330°

Take-Two expects shorter gaps between releases

When Borderlands 3 launches later this year, it will arrive almost exactly seven years after Borderlands 2. Eight years passed between the launches of Red Dead Redemption and Red Dead Redemption 2. It's been six years since Grand Theft Auto V and BioShock Infinite came out, and neither franchise has a sequel even announced, much less ready to launch in the near future.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
King_Noctis1772d ago

While this could shorten the development time by a bit and let us play those games earlier, I don’t support these kind of practices. Most (if not all) of GTA V and RDR2’s contents after launch are online stuff only and that is not exactly what most people want.

Nitrowolf21772d ago (Edited 1772d ago )

I don’t mind if these releases come faster, cause technically speaking we never got a new GTA this gen, just a port a year later of last gen. I mean last gen gave us three rockstar games, this gen we only got one new and a port.

The problem, as you said is that since GTA V they have focused to dam much on that comfy life of reaping in multiplayer content. Like I was really hoping gta v would get SP only to find out it was canned in favor of online support. And what if red dead2? Same thing? No chance of possibly getting SP content based around other characters or perhaps an undead nightmare 2?

Furesis1771d ago

you're right. I didn't even realize that there was no new GTA this gen. That's... kinda crazy to me now that i think about it

Ceaser98573611772d ago

I am disappointed that RED DEAD 2 didn't get a SP DLC. I was expecting something. RED DEAD Online launch wasn't successful either.

SheenuTheLegend1772d ago

i hope another company soon match the open world details of GTA and we get more worlds to enjoy.

Cmv381771d ago

You may not want online only content, but have you all ever looked at the whole picture? Do you want them to release dlc that doesn't fit the narrative or live up to their standards. The contradiction of single player gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1771d ago
kevinsheeks1772d ago

Ahhh so shorter single player campaigns no further story content but online purchases HERE WE COME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!NEW BIKE SKINS YEAHHH!!!!! A NEW SADDLE FOR ONLY 4.99 YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

and now you have nba 2k19 forcing live ads on you that are unskippable but people don't want government ruining games, you don't have to worry gaming is ruining itself just fine.

esherwood1772d ago (Edited 1772d ago )

I’m all for government stepping in on this one. no way these companies are changing direction unless they have too. It’s slowly turning into what’s on the mobile market

Razmiran1772d ago

RDR 2 was too long
But I thought GTA V was of the correct length

1772d ago Replies(2)
dRanzer1772d ago

Not such thing "too long" when the story is phenomenal

Razmiran1772d ago

The mission design has some awful blunders tho

Profchaos1772d ago (Edited 1772d ago )

Rdr2 was a perfect length imo I want more actually

BrianOBlivion1772d ago

Which just means... don't bother to buy until the Complete Edition is released.

Shalawsorchi1772d ago

There will be no CE, they only care about online loot now

1772d ago
Show all comments (23)
120°

Square & Bandai Namco Being Honest About Quality Is A Step In The Right Direction

Saad from eXputer: "After suffering from massive financial hits, Square Enix & Bandai Namco appear to be turning over a new leaf but I'm still unconvinced."

Nerdmaster13h ago(Edited 13h ago)

I was talking about games with some Japanese guys here in Japan, and it seems like around here Bandai Namco has a fame of making low-quality games, with the occasional gem.

About Square Enix, I believe they lack the capacity to improve. They should learn with Capcom (although even Capcom still makes some bad mistakes), but I don't think they ever will. They keep chasing whatever is new at the time (blockchain, AI...) to say "we innovate", without considering the public perception and if these things actually improve the games or not. Them releasing too many small games with no advertising also shows a lack of trust in its own products. Even with their biggest games, like turning FF into an action game with XVI and the very divisive plot changes regarding whispers and timelines in VII Remake, shows them trying to attract a new generation of gamers without understanding what made the series so big in the first place.

shinoff218312h ago

I want a true ff7 remake. With thatcsaid I'm way happier with 7 remake then I was with ff16. I'd still prefer turn based but square keep chasing these Lil kids

Snookies129h ago

Man, it is perfectly fine to prefer turn based. Turn based is amazing. But there's zero reason to call anyone who likes action games "lil kids". Liking one gameplay system over another does not make you more mature in any way.

VersusDMC12h ago

People love the new FF's overall...the problem is the abundance of 7's they release that lose money or make very little like diofield, star ocean divine force, Valkyrie asylum, harvestella, foam stars, etc. Advertising wouldn't have saved those games. Apparently Forespoken had a big Advertising budget but we saw how that went.

shinoff218311h ago(Edited 11h ago)

Star ocean divine force actually sold well from what I've read not ff type numbers but well enough. Was a dope game to.

FinalFantasyFanatic10h ago

Bandai Namco is going to Bandai Namco, I do believe that Square Enix can't change without changing the entire management, they've had these issues for more than a decade and haven't learnt, I have very little faith they can course correct. I'll still buy their better remasters/remakes like Star Ocean 2 though (not FF7R).

Asterphoenix8h ago

Namco is just milking the same Sword Art Online with lack of budget as well as anime IPs that don't go to decent developers like Jujutsu Kaisen and My Hero Academia. Namco deserves their losses and no future Dot Hack or Xenosaga remaster :(.

Square allocated lot of their budget on Forspoken was a mistake. Square always had management issues. Star Ocean 2 was a great remake and I found their recent entries of FF(16 and Rebirth) better than 13 and 15.
I think they were better than 360/PS3 generation where Square went really downhill.

CrimsonWing6911h ago

I don’t know why NOW they decide on this, but I guess later is better than never.

290°

Steam’s Refund Policy Change Won’t Affect You Unless You’re A Lowlife

Steam is changing its refund policy, but you probably won’t be affected

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
thorstein3d ago

Should have happened a long time ago. People wanting refunds after 50 hours in game.

fsfsxii2d ago

Pc gamers will take this as an excuse to pirate things

KyRo2d ago

I'm not sure why you're getting disgrees. Whilst not all PC gamers are petty, an awful lot of them are lol

Crows902d ago

Entirely untrue. Not any more petty than console gamers. The only large difference is console gamers don't have much of a choice.

Michiel19892d ago

Not sure why you're getting agrees. an awful lot of console gamers are overemotional twinks ready to go to war over a plastic box, I'll take being a pc gamer then.

Speaking about overgeneralizing much.

Nooderus2d ago

"X" type of gamer conversations are cringe

qalpha2d ago

Daily reminder that 'TheGamer' is a corporate-generated, anti-gamer, anti-consumer, clickbait web site. They are mostly A.I. generated articles that villainize gamers. They provide nothing positive and actively try to provoke and divide the community through extreme view points and politics. Do not give them any clicks.

Inverno2d ago

Only scumbags? As if people don't play their games on console put in the most amount of hours and return it to GameStop and trade it in for another game. But also how many people are actually do this? And what games have been allowed to be refunded?

DustMan2d ago

You can refund any game you've purchased as long as it hasn't been longer than two weeks, and you've played less than 2 hours. I wish they would change it to 3 hours because some RPG's have so much exposition that you may only get an hour total of complete gameplay. That's my only knock on it. I've refunded plenty of stuff I was just curious to try. I typically stay away from Early Access titles which are the only ones affected by this policy change.

Inverno2d ago

Apparently early access doesn't count, only complete games with a play early preorder bonus.

Gaming4Life19812d ago

I definitely know if I want a refund in 2 hours.

SegaSaturn6692d ago

I never liked refunding anything. Even if a film is bad, i dont want my money back. Sometimes things just aren't for me, and it's not the creator's fault necessarily.

Gaming4Life19812d ago

I feel you and i have never walked out on a bad movie cause I payed my money. I also don't refund games cause I'm a gamer and I know what to buy lol. I think having a digital refund is great.

Show all comments (15)
110°

Outriders Dev's Next Game Has Been Canceled After Publishing Agreement With Take-Two Fell Through

Outriders developer People Can Fly's next game has been canceled after its publishing agreement with Take-Two Interactive fell through.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Tacoboto4d ago

"the capital group of PCF Group S.A."

If you're getting funding from a group that needs two different ways of Acronyming itself, things will not go the way you want them to.

banger884d ago

If it was more online-only crap then good riddance.

jjb19814d ago

Outriders was crap. They slapped that game together and threw in a loot system to get players' attention. This game was absolutely jank and the always online nonsense made it stutter like crazy. People Can't Optimize.

thorstein3d ago

I liked Outriders but I could see where the artistic vision was compromised. The way the industry is now, it wouldn't surprise me that upper management would scrap something that didn't pull in money via gaas, mts, or other means.