and PC support would be their best bet imo.

I run Quest w/air link. Gives you all of the perks of PCVR plus freedom of going wireless. If it wasn't for the versatility, it wouldn't be worth it for me.

cartoonx1881d ago

@ApocalypseShadow do you even realize that quest can be used as PCVR as well as standalone. it can run pretty much any PCVR game and that too wirelessly.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 881d ago
WheatBread883d ago

It's dominating because it's the only vr headset you can get for $300.

annoyedgamer883d ago

It dominates because it's cheap.

Magog883d ago

Sony's plan for PSVR2 is to make their AAA games compatible and fully playable on PS5 or PSVR2. That alone is a game changer. Full AAA top of the line games released regularly is what will push VR into the mainstream.

TravsVoid883d ago

What is the point of VR in non VR games? You just want it for the 3D effect?

Magog883d ago (Edited 883d ago )

It would still be a VR game... VR support and inputs for all titles.

sourOG883d ago

I believe it. I bought 2 as Christmas gifts

Show all comments (21)
90°

Meta Is Doing With VR What Apple And Sony Have Struggled To Do

Shaz from GL: "Where Sony is ramping down support for PSVR2, and Apple are reconsidering their future with the Vision Pro, Meta and the Quest 3 continue to shine."

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
ApocalypseShadow20h ago(Edited 20h ago)

I'll admit that Facebook is doing more for VR than others. But they also have blown over 50 billion dollars so far and growing in R&D, building the meta verse, buying up exclusives and underpricing their products below build price, to kill competition in the stand alone space. Sony and Valve aren't willing to go into the red at an unheard level to capture the market. We know Sony could build a stand alone device that beats Quest just by the features in PS VR 2 and the new stand alone headset they built. But the new Sony would rather build a device they can profit from day one.

But, Sony so far has profited on hardware and on software. They just don't seem willing to spend the money on marketing, selling under build price or spending millions on making in-house VR exclusives for PS VR 2. Which sucks big time. They're just letting 3rd parties and indies run the show.

Article also doesn't mention that Apple's headset is more a developers product than a mass market item. To say they are looking into making a cheaper one for the next iteration is speaking the obvious. Duh. That was always the case. Build something the public sees as quality not can't afford, then make another that the masses can afford. TVs, cars, cellphones etc all were once expensive. Now, they're cheap to buy with many options to choose from. And Apple isn't even selling VP as a VR headset. I'm well aware that Apple's true intentions is to build a device that pushes AR with VR as an option. Not build a VR device. Because they know eventually that they want to replace the cellphone with AR glasses or an AR headset. If they cared about games, they would have launched as a gaming device.

Lastly, Facebook launched Quest 3 last year. But has not mentioned how many they sold up to this point. Why is that? Besides Quest 2 selling more by being cheap, the market can't move forward until they start selling more Quest 3 headsets than 2. Maybe the new exclusive Batman and Hitman games will help. But we'll see.

helicoptergirl15h ago

Meta is also Billions and billions in the hole in regards to VR. If Sony were to do what Meta has done, they'd be bankrupt

ChasterMies58m ago

Meta is losing billions on a business that theh will probably walk away from like they did the Facebook phone. Temper your expectations of your investments in Meta’s hardware.

400°

PS5 Livestreams Are No Longer Speaking to the Fans Who Built the Brand

The problem for PlayStation right now – through a heady combination of its own adjusted marketing plans, the aftermath of the pandemic, and never-ending development cycles – is that it feels like it’s abandoned the kinds of software that fans have always valued most.

Read Full Story >>
pushsquare.com
-Foxtrot23h ago

My issue with the announcements over the past 2 years or so is that now these "big" announcements they hint at or whatever end up being just PC ports.

For most of their core audience, the people watching, we've played them, a PC announcement being made into a big thing and counting as one of their major announcements means f*** all to most of us. Also you have to think if they didn't have them then first party wise they don't have much else.

So now it's split between PC ports (God of War Ragnarök), live service shit (Concord) and the first party games we actually do want (Astrobot).

CrashMania22h ago

Yeah they really should leave the PC announcements to blog posts, most of the audience watching are PlayStation console players, not PC players.

Eonjay8h ago

I'm not sure I understand the stance. They surely want to sell their games no matter what platform they are on. Also leaving out PC port announcements isn't gonna magically make more PS5 announcements.

Abear214h ago

Agreed I thought the God of War announcement was more DLC, disappointing PC announcements on a hype reel doesn’t make sense to PS5 players watching.

CrimsonWing6910h ago(Edited 10h ago)

This particularly was a bad showcase in my opinion. Derivative Souls-like (which in all honesty I will check out because I like the genre, but I couldn’t tell you the names of the games without looking it up or how they’re different from one another), Concord, a mid Silent Hill 2 Remake. I’m not really into platformers so Astrobot didn’t stick to me. The only thing that got me hyped was Monster Hunter: Wilds.

Truth be told though, most of these showcases are ass anyways. I’m struggling to think of one that was firing on all cylinders like the good ol’ E3 conference announcements.

The shift to GaaS is absolute sh*t and for them to think that’s the game to make the focus shows just gives me little hope for the future of gaming, especially the state that the industry is in.

I wish they’d have shown Wolverine or something that would’ve been a “holy sh*t” moment… but nope.

ravens527h ago

Ballad of Antara and Where Winds Meet. They both look dope to me 🤷🏽. N If Concord is on PS+ then I'll take it. It wasn't as bad as people are making it out to be.

-Foxtrot5h ago

Yeah it's funny I'm the same, I can't remember the names off by heart unless I'm reminded.

I think most of these games are just starting to mush together where the one game we do want "Bloodborne" is no where in site whether it's a remake or sequel.

" I wish they’d have shown Wolverine or something that would’ve been a “holy sh*t” moment… but nope"

I don't think we'll see it for a while after the leaks

I just can't believe we've seen nothing on Spiderman 2 DLC, not like I'd be that enthusiastic about it myself but I mean in general I'm surprised it's a no show.

We got 3 story episodes within 3 months of the first games release and it took months to get a New Game Plus mode and that was before all the major leaks that happened

fr0sty5h ago

It isn' that Concord was bad, it's that we've all played it before.

Psychonaut852h ago

Yeah they’ve shown before that they have no problem showing teasers way in advance, so the fact there was no trade for any of the heavy hitting first party studios is quite concerning. I feel like there may be no Sony Santa Monica or Naughty PS5 only game this gen. Which is sad.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2h ago
Tacoboto4h ago

It sucks, doesn't it?

And the company that *is* announcing new single-player titles can't manage themselves at all and have both monetization and perception dilemnas they themselves created, problems so severe it puts all the titles they're announcing in a compromised position right out the gate.

Perfect Dark should've been an EASY win for the creative head of the Tomb Raider reboot, but it's in development hell. They cratered Starfield's potential by thinking it was ready for release last September. Hellblade received all the pressure of a AAA title despite being the gaming equivalent of an art film. They closed Tango after HiFi.

Sony has no pressure to change anything about what they're currently doing when the competition became a mockery by its own doing. With PS5 outpacing PS4 and being their most profitable generation so far, the people spending the money are saying they're totally ok with this approach.

Christopher4h ago

Where's. My. First. Party. Support. ?.

just_looken29m ago

@fox 100% agree

Along with that is the new leadership pushing into the "modern" audiance crap now there getting into mobile gaming with no doubt more microtransactions in there games.

As of june 1rst one person Hiroki Totoki,serves as the Chair of Sony Interactive Entertainment (SIE) and the President, COO, and CFO of Sony Group Corporation.

That is way to much power no checks no real hey that is a bad idea not to mention the work load

https://gamerant.com/playst...

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 29m ago
isarai17h ago

This gen just sucks, period. More PS4 games have come out than PS5 exclusives, and we're almost 4yrs in. Then this unwanted GAAS push which is completely tone deaf, and not what their fanbase wanted. Feel like im just watching a childhood friend kill themselves with an addiction.

purple10112h ago

the gas is in ADDITION, to all their other games, thats why they brought more studios,

so the old ones can continue doing what they do best.

Yi-Long9h ago(Edited 9h ago)

The argument 'GAAS is in addition to what we already had' kinda goes out of the window when we can see very clearly a lack of SP offline games, Sony killing studios and IPs left, right and center, and pushing 'always online' in games that never had it and don't need it (Gran Turismo).

You can clearly tell that earlier generations offered far more in terms of diversity/variety of genres, be it Everybody's Golf, Driveclub/Motorstorm, LittleBigPlanet, Modnation Racers, Jak & Daxter, Gravity Rush, Ico, Sly Cooper, Locoroco, Tearaway, whatever.

It feels like they killed off anything that wasn't going to sell massive numbers but did offer something fresh and original and were just 'fun'.

shinoff21839h ago

Imagine if some of those new studios were working on single player games. Sony would have it locked. Instead we get trash.

isarai5h ago

Not really, for a few studios that's literally all they are making, and for others, it being ADDITIONAL is the problem as it is delaying anything else they may be working on, hell ND had to cancel theirs because it was getting in the way.

EazyC4h ago

That's what it looks like now but it is already cannibalizing the other aspects of their brand. These things historically happen slowly, and then all at once...the brand you once knew is unrecognisable

SimpleDad4h ago

That's such a bad narrative. So wrong and we see the end results. No single player games... only Marvel.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4h ago
MrBaskerville10h ago

Though, do note that since summer last year, more and more games have been current gen only. Lots of smaller titles, but of bigger stuff there's Baldurs Gate 3, Alan Wake 2, Rise of the Ronin, Dragons Dogma 2, FFRebirth and so on. Being on ps4 only, means you will be missing out on a lot of releases both major and minor.

anast6h ago

Roughly 5 PS5 exclusives have come out, this is a similar drop rate than PS4.

anast4h ago

Through first party releases this gen through may 23: Astro's, Stranding directors Cut, Destruction all stars, GT7, GT7 VR, Miles Morales, Rift Apart, Demon's Souls, Returnal, and Sack Boy. There are more. Some will say well they release some of those on PS4. I say play them on PS4 and then play them on PS5, then tell me it's just as good.

isarai3h ago

Stranding is not 1st party and it's still a ps4 game just with minor additions. Miles Morales is also a ps4 game, gt7 is also a ps4 game, sackboy is also a ps4 game, so you got returnal, demon's souls, and destruction all stars, also Spider-Man 2, so 3 launch window games and one later game exclusive to ps5, with 2 of those by the same studio, In 4yrs,

anast3h ago

They are still PS5 games. When I play some of these that can be played on both systems. One is a PS4 and the other is a PS5 experience, To say otherwise is disingenuous. For some reason, I can't get my Stranding PS5 directors cut to work on my PS4. And I cant get GT7 VR to work on my PS4 either....and so on. Sony first party studios have been releasing close to the same clip as PS4. This is a fact.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3h ago
EazyC4h ago

It's making them money but like the M$ thing, Sony is going to start killing their brand over the longer term. Especially now that they're basically running a monopoly.

I plugged in my PS3 recently and it was a mixture of uplifting and depressing. Modern gaming STINKS.

Psychonaut852h ago

Great analogy. They see the Fortnite money and think maybe if they just keep hurling shit at the wall something will stick. Gambling with cumulatively billions of dollar AND people’s livelihoods. AA and indie is the future, unless AAA pulls their head out of their see which is unlikely

ChasterMies1h ago

Everyone is focused on having current gen exclusives as if losing last gen support will magically make games better. Games like Fortnite and GTA V embraced last gen and were huge hits. Switch games like Zelda looked worse than last gen and were huge hits. If this console generation is like any other, we won’t see the best of current gen games until next year.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1h ago
Profchaos12h ago

Yeah this 9th generation has been the biggest let down out of every console generation I've experienced since the 8 bit era.

For the first time in near 30 years I feel like Sony has completely abandoned the fanbase that got them to where they are. We see GAAS being shoved down our throats and fun replaced by lootboxes and milking us. This isn't the Sony experience I ever wanted

if I wanted to be exploited I'd play a mobile game

I find the modern line up though just lacks innovation which earlier generation games had in spades we only get what is going to sell big numbers even if the games a single player games it's likely so by the book I feel like I've played it before.

I think the PS2 was likely the golden era for experimental game design everything since that has been game design by bored room

MrBaskerville10h ago

Atleast I think they've pivoted back to singleplayer stuff. But it will take a while. I think they will announce some big game next year, like Ghost Of Tsushima 2 or something. Notice how they showed us Concord and Astro Bot a few months before release. I think the time of knowing what's on the horizon is over.

shinoff21839h ago

Although the lack of 1st party ps5 games only is there. I'm still having a blast. Much more then the ps3 generation.

Storm238h ago

Not me I mean I am having fun, but the PS3 generation was my favorite ever, by far, and man do I miss those times...

EazyC4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

I always feel like these "still having a blast" guys are like people at parties who stay after things get really stale, not realising they're dancing alone in their faeces-stained undies

rippermcrip8h ago

Care to list all the "Sony" GAAS games with all the loot boxes and milking? Aside from Destiny (which already was like that when they bought it), what are you referring to?

fr0sty5h ago

I think they're still recovering from Jim Ryan... in the gaming industry, just firing a guy isn't going to immediately undo all the projects he greenlit to see his myopic GaaS vision come to life, they have to cut some of those projects, and do their best to recoup losses on others... but I do think Sony realized this isn't the way we want to see PlayStation go, which is why he lost his job.

EazyC4h ago

I feel like we haven't even seen anywhere close to the full push yet.

Mark my words. By the end of this generation, it will be game over for ANY semblance of what we loved as videogames, and by extension, the PlayStation brand

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4h ago
lellkay10h ago

I love my PS5, but these state of plays are 100% not delivering.

VersusDMC9h ago

Granblue relink
FF7 Rebirth
Helldivers 2
Rise of the ronin
Stellar blade
Concord
Astro bot
Silent hill 2

How is this years list not mostly games that a playstation fan would like?

Armyofdarkness9h ago

Great games all, except Rise of the Ronin! It sucks!

FACTUAL evidence8h ago

Sony fans usually just type list out in abundance to make it look good, no matter how crappy. I used to literally laugh out loud back in the ps3 days when people will type out long list of exclusives, and add “Afrika” and also “the last guardian” and “the agent”. Lol The last guardian didn’t even see that generation, and sony fans are still waiting for the agent.

TL;DR ignore the sony list, they just like to name games only on their console no matter the status.

InUrFoxHole6h ago

@Factual evidence
We're eating over here. Keep your fake concern for Sony over there. We're just waiting for the showcase

FACTUAL evidence1h ago

@InUrFoxHole

Fake concern? I’m not even concerned for Sony, I know they could do better. Most importantly the fanboys know they could do better. Not saying sony is doing bad, but just stating the obvious how fanboys thiink they could do no wrong. BTW PS is my console preference so don’t even try to make me look like I’m downing Sony.

thesoftware7309h ago

Versus, I know you have to defend to the end, but dont be dense.

If you read the comments, you can see that people are talking about Sony's first-party output, past innovation, and its usually high-level game output. You posted a list of 3 games that are not out yet: 2 mid games, one Gaas, and 2 paid-for 3rd party exclusives. I do not hate your list, but that is not what people here are talking about.

VersusDMC8h ago

I am replying to the article.

i"s that it feels like it’s abandoned the kinds of software that fans have always valued most."

Sony is making deals for mostly single player games just as it always has.

And the argument that only games made by studios that Sony owns matter is beyond brain dead and i just look at all the games released on a console that isn't on the competitions.

Profchaos9h ago(Edited 9h ago)

The only game on that list that interests me is astro bot and I'm a PS fan since it's inception. Let be honest there's not a lot of amazing games on that list maybe astro bot and helldivers

FF another rpg in a long running franchise selling less and less each entry
Helldivers 2 a fun live service game I got a few hours of enjoyment with friends
Rise of Ronin may aswell play ghost of Tsushima
Stellar blade yeah ok you have to admit this one is beyond niche
Concord amazing cutscenes lackluster Game
Astro bot day 1 I'm so there
Silent hill 2 verdict is still out on this one.
Granblue ok I take stellar blade being niche back granblue I've never heard of

The games your listing here are not all that great outside of astro bot and helldivers.

This is the bare minimum release schedule as far as exclusives I'd expect similar on switch and Xbox really.

VersusDMC8h ago

You'd expect similar on xbox and switch but you aren't getting it. Without looking into it i just think hellblade 2, princess peach and paper mario is the only console exclusives that the competition has released and are selling less than the "niche" games on the playstation side.

Profchaos8h ago

Actually I thought paper Mario sold quite well peach however yeah that was a flop on the switch side of things they kind of have an excuse it's the end of life for that system but they are still getting new games of a good quality.

Yeah Xbox I don't own a Xbox I don't want one especially with their recent flip flopping and basically killing of the brand but there's a good chance they have a new Doom game this year and I've been a room fan since the first game.

hiroyukisanada7h ago

@VersusDMC yes, I own the first four on that list and I have had an absolute blast with them. For those who play a variety of games, they really are fantastic with over 100 hours of gameplay for each title. Granted, only one is a true "blockbuster" like a traditional first party Sony game. Which is Rebirth.
Sounds like the people complaining only want that, which is fine, I guess. Their loss by not choosing all the games on that list 😂
Silent Hill is looking a little rough and not my cup of my tea, but the rest of that list is excellent.

-Foxtrot4h ago

Why is it everytime people talk about Sony's FIRST PARTY STUDIO output the counter argument is posting a bunch of games from third party developers

We're talking about first party and how Sony isn't about trying new things or having variety like past generations.

It's just Sony playing things super safe these days.

VersusDMC4h ago

Why is it that when an article says Software people don't count the THIRD-PARTY exclusives?

The begining of the article mentions the trifecta of announcements of Final Fantasy 7 Remake, Shenmue 3, and The Last Guardian. One third party exclusive , one multiplatform and one first party.

So if the article talks about third party games why are you only mentioning First party?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1h ago
Show all comments (68)
70°

Interview: Winifred Phillips Discusses the Wizardry Soundtrack -- Gamerhub UK

The talented music maker discusses her process, challenges and, of course, magic!

Read Full Story >>
gamerhub.co.uk