600°

Halo Coming to PC Means I No Longer Need an Xbox

"With news and reports of the Halo franchise finally embracing PC, I have realized that I no longer need an Xbox."

Read Full Story >>
rashbandicoot.com
Gazondaily2900d ago

Halo is such a beast that the author bought the Xbox just for that
Shieeee nice.

This will definitely be great for those that game on PC and consoles. But yeah, you won’t need the Xbox in the future if you are primarily a PC gamer and like Xbox games.

If you're primarily a console gamer then it won't really make much of a difference unless there's crossplay.

darthv722899d ago

I am primarily a console gamer simply because I like the ease of just plug and play. No worrying about needing a certain class of gpu / cpu / apu. The games just... work.

I had my days with the PC. doing lan parties and file sharing and playing counter strike and unreal tournament. fun times but that was then... this is now and it's much cheaper now to just buy a set top box and game on. Halo coming to PC means there is the potential for console and PC players to compete with/against one another. More players is never a bad thing, just like having options is a good thing.

PC enthusiasts generally don't dive that deeply into the console realm but they do dip their toe in for various games not found on the PC. Console enthusiasts may have a gaming PC but it is the simplicity of the console that keeps them rooted to that side despite the improvements that a PC can deliver.

Trade offs... everybody has them.

Kleptic2899d ago

I'm primarily back into PC gaming more or less (meaning I spend way less time gaming in general than I used to...adulting sucks)...grew up on PC, then had a family PC and a PS1, PC only, then had PS3 w/ no gaming PC, now PC only again.

I don't think Halo on PC will have as big of an impact as many make it out to. It wasn't a big deal the first time it was tried, primarily because Halo's significance is entirely related to how 'well' it plays on a console...the entire feel of the series, and pacing, etc., does not translate well into PC imo.

but, to each their own...I think its pretty obvious that fans of the series get the platform they need to enjoy it...and that was never a PC...the advantages of a PC in no way 'expand' on Halo...and people talking about cross-platfrom this and that; I promise, no xbox owners want PC players in their matches with a mouse and keyboard. If they do something like forcing a controller on PC for the cross platform play, then barely anyone will do it to begin with.

2899d ago
NewMonday2899d ago

still not enough to force me to use W10

dogga942899d ago

why is this getting so many upvotes... Its like saying macs are better. No consoles are not better in any way. They are easy to use but that means that are worse in basically every possible way. PC have better graphics, better ping, dedicated servers, more options, better communities, keyboard and mouse. I could go on... PC's really arnt that difficult and in the long run there cheaper anyway..

Erik73572899d ago (Edited 2899d ago )

"ughhh me no want to launch steam to play game..me just want to hit button and play play play. Me think keyboard to hard to play play game to hard brain hurts uhhhhh"

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2899d ago
Omnislashver362899d ago (Edited 2899d ago )

Only thing I won't like is how they implement keyboard and mouse. Even if they restrict matches vs controller, you're still splitting the userbase, which is getting a lesser experience. If they don't, it's unfair. Either way it's a lose lose situation. They should make the game controller-required. It's a great way for them to profit, be fair, and to make PC still feel like an Xbox experience.

Khaotic2899d ago

The PC gamers would just create a MOD to bypass controller tequirements

GMR_PR2899d ago (Edited 2899d ago )

People act like this is the first time Halo is on PC :/

I guess if you have a capable PC which most of people don't, then you don't need an Xbox.

_-EDMIX-_2899d ago (Edited 2899d ago )

SHOCK /s

Pretty sure I called this MONTHS ago based on what Phil and MS have been saying. Thought such a thing wasn't going to happen Sep?

We still holding on to other titles are we finally willing to understand this company is bringing all titles to PC?

In your words ". Would be a silly move imo."

iTechHeads2899d ago (Edited 2899d ago )

Halo 5 is not a good game IMO. (Multiplayer is OK but doesn't compare to something like Black Ops 3)
Franchise peaked at around Halo 2/3 days...

I think if they bring Halo to PC, it would be because they need higher sales since the franchise has been declining ever since 343 took over.

Gazondaily2899d ago

Lol you're comparing Halo 5's mp to Black Ops 3 and think the latter is better? Yeah your taste in FPS' is way off IMO.

ShottyatLaw2899d ago

Boy, you are really into COD. I don't agree with your opinion regarding H5 multiplayer (best FPS MP this gen IMO), but I'll give you credit for being a dedicated fan of COD.

As far as going to PC at some point, of course the goal would be to sell more by releasing on PC. Also, H4 sold millions more than ODST and was on par with Reach.

spicelicka2899d ago (Edited 2899d ago )

Lol sorry but Halo 5 has the best multiplayer this gen, for many people. Majority of the comments will say this because it's just true.

ShottyatLaw2899d ago

I got excited that they had announced Halo Online or at least MCC coming to PC, but is this just about Forge coming to PC? What are the news and reports the author is discussing?

spicelicka2899d ago (Edited 2899d ago )

I agree. This will be true for gamers that own a capable PC. But most gamers who have an Xbox don't have both Xbox and PC, so they will remain the same. Then there are the console gamers who will decide between XB1, PS4 and Wii-U (or NX), those people will remain undeterred by this because if they really want Halo they will still buy an Xbox, I think majority is in this category.

How much this will affect Xbox sales remains to be seen. But we have to understand MS isn't stupid, they wouldn't just kill off the Xbox, they obviously have some kind of plan that goes along with this.

I personally couldn't care as long as I get to play Halo somewhere, and I think most people feel the same way.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2899d ago
2900d ago Replies(1)
mochachino2900d ago

The author must really like Halo to spend $400 on it.

RashBandicoot2899d ago

It wasn't just Halo. On my 360 I enjoyed a lot of games as I mentioned similar to Lost Odyssey. But none of the exclusives that came so far left an impression on me. Hence I only switch it on for Halo.

gdogg9792899d ago

Dude that's fair enough , but ultimately Microsoft aren't losing anything in this instance. As they dont make much if anything on the hardware anyway.

If you continue to buy halo on windows 10 then all stays the same.

Eidolon2899d ago

Halo 5 left an impression? OR you're still playing the crap out of old games?

DLConspiracy2899d ago

I have friends on all systems so getting rid of a console means getting rid of friends. Which I won't do. So if you have zero friends on Xbox I would say donate the console to a kid who would appreciate it for gaming.

Although, there will probably come a time that something will come out on xb1 that you will kick yourself for not keeping it. Its not like all games come to PC. I typically only play the exclusives on my PS4. I play mostly MP and exclusives on Xbox One. I collect games I love on PC, exclusives, early access, rpgs and graphics intensive games on PC too.

yomfweeee2899d ago

@gdogg

Microsoft doesn't make much profit on Xbox hardware true, but they make their money off every game sold for the system. Every game including third party. That is not true for PC games. They will miss out on a lot of software income.

BlackTar1872899d ago

do you have to pay for Xbox live on PC?

ShadowKnight2899d ago (Edited 2899d ago )

@BlackTar187 I have a feeling Microsoft might try to change that. I hope not.

lastking952899d ago (Edited 2899d ago )

I'm pretty sure they get some cut of pc games (at least the xbox windows 10 ms studio games) would ms get nothing for halo 6 pc sales? Yeah if ms cuts a deal with 3rd party studio to exclusively make a game for w10 pc and xbox they can potentially get a cut.(pending on the deal)

Not on Windows store they don't lol that's why many love steam.

Lennoxb632899d ago

They won't make much profit selling their games on PC either. Seeing as PC games range from 15 to 45 dollars days/weeks after release.

starchild2899d ago

Maybe so. But even if I, as a PC gamer, were to buy an XB1 it's not like I would start buying multiplats for it. No, I would buy a couple of exclusives and that's it. So they're really not missing out on anything but the console sale, which they don't make a lot of money off anyway.

Either way, I respect that Microsoft is giving me the option to buy their games without having to buy another piece of hardware I otherwise don't need.

mochachino2898d ago

But people will still buy consoles.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2898d ago
Dezmond2899d ago

But still you need Windows to play Halo

2899d ago
WhoCaresWhatMyNameIs2899d ago

But PC requires Windows to run Halo.

Hold_It2899d ago

Windows is made and owned by Microsoft, as is Xbox. Both use Directx which is present in Windows games and Xbox games.

2pacalypsenow2899d ago (Edited 2899d ago )

You cant play games made for Windows on an Xbox unless they are ported over to Xbox, so they are not the same no says "hey it says Made for windows I can play it on my Xbox."

game4funz2899d ago

but you still need windows...part of that license built in or not goes to microsoft.

343_Guilty_Spark2899d ago

Windows is on Xbox and they both will use the same storefront after the merger.

MachuchalBrotha3162899d ago

2pac is right, Windows is a different platform than Xbox. Windows is a PC Os, Xbox is a Windows/DX device. Windows 10 is unifying the devices in one eco so I can see why they disagreed with you.

WhoCaresWhatMyNameIs2899d ago

@2pacalypsenow

That's the point of unifying platform on Windows and Microsoft. Both games will be available on both platforms from here on out. Microsoft is still winning regardless.

JasonKCK2899d ago

"Windows is not Xbox" Yeah it is now. Last gen no, this gen both are just Windows platforms.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2899d ago
343_Guilty_Spark2899d ago

Correction you need a Windows 10 OS and HAVE to buy from the Windows Store.

Timesplitter142899d ago (Edited 2899d ago )

I can't believe there are people who have reached such unimaginably insane depths of fanboyism that they really believe that this whole thing is about COMPANY allegiances and not just about SYSTEM allegiances.

Don't get me wrong; system allegiance is dumb... but company allegiance? That's TURBO-DUMB

starchild2899d ago

Most fanboyism in gaming really does revolve around companies if you think about it. People tend to keep buying and hyping products from the same companies over and over.

I agree, though, that it's all dumb.

BitbyDeath2899d ago

Yep, but you won't need to buy the console.

If enough people switch then MS will have no need to make them anymore.

It's a test of strength.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2899d ago
Matology2899d ago (Edited 2899d ago )

Master Chief finally becomes Master Race.

Hold_It2899d ago

Halo 1 was on PC/Mac/Xbox Original, Halo 2 was on Original Xbox, and was Windows Exclusive to Windows Vista. This isn't the first time Halo is on PC/Windows.

Mikefizzled2899d ago

Hell, Halo Online is still playable right now even though the development has ceased.

_-EDMIX-_2899d ago

Agreed, if anything....Master Chief is finally RETURNS TO MASTER RACE! lol

I played well over 200 if not more hours in Halo 1 and 2 on PC back in the day! I remember the rumors of Bungie leaving (which in some respect were true) and wanted MS to buy Gearbox to continue the Halo series.

That was also when I was a young lad that didn't really know that porting and creating were not the same thing. My current self would have lashed out at my younger self for assuming such a thing lol.

I now know the error of my ways. Would LOVE to play MCC on PC, keyboard and mouse is my preferred way to play Halo. I'm not even sure I would care for the series as much considering this was well over 10 years ago. For the right price, I would still give it a shot though.

Show all comments (122)
70°

PS Remote Play on Android TV OS devices & Chromecast with Google TV | PS5

PS Remote Play on Android TV OS devices offers you more ways to play your favorite PS5® and PS4™ games.

Cacabunga1h ago

i have a 4K chrome cast from some years ago, not this white one.
does it support remote play as well?
next question: does PS5 and the chromecast have to be connected to same network?

i will try later and update here if no one has an answer, so people benefit.

70°

Unity Draws From EA Well Again for New CEO

Unity has announced the appointment of its new CEO, and it's another former EA exec in the form of ex-Zynga COO Matthew Bromberg.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
gamerz1d 3h ago

Poo is heart of this companies DNA.

Chocoburger1d 1h ago

Oh cool, from douchebag to douchebag. Don't expect anything to change.

TheColbertinator17h ago

Meet the new Boss
Same as the old Boss

270°

AMD gaming revenue declined massively year-over-year, CFO says the demand is 'weak'

Poor Xbox sales have affected AMD’S bottom line

Read Full Story >>
tweaktown.com
RonsonPL2d ago

Oh wow. How surprising! Nvidia overpriced their RTX cards by +100% and AMD instead of offering real competition, decided to join Nvidia in their greedy approach, while not having the same mindshare as Nvidia (sadly) does. The 7900 launch was a marketing disaster. All the reviews were made while the card was not worth the money at all, they lowered the price a bit later on, but not only not enough but also too late and out of "free marketing" window coming along with the new card generation release. Then the geniuses at AMD axed the high-end SKUs with increased cache etc, cause "nobody will buy expensive cards to play games" while Nvidia laughed at them selling their 2000€ 4090s.
Intel had all the mindshare among PC enthusiasts with their CPUs. All it took was a competetive product and good price (Ryzen 7000 series and especially 7800x3d) and guess what? AMD regained the market share in DYI PCs in no time! The same could've have happened with Radeon 5000, Radeon 6000 and Radeon 7000.
But meh. Why bother. Let's cancell high-end RDNA 4 and use the TSMC wafers for AI and then let the clueless "analysts" make their articles about "gaming demand dwingling".

I'm sure low-end, very overpriced and barely faster if not slower RDNA4 will turn things around. It will have AI and RT! Two things nobody asked for, especially not gamers who'd like to use the PC for what's most exciting about PC gaming (VR, high framerate gaming, hi-res gaming).
8000 series will be slow, overpriced and marketed based on its much improved RT/AI... and it will flop badly.
And there will be no sane conclusions made at AMD about that. There will be just one, insane: Gaming is not worth catering to. Let's go into AI/RT instead, what could go wrong..."

Crows901d 20h ago

What would you say would be the correct pricing for new cards?

Very insightful post!

RonsonPL1d 14h ago

That's a complicated question. Depends on what you mean. The pricing at the release date or the pricing planned ahead. They couldn't just suddenly end up in a situation where their existing stock of 6000 cards is suddenly unsellable, but if it was properly rolled out, the prices should be where they were while PC gaming industry was healthy. I recognize the arguments about inflation, higher power draw and PCB/BOM costs, more expensive wafers from TSMC etc. but still, PC gaming needs some sanity to exist and be healthy. Past few years were very unhealthy and dangerous to whole PC gaming. AMD should recognize this market is very good for them as they have advantage in software for gaming and other markets while attractive short term, may be just too difficult to compete at. AI is the modern day gold rush and Nvidia and Intel can easily out-spend AMD on R&D. Meanwhile gaming is tricky for newcomers and Nvidia doesn't seem to care that much about gaming anymore. So I would argue that it should be in AMDs interest to even sell some Radeon SKUs at zero profit, just to prevent the PC gaming from collapsing. Cards like 6400 and 6500 should never exist at their prices. This tier was traditionally "office only" and priced at 50$ in early 2000s. Then we have Radeons 7600 which is not really 6-tier card. Those were traditionally quite performant cards based on wider than 128-bit memory bus. Also 8GB is screaming "low end". So I'd say the 7600 should've been available at below 200$ (+taxes etc.) as soon as possible, at least for some cheaper SKUs.For faster cards, the situation is bad for AMD, because people spending like $400+ are usually fairly knowledgable and demanding. While personally I don't see any value in upscallers and RT for 400-700$ cards, the fact is that especially DLSS is a valuable feature for potential buyers. Therefore, even 7800 and 7900 cards should be significantly cheaper than they currently are. People knew what they were paying for when buying Radeon 9700, 9800, X800, 4870 etc. They were getting gaming experience truly unlike console or low-end PC gaming. By all means, let's have expensive AMD cards for even above $1000, but first, AMD needs to show value. Make the product attractive. PS5 consoles can be bought at 400$. If AMD offers just a slightly better upscalled image on the 400$ GPU, or their 900$ GPU cannot even push 3x as many fps compared to cheap consoles, the pricing acts like cancer on PC gaming. And poor old PC gaming can endure only so much.

MrCrimson1d 11h ago

I appreciate your rant sir, but it has very little to do with gpus. It is the fact that the PS5 and Xbox are in end cycle before a refresh.

RonsonPL22h ago

Yes, but also no. AMD let their PC GPU marketshare to shrink by a lot (and accidentally helped the whole market shrink in general due to bad value of PC GPUs over the years) and while their console business may be important here, I'd still argue their profits from GPU division could've been much better if not for mismanagement.

bababooiy1d 5h ago

This is something many have argued over the last few years when it comes to AMD. The days of them selling their cards at a slight discount while having a similar offering are over. Its not just a matter of poor drivers anymore, they are behind on everything.

Tody_ZA1d 2h ago (Edited 1d 2h ago )

Great post. I went for a Nvidia RTX 3060Ti which was insane value for money when I look at the fidelity and frame rates I can push in most games including new releases. Can't justify spending 3 times what my card cost at the time to get marginal better returns or the big sell of "ray tracing", which is a nice to have feature but hardly essential given what it costs to maintain.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 22h ago
1d 21h ago Replies(1)
KwietStorm_BLM1d 20h ago

Well that's gonna happen when you don't really try. I want to support AMD so badly and give Nvidia some actual competition but they don't very much seem interested in challenging, by their own accord. I been waiting for them to attack the GPU segment the same way they took over CPU, but they just seem so content with handing Nvidia the market year after year, and it's happening again this year with their cancelled high end card.

MrCrimson1d 11h ago

I think you're going to see almost zero interest from AMD or Nvidia on the gaming GPU market. They are all in on AI.

RhinoGamer881d 19h ago

No Executive bonuses then...right?

enkiduxiv1d 14h ago

What are smoking? Got to layoff your way to those bonuses. Fire 500 employees right before Christmas. That should get you there.

Tapani1d 13h ago (Edited 1d 13h ago )

Well, if you are 48% down in Q4 in your Gaming sector as they are, which in absolute money terms is north of 500M USD, then you are not likely to get at least your quarterly STI, but can be applicable for annual STI. The LTI may be something you are still eligible for, such as RSUs or other equity and benefits, especially if they are based on the company total result rather than your unit. All depends on your contract and AMD's reward system.

MrCrimson1d 11h ago

Lisa Su took AMD from bankruptcy to one of the best semiconductor companies on the planet. AMD from 2 dollars a share to 147. She can take whatever she wants.

Tapani1d ago

You are not wrong about what she did for AMD and that is remarkable. However, MNCs' Rewards schemes do not work like "take whatever you want, because you performed well in the past".

darksky1d 17h ago

AMD prcied their cards thinking that they will sell out just like in the mining craze. I suspect reality has hit home when they realized most gamers cannot afford to spend over $500 for a gpu.

Show all comments (33)